You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: I consider it credible for discussion because [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-13 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I consider it credible for discussion because
I agree with idea that given that many were quick to forgive former Klansmen, Democrats who voted for DOMA, voted for deregulation, etc who later admitted it was a mistake why Hagel should not be afforded the same consideration. If people's positions have changed I happen to believe that we should accept their evolution and move on to people (Ben Nelson) who haven't
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
  -Obama taps Hagel for Pentagon, Brennan for CIA No Elephants  Jan-07-13 09:25 AM   #0 
  - You will rival Rip Van Winkle.  Enthusiast   Jan-07-13 11:19 AM   #1 
  - Not saying I disagree with your position. But I will offer this as counter  rpannier   Jan-10-13 04:41 AM   #2 
  - Aside from the gay thing. One thing for certain.  Enthusiast   Jan-10-13 06:13 AM   #3 
  - Bush never convinced the world either.  No Elephants   Jan-10-13 06:50 AM   #5 
  - Thanks rpannier. I've come across kind of argument. I consider it total bs.  No Elephants   Jan-10-13 06:34 AM   #4 
     - I consider it credible for discussion because  rpannier   Jan-12-13 03:10 AM   #10 
  - I'm more concerned about Brennan given that Obama and the American public openly support  Leopolds Ghost   Jan-11-13 12:55 AM   #6 
  - There has been no 180 degree shift on gay marriage. Greenwald is full of it.  No Elephants   Jan-11-13 11:24 PM   #7 
  - Inasmuch as rpannier has not been back, and I have responded to the  No Elephants   Jan-11-13 11:27 PM   #8 
     - I'd be interested in the links  rpannier   Jan-12-13 01:32 AM   #9 
        - I thought that I had already addressed "conversation purposes" when i responded to  No Elephants   Jan-14-13 07:55 AM   #11 
        - P.S.  No Elephants   Jan-14-13 09:07 AM   #12 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC