Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-02-11 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #39 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules. |
| -It is December. In one month 2012 will begin. |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 04:01 PM |
#0 |
 -
K&R..I'm not looking for a unicorn.. |
HipChick |
Dec-02-11 04:04 PM |
#1 |
 -
More than unpalatable. Unthinkable. |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 04:05 PM |
#3 |
 -
I want a frickin Unicorn. |
ellisonz |
Dec-02-11 04:24 PM |
#6 |
| -
nice horsey! nt |
flamingdem |
Dec-02-11 06:00 PM |
#14 |
| -
The horn is a secret weapon. |
ellisonz |
Dec-02-11 06:32 PM |
#16 |
| -
In Minnesota, Democratic caucuses for the precinct level |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 04:05 PM |
#2 |
| -
Interestingly, a similar event occurred about the same time of December last year. |
Obamanaut |
Dec-02-11 04:11 PM |
#4 |
| -
Optimistic. |
ellisonz |
Dec-02-11 05:42 PM |
#7 |
| -
December of last year. Really? |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 06:34 PM |
#17 |
| -
The numbers of the year (2010, 2011, 2012, etc). That changes. But along about Dec 2 of |
Obamanaut |
Dec-02-11 06:52 PM |
#26 |
| -
The subject line of the OP does not always necessarily sum up the contents. |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 06:59 PM |
#27 |
| -
Are you saying you don't understand the significance of some year numbers vs. others? |
MH1 |
Dec-03-11 09:30 AM |
#61 |
| -
Ah, well, yes. I see that my title did lead you to read the post, |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 09:39 AM |
#65 |
| -
How dare you! |
ellisonz |
Dec-02-11 04:13 PM |
#5 |
| -
K & R |
shraby |
Dec-02-11 05:44 PM |
#8 |
| -
A republican in the WH is not an option. |
Zorra |
Dec-02-11 05:47 PM |
#9 |
| -
I picked my side before I could vote. |
Wait Wut |
Dec-02-11 05:53 PM |
#10 |
| -
Yup, until there's a real labor party this is it - |
TBF |
Dec-03-11 01:04 PM |
#97 |
| -
I'll go vote, but that's about it... |
Modern_Matthew |
Dec-02-11 05:57 PM |
#11 |
| -
Well, good luck with that. I'm more interested in getting the Democratic |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 06:35 PM |
#18 |
| -
Tea Party got out 9% more votes than we did, with a turnout close to 2006, it was as if... |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 07:01 PM |
#29 |
| -
Well, Koch Bros. is funding the T-Party ... why wouldn't that happen??? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:13 PM |
#49 |
| -
In my precinct in St. Paul, MN, we turned out 60% of eligible |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 10:23 AM |
#75 |
| -
Cool. |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 07:00 PM |
#28 |
| -
OBAMA 2012! |
flamingdem |
Dec-02-11 05:59 PM |
#12 |
| -
K&R |
DesertRat |
Dec-02-11 06:00 PM |
#13 |
| -
Supreme court. nt |
ZombieHorde |
Dec-02-11 06:19 PM |
#15 |
| -
Indeed, among other things. |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 06:36 PM |
#19 |
| -
The Supreme Court is one of my main reasons to vote for Obama, as opposed to against Republicans. |
ZombieHorde |
Dec-02-11 06:48 PM |
#24 |
| -
Anyone leaving the SC during an Obama administration will NOT create a difference ... |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:17 PM |
#51 |
| -
But they would likely retire if a repub wins |
ecstatic |
Dec-03-11 09:32 AM |
#63 |
| -
By the time you win two more elections by .... |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 11:18 AM |
#79 |
| -
You don't know that for certain, but let's pretend you do. |
ZombieHorde |
Dec-03-11 12:38 PM |
#91 |
| -
I'm voting for President Obama |
Ohio Joe |
Dec-02-11 06:36 PM |
#20 |
| -
You know I am there already |
NNN0LHI |
Dec-02-11 06:39 PM |
#21 |
| -
Yes! Thank you so much! |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 06:48 PM |
#23 |
| -
K&R |
B Calm |
Dec-02-11 06:41 PM |
#22 |
| -
Thank you! nt |
MineralMan |
Dec-02-11 06:49 PM |
#25 |
| -
Sorry, but I have a problem with Obama's support for RW policies. |
Edweird |
Dec-02-11 07:06 PM |
#30 |
| -
You may, but |
DonCoquixote |
Dec-02-11 07:11 PM |
#32 |
| -
For an ace-in-the-hole that's pretty flaccid. |
Edweird |
Dec-02-11 07:39 PM |
#33 |
| -
Hard enough |
DonCoquixote |
Dec-02-11 08:29 PM |
#36 |
| -
The SC is already "stacked" ... you think RW wiull leave while Obama is prsesident? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:18 PM |
#52 |
| -
Certain liberal justices might not have a choice about leaving under the next presidential term, |
MH1 |
Dec-03-11 10:12 AM |
#74 |
| -
Replacing a liberal with a liberal won't change the balance of the court -- i. |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 11:10 AM |
#78 |
| -
So, your issues with Obama's policies has relevance to getting out the vote for other politicians... |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 07:45 PM |
#34 |
| -
I'm responding to a post about Obama. I don't know what you read, or are refering to. |
Edweird |
Dec-02-11 07:57 PM |
#35 |
| -
The third pararagraph in the OP is not about Obama. |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 09:02 PM |
#39 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-02-11 09:27 PM |
#42 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-02-11 11:20 PM |
#53 |
| -
2012 is Occupy's year. |
workinclasszero |
Dec-02-11 07:07 PM |
#31 |
| -
^ ^ This. n/t |
gkhouston |
Dec-03-11 12:29 PM |
#90 |
| -
Yep. |
woo me with science |
Dec-03-11 01:05 PM |
#98 |
| -
K & R |
Scurrilous |
Dec-02-11 08:35 PM |
#37 |
| -
Hmm loyalty oaths, I find them offensive, no matter who does them |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-02-11 08:37 PM |
#38 |
| -
"work together toward common goals" = loyalty oath? |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 09:05 PM |
#40 |
| -
Read the whole op, it is time to chose sides |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-02-11 09:18 PM |
#41 |
| -
I guess I can see that, the sides being "those who work for democracy" and "those who don't." |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 10:08 PM |
#43 |
| -
Actually those who work for this party |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-02-11 10:47 PM |
#44 |
| -
You don't have to work for this party to "work for common goals." |
joshcryer |
Dec-02-11 10:57 PM |
#45 |
| -
We need a democrat in the White House who will work for common goals ... general welfare ... |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:34 PM |
#57 |
| -
Loyalty oaths are disgusting |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-02-11 11:38 PM |
#59 |
| -
No loyalty oath was proposed by me. I wouldn't do that. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 11:47 AM |
#84 |
| -
Good to know because that is how it reads. |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-03-11 12:25 PM |
#87 |
| -
No, actually that is not how it reads. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 12:28 PM |
#89 |
| -
That is how it reads and I am not alone interpreting it that way |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-03-11 12:56 PM |
#92 |
| -
I have no doubt that you will vote and do nothing else. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 01:01 PM |
#93 |
| -
Oh I will be doing other things |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-03-11 01:04 PM |
#95 |
| -
More like dividing line ... those who criticize Obama and those who want it stopped -- |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:32 PM |
#56 |
| -
A call for criticism of Obama to be shut down -- and .... |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:26 PM |
#55 |
| -
Well said, Nadin. |
sabrina 1 |
Dec-02-11 11:07 PM |
#46 |
| -
+1 -- |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:34 PM |
#58 |
| -
How charming. Where did I suggest anything similar to a |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 09:22 AM |
#60 |
| -
Apparently, your OP didn't attack Obama sufficiently. |
JoePhilly |
Dec-03-11 09:31 AM |
#62 |
| -
Thanks for interpreting my post. That does seem to be what |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 09:37 AM |
#64 |
| -
I say this all the time ... |
JoePhilly |
Dec-03-11 09:49 AM |
#66 |
| -
It's interesting, to be sure. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 09:59 AM |
#68 |
| -
Agree completely .... Great point. nt |
JoePhilly |
Dec-03-11 10:02 AM |
#71 |
| -
"Obama hasn't accomplished all we hoped for" ...???? ROFL |
defendandprotect |
Dec-02-11 11:09 PM |
#47 |
| -
A Democratic challenger to Obama? Why are they not lining up |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 10:00 AM |
#69 |
| -
Do you think corporate money backing Obama might have something to do with it? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 11:25 AM |
#80 |
| -
Then they should step up and declare their candidacy. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 11:39 AM |
#83 |
| -
How about Obama should "step up" and give up corporate money ... ??? |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 12:18 PM |
#86 |
| -
I don't know. You could email him with your suggestion. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 01:02 PM |
#94 |
| -
If Obama was paying any attention to the public, OWS wouldn't exist -- !! |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 01:27 PM |
#100 |
| -
. |
dionysus |
Dec-03-11 10:35 AM |
#76 |
| -
Flypaper. Ick. nt |
Bonobo |
Dec-02-11 11:12 PM |
#48 |
| -
Lotta that, tonight. nt |
Poll_Blind |
Dec-02-11 11:15 PM |
#50 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Dec-02-11 11:24 PM |
#54 |
| -
It will be a miracle if he is re-elected. |
Safetykitten |
Dec-03-11 09:57 AM |
#67 |
| -
I think you are very mistaken in that view. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 10:03 AM |
#72 |
| -
. |
dionysus |
Dec-03-11 10:35 AM |
#77 |
| -
I remember in that half hour ad he made |
treestar |
Dec-03-11 10:01 AM |
#70 |
| -
Yes. There has never been a perfect President, because there |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 10:08 AM |
#73 |
| -
I don't see that OWS is calling for a "perfect president" -- just an end to Wall St. agenda -- !! |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 11:28 AM |
#81 |
| -
OWS is calling for many things, and that's wonderful. |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 11:35 AM |
#82 |
| -
Eh ... Obama is Wall Street -- OWS is anti-Wall Street -- |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 12:17 PM |
#85 |
| -
As I said, time's a'wasting. If you don't find someone to stand |
MineralMan |
Dec-03-11 12:27 PM |
#88 |
| -
You really need to read on the history of social movements |
nadinbrzezinski |
Dec-03-11 01:14 PM |
#99 |
| -
Again, you're ignoring history -- OWS has already moved government to the LEFT ... !! |
defendandprotect |
Dec-03-11 01:31 PM |
#101 |
| -
Countdown to the end of the world |
demicritic |
Dec-03-11 01:04 PM |
#96 |
| -
Uptick of passive aggressive posts on GD recently |
hulka38 |
Dec-03-11 01:59 PM |
#102 |
| -
2012 begins the month after December -that's generally how it works |
CreekDog |
Dec-03-11 02:05 PM |
#103 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread