You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: Please see my reply seven and my reply ten. n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-31-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Please see my reply seven and my reply ten. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Rahm Emanuel's Nightmare - Health Care "Reform" Illegal truedelphi  Jan-31-11 02:41 PM   #0 
  - Can't pass an opportunity to go after Rahm. . .  wndycty   Jan-31-11 02:42 PM   #1 
  - dutifully unrecc'd in the apologist scramble...  villager   Jan-31-11 02:44 PM   #2 
  - This is a Reagan appointee and we knew he'd rule this way.  jaxx   Jan-31-11 02:52 PM   #3 
  - The glee is because some folk can't pass up the opportunity to diss the administration/Emanuael  wndycty   Jan-31-11 02:54 PM   #4 
     - They need to remember one thing....Democrats passed that bill.  jaxx   Jan-31-11 02:57 PM   #5 
     - That and this posters inability to accept that single payer was NOT going to pass  karynnj   Jan-31-11 03:02 PM   #7 
        - You know what, karynnj -  truedelphi   Jan-31-11 03:56 PM   #13 
           - +100000!  SammyWinstonJack   Jan-31-11 04:00 PM   #15 
           - In solidarity with you -  truedelphi   Jan-31-11 04:38 PM   #18 
           - Well,  ProSense   Jan-31-11 04:03 PM   #17 
           - Ben Nelson was NEVER going to vote yes. Never.  JoePhilly   Jan-31-11 04:54 PM   #19 
           - Knowing that it would be an incredibly tough fight to pass anything ,  karynnj   Jan-31-11 06:43 PM   #20 
           - Excellent response!..  truth2power   Jan-31-11 07:07 PM   #21 
  - Tell me how you pass single payer with fewer than 10 Senate votes  karynnj   Jan-31-11 03:00 PM   #6 
  - Had we gotten ourselves a "Give 'em hell," kind of President  truedelphi   Jan-31-11 03:50 PM   #10 
  - Rahm was against pushing for the bill, incidentally  Recursion   Jan-31-11 03:03 PM   #8 
  - So? When did a single judge decide constitutionality?  sinkingfeeling   Jan-31-11 03:04 PM   #9 
  - Since 1790  jeff47   Jan-31-11 03:54 PM   #11 
  - Well, that makes  ProSense   Jan-31-11 03:56 PM   #12 
     - Please see my reply seven and my reply ten. n/t  truedelphi   Jan-31-11 03:58 PM   #14 
     - What do those have to do with what I posted? n/t  ProSense   Jan-31-11 04:01 PM   #16 
     - My blood does boil to think that the same people that initially came  truedelphi   Feb-01-11 02:27 PM   #22 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC