You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #127: Oh and while they did not fire [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-11 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #124
127. Oh and while they did not fire
this jewel from 2002 in LA too



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Our military fired on our citizens before boston bean  Feb-10-11 09:16 PM   #0 
  - Didn't they via black water shoot at Katrina victims?  midnight   Feb-10-11 09:18 PM   #1 
  - Those had no connection to the DoD...they were private hires  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 12:20 AM   #84 
  - In a fucking heartbeat.  lonestarnot   Feb-10-11 09:18 PM   #2 
  - my first thought...  handmade34   Feb-10-11 09:27 PM   #7 
  - Some might, but as a whole, no.  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 09:19 PM   #3 
  - Ever been in the military?  Dan   Feb-10-11 09:38 PM   #13 
  - Yes, I have, served in a front-line intel unit in Afghanistan  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 09:42 PM   #15 
  - you just got owned.  Teaser   Feb-11-11 10:14 AM   #103 
     - of course not,  Dan   Feb-11-11 09:35 PM   #121 
  - A professional force, that has been separated from the population they serve,  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 09:42 PM   #14 
     - Physically separated, maybe  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 09:45 PM   #19 
        - You can't deny it happened in the past......  boston bean   Feb-10-11 09:47 PM   #20 
        - I'm not denying it at all  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 09:51 PM   #23 
        - I think they would follow orders.  boston bean   Feb-10-11 09:53 PM   #26 
           - And I believe you are correct, as much as it saddens me  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 09:54 PM   #29 
           - I'm afraid I'll have to disagree with you on that  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 09:59 PM   #36 
              - what violence was occurring at Kent State?  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:01 PM   #38 
                 - Or during the Bonus Army March  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 10:07 PM   #40 
                 - I'll give you that,  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:10 PM   #42 
                 - Escalation  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:07 PM   #41 
                    - You realize that rocks were flying  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 10:11 PM   #43 
                       - Guess I'm just naive and hoping for the best  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:14 PM   #46 
                          - there could still be violence in Egypt... provoked violence  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:18 PM   #48 
                          - Yep, why I am surprsied, and pleased  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 10:20 PM   #50 
                          - See, with Egypt, I think the reason there hasn't been violence against the Army  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:22 PM   #51 
                             - You're not saying it would be the rowdy, protesting, rauckus protestors fault, are you?  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:30 PM   #55 
                                - No, not at all  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:34 PM   #59 
                                   - why do you think the relationship is different? i agree it is, but I think we probably have  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:35 PM   #60 
                                   - Well, the main reason I see  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:38 PM   #63 
                                      - maybe we're not that far off.  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:42 PM   #65 
                                         - I still think they'd follow orders to keep the peace  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:47 PM   #69 
                                         - the furthest it can escalate has already happened here. it is not a common occurrence  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:51 PM   #72 
                                         - Worst case scenario, yes, I agree with you  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:52 PM   #74 
                                   - The third Army was ordered to break it up by Mubarak  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 10:39 PM   #64 
                                      - The US military does seem to be split between..........  socialist_n_TN   Feb-11-11 07:39 PM   #119 
                                         - This, exactly this  NuclearDem   Feb-11-11 09:41 PM   #123 
                          - It really depends on the conditions  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 10:18 PM   #49 
                             - The "conditions" almost universally include a ready-made enemy throwing epithets, rocks & bottles  nomb   Feb-11-11 03:06 PM   #116 
        - False logic  WatsonT   Feb-10-11 11:17 PM   #83 
        - You may want to believe that  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 09:53 PM   #28 
        - That makes two of us.  westerebus   Feb-10-11 10:29 PM   #54 
           - You do not think those same divisions exist today and are even  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:31 PM   #57 
              - Well, to be fair, the average member of the military was treated a lot worse  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:36 PM   #61 
              - that has some truth to it. but it's no reason or justification to fire on American citizens on a  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:48 PM   #70 
              - No, I don't think so.  westerebus   Feb-11-11 08:57 AM   #91 
  - In a Republican governor's state, they sure would. n/t  Waiting For Everyman   Feb-10-11 09:20 PM   #4 
  - 6 months ago the California National Guard would have shot people?  Throd   Feb-10-11 09:22 PM   #5 
     - It isn't something you get advance notice of.  Waiting For Everyman   Feb-10-11 09:52 PM   #25 
        - Were you full of crap then too?  Throd   Feb-10-11 10:14 PM   #45 
  - Or the Ludlow Massacre  Make7   Feb-10-11 09:22 PM   #6 
  - Yes! n/t  RKP5637   Feb-10-11 09:28 PM   #8 
  - There were once tanks and troops on Pennsylvania Ave.  Canuckistanian   Feb-10-11 09:29 PM   #9 
  - After MLK's shooting, there were too - when all the cities were burning at once.  Waiting For Everyman   Feb-10-11 09:56 PM   #31 
  - Also during Depression when some workers came on Capital Grounds.  OHdem10   Feb-10-11 09:34 PM   #10 
  - so much for the military 'protecting our freedoms'  KG   Feb-10-11 09:37 PM   #11 
  - Got some bad news  atreides1   Feb-10-11 09:47 PM   #21 
  - Oathkeepers say they never will.  Capitalocracy   Feb-10-11 09:37 PM   #12 
  - They are tools of the conservanazi bu$hit machine.  TxVietVet   Feb-10-11 09:58 PM   #35 
  - It'd take about 2 seconds for them rationalize it.  Marr   Feb-10-11 10:16 PM   #47 
  - The Harlan County War  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 09:43 PM   #16 
  - MacArthur burning Hooverville might count, too.  sofa king   Feb-10-11 09:53 PM   #27 
  - And your guns won't help protect you.  baldguy   Feb-10-11 09:43 PM   #17 
  - dey gots rocket launchers. :)  lonestarnot   Feb-10-11 09:49 PM   #22 
  - And flamethrowers!  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 09:52 PM   #24 
  - I'm not so sure about that.  sofa king   Feb-10-11 10:07 PM   #39 
  - Actually they would probably work better against the military than the police  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 12:21 AM   #85 
     - What kind of civilian weaponry is effective against an M1A2 tank?  baldguy   Feb-11-11 05:20 AM   #89 
        - A tank not so much..  virginia mountainman   Feb-11-11 09:48 AM   #97 
        - The army does not use tanks in an urban disturbance situation (which is what I was considering)  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 10:13 AM   #102 
           - Once you step into the RW fantasy world of an armed uprising in America  baldguy   Feb-11-11 06:50 PM   #117 
           - I am sure that Detroit was a fantasy....  Dan   Feb-11-11 09:37 PM   #122 
              - Yep you had a very fertile imagination  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-11-11 10:37 PM   #126 
  - Yes, in a heartbeat.  Dash87   Feb-10-11 09:43 PM   #18 
  - During Katrina too, IIRC. NT  Ian David   Feb-10-11 09:56 PM   #30 
  - No during Katrina the Army behaved splendlidly  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 09:57 PM   #33 
     - I think you're right. Nt  Ian David   Feb-10-11 10:01 PM   #37 
  - The abuses our military and "security" forces do in and with other nations  EFerrari   Feb-10-11 09:56 PM   #32 
  - And during numerous labor strikes. Something we never, ever hear about.  Puregonzo1188   Feb-10-11 09:57 PM   #34 
  - Draft riots in Civil War  AngryAmish   Feb-11-11 05:39 AM   #90 
  - They'd do as they're told.  Marr   Feb-10-11 10:12 PM   #44 
  - Very few in the military actually 'enjoy' killing  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:45 PM   #66 
  - and I'm sure they don't enjoy taking orders, but they do both. take orders and kill. nt  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:53 PM   #75 
  - Yeah, but my point was rejecting the poster's claim that a large number enjoy killing  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:55 PM   #76 
     - ok  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:56 PM   #77 
  - Oh, bullshit.  Marr   Feb-10-11 11:02 PM   #80 
     - Like I said, very few  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 11:11 PM   #82 
        - Then your disagreement is one of degree, not principle.  Marr   Feb-11-11 09:10 AM   #93 
  - The good news is that you are quite wrong  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 12:22 AM   #86 
     - Do you think American soldiers just genetically differerent from other humans?  Marr   Feb-11-11 09:08 AM   #92 
        - Have you ever been in the military?  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 10:25 AM   #107 
           - Yes, have you?  Marr   Feb-11-11 10:35 AM   #108 
              - I have as well  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 02:19 PM   #110 
  - Read about the WW I vetrans, called the Bonus Army, attacked machine guns..  Ozymanithrax   Feb-10-11 10:22 PM   #52 
  - MacArthur, Eisenhower, Patton. It was quite a day. Surprised it was only mentioned this far down  nomb   Feb-11-11 02:45 PM   #113 
  - yes, without any doubt. the question is "when", not "if".  inna   Feb-10-11 10:23 PM   #53 
  - Some of the comments in this thread are good examples of why  sufrommich   Feb-10-11 10:31 PM   #56 
  - Facts. it happened before what makes you think it couldn't happen again?  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:32 PM   #58 
  - Comments like these aren't "facts":  sufrommich   Feb-10-11 10:37 PM   #62 
     - there is a point to be made with each of those comments.  boston bean   Feb-10-11 10:46 PM   #68 
        - Yeah, there might be a little bit of a point  NuclearDem   Feb-10-11 10:50 PM   #71 
  - The right gets away with that because they own the media.  EFerrari   Feb-10-11 10:52 PM   #73 
  - If you own the media you can invent facts  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 10:56 PM   #78 
  - Oh for God sake. I have not "bought into it". Broadbrush  sufrommich   Feb-10-11 10:59 PM   #79 
     - Some people in BOTH the RIGHT AND THE LEFT  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-10-11 11:08 PM   #81 
        - The army today is not the same as National Guard at Kent State  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 12:28 AM   #87 
           - And that has been my point all along  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-11-11 10:10 AM   #100 
              - I do not think as a "policy" the military would fire on civilians unless the small unit in question  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 10:19 AM   #104 
                 - If you are thinking NG units, yes  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-11-11 10:24 AM   #106 
                    - NG training for crowd control etc has be greatly diminished recently  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 02:21 PM   #111 
  - I find it odd that you assume such an opinion means you don't have  Marr   Feb-11-11 09:19 AM   #94 
  - Let's not forget the 'police riot'  Ptah   Feb-10-11 10:46 PM   #67 
  - I would be more concerned about a police massacre than an army one  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 12:31 AM   #88 
     - Why?  Marr   Feb-11-11 09:37 AM   #96 
        - IMO the army indentifies with the civilians much more than cops  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 10:08 AM   #99 
           - Again, I'd suggest you look at some of the social science that's been  Marr   Feb-11-11 10:39 AM   #109 
           - 2002 LA  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-11-11 10:39 PM   #128 
  - Possibly but I think there is enough doubt all around that has been a part of the push  TheKentuckian   Feb-11-11 09:20 AM   #95 
  - Drone zombies could do it  Bragi   Feb-11-11 09:57 AM   #98 
  - On about a hundred occasions. Most significantly, 1877 to break the railway strikes.  JackRiddler   Feb-11-11 10:11 AM   #101 
  - Anything in the last 30 years  ProgressiveProfessor   Feb-11-11 02:23 PM   #112 
     - At a minimum - while participants can still bear witness first hand. Kent State qualifies.  nomb   Feb-11-11 02:53 PM   #114 
     - Our social memory? I'm afraid in recent decades it's been replaced with a cultural simulation.  JackRiddler   Feb-11-11 02:57 PM   #115 
     - So true, so true  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-11-11 10:15 PM   #125 
     - The Rodney King Riots  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-11-11 10:01 PM   #124 
        - Oh and while they did not fire  nadinbrzezinski   Feb-11-11 10:38 PM   #127 
  - Read this  RegieRocker   Feb-11-11 10:23 AM   #105 
  - If they'd shoot US students, they will shoot anyone. Just one of many reasons I hate the military.  L0oniX   Feb-11-11 07:00 PM   #118 
  - Who would authorize it? Obama? n/t  cherokeeprogressive   Feb-11-11 07:39 PM   #120 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC