You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #48: Har har! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. Har har!

Nah! Instead there should be a law about the deliberate sabotage of Constitutional rights by those with authority.

But that'll never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Police Infiltrators MUST Be BUSTED! The Doctor.  Nov-10-11 08:12 AM   #0 
  - Good luck with that one  NNN0LHI   Nov-10-11 08:17 AM   #1 
  - Bwhaahahahaa! Funny thing-  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 08:19 AM   #2 
  - Another "tell" from the '60s:  hvn_nbr_2   Nov-10-11 09:27 AM   #10 
  - Seems easy to me...  socialindependocrat   Nov-10-11 08:33 AM   #3 
  - Unfortunately, it's not nearly so easy.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 08:54 AM   #5 
     - So the entire black block are police?  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 09:17 AM   #8 
     - Huh? Where the hell did I say that?  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 12:12 PM   #12 
        - Your cluelessness and calls for actions are amusing  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 12:26 PM   #15 
           - Okay, great. I'm very glad they've managed to solve the problem of the agents provocateur.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 12:33 PM   #16 
              - Check out the Wired article on Oakland  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 12:37 PM   #19 
                 - I didn't ask about the Black Blocs (no 'K' btw). I asked how they solved the police problem.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 12:41 PM   #22 
     - Thanks for the feedback.  socialindependocrat   Nov-10-11 09:25 AM   #9 
     - Are you an infiltrator or provocateur? Everything you suggested is illegal and violent  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 12:34 PM   #17 
     - Those are called "Questions", not "Suggestions".  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 12:39 PM   #20 
     - It's an excellent question.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 12:59 PM   #25 
     - I SENT A NOTE TO MSNBC  socialindependocrat   Nov-10-11 09:51 AM   #11 
        - Ummm... this is *Probably* not the best post to refer them to.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 02:52 PM   #36 
           - I figure this way  socialindependocrat   Nov-10-11 06:17 PM   #43 
              - Hahaha! Yes.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 06:41 PM   #47 
  - Oh, and let me add;  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 08:35 AM   #4 
  - Who sets the tactics, protocols, and who is going to risk jail when things are unclear at best?  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 12:36 PM   #18 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-10-11 01:53 PM   #32 
  - Have you actually been to an encampment?  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 09:09 AM   #6 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Nov-10-11 12:16 PM   #13 
  - That's not relevant. Please read the OP.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 02:03 PM   #34 
     - Already done...  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 04:31 PM   #38 
        - Wow. So first you tell me to learn about the dynamics of OWS in Oakland or whatever hotspot  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 05:14 PM   #40 
           - Somehow I don't think you will keep your word  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 05:49 PM   #41 
              - I absolutely will. But again we're running into your reading comprehension issue.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 06:16 PM   #42 
              - Clearly you did not keep your word and most likely never intended to  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 10:39 PM   #49 
                 - What in the hell are you talking about? Is this how you plan on avoiding the questions?  The Doctor.   Nov-11-11 06:43 AM   #51 
                    - You really are not a man of your world and showing it off for all to see  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-11-11 09:57 AM   #53 
                       - I doubt anyone knows what the hell you're talking about. Care to tell us what this 'word' was?  The Doctor.   Nov-11-11 12:14 PM   #56 
              - Also, suggesting I am a liar about my participation in the local OWS is not only insulting,  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 06:37 PM   #46 
                 - I said I did not believe your statement and I don't  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 10:41 PM   #50 
                    - And you are obviously not any part of OWS either. As you've proven by your inability to answer  The Doctor.   Nov-11-11 06:46 AM   #52 
                       - Keep showing how you are not a man of your word  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-11-11 09:58 AM   #54 
                          - You're deluded. Why don't you keep the promise you made?  The Doctor.   Nov-11-11 12:08 PM   #55 
  - Remember, victims of crime can still file PRIVATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS  happyslug   Nov-10-11 09:11 AM   #7 
  - Thanks for the info.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 12:21 PM   #14 
  - No encampment is taking the "show us your papers" approach you advocate  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 12:41 PM   #21 
  - and OWS is correct  unionworks   Nov-10-11 12:48 PM   #24 
  - Precisely. There are very few options for stopping this practice.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 01:01 PM   #27 
  - Who needs unlimited funds  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 01:24 PM   #31 
  - My point was the need to be able to get a NAME and an ADDRESS  happyslug   Nov-10-11 01:56 PM   #33 
     - Your point was clear, it just runs counter to what OWS stands for  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 02:25 PM   #35 
        - No, I am NOT demanding papers, but it is a way to make sure you can ID people  happyslug   Nov-10-11 03:37 PM   #37 
           - Yes you are...  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 04:43 PM   #39 
  - the main purpose  unionworks   Nov-10-11 12:44 PM   #23 
     - Actually, ProgressiveProfessor illustrated fairly well how that result has been avoided.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 01:08 PM   #29 
  - OWS needs 'air marshalls' - ppl who carry squirt bottles  alittlelark   Nov-10-11 01:00 PM   #26 
  - I like it, but it won't be terribly effective.  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 01:04 PM   #28 
  - Using that would be considered assault & battery  ProgressiveProfessor   Nov-10-11 01:08 PM   #30 
  - There outta be a law  bluestateguy   Nov-10-11 06:20 PM   #44 
     - I have to say...  socialindependocrat   Nov-10-11 06:34 PM   #45 
     - Har har!  The Doctor.   Nov-10-11 06:54 PM   #48 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC