You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #42: And how is that any different from a person who has less to spend on [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-11 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. And how is that any different from a person who has less to spend on
Edited on Tue Feb-01-11 11:06 PM by pnwmom
a family's other expenses because he bought a house and put some cash into a downpayment? If the market goes down, that person has lost his cash, just as much as the people who are underwater. Are you saying that no one should buy a house anymore? Or, at least, have any equity in one?

Why is it overpaying a bank to pay the amount that you agreed on in the first place? When you buy a house, shouldn't you be prepared for the fact that values can go up or down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Why is there so much media concern about "underwater" mortagages pnwmom  Feb-01-11 07:17 PM   #0 
  - Underwater houses are far more likely to go into foreclosure  CreekDog   Feb-01-11 07:18 PM   #1 
  - I wonder if part of the reason for that  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:21 PM   #3 
  - I suppose some people think it's stupid to pay back money you owe. nt  wtmusic   Feb-01-11 07:23 PM   #5 
     - Some financial bloggers do. One, in particular,  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:25 PM   #7 
     - You can write off what you lose, you can't write off what you owe.  wtmusic   Feb-01-11 07:27 PM   #9 
        - Technically, no. But don't short sale agreements and foreclosures  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:30 PM   #11 
           - Your credit will be in the toilet for a good long while  wtmusic   Feb-01-11 07:35 PM   #19 
              - Not the distant past, unfortunately.  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:43 PM   #25 
                 - Amazing.  wtmusic   Feb-01-11 07:48 PM   #27 
                    - You missed the period of "no doc" loans.  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:51 PM   #30 
                       - I guess I did.  wtmusic   Feb-01-11 07:52 PM   #33 
     - It is stupid  MattBaggins   Feb-02-11 08:21 AM   #46 
     - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Feb-02-11 09:00 AM   #49 
     - Morgan Stanley thinks it's stupid  SOS   Feb-02-11 09:14 AM   #50 
  - Foreclosure and negative amortization are two symptoms of the same problem  slackmaster   Feb-01-11 07:31 PM   #13 
  - Because if Investor Y has to sell his house he'll still owe $40,000 to the bank.  wtmusic   Feb-01-11 07:20 PM   #2 
  - So the real concern is that the banks won't have enough equity?  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:23 PM   #4 
  - The concern is that the home "owners" can't sell without a short sale...  PassingFair   Feb-01-11 07:25 PM   #8 
     - But if a homeowner doesn't need to sell,  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:28 PM   #10 
        - That's true, if she has enough job security and savings to wait for a while  wtmusic   Feb-01-11 07:31 PM   #12 
        - We brilliantly bought in July 2007, so we've seen a huge loss.  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:34 PM   #16 
           - Prices will likely return.  wtmusic   Feb-01-11 07:41 PM   #23 
              - Yeah, I try to stay away from Zillow.  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:46 PM   #26 
        - The problem is that wages are falling...  PassingFair   Feb-01-11 07:34 PM   #15 
        - I wasn't trying to make people say anything in particular.  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:37 PM   #20 
        - No but even there the risk is strategic default.  Statistical   Feb-01-11 07:52 PM   #31 
        - In the case of such an individual, you're right  customerserviceguy   Feb-01-11 09:38 PM   #39 
        - But why should the homeowner pay off 140k in debt when they could move into similar accomodation...  JVS   Feb-02-11 06:33 AM   #45 
  - Bingo.  PassingFair   Feb-01-11 07:24 PM   #6 
  - Because it generally makes the house unsellable, increasing the odds of foreclosure.  Xithras   Feb-01-11 07:32 PM   #14 
  - It's probably not so good for your friend's credit rating, either....n/t  PassingFair   Feb-01-11 07:35 PM   #18 
  - Nope. Speaking from experience, it does quite a bit of damage.  Xithras   Feb-01-11 07:43 PM   #24 
  - Thanks. n/t  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:40 PM   #21 
  - Underwater and Not Walking Away: Shame, Fear and the Social Management of the Housing Crisis  enough   Feb-01-11 07:35 PM   #17 
  - OR...they understand proper economics.  flvegan   Feb-01-11 07:50 PM   #29 
  - interesting cryptic post. Please expand. (nt)  enough   Feb-01-11 08:09 PM   #34 
     - Well you see  flvegan   Feb-01-11 08:35 PM   #36 
        - Most businesses walk away from underwater mortgages.  jtown1123   Feb-02-11 10:26 AM   #53 
  - As I stated above; "It's good business"  MattBaggins   Feb-02-11 08:41 AM   #47 
  - Part of it is probably the psychological aspect...  Curmudgeoness   Feb-01-11 07:40 PM   #22 
  - When the middle class walks away their irresponsible; when the rich walk away  Dappleganger   Feb-01-11 07:50 PM   #28 
  - Or  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 07:52 PM   #32 
     - Duh! Of course, it's better to lose bank's money than  Fool Count   Feb-01-11 09:10 PM   #38 
        - And how is that any different from a person who has less to spend on  pnwmom   Feb-01-11 11:05 PM   #42 
           - This is different in a very simple and obvious way:  Fool Count   Feb-02-11 12:37 AM   #43 
  - If you have equity in the house you can take the loss and sell  dkf   Feb-01-11 08:29 PM   #35 
  - Your comparison is apples and kiwis  social_critic   Feb-01-11 08:38 PM   #37 
  - If Family X got their house with a variable rate mortgage  customerserviceguy   Feb-01-11 09:41 PM   #40 
  - Good point.  lumberjack_jeff   Feb-01-11 09:42 PM   #41 
  - The reason there is concern is that underwater mortgages are actually better off defaulting and...  JVS   Feb-02-11 06:31 AM   #44 
  - Because MANY "underwater mortgages" are that way because people used houses like ATMS  SoCalDem   Feb-02-11 08:49 AM   #48 
  - I always figure being underwater only matters if you HAVE to move, or have to  TwilightGardener   Feb-02-11 10:07 AM   #51 
  - It does not matter if home values come back in some  Fool Count   Feb-02-11 05:06 PM   #54 
  - Look at it this way: 90k house, 30 yr loan, will cost you 250k+ - will be underwater either way  The Straight Story   Feb-02-11 10:22 AM   #52 
  - For a lot of people the majority if not all of their assets are invested in their home  NNN0LHI   Feb-02-11 05:41 PM   #55 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC