You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #59: Loyalty oaths are disgusting [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-02-11 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #45
59. Loyalty oaths are disgusting
as well as either you are with us or against us...

You can either understand this, or not.

you got my vote, that's it.

There are things happening in the streets right now that will make this a very non regular election that actually matter a lot more than the corporate rigged game in DC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -It is December. In one month 2012 will begin. MineralMan  Dec-02-11 04:01 PM   #0 
  - K&R..I'm not looking for a unicorn..  HipChick   Dec-02-11 04:04 PM   #1 
  - More than unpalatable. Unthinkable.  MineralMan   Dec-02-11 04:05 PM   #3 
  - I want a frickin Unicorn.  ellisonz   Dec-02-11 04:24 PM   #6 
     - nice horsey! nt  flamingdem   Dec-02-11 06:00 PM   #14 
        - The horn is a secret weapon.  ellisonz   Dec-02-11 06:32 PM   #16 
  - In Minnesota, Democratic caucuses for the precinct level  MineralMan   Dec-02-11 04:05 PM   #2 
  - Interestingly, a similar event occurred about the same time of December last year.  Obamanaut   Dec-02-11 04:11 PM   #4 
  - Optimistic.  ellisonz   Dec-02-11 05:42 PM   #7 
  - December of last year. Really?  MineralMan   Dec-02-11 06:34 PM   #17 
     - The numbers of the year (2010, 2011, 2012, etc). That changes. But along about Dec 2 of  Obamanaut   Dec-02-11 06:52 PM   #26 
        - The subject line of the OP does not always necessarily sum up the contents.  joshcryer   Dec-02-11 06:59 PM   #27 
        - Are you saying you don't understand the significance of some year numbers vs. others?  MH1   Dec-03-11 09:30 AM   #61 
        - Ah, well, yes. I see that my title did lead you to read the post,  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 09:39 AM   #65 
  - How dare you!  ellisonz   Dec-02-11 04:13 PM   #5 
  - K & R  shraby   Dec-02-11 05:44 PM   #8 
  - A republican in the WH is not an option.  Zorra   Dec-02-11 05:47 PM   #9 
  - I picked my side before I could vote.  Wait Wut   Dec-02-11 05:53 PM   #10 
  - Yup, until there's a real labor party this is it -  TBF   Dec-03-11 01:04 PM   #97 
  - I'll go vote, but that's about it...  Modern_Matthew   Dec-02-11 05:57 PM   #11 
  - Well, good luck with that. I'm more interested in getting the Democratic  MineralMan   Dec-02-11 06:35 PM   #18 
  - Tea Party got out 9% more votes than we did, with a turnout close to 2006, it was as if...  joshcryer   Dec-02-11 07:01 PM   #29 
     - Well, Koch Bros. is funding the T-Party ... why wouldn't that happen???  defendandprotect   Dec-02-11 11:13 PM   #49 
     - In my precinct in St. Paul, MN, we turned out 60% of eligible  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 10:23 AM   #75 
  - Cool.  joshcryer   Dec-02-11 07:00 PM   #28 
  - OBAMA 2012!  flamingdem   Dec-02-11 05:59 PM   #12 
  - K&R  DesertRat   Dec-02-11 06:00 PM   #13 
  - Supreme court. nt  ZombieHorde   Dec-02-11 06:19 PM   #15 
  - Indeed, among other things.  MineralMan   Dec-02-11 06:36 PM   #19 
     - The Supreme Court is one of my main reasons to vote for Obama, as opposed to against Republicans.  ZombieHorde   Dec-02-11 06:48 PM   #24 
        - Anyone leaving the SC during an Obama administration will NOT create a difference ...  defendandprotect   Dec-02-11 11:17 PM   #51 
           - But they would likely retire if a repub wins  ecstatic   Dec-03-11 09:32 AM   #63 
           - By the time you win two more elections by ....  defendandprotect   Dec-03-11 11:18 AM   #79 
           - You don't know that for certain, but let's pretend you do.  ZombieHorde   Dec-03-11 12:38 PM   #91 
  - I'm voting for President Obama  Ohio Joe   Dec-02-11 06:36 PM   #20 
  - You know I am there already  NNN0LHI   Dec-02-11 06:39 PM   #21 
  - Yes! Thank you so much!  MineralMan   Dec-02-11 06:48 PM   #23 
  - K&R  B Calm   Dec-02-11 06:41 PM   #22 
  - Thank you! nt  MineralMan   Dec-02-11 06:49 PM   #25 
  - Sorry, but I have a problem with Obama's support for RW policies.  Edweird   Dec-02-11 07:06 PM   #30 
  - You may, but  DonCoquixote   Dec-02-11 07:11 PM   #32 
  - For an ace-in-the-hole that's pretty flaccid.  Edweird   Dec-02-11 07:39 PM   #33 
  - Hard enough  DonCoquixote   Dec-02-11 08:29 PM   #36 
  - The SC is already "stacked" ... you think RW wiull leave while Obama is prsesident?  defendandprotect   Dec-02-11 11:18 PM   #52 
     - Certain liberal justices might not have a choice about leaving under the next presidential term,  MH1   Dec-03-11 10:12 AM   #74 
        - Replacing a liberal with a liberal won't change the balance of the court -- i.  defendandprotect   Dec-03-11 11:10 AM   #78 
  - So, your issues with Obama's policies has relevance to getting out the vote for other politicians...  joshcryer   Dec-02-11 07:45 PM   #34 
  - I'm responding to a post about Obama. I don't know what you read, or are refering to.  Edweird   Dec-02-11 07:57 PM   #35 
     - The third pararagraph in the OP is not about Obama.  joshcryer   Dec-02-11 09:02 PM   #39 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-02-11 09:27 PM   #42 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-02-11 11:20 PM   #53 
  - 2012 is Occupy's year.  workinclasszero   Dec-02-11 07:07 PM   #31 
  - ^ ^ This. n/t  gkhouston   Dec-03-11 12:29 PM   #90 
  - Yep.  woo me with science   Dec-03-11 01:05 PM   #98 
  - K & R  Scurrilous   Dec-02-11 08:35 PM   #37 
  - Hmm loyalty oaths, I find them offensive, no matter who does them  nadinbrzezinski   Dec-02-11 08:37 PM   #38 
  - "work together toward common goals" = loyalty oath?  joshcryer   Dec-02-11 09:05 PM   #40 
  - Read the whole op, it is time to chose sides  nadinbrzezinski   Dec-02-11 09:18 PM   #41 
  - I guess I can see that, the sides being "those who work for democracy" and "those who don't."  joshcryer   Dec-02-11 10:08 PM   #43 
     - Actually those who work for this party  nadinbrzezinski   Dec-02-11 10:47 PM   #44 
     - You don't have to work for this party to "work for common goals."  joshcryer   Dec-02-11 10:57 PM   #45 
        - We need a democrat in the White House who will work for common goals ... general welfare ...  defendandprotect   Dec-02-11 11:34 PM   #57 
        - Loyalty oaths are disgusting  nadinbrzezinski   Dec-02-11 11:38 PM   #59 
           - No loyalty oath was proposed by me. I wouldn't do that.  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 11:47 AM   #84 
              - Good to know because that is how it reads.  nadinbrzezinski   Dec-03-11 12:25 PM   #87 
                 - No, actually that is not how it reads.  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 12:28 PM   #89 
                    - That is how it reads and I am not alone interpreting it that way  nadinbrzezinski   Dec-03-11 12:56 PM   #92 
                       - I have no doubt that you will vote and do nothing else.  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 01:01 PM   #93 
                          - Oh I will be doing other things  nadinbrzezinski   Dec-03-11 01:04 PM   #95 
     - More like dividing line ... those who criticize Obama and those who want it stopped --  defendandprotect   Dec-02-11 11:32 PM   #56 
  - A call for criticism of Obama to be shut down -- and ....  defendandprotect   Dec-02-11 11:26 PM   #55 
  - Well said, Nadin.  sabrina 1   Dec-02-11 11:07 PM   #46 
  - +1 --  defendandprotect   Dec-02-11 11:34 PM   #58 
  - How charming. Where did I suggest anything similar to a  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 09:22 AM   #60 
     - Apparently, your OP didn't attack Obama sufficiently.  JoePhilly   Dec-03-11 09:31 AM   #62 
        - Thanks for interpreting my post. That does seem to be what  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 09:37 AM   #64 
           - I say this all the time ...  JoePhilly   Dec-03-11 09:49 AM   #66 
              - It's interesting, to be sure.  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 09:59 AM   #68 
                 - Agree completely .... Great point. nt  JoePhilly   Dec-03-11 10:02 AM   #71 
  - "Obama hasn't accomplished all we hoped for" ...???? ROFL  defendandprotect   Dec-02-11 11:09 PM   #47 
  - A Democratic challenger to Obama? Why are they not lining up  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 10:00 AM   #69 
  - Do you think corporate money backing Obama might have something to do with it?  defendandprotect   Dec-03-11 11:25 AM   #80 
     - Then they should step up and declare their candidacy.  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 11:39 AM   #83 
     - How about Obama should "step up" and give up corporate money ... ???  defendandprotect   Dec-03-11 12:18 PM   #86 
        - I don't know. You could email him with your suggestion.  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 01:02 PM   #94 
           - If Obama was paying any attention to the public, OWS wouldn't exist -- !!  defendandprotect   Dec-03-11 01:27 PM   #100 
  - .  dionysus   Dec-03-11 10:35 AM   #76 
  - Flypaper. Ick. nt  Bonobo   Dec-02-11 11:12 PM   #48 
  - Lotta that, tonight. nt  Poll_Blind   Dec-02-11 11:15 PM   #50 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Dec-02-11 11:24 PM   #54 
  - It will be a miracle if he is re-elected.  Safetykitten   Dec-03-11 09:57 AM   #67 
  - I think you are very mistaken in that view.  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 10:03 AM   #72 
  - .  dionysus   Dec-03-11 10:35 AM   #77 
  - I remember in that half hour ad he made  treestar   Dec-03-11 10:01 AM   #70 
  - Yes. There has never been a perfect President, because there  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 10:08 AM   #73 
     - I don't see that OWS is calling for a "perfect president" -- just an end to Wall St. agenda -- !!  defendandprotect   Dec-03-11 11:28 AM   #81 
        - OWS is calling for many things, and that's wonderful.  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 11:35 AM   #82 
           - Eh ... Obama is Wall Street -- OWS is anti-Wall Street --  defendandprotect   Dec-03-11 12:17 PM   #85 
              - As I said, time's a'wasting. If you don't find someone to stand  MineralMan   Dec-03-11 12:27 PM   #88 
                 - You really need to read on the history of social movements  nadinbrzezinski   Dec-03-11 01:14 PM   #99 
                 - Again, you're ignoring history -- OWS has already moved government to the LEFT ... !!  defendandprotect   Dec-03-11 01:31 PM   #101 
  - Countdown to the end of the world  demicritic   Dec-03-11 01:04 PM   #96 
  - Uptick of passive aggressive posts on GD recently  hulka38   Dec-03-11 01:59 PM   #102 
  - 2012 begins the month after December -that's generally how it works  CreekDog   Dec-03-11 02:05 PM   #103 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC