You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #55: Five or 5,000, each dies his own death. Thus, the one is no less, here, than the five. So: No. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-04-11 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
55. Five or 5,000, each dies his own death. Thus, the one is no less, here, than the five. So: No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Would you kill one person to save five others? The Straight Story  Dec-04-11 03:25 PM   #0 
  - I would be surprised...  Cid_B   Dec-04-11 03:28 PM   #1 
  - Consider the following case:  BOG PERSON   Dec-04-11 03:29 PM   #2 
  - or: If the 5 were homeless people and the 1 was a bank ceo, which would the RW save?  The Straight Story   Dec-04-11 03:30 PM   #4 
  - Supposing the five are  sabrina 1   Dec-04-11 04:15 PM   #20 
     - Is there an option for hitting the gas?  RUMMYisFROSTED   Dec-05-11 07:58 AM   #78 
  - I need a drink.  EOTE   Dec-04-11 05:38 PM   #40 
  - I Think You May Be on to something  Baby Bear   Dec-04-11 09:35 PM   #61 
  - No, I would not!  quinnox   Dec-04-11 03:29 PM   #3 
  - 10% killed 5 people  dems_rightnow   Dec-04-11 03:33 PM   #5 
  - oh crap lol  quinnox   Dec-04-11 03:35 PM   #6 
  - Nuke all 6 from orbit, only way to be sure  The Straight Story   Dec-04-11 03:38 PM   #8 
  - If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice  Electric Monk   Dec-04-11 03:39 PM   #10 
  - Rush of course. I don't even need to see the video.  U4ikLefty   Dec-04-11 10:44 PM   #64 
  - There is no 3rd option.  hobbit709   Dec-04-11 03:40 PM   #11 
  - 10% Rejected Control Freak Behavior  NashVegas   Dec-04-11 05:13 PM   #33 
  - 10% did not act to save 5 people.  Barack_America   Dec-04-11 05:39 PM   #41 
     - 10% allowed 5 people to die.  joshcryer   Dec-05-11 01:36 AM   #73 
  - So you would kill five, not one?  tavalon   Dec-05-11 10:56 AM   #86 
  - Channeling my inner Spock  Ishoutandscream2   Dec-04-11 03:38 PM   #7 
  - ...  The Straight Story   Dec-04-11 03:39 PM   #9 
  - yes, but spock chose to sacrifice himself.  newspeak   Dec-05-11 11:46 AM   #88 
  - If it's an imminent danger I frankly don't see what the dilemma is.  LisaL   Dec-04-11 03:41 PM   #12 
  - Of course I would. Unless that one person was my spouse or child.  Lyric   Dec-04-11 03:48 PM   #13 
  - The right answer in the real world is usually "kill the experimenter first".  saras   Dec-04-11 04:01 PM   #14 
  - No.  RagAss   Dec-04-11 04:04 PM   #15 
  - This theory makes no sense  Hutzpa   Dec-04-11 04:11 PM   #16 
  - "deep seeded thinking by an individual that thrives on hate and division" WTF are you talking about?  Odin2005   Dec-04-11 04:13 PM   #18 
  - I dson't expect you to understand as you've have clearly stated  Hutzpa   Dec-04-11 04:15 PM   #19 
     - Yes, because you are obviously so superior to everyone, O Wise One!  Odin2005   Dec-04-11 04:16 PM   #22 
     - No, "deep seeded thinking by an individual that thrives on hate and division" doesn't make sense  muriel_volestrangler   Dec-04-11 05:48 PM   #44 
        - It is unrealistic  Hutzpa   Dec-04-11 06:09 PM   #54 
        - He or she means "deep-seated," which is a common descriptor for  tblue37   Dec-05-11 02:16 AM   #74 
  - This goes way back, in a book on Tibetan Buddhism I read there was this:  The Straight Story   Dec-04-11 04:16 PM   #21 
  - I'm with the 90% on this.  Odin2005   Dec-04-11 04:11 PM   #17 
  - Strange, my posts in this thread are not on MyDU  Odin2005   Dec-04-11 04:19 PM   #23 
  - We had to kill your replies to save others  The Straight Story   Dec-04-11 04:32 PM   #24 
     - LMAO!!! DU is really buggy, I started a thread on it:  Odin2005   Dec-04-11 04:34 PM   #25 
     - delete -- dupe  fishwax   Dec-04-11 06:01 PM   #50 
     - lol  fishwax   Dec-04-11 06:02 PM   #51 
  - What if the one is Newt ... and the five others are Glenn Beck, Hannity, Rush, Coulter, and Ailes?  JoePhilly   Dec-04-11 04:42 PM   #26 
  - No question ......... would take out the five  Angry Dragon   Dec-04-11 05:10 PM   #32 
  - I wish DU was not buggy right now ... I agree with you.  JoePhilly   Dec-04-11 08:38 PM   #56 
  - Is there time to get Newt to move over to the other track? nt  tblue37   Dec-05-11 02:17 AM   #75 
     - Maybe we could tell him that there's a train coming and he should move over.  JoePhilly   Dec-05-11 08:12 AM   #79 
  - Consider the Essex, an American whale-ship from Nantucket, Massachusetts where the crew drew lots to...  jody   Dec-04-11 04:53 PM   #27 
  - I think the more interesting ethical dilemma is "would you torture someone if you KNEW they  cherokeeprogressive   Dec-04-11 04:56 PM   #28 
  - How many would sit on the ground...  Tyrs WolfDaemon   Dec-04-11 04:57 PM   #29 
  - It wasn't the one person's fault the other 5 were on the track with the train  Liberal_in_LA   Dec-04-11 04:58 PM   #30 
  - What if the one is Newt ... and the five others are Glenn Beck, Hannity, Rush, Coulter, and Ailes?  JoePhilly   Dec-04-11 05:10 PM   #31 
  - Idiots who walk on train tracks and don't look behind them  kudzu22   Dec-04-11 05:17 PM   #34 
  - Idiots who walk on train tracks without looking up  kudzu22   Dec-04-11 05:18 PM   #35 
  - Shit like this hardly ever happens...  hunter   Dec-04-11 05:25 PM   #36 
  - +1000, with one caveat.  gkhouston   Dec-04-11 08:54 PM   #57 
  - 90% Rationalized Murder. That's Scary  NashVegas   Dec-04-11 05:30 PM   #37 
  - What if the 5 are Glenn Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Rush, and roger Ailes.  JoePhilly   Dec-04-11 05:34 PM   #38 
  - 1 dying is better than 5 dying.  Odin2005   Dec-04-11 05:38 PM   #39 
  - So you'd rather 5 people die then one.  Bladian   Dec-04-11 05:41 PM   #42 
  - Yes, society has issues rewarding good, decent behavior toward fellow humans.  joshcryer   Dec-05-11 01:23 AM   #70 
  - Not a realistic situation.  Ready4Change   Dec-04-11 05:42 PM   #43 
  - ding ding  Hutzpa   Dec-04-11 05:59 PM   #49 
  - ....  octothorpe   Dec-05-11 10:37 AM   #84 
  - a lot more chance for 1 of the 5 to look up and see the train than the 1. nt  seabeyond   Dec-04-11 05:49 PM   #45 
  - Anyone stupid enough to be walking on a railroad track deserves whatever fate befalls them.  Ikonoklast   Dec-04-11 05:50 PM   #46 
  - My mom said the same thing about sex and STD's  The Straight Story   Dec-04-11 05:53 PM   #47 
     - Hope you listened to your Momma.  Ikonoklast   Dec-04-11 05:58 PM   #48 
  - Save the five. "I never took the Kobayashi Maru test till now...what do you think of my solution?"  apocalypsehow   Dec-04-11 06:04 PM   #52 
  - No.  JVS   Dec-04-11 06:08 PM   #53 
  - Five or 5,000, each dies his own death. Thus, the one is no less, here, than the five. So: No.  WinkyDink   Dec-04-11 06:30 PM   #55 
  - If the "one person" is a socio-manipulative researcher, possibly...  T S Justly   Dec-04-11 09:15 PM   #58 
  - I would reroute the train and hope like hell that the person on the track  Nye Bevan   Dec-04-11 09:24 PM   #59 
  - let....  unkachuck   Dec-04-11 09:34 PM   #60 
  - Let the train hit the five - if people are foolish enough to hike along a track with no escape,  petronius   Dec-04-11 09:44 PM   #62 
  - Some years ago, I took an internet test and this was one of the  Recovered Repug   Dec-04-11 10:33 PM   #63 
  - I think I'd answer the same as you, and my argument would be:  muriel_volestrangler   Dec-05-11 05:31 AM   #76 
  - So if you need to torture someone to save the lives of thousands  U4ikLefty   Dec-04-11 10:48 PM   #65 
  - I'd probably just yell "TRAAAAAAIN!!!!!!!" and save all 6.  flvegan   Dec-04-11 10:56 PM   #66 
  - Yikes. But not exactly surprising. nt  BlueIris   Dec-05-11 12:28 AM   #67 
  - Que sera sera  Cronus Protagonist   Dec-05-11 01:05 AM   #68 
  - Is there a choice that lets me kill them all????  cliffordu   Dec-05-11 01:14 AM   #69 
  - The trick is to reprogram the computer.  LeftyMom   Dec-05-11 01:27 AM   #71 
  - #52 already took your Star Trek bit...  Cid_B   Dec-05-11 06:03 AM   #77 
  - Give them a third choice, and I can predict the outcome 99% of the time. Or change the...  joshcryer   Dec-05-11 01:35 AM   #72 
  - Never. nt  bemildred   Dec-05-11 09:13 AM   #80 
  - My instinct would be to wonder how the hell I ended up in front of a railroad switch  Godhumor   Dec-05-11 10:09 AM   #81 
  - This is why I'm more for deontological ethics than utilitarian ethics.  backscatter712   Dec-05-11 10:25 AM   #82 
  - Now, make it a tough decision. Would you kill yourself to save five others?  Tierra_y_Libertad   Dec-05-11 10:33 AM   #83 
  - I'd derail the train as to kill hundreds!!!  octothorpe   Dec-05-11 10:38 AM   #85 
  - we had a similar scenario in philosophy class  newspeak   Dec-05-11 11:34 AM   #87 
  - I doubt these scenarios happen very often in real life  CJCRANE   Dec-05-11 12:00 PM   #89 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC