You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Igore the above post. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-10-13 03:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Igore the above post.
I meant to bold only quotes from DD's post, but I messed up, as usual.

Here is the text again, but with the bolding that I originally intended. I also deleted some stuff that just made it way too long.



"I hope you know that have nothing but affection for you and nothing but respect for your positions. On the other hand, I am sure you know by now that I am almost 100% totally incapable of remaining silent if I disagree.

Repubs are nearly always (99%!) the ones I hear in public going on about politics, and ripping on the liberals, and most always turning it to Obama and sounding awfully close to racists, if not outright racists

Words are important, but, for this post, I want to focus on deeds, not words.


we are so much a better party than the republicans

no comment

but it's a shame that we're being led by many a centrist in DC institutions.

Think tanks can't lead squat unless the politicians look to them for leadership--mostly for the purpose of their own re-election and financial security. Even lobbyists don't lead them. Politicians don't vote at gunpoint. So, I'll focus on the politicians.


The current head of the DNC is a New Democrat. So was her predecessor.

The head of the Democratic Party recently referred to his positions as those as a moderate Republican from a few years ago. He and his White House have insulted and demeaned those of us to their left in many a word and deed and policy and appointment in the last four years.

Let's see. The head of the party, the head of the DNC, the Senate and quite a few House Democrats. (Yes, the Progressive Caucus is supposedly liberal, but, in the end, they usually vote with centrists, if their vote is likely to affect anything.) At what point do we admit that New Democrats, aka Reagan Republicans, ARE the Democratic Party at this point? Perhaps not in words or affect, but in ways that actually affect our lives?

No, it wasn't always this bad. It became this bad when the guy who looks black (half Irish, half African, not that they care - one drop, indeed) was elected by the People

My question was not only about Republican cheerleaders, but about cheerleaders on both sides.

Actually, Republicans bother me less than Democrats. I never expected anything but bad things from Republican politicians, so they never diappoint me. In fact, I am not even sure I care about political parties. I care only about actions, not words, not party labels, but actions.

If a Democratic President signs repeal of Glass Steagall and NAFTA, does that mean the global economic of 2008 was not as bad as if a Republican President had signed them?

If a Democratic President turns to Republican Dick Morris and Republican Colin "My Lai" Powell to craft DADT--and then puts it through Congress instead of signing an Executive Order (easier to change, but no political cover for Clinton), is that better than if Dummya had done the same?

If Obama chooses Rick Warren for the invocation at his first inaugural and Giglio for the benediction at his second inaugural, is that much more acceptable to Democrats than if Bush had chosen them? Should it be? Or should it be much less acceptable if a Democrat does it?

"Republican politicians bad." Yes, I agree. And?

"Democrats much, much better." Not at all sure I agree.

And there is, IMO, the greatest danger for our country and for us as individuals, namely the lack of a Democratic Party that is in deed, as well as in word, significantly different from the Republican Party and mounts strong opposition to Republican politicians.

As an example, I'll tell you a secret. The most damage Romney did while Governor of Massachusetts was Romneycare.

Romneycare was a Heritage Foundation brainchild, conceived because even Nixon's Republican plan was far too liberal for the Heritage Foundation. Clinton tried and failed to pass it when it was called Hillarycare. Romney passed it in Massachusetts and Democrats sneeringly called it Romneycare. But they loved it when the entire nation got it as Obamacare. Oh, and Republicans who loved it when it called Romneycare threatened to secede whan it was called Obamacare.

Does any of that sound sane to anyone? That's what I mean by two colors of the same strength of Kool-Aid. One is blue, one is red, but they both rot your insides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC