You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #4: Probably a good choice. I would have to study up on it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-13 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Probably a good choice. I would have to study up on it.
1916 was still close enough to 1893 that racists within the Democratic Party and its kissin cousin, Dixiecrats, would have been common.

Martin Luther King, Sr., for example, did not switch until JFK helped get his son out of jail.

Incredibly, Senator Brooke, the first African American Senator post Reconstruction era (Massachusetts, of course), claimed within the past few year that he had run as a Republican in 1965 without realizing that things had changed between the Parties since Lincoln. (If he was that out of touch, he shouldn't have been Senator of his high school, ffs.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC