MineralMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-03-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #67 |
| 72. I think you are very mistaken in that view. |
|
I think he will be elected handily. But, I'm more concerned with Congress and state legislatures. That's the real focus for me. I'll let President Obama work for his own reelection. There are many, many other races that are far more important in 2012. As I said, nominating season is soon upon us. How are your own legislators doing? Any you'd like to see replaced? If so, start now.
|
| -It is December. In one month 2012 will begin. |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 04:01 PM |
#0 |
 -
K&R..I'm not looking for a unicorn.. |
HipChick |
Dec-02-11 04:04 PM |
#1 |
 -
More than unpalatable. Unthinkable. |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 04:05 PM |
#3 |
 -
I want a frickin Unicorn. |
ellisonz |
Dec-02-11 04:24 PM |
#6 |
| -
nice horsey! nt |
flamingdem |
Dec-02-11 06:00 PM |
#14 |
| -
The horn is a secret weapon. |
ellisonz |
Dec-02-11 06:32 PM |
#16 |
| -
In Minnesota, Democratic caucuses for the precinct level |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 04:05 PM |
#2 |
| -
Interestingly, a similar event occurred about the same time of December last year. |
Obamanaut |
Dec-02-11 04:11 PM |
#4 |
| -
Optimistic. |
ellisonz |
Dec-02-11 05:42 PM |
#7 |
| -
December of last year. Really? |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 06:34 PM |
#17 |
| -
The numbers of the year (2010, 2011, 2012, etc). That changes. But along about Dec 2 of |
Obamanaut |
Dec-02-11 06:52 PM |
#26 |
| -
The subject line of the OP does not always necessarily sum up the contents. |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 06:59 PM |
#27 |
| -
Are you saying you don't understand the significance of some year numbers vs. others? |
MH1 |
Dec-03-11 09:30 AM |
#61 |
| -
Ah, well, yes. I see that my title did lead you to read the post, |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 09:39 AM |
#65 |
| -
How dare you! |
ellisonz |
Dec-02-11 04:13 PM |
#5 |
| -
K & R |
shraby |
Dec-02-11 05:44 PM |
#8 |
| -
A republican in the WH is not an option. |
Zorra |
Dec-02-11 05:47 PM |
#9 |
| -
I picked my side before I could vote. |
Wait Wut |
Dec-02-11 05:53 PM |
#10 |
| -
Yup, until there's a real labor party this is it - |
TBF |
Dec-03-11 01:04 PM |
#97 |
| -
I'll go vote, but that's about it... |
Modern_Matthew |
Dec-02-11 05:57 PM |
#11 |
| -
Well, good luck with that. I'm more interested in getting the Democratic |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 06:35 PM |
#18 |
| -
Tea Party got out 9% more votes than we did, with a turnout close to 2006, it was as if... |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 07:01 PM |
#29 |
| -
Well, Koch Bros. is funding the T-Party ... why wouldn't that happen??? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:13 PM |
#49 |
| -
In my precinct in St. Paul, MN, we turned out 60% of eligible |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 10:23 AM |
#75 |
| -
Cool. |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 07:00 PM |
#28 |
| -
OBAMA 2012! |
flamingdem |
Dec-02-11 05:59 PM |
#12 |
| -
K&R |
DesertRat |
Dec-02-11 06:00 PM |
#13 |
| -
Supreme court. nt |
ZombieHorde |
Dec-02-11 06:19 PM |
#15 |
| -
Indeed, among other things. |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 06:36 PM |
#19 |
| -
The Supreme Court is one of my main reasons to vote for Obama, as opposed to against Republicans. |
ZombieHorde |
Dec-02-11 06:48 PM |
#24 |
| -
Anyone leaving the SC during an Obama administration will NOT create a difference ... |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:17 PM |
#51 |
| -
But they would likely retire if a repub wins |
ecstatic |
Dec-03-11 09:32 AM |
#63 |
| -
By the time you win two more elections by .... |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 11:18 AM |
#79 |
| -
You don't know that for certain, but let's pretend you do. |
ZombieHorde |
Dec-03-11 12:38 PM |
#91 |
| -
I'm voting for President Obama |
Ohio Joe |
Dec-02-11 06:36 PM |
#20 |
| -
You know I am there already |
NNN0LHI |
Dec-02-11 06:39 PM |
#21 |
| -
Yes! Thank you so much! |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 06:48 PM |
#23 |
| -
K&R |
B Calm |
Dec-02-11 06:41 PM |
#22 |
| -
Thank you! nt |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 06:49 PM |
#25 |
| -
Sorry, but I have a problem with Obama's support for RW policies. |
Edweird |
Dec-02-11 07:06 PM |
#30 |
| -
You may, but |
DonCoquixote |
Dec-02-11 07:11 PM |
#32 |
| -
For an ace-in-the-hole that's pretty flaccid. |
Edweird |
Dec-02-11 07:39 PM |
#33 |
| -
Hard enough |
DonCoquixote |
Dec-02-11 08:29 PM |
#36 |
| -
The SC is already "stacked" ... you think RW wiull leave while Obama is prsesident? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:18 PM |
#52 |
| -
Certain liberal justices might not have a choice about leaving under the next presidential term, |
MH1 |
Dec-03-11 10:12 AM |
#74 |
| -
Replacing a liberal with a liberal won't change the balance of the court -- i. |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 11:10 AM |
#78 |
| -
So, your issues with Obama's policies has relevance to getting out the vote for other politicians... |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 07:45 PM |
#34 |
| -
I'm responding to a post about Obama. I don't know what you read, or are refering to. |
Edweird |
Dec-02-11 07:57 PM |
#35 |
| -
The third pararagraph in the OP is not about Obama. |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 09:02 PM |
#39 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-02-11 09:27 PM |
#42 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-02-11 11:20 PM |
#53 |
| -
2012 is Occupy's year. |
workinclasszero |
Dec-02-11 07:07 PM |
#31 |
| -
^ ^ This. n/t |
gkhouston |
Dec-03-11 12:29 PM |
#90 |
| -
Yep. |
woo me with science |
Dec-03-11 01:05 PM |
#98 |
| -
K & R |
Scurrilous |
Dec-02-11 08:35 PM |
#37 |
| -
Hmm loyalty oaths, I find them offensive, no matter who does them |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-02-11 08:37 PM |
#38 |
| -
"work together toward common goals" = loyalty oath? |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 09:05 PM |
#40 |
| -
Read the whole op, it is time to chose sides |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-02-11 09:18 PM |
#41 |
| -
I guess I can see that, the sides being "those who work for democracy" and "those who don't." |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 10:08 PM |
#43 |
| -
Actually those who work for this party |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-02-11 10:47 PM |
#44 |
| -
You don't have to work for this party to "work for common goals." |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 10:57 PM |
#45 |
| -
We need a democrat in the White House who will work for common goals ... general welfare ... |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:34 PM |
#57 |
| -
Loyalty oaths are disgusting |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-02-11 11:38 PM |
#59 |
| -
No loyalty oath was proposed by me. I wouldn't do that. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 11:47 AM |
#84 |
| -
Good to know because that is how it reads. |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-03-11 12:25 PM |
#87 |
| -
No, actually that is not how it reads. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 12:28 PM |
#89 |
| -
That is how it reads and I am not alone interpreting it that way |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-03-11 12:56 PM |
#92 |
| -
I have no doubt that you will vote and do nothing else. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 01:01 PM |
#93 |
| -
Oh I will be doing other things |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-03-11 01:04 PM |
#95 |
| -
More like dividing line ... those who criticize Obama and those who want it stopped -- |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:32 PM |
#56 |
| -
A call for criticism of Obama to be shut down -- and .... |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:26 PM |
#55 |
| -
Well said, Nadin. |
sabrina 1 |
Dec-02-11 11:07 PM |
#46 |
| -
+1 -- |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:34 PM |
#58 |
| -
How charming. Where did I suggest anything similar to a |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 09:22 AM |
#60 |
| -
Apparently, your OP didn't attack Obama sufficiently. |
JoePhilly |
Dec-03-11 09:31 AM |
#62 |
| -
Thanks for interpreting my post. That does seem to be what |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 09:37 AM |
#64 |
| -
I say this all the time ... |
JoePhilly |
Dec-03-11 09:49 AM |
#66 |
| -
It's interesting, to be sure. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 09:59 AM |
#68 |
| -
Agree completely .... Great point. nt |
JoePhilly |
Dec-03-11 10:02 AM |
#71 |
| -
"Obama hasn't accomplished all we hoped for" ...???? ROFL |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:09 PM |
#47 |
| -
A Democratic challenger to Obama? Why are they not lining up |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 10:00 AM |
#69 |
| -
Do you think corporate money backing Obama might have something to do with it? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 11:25 AM |
#80 |
| -
Then they should step up and declare their candidacy. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 11:39 AM |
#83 |
| -
How about Obama should "step up" and give up corporate money ... ??? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 12:18 PM |
#86 |
| -
I don't know. You could email him with your suggestion. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 01:02 PM |
#94 |
| -
If Obama was paying any attention to the public, OWS wouldn't exist -- !! |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 01:27 PM |
#100 |
| -
. |
dionysus |
Dec-03-11 10:35 AM |
#76 |
| -
Flypaper. Ick. nt |
Bonobo |
Dec-02-11 11:12 PM |
#48 |
| -
Lotta that, tonight. nt |
Poll_Blind |
Dec-02-11 11:15 PM |
#50 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-02-11 11:24 PM |
#54 |
| -
It will be a miracle if he is re-elected. |
Safetykitten |
Dec-03-11 09:57 AM |
#67 |
| -
I think you are very mistaken in that view. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 10:03 AM |
#72 |
| -
. |
dionysus |
Dec-03-11 10:35 AM |
#77 |
| -
I remember in that half hour ad he made |
treestar |
Dec-03-11 10:01 AM |
#70 |
| -
Yes. There has never been a perfect President, because there |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 10:08 AM |
#73 |
| -
I don't see that OWS is calling for a "perfect president" -- just an end to Wall St. agenda -- !! |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 11:28 AM |
#81 |
| -
OWS is calling for many things, and that's wonderful. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 11:35 AM |
#82 |
| -
Eh ... Obama is Wall Street -- OWS is anti-Wall Street -- |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 12:17 PM |
#85 |
| -
As I said, time's a'wasting. If you don't find someone to stand |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 12:27 PM |
#88 |
| -
You really need to read on the history of social movements |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-03-11 01:14 PM |
#99 |
| -
Again, you're ignoring history -- OWS has already moved government to the LEFT ... !! |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 01:31 PM |
#101 |
| -
Countdown to the end of the world |
demicritic |
Dec-03-11 01:04 PM |
#96 |
| -
Uptick of passive aggressive posts on GD recently |
hulka38 |
Dec-03-11 01:59 PM |
#102 |
| -
2012 begins the month after December -that's generally how it works |
CreekDog |
Dec-03-11 02:05 PM |
#103 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread