You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #: I am not sure that is so. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-14-13 10:32 AM
Original message
I am not sure that is so.
Remember, Citizens United decided whether CU violated certain campaign laws.

The answer was yes, but the laws CU violated were unconstitutional because they restrained CU's free speech.

Campaign laws limiting campaign spending are relatively new in the history of the US. Before those relatively new laws, there were no limits at all on campaign spending.


Granted, the invention of television and radio advertising kicked up the cost of campaigns considerably, but that happened outside the Constitution, the intent of the Framers, etc.

The way the Framers assured the plutocracy was by severely limiting the things that the general populace could vote on and then by severely limiting who within the general populace was able to vote. Between gender, race and wealth restrictions on the right to vote, only about 6% of the population of 1789 was entitled to vote. And they were very unlikely to elect anyone who was not like themselves.

So, one way or another, the plutocrats have always had control.


The Equal Time rule (1927) and The Fairness Doctrine (1949) were intended to mitigate the impact of buying air time, but the former is almost meaningless at this point and the Obama Administration put the final nail in the coffin of the latter during Obama's first term.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/315

It's odd. When Reagan and Bush were opposing the Doctrine, Democrats opposed them. When the Obama administration put the final nail in the coffin, though, neither party gave him much opposition.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine#Revocati...

BTW, the FCC was also a New Deal program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC