| 129. Re "beholden", yeah, and We the People had absolutely nothing to do with the Dem's(or anyone-else's) |
|
failures to read our minds.
Innocent us. We all just showed up yesterday to discover the little puppy we had put into the hen-house grown fat on Blood for Oil amongst other things we wanted and then didn't.
Anyone who has been around political parties much KNOWS that they are social organizations at the grassroots level, AMERICANS content to NOT ask the hard questions or do any hard work, like canvassing, a fact that changed for Republicans with their use of CHURCHES, and a fact that the Democrats have only just now started to admit, perhaps tooooooooooo late.
Our politics are the result of who/what we are. Authoritarians capitulate to authority, especially money in our culture.
We did a significant part of what has happened to ourselves; no party label of anykind/color would have changed that.
|
| -Fake forum commenters 'eroding' trust in the web - BBC |
sixmile |
Nov-26-11 02:38 PM |
#0 |
 -
Describing them as "people" is rather misleading. |
TheWraith |
Nov-26-11 02:41 PM |
#1 |
  -
Ever debated a Troll? |
sixmile |
Nov-26-11 02:51 PM |
#3 |
| -
Yeah, but obfuscating stupidity is different from paid astroturf. ;) nt |
TheWraith |
Nov-26-11 03:36 PM |
#12 |
| -
I've seen a lot of really nasty ones on YouTube who sound like they could be Establishment shills... |
AverageJoe90 |
Nov-27-11 11:01 PM |
#179 |
| -
I'm not worried. They'll try to automate it so as not to have to pay people |
annabanana |
Nov-26-11 02:41 PM |
#2 |
| -
Commercials should be clearly labeled as such. nt |
woo me with science |
Nov-26-11 02:51 PM |
#4 |
| -
All your comment |
Jackpine Radical |
Nov-27-11 02:15 PM |
#127 |
| -
How many fake forum commenting agents provocateurs does the BBC and other powers-that-be employ |
phasma ex machina |
Nov-26-11 02:57 PM |
#5 |
| -
As many red herrings as grow in the wood. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Nov-27-11 10:27 AM |
#63 |
| -
I think the vast majority are GOP paid operatives. |
DCBob |
Nov-26-11 03:01 PM |
#6 |
| -
If I managed a Marketing/PR firm For Corporate/Wall Street America, |
bvar22 |
Nov-26-11 03:25 PM |
#9 |
| -
If I were the GOP, and controlled the media, |
Robb |
Nov-26-11 03:33 PM |
#11 |
| -
Help me out here. |
bvar22 |
Nov-26-11 03:39 PM |
#13 |
| -
How do you define "Alternative Media," exactly? |
Robb |
Nov-26-11 03:43 PM |
#14 |
| -
Robb...Come On...Alternative Media is now many sites banned on DU... |
KoKo |
Nov-26-11 08:20 PM |
#28 |
| -
How do we learn which sites are banned afrom mentioning (?) on D.U.? |
Mimosa |
Nov-27-11 10:21 AM |
#61 |
| -
It's for "Some to Know" and "You and Me" not to know....??? |
KoKo |
Nov-27-11 07:37 PM |
#167 |
| -
I know of 2 ultra-right-wing sites that are forbidden to mention here. |
Quantess |
Nov-28-11 04:40 AM |
#187 |
| -
Thanks, I found them. |
Mimosa |
Nov-28-11 10:08 AM |
#199 |
| -
Evasion. You know he's right. nt |
caseymoz |
Nov-27-11 12:35 PM |
#84 |
| -
Alternative media is not paid for by advertising or corporations. What's so hard about that? |
saras |
Nov-27-11 04:59 PM |
#165 |
| -
There is no such beast. |
Robb |
Nov-28-11 03:50 PM |
#201 |
| -
"I have to search the Alternative Media to find any commentators from The Left." |
phasma ex machina |
Nov-26-11 03:59 PM |
#16 |
| -
Wait - you were serious, then ? |
muriel_volestrangler |
Nov-26-11 07:44 PM |
#27 |
| -
Oh, me too. Please. |
Laelth |
Nov-27-11 11:39 AM |
#80 |
| -
+1...nt |
SidDithers |
Nov-26-11 03:50 PM |
#15 |
| -
we know how you feel about many of us |
CreekDog |
Nov-26-11 10:27 PM |
#37 |
| -
I should think a person paid to post by the GOP |
JDPriestly |
Nov-27-11 11:32 AM |
#77 |
| -
1+++ |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 12:52 PM |
#88 |
| -
So why are so many "centrist" commenters such condescending assholes? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:29 PM |
#100 |
| -
They already do that. The only 'democrats' I ever see on the MSM |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 01:35 PM |
#105 |
| -
Your posts consistently |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 02:13 PM |
#125 |
| -
We have two kinds of media, Republican and establishment (whomever the establishment |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 04:24 AM |
#184 |
| -
'divisive commentators on the left ' |
Rex |
Nov-27-11 02:44 PM |
#140 |
| -
I'd like them to identify one with a following in numbers that would have any impact on an election |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 04:03 PM |
#161 |
| -
It was rhetorical. |
Rex |
Nov-27-11 04:31 PM |
#163 |
| -
Isn't that what the DLC was designed to do? nt |
Lucky Luciano |
Nov-26-11 10:40 PM |
#43 |
| -
No. It was to neuter the Democratic Party. |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 04:29 AM |
#185 |
| -
I strongly disagree. |
JNelson6563 |
Nov-27-11 10:03 AM |
#54 |
| -
Yep, "divide and conquer" |
GoCubsGo |
Nov-27-11 11:07 AM |
#67 |
| -
But for your theory to work |
hulka38 |
Nov-27-11 12:33 PM |
#83 |
| -
"Lifelong Dems" |
JNelson6563 |
Nov-27-11 01:25 PM |
#97 |
| -
"real grown ups in the big campaigns" huh? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:42 PM |
#109 |
| -
Ther gaping hole in your rebuttal is that... |
bvar22 |
Nov-27-11 02:58 PM |
#147 |
| -
Excellent post, thank you. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 03:48 PM |
#154 |
| -
Paul Krugman, who was their BFF during the health care debate is now UTB |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 03:52 PM |
#158 |
| -
Whaddaya tryin' to do? Kill a meme? |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 04:37 AM |
#186 |
| -
Yeah, those "real grown-ups" here in Michigan sure promoted our last candidate. NOT. |
PassingFair |
Nov-27-11 10:54 PM |
#178 |
| -
Just because they are informed doesn't me they're immune to discouragement. |
GoCubsGo |
Nov-27-11 01:29 PM |
#99 |
| -
+ a brazillion |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:32 PM |
#102 |
| -
Re "beholden", yeah, and We the People had absolutely nothing to do with the Dem's(or anyone-else's) |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:18 PM |
#129 |
| -
This is a damn good post. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 02:24 PM |
#131 |
| -
"...Work(ing) to co-opt..." can also result in being co-opted, another reason that it is avoided. It |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:01 PM |
#89 |
| -
Wow, if only the WH, DNC, DSCC, DCCC etc |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:37 PM |
#106 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 01:43 PM |
#110 |
| -
I'm not a believer in supernatural phenomena |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:51 PM |
#116 |
| -
So, can you give us some examples of these 'patterns' you see |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 01:45 PM |
#112 |
| -
Thank you. This is classic projection. |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:54 PM |
#117 |
| -
Woo hooo! |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 02:40 PM |
#139 |
| -
"Party of Wall Street" |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:09 AM |
#191 |
| -
Offering certain alternatives violates DU rules. |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:06 AM |
#190 |
| -
That appears to be the M.O., BVar. n/t |
Mimosa |
Nov-27-11 10:11 AM |
#57 |
| -
bvar22, it appears your strategy has been successfully employed. |
Laelth |
Nov-27-11 11:35 AM |
#78 |
| -
Yeah. Relentlessly promote core GOP ideology under the "big tent" meme. |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 11:38 AM |
#79 |
| -
I agree with you, Bvar22. n/t |
Blue_In_AK |
Nov-27-11 01:08 PM |
#91 |
| -
That's what I would do also. Infiltrate the party. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 01:32 PM |
#103 |
| -
I really wish the DLC crowd would go back to the GOP where they belong |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 04:48 PM |
#164 |
| -
Looks like you smoked a few out |
Union Scribe |
Nov-27-11 01:32 PM |
#104 |
| -
Interesting video |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:05 AM |
#189 |
| -
+ 1,000 |
SpiralHawk |
Nov-26-11 09:31 PM |
#35 |
| -
Remember the clumsy anti-Tibet posts from new, low count posters right before the 2008 Olympics? |
CreekDog |
Nov-26-11 10:31 PM |
#40 |
| -
It's painfully obvious this is true in responses to news articles posted at RoadRunner. |
Pacifist Patriot |
Nov-27-11 06:26 AM |
#52 |
| -
I agree. |
Rex |
Nov-27-11 02:47 PM |
#142 |
| -
Remember all the "fake commentators" on DU during the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster? |
lutefisk |
Nov-26-11 03:12 PM |
#7 |
| -
yup |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-26-11 03:14 PM |
#8 |
| -
Watch the Iran commenters across the interwebs |
sixmile |
Nov-26-11 03:25 PM |
#10 |
| -
They stand out like a sore thumb as do Chinese commenters. |
snagglepuss |
Nov-26-11 07:02 PM |
#24 |
| -
I'd be especially wary of those fervently defending the government and/or bashing Israel.... |
AverageJoe90 |
Nov-27-11 11:03 PM |
#180 |
| -
You meant THESE posts? |
bvar22 |
Nov-26-11 05:18 PM |
#18 |
| -
LOL You've summed them up in a nutshell |
MichaelMcGuire |
Nov-26-11 05:26 PM |
#20 |
| -
'However, fakes can be spotted by analysing their patterns of activity and the words they use ... |
GeorgeGist |
Nov-27-11 10:04 AM |
#55 |
| -
And I'm wondering about the deadly exploding batteries in the |
Sal Minella |
Nov-26-11 05:55 PM |
#22 |
| -
Or big phama. A few lurk regularly in the health forum |
Lorien |
Nov-27-11 11:13 AM |
#69 |
| -
I've got some facebook friends who are pro-nuke zealots |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:58 PM |
#120 |
| -
THAT'S THE ONES! |
Rex |
Nov-27-11 02:49 PM |
#143 |
| -
They've swooped in destroyed Huffington Post... n/t |
taught_me_patience |
Nov-26-11 04:00 PM |
#17 |
| -
Have you been over to "TPM's site recently? |
KoKo |
Nov-26-11 07:18 PM |
#26 |
| -
HuffPo destroyed itself with fluff and woo. |
Odin2005 |
Nov-26-11 08:46 PM |
#32 |
| -
By selling out to AOL and not paying their writers. That was BS and made |
cui bono |
Nov-26-11 10:27 PM |
#38 |
| -
True, but the paid trolls had already crapped the place up. |
GoCubsGo |
Nov-27-11 11:01 AM |
#66 |
| -
Point taken! |
Odin2005 |
Nov-27-11 01:19 PM |
#92 |
| -
+1 |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:00 AM |
#188 |
| -
The bbc pretty much shuts off comment from their site anyway |
MichaelMcGuire |
Nov-26-11 05:24 PM |
#19 |
| -
The 1% have LOTS of money to pay for this sort of thing, and I guarantee |
kestrel91316 |
Nov-26-11 05:29 PM |
#21 |
| -
. |
fascisthunter |
Nov-26-11 06:12 PM |
#23 |
| -
Yep. And their main objective is to stop OWS. There are no other threats |
Zorra |
Nov-26-11 09:07 PM |
#33 |
| -
I agree with you. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 02:51 PM |
#145 |
| -
"They have no message." |
bvar22 |
Nov-27-11 03:32 PM |
#151 |
| -
Oh these "Bots" are all over the web on the most respectable of sites which one would |
KoKo |
Nov-26-11 07:16 PM |
#25 |
| -
Gee, that doesn't sound like anyone here. |
eShirl |
Nov-26-11 08:29 PM |
#29 |
| -
I think this thread if just fucking hilarious.. |
Fumesucker |
Nov-26-11 08:39 PM |
#30 |
| -
We have a bunch of them here bashing Progressives. |
Odin2005 |
Nov-26-11 08:43 PM |
#31 |
| -
Oh please... |
ellisonz |
Nov-26-11 09:59 PM |
#36 |
| -
Really? Really..... |
DainBramaged |
Nov-26-11 10:31 PM |
#41 |
| -
Somebody get this guy a helmet... |
ellisonz |
Nov-26-11 10:40 PM |
#44 |
| -
Go back to sleep............... |
DainBramaged |
Nov-27-11 03:27 AM |
#45 |
| -
I can't remember what the topic was now |
JanMichael |
Nov-27-11 06:03 AM |
#50 |
| -
HFCS is big money, a major industry. |
Mimosa |
Nov-27-11 10:16 AM |
#58 |
| -
I'll bet they succeed too.. and if by some miracle they don't win |
russspeakeasy |
Nov-27-11 11:18 AM |
#73 |
| -
It gets discouraging when they succeed at everything. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 03:05 PM |
#150 |
| -
There isn't? |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 02:55 PM |
#146 |
| -
+1 |
cui bono |
Nov-26-11 10:30 PM |
#39 |
| -
Yes, the Democratic party. Do you really think that pro-Obama posters are out of line |
muriel_volestrangler |
Nov-27-11 04:51 AM |
#46 |
| -
Obama is solidly in the mainstream of the Democratic party - Sadly, This may be true |
panzerfaust |
Nov-27-11 06:03 AM |
#49 |
| -
Support of those issues would mean the democratic party offers a genuine alternative. n/t |
Mimosa |
Nov-27-11 10:17 AM |
#59 |
| -
"A genuine alternative" is undesirable to financial markets; and the golden rule prevails. |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:23 AM |
#192 |
| -
The Democratic Party used to support "rights", |
bvar22 |
Nov-27-11 11:13 AM |
#70 |
| -
Free trade and austerity are mainstream Dem positions? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:12 PM |
#124 |
| -
Americans, especially Democratic Party Americans, HATE |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 03:47 PM |
#153 |
| -
You missed the memo! |
a simple pattern |
Nov-27-11 10:19 AM |
#60 |
| -
How do you differentiate between "bashing" and horizontal processing? nt |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:25 PM |
#96 |
| -
LOL, WUT? |
Odin2005 |
Nov-27-11 01:40 PM |
#108 |
| -
Horizontal, as in Occupation general assemblies, which include occupiers who disagree with one |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:47 PM |
#113 |
| -
Fucking kidding? |
bluestate10 |
Nov-27-11 06:29 PM |
#166 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-26-11 09:12 PM |
#34 |
| -
Go to any article on any mainstream newspaper or news site... |
backscatter712 |
Nov-26-11 10:38 PM |
#42 |
| -
I noticed that, backscatter712 |
a simple pattern |
Nov-27-11 10:24 AM |
#62 |
| -
Right here in River City |
Jim Warren |
Nov-27-11 04:54 AM |
#47 |
| -
??? The significance of this remark escapes me |
panzerfaust |
Nov-27-11 06:08 AM |
#51 |
| -
DU must be designed wrong. |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:23 PM |
#95 |
| -
Information provided by random, unknown persons is not to be trusted?? |
panzerfaust |
Nov-27-11 05:49 AM |
#48 |
| -
It's esp. obvious on smaller blogs – when there are virtually NO comments on post after post, |
snot |
Nov-27-11 09:21 AM |
#53 |
| -
Don't they mean bought and paid for right wing posters. |
sarcasmo |
Nov-27-11 10:06 AM |
#56 |
| -
Paid posters should be required to disclose the fact. It's advertising, disguised as speech. |
DirkGently |
Nov-27-11 10:45 AM |
#64 |
| -
Agreed. Instead one dare not even ask the question |
Lorien |
Nov-27-11 11:15 AM |
#72 |
| -
That's one of the best ideas that I have heard on the subject. |
Response |
Nov-27-11 12:48 PM |
#87 |
| -
I've often wondered why this area isn't regulated. Commerical speech should be transparent. |
DirkGently |
Nov-28-11 12:32 PM |
#200 |
| -
Much can be revealed by asking them questions. A poster can refuse to answer just so often before |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:28 PM |
#98 |
| -
That is true. Eg, anyone who will not support SS, Medicare |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 01:49 PM |
#114 |
| -
Oh! I'm a Medicare Reform supporter. Have SEEN it up close and personal. |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:56 PM |
#119 |
| -
So what does the proposed deep cut to providers have to do with eliminating fraud? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:16 PM |
#128 |
| -
If you'll look at HR 676, I think you'll find payments in general to be reviewed, this would include |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:25 PM |
#132 |
| -
AND - This isn't just about fraud. Have you ever been around a CMS reporting system? |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:28 PM |
#133 |
| -
No I haven't. Can you explain how cuts to providers will adress that? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:30 PM |
#136 |
| -
I think you can read the bill and decide for yourself, can't you? I have to take some food to our |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:35 PM |
#137 |
| -
HR676? Are we getting Medicare for all with this provider cut? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:46 PM |
#141 |
| -
Physicians for a National Health Program: HR 676 Expanded & Improved Medicare for All Act |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:30 PM |
#134 |
| -
The point being, if cuts are appropriate, they'll be proportional to their in-efficiencies. |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:30 PM |
#135 |
| -
Heh |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:49 PM |
#144 |
| -
Please source "deep". Thanks! nt |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:39 PM |
#138 |
| -
Well, I didn't address that in my comment. My point was that |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 03:42 PM |
#152 |
| -
No one should be against your Medicare proposals. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 03:55 PM |
#160 |
| -
Doing one's best to eliminate fraud and waste in a program is not "reforming" that program. |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:36 AM |
#193 |
| -
Agreed. nt |
Enthusiast |
Nov-28-11 08:53 AM |
#197 |
| -
Please see Reply 195, |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:39 AM |
#194 |
| -
BTW, after passage of the ACA, Bernie Sanders said he supported Medicare reform and he |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:59 PM |
#121 |
| -
He does not support raising the age as is now being proposed. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 03:51 PM |
#156 |
| -
Plus one! |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 03:52 PM |
#157 |
| -
I call them on it when I run into them on my local paper's board. |
BiggJawn |
Nov-27-11 10:52 AM |
#65 |
| -
I'm going to have to remember that one. |
GoCubsGo |
Nov-27-11 11:09 AM |
#68 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 01:29 PM |
#101 |
| -
The editorials in the papers around here are nothing but regurgitated press releases. |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:18 PM |
#130 |
| -
And the fakers here to direct what they don't like to other forums to keep attention off |
DainBramaged |
Nov-27-11 11:14 AM |
#71 |
| -
One way to identify them; they generally post about a single issue, and never |
Lorien |
Nov-27-11 11:18 AM |
#74 |
| -
Here's some great info from an earlier post on a different thread, |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 01:20 PM |
#94 |
| -
Wow. Fascinating. Thanks for that, hadn't seen it the first time around. |
cui bono |
Nov-27-11 03:55 PM |
#159 |
| -
There's a reason that earlier thread is in the Woo-Woo Dungeon...nt |
SidDithers |
Nov-27-11 07:57 PM |
#169 |
| -
No, the thread I'm speaking of was actually posted today, a bit after this one. |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 08:40 PM |
#172 |
| -
Just following the link you provided in your post... |
SidDithers |
Nov-27-11 08:52 PM |
#174 |
| -
LOL, Lorien. You nailed it. |
Mimosa |
Nov-27-11 03:02 PM |
#148 |
| -
The word troll is arguably one of the most overused words on the itnernet. |
Quartermass |
Nov-27-11 11:20 AM |
#75 |
| -
Somebody paid you to say that, didn't they? |
MilesColtrane |
Nov-27-11 11:39 AM |
#81 |
| -
We need a troll sub-species for these people. Anyone have a good name? |
jimlup |
Nov-27-11 11:26 AM |
#76 |
| -
Here's one: Stupidius trollius. xD |
AverageJoe90 |
Nov-27-11 11:04 PM |
#181 |
| -
talk radio paid callers is good value. & citizens united money means going to see a lot more of both |
certainot |
Nov-27-11 11:47 AM |
#82 |
| -
remember - the one absolute proof of someone being a troll is that they deny being a troll |
Douglas Carpenter |
Nov-27-11 12:40 PM |
#85 |
| -
Lol! |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 01:55 PM |
#118 |
| -
Good one, Douglas. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 04:17 PM |
#162 |
| -
LOL! n/t |
tammywammy |
Nov-27-11 11:39 PM |
#183 |
| -
Let's face it. Corporations all have their agents, provocateurs and crumbots. |
caseymoz |
Nov-27-11 12:47 PM |
#86 |
| -
I trust posters here and huffpo |
PatrynXX |
Nov-27-11 01:05 PM |
#90 |
| -
a couple more threads discussing this topic |
darth marth |
Nov-27-11 01:19 PM |
#93 |
| -
Lol! you beat me by a minute |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 01:38 PM |
#107 |
| -
+ a million - Should be required reading here. AND WE SHOULD DISCUSS this kind of stuff when we |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:44 PM |
#111 |
| -
I laugh when posters pull threads from the Conspiracy Theory dungeon to try to prove their point... |
SidDithers |
Nov-27-11 07:59 PM |
#170 |
| -
"Hey, look, ma! It's another red herring!" |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 08:49 PM |
#173 |
| -
BHN's thread wasn't posted in the Conspiracy Theory forum... |
SidDithers |
Nov-27-11 08:56 PM |
#176 |
| -
And that proves what? That's actually extremely disturbing when you think about it. |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 11:33 PM |
#182 |
| -
Fast simple rules to make your DU less polluted by paid trolls... |
Evasporque |
Nov-28-11 09:19 AM |
#198 |
| -
Won't work |
aletier_v |
Nov-27-11 01:50 PM |
#115 |
| -
Agree. Software won't work. You have to do it yourself. |
McCamy Taylor |
Nov-27-11 02:11 PM |
#123 |
| -
Here is my fool proof plan for messing with the corporatew poster. Figure out which industry |
McCamy Taylor |
Nov-27-11 02:10 PM |
#122 |
| -
Another clue: anyone whose detailed knowledge of an industry or issue seems at odds with his "just |
McCamy Taylor |
Nov-27-11 02:14 PM |
#126 |
| -
"Anyone who posts anything in support of China's occupation of Tibet is a paid Chinese poster"... |
SidDithers |
Nov-27-11 08:02 PM |
#171 |
| -
Yes, I don't even bother anymore at the local paper.... |
WCGreen |
Nov-27-11 03:04 PM |
#149 |
| -
I remember reading a hilariously dishonest example a few months ago. |
chrisa |
Nov-27-11 03:48 PM |
#155 |
| -
Some of it, I think, is driven by a weird form of actual mental illness |
Warren DeMontague |
Nov-27-11 07:47 PM |
#168 |
| -
Spot on... |
Bobbie Jo |
Nov-27-11 08:54 PM |
#175 |
| -
Ha! |
Number23 |
Nov-27-11 10:34 PM |
#177 |
| -
Yup... |
SidDithers |
Nov-28-11 08:02 AM |
#195 |
| -
They'll post at wee-hours to have the "last word" for at least a few hours too. |
Populist_Prole |
Nov-28-11 04:26 PM |
#202 |
| -
I guess that's 62.43% of the people on DU including me |
snooper2 |
Nov-28-11 08:38 AM |
#196 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore