You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marco Rubio's bill imposes religious agenda in workplace (The war against women rages on.) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-02-12 01:02 PM
Original message
Marco Rubio's bill imposes religious agenda in workplace (The war against women rages on.)
Advertisements [?]
From today's Tampa Bay Times editorial staff: (Formerly the St. Petersburg Times)


February 2, 2012



Marco Rubio (AP)


U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio believes that women who work for religiously affiliated hospitals, universities and charities should be subject to a religious agenda as a condition of their employment. The Florida Republican introduced a bill this week that would allow any employer with religious objections to avoid covering contraception in its employee health insurance plan. Rubio claims this would promote religious liberty. But whose? Certainly not the religious liberty of female employees. Rubio's bill, which has 20 co-sponsors including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, is an attempt to extend religious dictates beyond the confines of churches and religious orders and impose them on a secular staff.

Rubio is taking the side of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops against the Obama administration over a so-called "refusal clause," an exemption to the contraception requirement offered to religious entities as a nod to church-state separation under the Affordable Care Act. After the administration determined that free contraception would be part of the basic package of mandatory preventative health care coverage, the bishops demanded an expanded "refusal clause" not just for employees of churches — which the administration granted — but any affiliated organization. Under the bishops' formulation, teachers at parochial schools, social workers at religious adoption agencies and nurses at hospitals that are religiously affiliated would be denied a key health care protection.

The administration rightly turned down the bishops last month, although it did delay for one year the requirement that religiously affiliated employers include contraception in health coverage without an out-of-pocket cost. But Rubio's bill would overrule the Health and Human Services Department with language so expansive that it would allow any employer, whether formally associated with a religion or not, to deny contraceptive coverage in its health care plan on the basis of a religious belief.

Rubio is gaining political points with Catholic leaders such as Bishop Robert Lynch of the Diocese of St. Petersburg, who has been threatening to drop health insurance for the diocese's approximately 2,300 employees if the mandate stands. In a letter, Lynch mistakenly claims this is a matter of church-state separation. But when the Catholic Church decides to offer a range of secular services through hospitals, schools and charities that serve clients of any faith; hires professionals without regard to religion; and takes public money such as Medicare, it does not have a right to impose religious tenets on those employees. Church-state separation protects the practice of a faith from government interference, not other endeavors that happen to be associated with a religious entity.

.....




Another nail in the coffin for Rubio's premeditated grasp for very high power.


Who IS Marco Rubio?


In addition to being funded by the Koch brothers and directed by puppet master Jeb Bush, Rubio is
but another example of the pain that right wing extremists, steeped in ideological meanness and enforced austerity, will force onto people, against their will.




Another prime example is U. S. Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL).



U. S. Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL) Photo credit: Joe Raedle / Getty Images, via Miami Herald


Rep. Stearns at center of Planned Parenthood funding dispute, February 1, 2012



Is the "political leadership" of Marco Rubio or Cliff Stearns what Americans deserve, in the face of unprecedented and cruel hardship across the country, specifically because of politicians like these?


For the preservation of what we hold dear, politicians such as these should be driven out of power.


They must be stripped of control over the levers of governmental power, for all time.



We have an opportunity to remove a sizable number of them via a ballot this November, including Mr. Stearns of Florida.


We must take it.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC