| 96. How do you differentiate between "bashing" and horizontal processing? nt |
| -Fake forum commenters 'eroding' trust in the web - BBC |
sixmile |
Nov-26-11 02:38 PM |
#0 |
 -
Describing them as "people" is rather misleading. |
TheWraith |
Nov-26-11 02:41 PM |
#1 |
  -
Ever debated a Troll? |
sixmile |
Nov-26-11 02:51 PM |
#3 |
| -
Yeah, but obfuscating stupidity is different from paid astroturf. ;) nt |
TheWraith |
Nov-26-11 03:36 PM |
#12 |
| -
I've seen a lot of really nasty ones on YouTube who sound like they could be Establishment shills... |
AverageJoe90 |
Nov-27-11 11:01 PM |
#179 |
| -
I'm not worried. They'll try to automate it so as not to have to pay people |
annabanana |
Nov-26-11 02:41 PM |
#2 |
| -
Commercials should be clearly labeled as such. nt |
woo me with science |
Nov-26-11 02:51 PM |
#4 |
| -
All your comment |
Jackpine Radical |
Nov-27-11 02:15 PM |
#127 |
| -
How many fake forum commenting agents provocateurs does the BBC and other powers-that-be employ |
phasma ex machina |
Nov-26-11 02:57 PM |
#5 |
| -
As many red herrings as grow in the wood. |
Donald Ian Rankin |
Nov-27-11 10:27 AM |
#63 |
| -
I think the vast majority are GOP paid operatives. |
DCBob |
Nov-26-11 03:01 PM |
#6 |
| -
If I managed a Marketing/PR firm For Corporate/Wall Street America, |
bvar22 |
Nov-26-11 03:25 PM |
#9 |
| -
If I were the GOP, and controlled the media, |
Robb |
Nov-26-11 03:33 PM |
#11 |
| -
Help me out here. |
bvar22 |
Nov-26-11 03:39 PM |
#13 |
| -
How do you define "Alternative Media," exactly? |
Robb |
Nov-26-11 03:43 PM |
#14 |
| -
Robb...Come On...Alternative Media is now many sites banned on DU... |
KoKo |
Nov-26-11 08:20 PM |
#28 |
| -
How do we learn which sites are banned afrom mentioning (?) on D.U.? |
Mimosa |
Nov-27-11 10:21 AM |
#61 |
| -
It's for "Some to Know" and "You and Me" not to know....??? |
KoKo |
Nov-27-11 07:37 PM |
#167 |
| -
I know of 2 ultra-right-wing sites that are forbidden to mention here. |
Quantess |
Nov-28-11 04:40 AM |
#187 |
| -
Thanks, I found them. |
Mimosa |
Nov-28-11 10:08 AM |
#199 |
| -
Evasion. You know he's right. nt |
caseymoz |
Nov-27-11 12:35 PM |
#84 |
| -
Alternative media is not paid for by advertising or corporations. What's so hard about that? |
saras |
Nov-27-11 04:59 PM |
#165 |
| -
There is no such beast. |
Robb |
Nov-28-11 03:50 PM |
#201 |
| -
"I have to search the Alternative Media to find any commentators from The Left." |
phasma ex machina |
Nov-26-11 03:59 PM |
#16 |
| -
Wait - you were serious, then ? |
muriel_volestrangler |
Nov-26-11 07:44 PM |
#27 |
| -
Oh, me too. Please. |
Laelth |
Nov-27-11 11:39 AM |
#80 |
| -
+1...nt |
SidDithers |
Nov-26-11 03:50 PM |
#15 |
| -
we know how you feel about many of us |
CreekDog |
Nov-26-11 10:27 PM |
#37 |
| -
I should think a person paid to post by the GOP |
JDPriestly |
Nov-27-11 11:32 AM |
#77 |
| -
1+++ |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 12:52 PM |
#88 |
| -
So why are so many "centrist" commenters such condescending assholes? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:29 PM |
#100 |
| -
They already do that. The only 'democrats' I ever see on the MSM |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 01:35 PM |
#105 |
| -
Your posts consistently |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 02:13 PM |
#125 |
| -
We have two kinds of media, Republican and establishment (whomever the establishment |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 04:24 AM |
#184 |
| -
'divisive commentators on the left ' |
Rex |
Nov-27-11 02:44 PM |
#140 |
| -
I'd like them to identify one with a following in numbers that would have any impact on an election |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 04:03 PM |
#161 |
| -
It was rhetorical. |
Rex |
Nov-27-11 04:31 PM |
#163 |
| -
Isn't that what the DLC was designed to do? nt |
Lucky Luciano |
Nov-26-11 10:40 PM |
#43 |
| -
No. It was to neuter the Democratic Party. |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 04:29 AM |
#185 |
| -
I strongly disagree. |
JNelson6563 |
Nov-27-11 10:03 AM |
#54 |
| -
Yep, "divide and conquer" |
GoCubsGo |
Nov-27-11 11:07 AM |
#67 |
| -
But for your theory to work |
hulka38 |
Nov-27-11 12:33 PM |
#83 |
| -
"Lifelong Dems" |
JNelson6563 |
Nov-27-11 01:25 PM |
#97 |
| -
"real grown ups in the big campaigns" huh? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:42 PM |
#109 |
| -
Ther gaping hole in your rebuttal is that... |
bvar22 |
Nov-27-11 02:58 PM |
#147 |
| -
Excellent post, thank you. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 03:48 PM |
#154 |
| -
Paul Krugman, who was their BFF during the health care debate is now UTB |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 03:52 PM |
#158 |
| -
Whaddaya tryin' to do? Kill a meme? |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 04:37 AM |
#186 |
| -
Yeah, those "real grown-ups" here in Michigan sure promoted our last candidate. NOT. |
PassingFair |
Nov-27-11 10:54 PM |
#178 |
| -
Just because they are informed doesn't me they're immune to discouragement. |
GoCubsGo |
Nov-27-11 01:29 PM |
#99 |
| -
+ a brazillion |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:32 PM |
#102 |
| -
Re "beholden", yeah, and We the People had absolutely nothing to do with the Dem's(or anyone-else's) |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:18 PM |
#129 |
| -
This is a damn good post. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 02:24 PM |
#131 |
| -
"...Work(ing) to co-opt..." can also result in being co-opted, another reason that it is avoided. It |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:01 PM |
#89 |
| -
Wow, if only the WH, DNC, DSCC, DCCC etc |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:37 PM |
#106 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 01:43 PM |
#110 |
| -
I'm not a believer in supernatural phenomena |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:51 PM |
#116 |
| -
So, can you give us some examples of these 'patterns' you see |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 01:45 PM |
#112 |
| -
Thank you. This is classic projection. |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:54 PM |
#117 |
| -
Woo hooo! |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 02:40 PM |
#139 |
| -
"Party of Wall Street" |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:09 AM |
#191 |
| -
Offering certain alternatives violates DU rules. |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:06 AM |
#190 |
| -
That appears to be the M.O., BVar. n/t |
Mimosa |
Nov-27-11 10:11 AM |
#57 |
| -
bvar22, it appears your strategy has been successfully employed. |
Laelth |
Nov-27-11 11:35 AM |
#78 |
| -
Yeah. Relentlessly promote core GOP ideology under the "big tent" meme. |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 11:38 AM |
#79 |
| -
I agree with you, Bvar22. n/t |
Blue_In_AK |
Nov-27-11 01:08 PM |
#91 |
| -
That's what I would do also. Infiltrate the party. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 01:32 PM |
#103 |
| -
I really wish the DLC crowd would go back to the GOP where they belong |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 04:48 PM |
#164 |
| -
Looks like you smoked a few out |
Union Scribe |
Nov-27-11 01:32 PM |
#104 |
| -
Interesting video |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:05 AM |
#189 |
| -
+ 1,000 |
SpiralHawk |
Nov-26-11 09:31 PM |
#35 |
| -
Remember the clumsy anti-Tibet posts from new, low count posters right before the 2008 Olympics? |
CreekDog |
Nov-26-11 10:31 PM |
#40 |
| -
It's painfully obvious this is true in responses to news articles posted at RoadRunner. |
Pacifist Patriot |
Nov-27-11 06:26 AM |
#52 |
| -
I agree. |
Rex |
Nov-27-11 02:47 PM |
#142 |
| -
Remember all the "fake commentators" on DU during the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster? |
lutefisk |
Nov-26-11 03:12 PM |
#7 |
| -
yup |
nadinbrzezinski |
Nov-26-11 03:14 PM |
#8 |
| -
Watch the Iran commenters across the interwebs |
sixmile |
Nov-26-11 03:25 PM |
#10 |
| -
They stand out like a sore thumb as do Chinese commenters. |
snagglepuss |
Nov-26-11 07:02 PM |
#24 |
| -
I'd be especially wary of those fervently defending the government and/or bashing Israel.... |
AverageJoe90 |
Nov-27-11 11:03 PM |
#180 |
| -
You meant THESE posts? |
bvar22 |
Nov-26-11 05:18 PM |
#18 |
| -
LOL You've summed them up in a nutshell |
MichaelMcGuire |
Nov-26-11 05:26 PM |
#20 |
| -
'However, fakes can be spotted by analysing their patterns of activity and the words they use ... |
GeorgeGist |
Nov-27-11 10:04 AM |
#55 |
| -
And I'm wondering about the deadly exploding batteries in the |
Sal Minella |
Nov-26-11 05:55 PM |
#22 |
| -
Or big phama. A few lurk regularly in the health forum |
Lorien |
Nov-27-11 11:13 AM |
#69 |
| -
I've got some facebook friends who are pro-nuke zealots |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 01:58 PM |
#120 |
| -
THAT'S THE ONES! |
Rex |
Nov-27-11 02:49 PM |
#143 |
| -
They've swooped in destroyed Huffington Post... n/t |
taught_me_patience |
Nov-26-11 04:00 PM |
#17 |
| -
Have you been over to "TPM's site recently? |
KoKo |
Nov-26-11 07:18 PM |
#26 |
| -
HuffPo destroyed itself with fluff and woo. |
Odin2005 |
Nov-26-11 08:46 PM |
#32 |
| -
By selling out to AOL and not paying their writers. That was BS and made |
cui bono |
Nov-26-11 10:27 PM |
#38 |
| -
True, but the paid trolls had already crapped the place up. |
GoCubsGo |
Nov-27-11 11:01 AM |
#66 |
| -
Point taken! |
Odin2005 |
Nov-27-11 01:19 PM |
#92 |
| -
+1 |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:00 AM |
#188 |
| -
The bbc pretty much shuts off comment from their site anyway |
MichaelMcGuire |
Nov-26-11 05:24 PM |
#19 |
| -
The 1% have LOTS of money to pay for this sort of thing, and I guarantee |
kestrel91316 |
Nov-26-11 05:29 PM |
#21 |
| -
. |
fascisthunter |
Nov-26-11 06:12 PM |
#23 |
| -
Yep. And their main objective is to stop OWS. There are no other threats |
Zorra |
Nov-26-11 09:07 PM |
#33 |
| -
I agree with you. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 02:51 PM |
#145 |
| -
"They have no message." |
bvar22 |
Nov-27-11 03:32 PM |
#151 |
| -
Oh these "Bots" are all over the web on the most respectable of sites which one would |
KoKo |
Nov-26-11 07:16 PM |
#25 |
| -
Gee, that doesn't sound like anyone here. |
eShirl |
Nov-26-11 08:29 PM |
#29 |
| -
I think this thread if just fucking hilarious.. |
Fumesucker |
Nov-26-11 08:39 PM |
#30 |
| -
We have a bunch of them here bashing Progressives. |
Odin2005 |
Nov-26-11 08:43 PM |
#31 |
| -
Oh please... |
ellisonz |
Nov-26-11 09:59 PM |
#36 |
| -
Really? Really..... |
DainBramaged |
Nov-26-11 10:31 PM |
#41 |
| -
Somebody get this guy a helmet... |
ellisonz |
Nov-26-11 10:40 PM |
#44 |
| -
Go back to sleep............... |
DainBramaged |
Nov-27-11 03:27 AM |
#45 |
| -
I can't remember what the topic was now |
JanMichael |
Nov-27-11 06:03 AM |
#50 |
| -
HFCS is big money, a major industry. |
Mimosa |
Nov-27-11 10:16 AM |
#58 |
| -
I'll bet they succeed too.. and if by some miracle they don't win |
russspeakeasy |
Nov-27-11 11:18 AM |
#73 |
| -
It gets discouraging when they succeed at everything. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 03:05 PM |
#150 |
| -
There isn't? |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 02:55 PM |
#146 |
| -
+1 |
cui bono |
Nov-26-11 10:30 PM |
#39 |
| -
Yes, the Democratic party. Do you really think that pro-Obama posters are out of line |
muriel_volestrangler |
Nov-27-11 04:51 AM |
#46 |
| -
Obama is solidly in the mainstream of the Democratic party - Sadly, This may be true |
panzerfaust |
Nov-27-11 06:03 AM |
#49 |
| -
Support of those issues would mean the democratic party offers a genuine alternative. n/t |
Mimosa |
Nov-27-11 10:17 AM |
#59 |
| -
"A genuine alternative" is undesirable to financial markets; and the golden rule prevails. |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:23 AM |
#192 |
| -
The Democratic Party used to support "rights", |
bvar22 |
Nov-27-11 11:13 AM |
#70 |
| -
Free trade and austerity are mainstream Dem positions? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:12 PM |
#124 |
| -
Americans, especially Democratic Party Americans, HATE |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 03:47 PM |
#153 |
| -
You missed the memo! |
a simple pattern |
Nov-27-11 10:19 AM |
#60 |
| -
How do you differentiate between "bashing" and horizontal processing? nt |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:25 PM |
#96 |
| -
LOL, WUT? |
Odin2005 |
Nov-27-11 01:40 PM |
#108 |
| -
Horizontal, as in Occupation general assemblies, which include occupiers who disagree with one |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:47 PM |
#113 |
| -
Fucking kidding? |
bluestate10 |
Nov-27-11 06:29 PM |
#166 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-26-11 09:12 PM |
#34 |
| -
Go to any article on any mainstream newspaper or news site... |
backscatter712 |
Nov-26-11 10:38 PM |
#42 |
| -
I noticed that, backscatter712 |
a simple pattern |
Nov-27-11 10:24 AM |
#62 |
| -
Right here in River City |
Jim Warren |
Nov-27-11 04:54 AM |
#47 |
| -
??? The significance of this remark escapes me |
panzerfaust |
Nov-27-11 06:08 AM |
#51 |
| -
DU must be designed wrong. |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:23 PM |
#95 |
| -
Information provided by random, unknown persons is not to be trusted?? |
panzerfaust |
Nov-27-11 05:49 AM |
#48 |
| -
It's esp. obvious on smaller blogs – when there are virtually NO comments on post after post, |
snot |
Nov-27-11 09:21 AM |
#53 |
| -
Don't they mean bought and paid for right wing posters. |
sarcasmo |
Nov-27-11 10:06 AM |
#56 |
| -
Paid posters should be required to disclose the fact. It's advertising, disguised as speech. |
DirkGently |
Nov-27-11 10:45 AM |
#64 |
| -
Agreed. Instead one dare not even ask the question |
Lorien |
Nov-27-11 11:15 AM |
#72 |
| -
That's one of the best ideas that I have heard on the subject. |
Response |
Nov-27-11 12:48 PM |
#87 |
| -
I've often wondered why this area isn't regulated. Commerical speech should be transparent. |
DirkGently |
Nov-28-11 12:32 PM |
#200 |
| -
Much can be revealed by asking them questions. A poster can refuse to answer just so often before |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:28 PM |
#98 |
| -
That is true. Eg, anyone who will not support SS, Medicare |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 01:49 PM |
#114 |
| -
Oh! I'm a Medicare Reform supporter. Have SEEN it up close and personal. |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:56 PM |
#119 |
| -
So what does the proposed deep cut to providers have to do with eliminating fraud? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:16 PM |
#128 |
| -
If you'll look at HR 676, I think you'll find payments in general to be reviewed, this would include |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:25 PM |
#132 |
| -
AND - This isn't just about fraud. Have you ever been around a CMS reporting system? |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:28 PM |
#133 |
| -
No I haven't. Can you explain how cuts to providers will adress that? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:30 PM |
#136 |
| -
I think you can read the bill and decide for yourself, can't you? I have to take some food to our |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:35 PM |
#137 |
| -
HR676? Are we getting Medicare for all with this provider cut? |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:46 PM |
#141 |
| -
Physicians for a National Health Program: HR 676 Expanded & Improved Medicare for All Act |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:30 PM |
#134 |
| -
The point being, if cuts are appropriate, they'll be proportional to their in-efficiencies. |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:30 PM |
#135 |
| -
Heh |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:49 PM |
#144 |
| -
Please source "deep". Thanks! nt |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 02:39 PM |
#138 |
| -
Well, I didn't address that in my comment. My point was that |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 03:42 PM |
#152 |
| -
No one should be against your Medicare proposals. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 03:55 PM |
#160 |
| -
Doing one's best to eliminate fraud and waste in a program is not "reforming" that program. |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:36 AM |
#193 |
| -
Agreed. nt |
Enthusiast |
Nov-28-11 08:53 AM |
#197 |
| -
Please see Reply 195, |
No Elephants |
Nov-28-11 05:39 AM |
#194 |
| -
BTW, after passage of the ACA, Bernie Sanders said he supported Medicare reform and he |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:59 PM |
#121 |
| -
He does not support raising the age as is now being proposed. |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 03:51 PM |
#156 |
| -
Plus one! |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 03:52 PM |
#157 |
| -
I call them on it when I run into them on my local paper's board. |
BiggJawn |
Nov-27-11 10:52 AM |
#65 |
| -
I'm going to have to remember that one. |
GoCubsGo |
Nov-27-11 11:09 AM |
#68 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Nov-27-11 01:29 PM |
#101 |
| -
The editorials in the papers around here are nothing but regurgitated press releases. |
ZenaD |
Nov-27-11 02:18 PM |
#130 |
| -
And the fakers here to direct what they don't like to other forums to keep attention off |
DainBramaged |
Nov-27-11 11:14 AM |
#71 |
| -
One way to identify them; they generally post about a single issue, and never |
Lorien |
Nov-27-11 11:18 AM |
#74 |
| -
Here's some great info from an earlier post on a different thread, |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 01:20 PM |
#94 |
| -
Wow. Fascinating. Thanks for that, hadn't seen it the first time around. |
cui bono |
Nov-27-11 03:55 PM |
#159 |
| -
There's a reason that earlier thread is in the Woo-Woo Dungeon...nt |
SidDithers |
Nov-27-11 07:57 PM |
#169 |
| -
No, the thread I'm speaking of was actually posted today, a bit after this one. |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 08:40 PM |
#172 |
| -
Just following the link you provided in your post... |
SidDithers |
Nov-27-11 08:52 PM |
#174 |
| -
LOL, Lorien. You nailed it. |
Mimosa |
Nov-27-11 03:02 PM |
#148 |
| -
The word troll is arguably one of the most overused words on the itnernet. |
Quartermass |
Nov-27-11 11:20 AM |
#75 |
| -
Somebody paid you to say that, didn't they? |
MilesColtrane |
Nov-27-11 11:39 AM |
#81 |
| -
We need a troll sub-species for these people. Anyone have a good name? |
jimlup |
Nov-27-11 11:26 AM |
#76 |
| -
Here's one: Stupidius trollius. xD |
AverageJoe90 |
Nov-27-11 11:04 PM |
#181 |
| -
talk radio paid callers is good value. & citizens united money means going to see a lot more of both |
certainot |
Nov-27-11 11:47 AM |
#82 |
| -
remember - the one absolute proof of someone being a troll is that they deny being a troll |
Douglas Carpenter |
Nov-27-11 12:40 PM |
#85 |
| -
Lol! |
sabrina 1 |
Nov-27-11 01:55 PM |
#118 |
| -
Good one, Douglas. |
Enthusiast |
Nov-27-11 04:17 PM |
#162 |
| -
LOL! n/t |
tammywammy |
Nov-27-11 11:39 PM |
#183 |
| -
Let's face it. Corporations all have their agents, provocateurs and crumbots. |
caseymoz |
Nov-27-11 12:47 PM |
#86 |
| -
I trust posters here and huffpo |
PatrynXX |
Nov-27-11 01:05 PM |
#90 |
| -
a couple more threads discussing this topic |
darth marth |
Nov-27-11 01:19 PM |
#93 |
| -
Lol! you beat me by a minute |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 01:38 PM |
#107 |
| -
+ a million - Should be required reading here. AND WE SHOULD DISCUSS this kind of stuff when we |
patrice |
Nov-27-11 01:44 PM |
#111 |
| -
I laugh when posters pull threads from the Conspiracy Theory dungeon to try to prove their point... |
SidDithers |
Nov-27-11 07:59 PM |
#170 |
| -
"Hey, look, ma! It's another red herring!" |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 08:49 PM |
#173 |
| -
BHN's thread wasn't posted in the Conspiracy Theory forum... |
SidDithers |
Nov-27-11 08:56 PM |
#176 |
| -
And that proves what? That's actually extremely disturbing when you think about it. |
Zorra |
Nov-27-11 11:33 PM |
#182 |
| -
Fast simple rules to make your DU less polluted by paid trolls... |
Evasporque |
Nov-28-11 09:19 AM |
#198 |
| -
Won't work |
aletier_v |
Nov-27-11 01:50 PM |
#115 |
| -
Agree. Software won't work. You have to do it yourself. |
McCamy Taylor |
Nov-27-11 02:11 PM |
#123 |
| -
Here is my fool proof plan for messing with the corporatew poster. Figure out which industry |
McCamy Taylor |
Nov-27-11 02:10 PM |
#122 |
| -
Another clue: anyone whose detailed knowledge of an industry or issue seems at odds with his "just |
McCamy Taylor |
Nov-27-11 02:14 PM |
#126 |
| -
"Anyone who posts anything in support of China's occupation of Tibet is a paid Chinese poster"... |
SidDithers |
Nov-27-11 08:02 PM |
#171 |
| -
Yes, I don't even bother anymore at the local paper.... |
WCGreen |
Nov-27-11 03:04 PM |
#149 |
| -
I remember reading a hilariously dishonest example a few months ago. |
chrisa |
Nov-27-11 03:48 PM |
#155 |
| -
Some of it, I think, is driven by a weird form of actual mental illness |
Warren DeMontague |
Nov-27-11 07:47 PM |
#168 |
| -
Spot on... |
Bobbie Jo |
Nov-27-11 08:54 PM |
#175 |
| -
Ha! |
Number23 |
Nov-27-11 10:34 PM |
#177 |
| -
Yup... |
SidDithers |
Nov-28-11 08:02 AM |
#195 |
| -
They'll post at wee-hours to have the "last word" for at least a few hours too. |
Populist_Prole |
Nov-28-11 04:26 PM |
#202 |
| -
I guess that's 62.43% of the people on DU including me |
snooper2 |
Nov-28-11 08:38 AM |
#196 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore