| 49. To get a proper indication, this should be asked in all the main forums |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-23-11 03:53 AM by Turborama
A lot of DUers don't come to GD and spend their time in one of the other main forums and vice versa.
Unless this gets rec'd so much no one can miss it on the front page, which would kind of prove the value of the recommendation function.
|
| -Do you agree with the decision to do away with Unrec? |
itsrobert |
Jan-22-11 11:39 PM |
#0 |
 -
I don't care either way, but who are we to judge what is an attention-whore post? |
gateley |
Jan-22-11 11:41 PM |
#1 |
| -
no. and im suprised they let a few loud people run this board for them |
meow mix |
Jan-22-11 11:42 PM |
#2 |
  -
It is a shame. |
emilyg |
Jan-22-11 11:47 PM |
#4 |
| -
But entirely predictable. nt |
Codeine |
Jan-23-11 09:19 AM |
#72 |
| -
I remember when we didn't have them... |
CaliforniaPeggy |
Jan-22-11 11:47 PM |
#3 |
| -
You're entitled to your opiniom - my feeling |
emilyg |
Jan-22-11 11:48 PM |
#6 |
| -
My thoughts exactly, they should both go if one goes. |
jp11 |
Jan-23-11 10:30 AM |
#83 |
| -
My thinking as well. |
Poboy |
Jan-23-11 05:05 PM |
#131 |
| -
Huh, It worked great |
itsrobert |
Jan-22-11 11:49 PM |
#7 |
| -
I didn't like it loud and annoyingly at first. |
EFerrari |
Jan-23-11 04:01 AM |
#52 |
| -
regression is good ... |
GeorgeGist |
Jan-23-11 04:08 PM |
#112 |
| -
Don't really care, but I'd vote to keep it just because the incessant whining |
petronius |
Jan-22-11 11:48 PM |
#5 |
| -
What is really funny is the people who don't like unrec or the ones unec this thread |
itsrobert |
Jan-22-11 11:52 PM |
#9 |
| -
lol |
slay |
Jan-23-11 12:12 AM |
#20 |
| -
That's one word for it. There are a few more. |
emilyg |
Jan-23-11 01:24 PM |
#87 |
| -
I don't really care but I thought that the Rec feature was going away too. |
CTyankee |
Jan-23-11 02:09 PM |
#102 |
| -
Who you calling a whiner, Willis?? |
madinmaryland |
Jan-23-11 02:30 PM |
#106 |
| -
hee hee, good one... |
CTyankee |
Jan-23-11 02:44 PM |
#109 |
| -
People are too short sighted to see the need for unrec...... |
KansasVoter |
Jan-22-11 11:51 PM |
#8 |
| -
"a set of idiots" . . . those are not words I would use to describe my |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 12:11 AM |
#18 |
| -
I firmly disagree. Carve idiot posts up. Unrec is a soft way out. nt |
bluestate10 |
Jan-23-11 01:31 PM |
#91 |
| -
That's the bottom line... |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 09:27 PM |
#163 |
| -
I really come here for News and Opinon |
AsahinaKimi |
Jan-22-11 11:53 PM |
#10 |
| -
I've seen "MLK is good" posts getting un-recc'ed. Some people enjoy the |
mistertrickster |
Jan-22-11 11:56 PM |
#11 |
| -
And now you will see "Obama is dumb" posts getting recced! Get it? |
KansasVoter |
Jan-22-11 11:58 PM |
#12 |
| -
No, I don't get it. Not really. What I often saw happening were good posts |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 12:07 AM |
#14 |
| -
You WILL make it easy for trolls to rec posts and NO WAY to unrec them? GET IT? |
KansasVoter |
Jan-23-11 12:13 AM |
#22 |
| -
I don't believe their is a significant number of trolls to effect the rec/unrec feature |
itsrobert |
Jan-23-11 12:16 AM |
#24 |
| -
I see your point but I also saw a lot of abuse of the unrec feature too |
slay |
Jan-23-11 12:17 AM |
#25 |
| -
Ditto what they said. nt |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 12:27 AM |
#32 |
| -
There is a hidden life to DU |
intheflow |
Jan-23-11 04:49 AM |
#57 |
| -
I've been here since 2003 and I've never seen a single PM |
Codeine |
Jan-23-11 09:17 AM |
#70 |
| -
Well, me neither, but... |
pipi_k |
Jan-23-11 10:00 AM |
#78 |
| -
Not here as much...other places on the web. |
Ikonoklast |
Jan-23-11 01:32 PM |
#94 |
| -
it sure does! i just think those people have a feeling you'd tell em to fuck off, ha! |
bettyellen |
Jan-23-11 05:13 PM |
#132 |
| -
This is entirely possible. |
Codeine |
Jan-23-11 07:52 PM |
#142 |
| -
I'm sure! people stopped asking me after I ignored their rec requests, but it is certainly |
bettyellen |
Jan-23-11 09:30 PM |
#165 |
| -
Good point.... |
pipi_k |
Jan-23-11 09:59 AM |
#76 |
| -
Don't be paranoid. |
Joe the Revelator |
Jan-23-11 01:26 PM |
#89 |
| -
I'm not paranoid. |
intheflow |
Jan-23-11 01:51 PM |
#97 |
| -
So you're saying that mods can read PMs not addressed to them? |
Joe the Revelator |
Jan-23-11 02:50 PM |
#110 |
| -
NO, I'm not saying that. |
intheflow |
Jan-24-11 05:36 PM |
#214 |
| -
Interesting . . . that explains a few things I've seen that otherwise didn't make sense. |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 09:07 PM |
#149 |
| -
Do you deny |
polmaven |
Jan-24-11 01:52 PM |
#208 |
| -
That also happened to my post telling people to consider donating bone marrow for leukemia patients. |
LoZoccolo |
Jan-23-11 01:19 AM |
#42 |
| -
Perfect example. The dildo unrecced that just because he could. nt |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 09:14 PM |
#154 |
| -
Playing Devil's Advocate here, but does a thread simply stating "MLK is good"... |
LostInAnomie |
Jan-23-11 07:06 PM |
#139 |
| -
Perhaps not. But it doesn't need to be un-recced. nt |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 09:13 PM |
#153 |
| -
An excellent point that people have valid reasons to unrec. even a worthy topic like MLK for |
snagglepuss |
Jan-23-11 09:15 PM |
#155 |
| -
I think we know shit when we smell it. |
rucky |
Jan-23-11 12:00 AM |
#13 |
| -
yup progressives are pretty united in unreccing together, i can see why "some people" have a problem |
meow mix |
Jan-23-11 01:03 AM |
#39 |
| -
I'd like to see unrec and rec go away together. |
woo me with science |
Jan-23-11 12:10 AM |
#15 |
| -
No. I had no problem with it. |
pinboy3niner |
Jan-23-11 12:11 AM |
#16 |
| -
I voted "Yes" because people abuse it - probably not regular posters |
slay |
Jan-23-11 12:11 AM |
#17 |
| -
Agreed. nt |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 12:12 AM |
#21 |
| -
So far it's looking like the 27% majority has won |
johnnie |
Jan-23-11 12:12 AM |
#19 |
| -
Yep, minority wins again! |
KansasVoter |
Jan-23-11 12:14 AM |
#23 |
| -
Hey! You got something against minorities? |
slay |
Jan-23-11 12:20 AM |
#27 |
| -
Well . . . this isn't in any respect a "scientific" poll, i.e., a sample that |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 12:27 AM |
#31 |
| -
Don't care. |
Mojambo |
Jan-23-11 12:19 AM |
#26 |
| -
Not my website, not my decision. |
flvegan |
Jan-23-11 12:21 AM |
#28 |
| -
The star on your name says you're a share holder. |
Joe the Revelator |
Jan-23-11 01:32 PM |
#93 |
| -
Says no such thing. |
Lance_Boyle |
Jan-24-11 02:00 PM |
#210 |
| -
I feel it could be highly useful, but... |
hootinholler |
Jan-23-11 12:23 AM |
#29 |
| -
Excellent points. nt |
snagglepuss |
Jan-23-11 09:23 PM |
#160 |
| -
I think as an homage to our party we should have a "kinda" . |
Safetykitten |
Jan-23-11 12:26 AM |
#30 |
| -
Good one. And all too true. nt |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 12:29 AM |
#34 |
| -
Or better yet, just ask those in the top 1% bracket. |
Foo Fighter |
Jan-23-11 12:42 AM |
#35 |
| -
I give this 5 out of 5 Goldmans. |
Safetykitten |
Jan-23-11 12:44 AM |
#36 |
| -
LOL! |
Foo Fighter |
Jan-23-11 01:40 AM |
#44 |
| -
Well, if you're going to have "Goldmans," you should also have "Olbermanns" |
Buns_of_Fire |
Jan-23-11 08:09 AM |
#65 |
| -
LOL |
EFerrari |
Jan-23-11 04:18 AM |
#54 |
| -
I believe the rec/unrec feature is a useful tool.. |
Upton |
Jan-23-11 12:29 AM |
#33 |
| -
I kinda liked the earlier culture of kicking threads |
struggle4progress |
Jan-23-11 12:49 AM |
#37 |
| -
I never really like them when they were added. |
SlipperySlope |
Jan-23-11 12:52 AM |
#38 |
| -
I can't find the post announcing this, but ... |
Akoto |
Jan-23-11 01:18 AM |
#40 |
| -
No; it's one of the funniest things I've seen on the Internet. |
LoZoccolo |
Jan-23-11 01:18 AM |
#41 |
| -
Yes, number of corporate trolls rose when they could unrec stories that hurt their business, |
McCamy Taylor |
Jan-23-11 01:40 AM |
#43 |
| -
But what will happen to the "First Posters Who Complain About Unrecs Already" crowd? |
NBachers |
Jan-23-11 02:45 AM |
#45 |
| -
Didn't Skinner say that the upgrade demo was missing features |
EFerrari |
Jan-23-11 02:50 AM |
#46 |
| -
So it is said in this ATA thread.... |
jannyk |
Jan-23-11 03:49 AM |
#48 |
| -
Thanks, jannyk. |
EFerrari |
Jan-23-11 03:55 AM |
#50 |
| -
Ahhh. a very intersting exercise..not unlike the current TV polling |
SoCalDem |
Jan-23-11 03:37 AM |
#47 |
| -
To get a proper indication, this should be asked in all the main forums |
Turborama |
Jan-23-11 03:53 AM |
#49 |
| -
It doesn't really matter one way or the other to me |
Raine |
Jan-23-11 03:59 AM |
#51 |
| -
I think the recs/unrecs balance each other out. |
intheflow |
Jan-23-11 04:10 AM |
#53 |
| -
I go to performance works |
canetoad |
Jan-23-11 04:30 AM |
#55 |
| -
That people want free rein for their disapproval is an interesting observation. nt |
snagglepuss |
Jan-23-11 09:35 PM |
#170 |
| -
no, i don't. nt |
xchrom |
Jan-23-11 04:46 AM |
#56 |
| -
Just wait for an egregious thread that most find distasteful or just offensive, |
elocs |
Jan-23-11 06:18 AM |
#58 |
| -
I disagree. Now one will have to actually take the time to post WHY one objects. |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 09:21 PM |
#157 |
| -
The only thing wrong with rec/unrec was that only the sum was reported. |
Tesha |
Jan-23-11 06:44 AM |
#59 |
| -
+1 |
snagglepuss |
Jan-23-11 09:38 PM |
#173 |
| -
The Heckler's Veto wins again. |
Codeine |
Jan-23-11 06:49 AM |
#60 |
| -
No |
cordelia |
Jan-23-11 06:50 AM |
#61 |
| -
Not at all. So a small group doesn't like it, so what? Keep it, we need it. Rec'd. n/t |
Catherina |
Jan-23-11 07:30 AM |
#62 |
| -
Actually, unrecs can keep varied opinions off the Greatest Page. |
mmonk |
Jan-23-11 07:46 AM |
#63 |
| -
I am very glad to see it gone in its present form |
dsc |
Jan-23-11 07:49 AM |
#64 |
| -
you need neither, or you need both. nt |
seabeyond |
Jan-23-11 08:23 AM |
#66 |
| -
Yes, but only if recs are also mothballed... |
SidDithers |
Jan-23-11 08:27 AM |
#67 |
| -
I vote "other", here's my idea: |
Jester Messiah |
Jan-23-11 08:39 AM |
#68 |
| -
Good idea. nt |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 09:24 PM |
#161 |
| -
I would like to see a 5 star rating system instead. |
golddigger |
Jan-23-11 09:08 AM |
#69 |
| -
They could even make it color coded! |
PBS Poll-435 |
Jan-23-11 09:18 AM |
#71 |
| -
Okay, I'll shut up! |
golddigger |
Jan-23-11 09:34 AM |
#74 |
| -
Meh, people would only ever give one or five star ratings |
Posteritatis |
Jan-23-11 11:49 AM |
#85 |
| -
I think that is a worthy idea. |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 09:25 PM |
#162 |
| -
Unrec creates an echo chamber |
Still a Democrat |
Jan-23-11 09:28 AM |
#73 |
| -
And how do you know this? |
EFerrari |
Jan-23-11 04:29 PM |
#119 |
| -
Exactly. nt |
Bobbie Jo |
Jan-24-11 12:44 PM |
#205 |
| -
I know some feel it was the cause of a lot of incivility here, but... |
pipi_k |
Jan-23-11 09:49 AM |
#75 |
| -
Unrec hasn't done anything about attention whores. |
Renew Deal |
Jan-23-11 09:59 AM |
#77 |
| -
i agree with the folks that say if UNREC is shitcanned, REC |
jonnyblitz |
Jan-23-11 10:02 AM |
#79 |
| -
There's no reason to get rid of unrec. I think it's a helpful feature. |
Very_Boring_Name |
Jan-23-11 10:04 AM |
#80 |
| -
Why only "FIVE" recs to get to the "greatest page"? |
mzteris |
Jan-23-11 10:24 AM |
#81 |
| -
Exactly. Now with no unrec the number of rec necessary should be upped |
snagglepuss |
Jan-23-11 09:45 PM |
#175 |
| -
Yes. I hope it never comes back. |
Phentex |
Jan-23-11 10:26 AM |
#82 |
| -
I recently changed my mind |
proud2BlibKansan |
Jan-23-11 10:35 AM |
#84 |
| -
People seem to have forgotten how shitty the "Greatest Page" was before unrec. |
LostInAnomie |
Jan-23-11 12:05 PM |
#86 |
| -
I don't agree with it at all. I used it to decide if I should open a thread or not. It's a shame.... |
Joe the Revelator |
Jan-23-11 01:25 PM |
#88 |
| -
Yes. And I hope the Ignore feature is next. |
bluestate10 |
Jan-23-11 01:27 PM |
#90 |
| -
No. |
Iggo |
Jan-23-11 01:32 PM |
#92 |
| -
It's a popularity contest or unpopularity contest ... |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 01:44 PM |
#95 |
| -
Speak for yourself. That isn't true for me. |
Quantess |
Jan-23-11 01:46 PM |
#96 |
| -
Or me. If you think it is, you're taking this place way too seriously as a social outlet. |
Joe the Revelator |
Jan-23-11 02:51 PM |
#111 |
| -
I don't think we need either |
SheilaT |
Jan-23-11 01:52 PM |
#98 |
| -
I truly and deeply do not care. |
undeterred |
Jan-23-11 01:53 PM |
#99 |
| -
No. It was a quite useful tool, that was only opposed by those upon whom it was *most* useful, i.e., |
apocalypsehow |
Jan-23-11 02:02 PM |
#100 |
| -
i guess we'll have to be more aggressive with verbal unrecs. |
meow mix |
Jan-23-11 02:12 PM |
#103 |
| -
Further, the *manner* in which it was finally taken from the vast majority of posters who liked it |
apocalypsehow |
Jan-23-11 02:08 PM |
#101 |
| -
Unfortunately for folks like you, technology does not allow you to administer painful electric shock |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 09:27 PM |
#164 |
| -
This is how laughable the argument against the UnRec system has become: it's akin to administering a |
apocalypsehow |
Jan-24-11 12:11 AM |
#182 |
| -
Thank you. It saves me the trouble. We've crossed paths before |
mistertrickster |
Jan-24-11 09:06 AM |
#185 |
| -
BRING BACK UNREC! |
Quantess |
Jan-23-11 02:18 PM |
#104 |
| -
Only if "rec" is eliminated too. |
Bobbie Jo |
Jan-23-11 02:27 PM |
#105 |
| -
?! It just accepted my "unrec" for this thread! |
reformist2 |
Jan-23-11 02:32 PM |
#107 |
| -
For what it's worth... |
timtom |
Jan-23-11 02:37 PM |
#108 |
| -
Get rid of the Greatest Page, then |
Stevenmarc |
Jan-23-11 04:15 PM |
#113 |
| -
+1 |
Iggo |
Jan-23-11 04:21 PM |
#115 |
| -
+2 |
Joe the Revelator |
Jan-23-11 05:31 PM |
#133 |
| -
+3 |
gristy |
Jan-23-11 06:55 PM |
#138 |
| -
A simple question? |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 04:15 PM |
#114 |
| -
It's not a matter of bravery or cowardice, it's about kicking/not kicking. nt |
johnaries |
Jan-23-11 04:26 PM |
#117 |
| -
kick and unrec... |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 04:27 PM |
#118 |
| -
You're right. It's takes amazing bravery to post "k&r". |
LostInAnomie |
Jan-23-11 04:31 PM |
#120 |
| -
You can still "unrec"... |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 04:33 PM |
#122 |
| -
The power was in the entirety of DU's hands with unrec. |
LostInAnomie |
Jan-23-11 04:45 PM |
#125 |
| -
Seems to me there are people here that are smart enough to respond... |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 04:49 PM |
#127 |
| -
Ugh... You're being disingenuous. |
LostInAnomie |
Jan-23-11 05:04 PM |
#130 |
| -
So what? |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 08:56 PM |
#145 |
| -
Maybe because... |
LostInAnomie |
Jan-24-11 11:24 AM |
#197 |
| -
I can understand your argument... |
kentuck |
Jan-24-11 11:41 AM |
#198 |
| -
The designated purpose of the Greatest Page is... |
LostInAnomie |
Jan-24-11 03:57 PM |
#213 |
| -
People announce that they Unrec'd all the time. |
Quantess |
Jan-23-11 04:32 PM |
#121 |
| -
A few do. |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 04:34 PM |
#123 |
| -
The question is based on TWO false premises: |
apocalypsehow |
Jan-23-11 04:39 PM |
#124 |
| -
Lesson continued. |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 04:47 PM |
#126 |
| -
This reply is non-responsive, and makes assertions not backed by a shred of evidence or a link. |
apocalypsehow |
Jan-23-11 05:01 PM |
#129 |
| -
We can only hope. |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 09:12 PM |
#152 |
| -
Can you explain to me why a thread about a sick DU'r qualifies as a Greatest Thread? |
A HERETIC I AM |
Jan-23-11 06:15 PM |
#136 |
| -
+1 |
LostInAnomie |
Jan-23-11 07:12 PM |
#140 |
| -
You're entitled to your opinion. |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 09:00 PM |
#148 |
| -
LOL..... |
A HERETIC I AM |
Jan-23-11 09:12 PM |
#151 |
| -
I think your name explains your position quite well. |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 09:34 PM |
#169 |
| -
Oh, for crying out fucking loud. |
A HERETIC I AM |
Jan-23-11 10:05 PM |
#177 |
| -
My answer is: |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 11:00 PM |
#180 |
| -
That answer: |
A HERETIC I AM |
Jan-24-11 12:31 AM |
#183 |
| -
I think... |
kentuck |
Jan-24-11 09:17 AM |
#188 |
| -
"You still haven't answered my question--why are sick DUers on the Greatest page?" |
mistertrickster |
Jan-24-11 12:08 PM |
#202 |
| -
Why use quote marks if you aren't going to quote me? |
A HERETIC I AM |
Jan-24-11 12:38 PM |
#204 |
| -
But aren't "greatest" page threads totally subjective? |
kentuck |
Jan-24-11 01:41 PM |
#206 |
| -
Of course, it's easy to call others cowards... |
pipi_k |
Jan-23-11 08:36 PM |
#144 |
| -
You certainly make a great argument for it. |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 08:58 PM |
#146 |
| -
Although I do enjoy open discussion, I have seen way too many |
johnaries |
Jan-23-11 04:24 PM |
#116 |
| -
Other |
Ohio Joe |
Jan-23-11 04:54 PM |
#128 |
| -
I'm unreccing! |
LeftishBrit |
Jan-23-11 05:59 PM |
#134 |
| -
No |
me b zola |
Jan-23-11 06:04 PM |
#135 |
| -
get rid of the unrec |
Liberal_in_LA |
Jan-23-11 06:17 PM |
#137 |
| -
no. bad idea. nt |
inna |
Jan-23-11 07:13 PM |
#141 |
| -
No I do not. It was useful. It kept clique-ish and cult garbage from gaining the appearance of |
Maru Kitteh |
Jan-23-11 08:04 PM |
#143 |
| -
Useful tools are for those who hold grudges, and the unrecing crew does |
DainBramaged |
Jan-23-11 09:00 PM |
#147 |
| -
I never liked the unrec feature. |
Beacool |
Jan-23-11 09:08 PM |
#150 |
| -
Nor did I. Good idea in theory, in practice, not so much. n/t |
stevenleser |
Jan-24-11 01:54 PM |
#209 |
| -
This is great news. The right-wing trolls |
roody |
Jan-23-11 09:20 PM |
#156 |
| -
Agreed. A lot of serious issues were getting buried in favor of the "outrage d' jour." nt |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 09:23 PM |
#159 |
| -
Which side is the most obnoxious?? |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 09:21 PM |
#158 |
| -
Un-reccers. No contest. nt |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 09:31 PM |
#166 |
| -
Those who have whined almost non stop about the unrec option.. |
Upton |
Jan-23-11 09:37 PM |
#172 |
| -
The "rec" side is more obnoxious, due to the level of whining, |
Quantess |
Jan-23-11 09:38 PM |
#174 |
| -
Odd, isn't it. Pointing out abuse is "whining" now. nt |
mistertrickster |
Jan-24-11 09:11 AM |
#186 |
| -
No. But if it's going, it should take "Recommend" with it. |
City Lights |
Jan-23-11 09:33 PM |
#167 |
| -
Apparently, no one considered that perhaps the Admins are in a better position to evaluate |
mistertrickster |
Jan-23-11 09:33 PM |
#168 |
| -
We went with their decision before... |
kentuck |
Jan-23-11 09:36 PM |
#171 |
| -
you know the child that continually whines and eventually gets his way. not a matter |
seabeyond |
Jan-24-11 09:17 AM |
#189 |
| -
Our admins = bad parents. Sorry, I don't buy it. nt |
mistertrickster |
Jan-24-11 12:05 PM |
#200 |
| -
Not at all. |
Bonobo |
Jan-23-11 10:02 PM |
#176 |
| -
First I heard about it. Que Pasa? n/t |
lefty2000 |
Jan-23-11 10:24 PM |
#178 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-23-11 10:44 PM |
#179 |
| -
It can be fun to do, but if this was my site there never would have |
Bluenorthwest |
Jan-23-11 11:53 PM |
#181 |
| -
I'd Like To See Everyone Who Recs or UnRecs A Thread Be Listed Right Below The OP... |
JimGinPA |
Jan-24-11 12:53 AM |
#184 |
| -
How about no recs but ONLY UN-RECS. The ones that make it to the Greatest |
mistertrickster |
Jan-24-11 09:15 AM |
#187 |
| -
I opposed "unrec" from the beginning, and I oppose it now. |
Laelth |
Jan-24-11 09:26 AM |
#190 |
| -
Unrec didn't stop assholes from posting their goosestepping shit in GD |
kenny blankenship |
Jan-24-11 09:28 AM |
#191 |
| -
Yes, absolutely the Unrec feature should be |
liberalhistorian |
Jan-24-11 09:31 AM |
#192 |
| -
oh get rid of it, we wouldnt want to hurt peoples feelings |
iamthebandfanman |
Jan-24-11 09:36 AM |
#193 |
| -
I've seen many "attention whore posts" aka "K&R if ...." posts on the Greatest Page ... |
meegbear |
Jan-24-11 10:22 AM |
#194 |
| -
I think a good argument against a post is better than an "unrec"... |
kentuck |
Jan-24-11 10:47 AM |
#196 |
| -
I would love to buy an un-wreck. |
RedCloud |
Jan-24-11 10:32 AM |
#195 |
| -
This poll proves the silent majority are ok with unrec |
taught_me_patience |
Jan-24-11 11:54 AM |
#199 |
| -
Really, this poll "proves" that? You should work for Rassmussen, heh. nt |
mistertrickster |
Jan-24-11 12:12 PM |
#203 |
| -
yes |
samsingh |
Jan-24-11 12:06 PM |
#201 |
| -
A matter 0f weighing disadvantages with disadvantages. |
skip fox |
Jan-24-11 01:49 PM |
#207 |
| -
If we have apples, we must have oranges? |
kentuck |
Jan-24-11 02:25 PM |
#211 |
| -
I think folks should get X number of rec/unrecs a day |
Inchworm |
Jan-24-11 02:31 PM |
#212 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore