You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #211: +1 Thanks! /nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
211. +1 Thanks! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  - Pot Smoking May More Than Double Crash Risk HuckleB  Oct-16-11 10:16 PM   #0 
  - Yep, definitely a "no shit" moment.  TheWraith   Oct-16-11 10:19 PM   #1 
  - unnhhReck  leftstreet   Oct-16-11 10:21 PM   #2 
  - Saw a post to the contrary here few days ago.  elleng   Oct-16-11 10:21 PM   #3 
  - A post that showed a legitimate study on the matter?  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:26 PM   #9 
  - Yes  elleng   Oct-16-11 10:30 PM   # 
  - No.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:37 PM   #29 
  - No.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:37 PM   #30 
  - mighty broad statement....depends on dosage, as in all drugs.  spanone   Oct-16-11 11:54 PM   # 
     - Hardly.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:02 AM   #123 
     - you believe whatever you wish in your fantasy world. i offered you a link with proof.  spanone   Oct-18-11 02:04 PM   #257 
     - +1 Thanks! /nt  GliderGuider   Oct-17-11 01:54 PM   #211 
  - Here are 2 studies that suggests the risks are small  BadDog40   Oct-17-11 12:18 AM   #127 
     - Thanks. The 'steady lateral position' sounds familiar.  elleng   Oct-17-11 11:38 AM   #138 
     - You have to go pretty far back then, to some small studies.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:23 PM   #142 
  - Really?  demosincebirth   Oct-16-11 10:22 PM   #4 
  - This "study" is a load of crap!  Rageneau   Oct-16-11 10:23 PM   #5 
  - I followed the link, and there is plenty to back it up.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:28 PM   #13 
     - What about this statement from the article:  leftstreet   Oct-16-11 10:30 PM   #16 
     - I love it when folks try to use a single line, as it means everything.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:33 PM   #22 
     - Driving while impaired is already illegal. Doesn't matter what you're fucked up on  leftstreet   Oct-16-11 10:35 PM   #25 
        - That's great.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:35 PM   #26 
     - When you are so effin baked you can't even remember  FrodosPet   Oct-16-11 11:41 PM   #95 
     - Smoking pot has no negative effect on driving.  Rageneau   Oct-16-11 11:55 PM   #115 
        - It's funny that research appears to show otherwise.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:57 PM   #118 
        - i don't know about that. in general yes, you'll most likey be more careful and not speed. however,  dionysus   Oct-17-11 05:39 PM   #238 
  - Smoking affects people differently.  tridim   Oct-16-11 10:24 PM   #6 
  - I know plenty of people who drink who say the same thing.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:27 PM   #11 
     - Try what again? I said I don't drive while stoned.  tridim   Oct-16-11 10:37 PM   #28 
        - I'm glad you don't.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:38 PM   #32 
           - Pot isn't heroin.  tridim   Oct-16-11 10:40 PM   #34 
              - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Oct-16-11 10:40 PM   #35 
              - Who said "Pot is heroin?"  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:54 PM   #110 
                 - You're acting like it is  BadDog40   Oct-17-11 12:20 AM   #129 
                    - Goodness.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:24 PM   #143 
  - Yes, just a reminder: DON'T smoke pot then drive. Also, don't use a heat gun as a blow dryer.  FarLeftFist   Oct-16-11 10:24 PM   #7 
  - Yup.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:54 PM   #112 
  - What about using rubbing alcohol instead of vodka?  Taverner   Oct-17-11 05:20 PM   #237 
  - JFC...  WillyT   Oct-16-11 10:26 PM   #8 
  - That's right, bang your head when reality hits.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:41 PM   #36 
     - No, I Bang My Head When Teh Stupid Succeed  WillyT   Oct-16-11 11:04 PM   #63 
        - That might make sense if you cared about "Teh Stupid."  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:26 PM   #68 
  - I call bullshit!  markpkessinger   Oct-16-11 10:27 PM   #10 
  - So this expert says that the preponderance of evidence agrees with this study.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:44 PM   #37 
  - rec but you've been neg-recced to zero.  Liberal_in_LA   Oct-16-11 10:27 PM   #12 
  - Yeah, it's almost as if I posted something that says vaccines prevent disease.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:30 PM   #17 
     - oh oh... now you've done it!  Liberal_in_LA   Oct-16-11 10:34 PM   #24 
  - Let me be honest. I've smoked MJ and drove a car. I became a better driver.  FarLeftFist   Oct-16-11 10:29 PM   #14 
  - Post to that effect here a few days ago.  elleng   Oct-16-11 10:31 PM   #19 
  - "Dude! I can drink a fifth of Jim Beam, and boy can I drive a straight line afterward!"  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:37 PM   #27 
     - Means you're probably an alcoholic.  elleng   Oct-16-11 10:38 PM   #31 
        - Perhaps. Certainly, it means anyone claiming that is an idiot.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:39 PM   #33 
  - Then please don't drive at all.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:31 PM   #20 
  - How do you know?  Swede   Oct-16-11 10:34 PM   #23 
  - I dunno about this. I feel more "impaired" after a single beer than I do after  kestrel91316   Oct-16-11 10:29 PM   #15 
  - That may be true, but that's not the point of the study.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:31 PM   #18 
     - FWIW, every last person I know who wants it legalized (and that's no small number)  kestrel91316   Oct-16-11 10:46 PM   #42 
        - I stated that in the OP.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:49 PM   #45 
           - If you don't want OTHER people's opinion or perspective, you perhaps  kestrel91316   Oct-17-11 01:48 PM   #207 
              - Is that your response whenever you push something completely baseless...  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:57 PM   #214 
  - Will eating a bag of Doritos bring the risk back down to normal?  Fire Walk With Me   Oct-16-11 10:31 PM   #21 
  - +100  FirstLight   Oct-16-11 10:45 PM   #41 
  - :)  Monk06   Oct-16-11 10:44 PM   #38 
  - I am pro-legalization and anti-impaired driving, too.  Warren DeMontague   Oct-16-11 10:44 PM   #39 
  - Yup.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:48 PM   #44 
  - On the flip side, to be fair, this "what about stoned drivers" is clearly a talking point for  Warren DeMontague   Oct-16-11 10:54 PM   #49 
     - Indeed.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:56 PM   #51 
        - Like I said, impaired driving is already against the law.  Warren DeMontague   Oct-16-11 10:58 PM   #56 
           - There should not be insurmountable challenges to enforcement.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:00 PM   #58 
              - They have to do with the topic because it means we agree that the issue is already settled.  Warren DeMontague   Oct-16-11 11:05 PM   #64 
                 - Well, we do need to know what risks stoned providers provide.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:24 PM   #66 
                    - Because, like I said, it has come up as a big anti-legalization talking point.  Warren DeMontague   Oct-17-11 12:04 AM   #125 
                       - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Oct-17-11 12:05 AM   #126 
                       - True.  Rageneau   Oct-17-11 01:23 AM   #136 
  - I agree. Just because the drug war is bullshit and marijuana should be legal  NYC Liberal   Oct-17-11 02:08 PM   #223 
  - Oh please....  ohheckyeah   Oct-16-11 10:45 PM   #40 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Oct-16-11 10:47 PM   #43 
  - Bottom line: Inconclusive...  Joe Fields   Oct-16-11 10:50 PM   #46 
  - Only if one chooses to go down the road of science is just "theory."  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:53 PM   #47 
     - It would take blind faith to believe  ohheckyeah   Oct-16-11 10:56 PM   #52 
     - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Oct-16-11 10:59 PM   #57 
     - Whose evidence?  ohheckyeah   Oct-16-11 11:04 PM   #62 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-16-11 11:33 PM   #80 
        - Seriously?  ohheckyeah   Oct-16-11 11:39 PM   #90 
           - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Oct-16-11 11:42 PM   #96 
     - Other studies point the other way.  Joe Fields   Oct-16-11 11:42 PM   #97 
        - That's not unusual for science.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:44 PM   #99 
  - these studies reappear every so often  mitchtv   Oct-16-11 10:53 PM   #48 
  - Single studies don't negate much.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:57 PM   #53 
     - Can you find some studies analyzing driving habits of med marijuana users?  leftstreet   Oct-16-11 11:01 PM   #59 
        - Can you offer any other red herrings?  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:29 PM   #74 
           - You're high!  leftstreet   Oct-17-11 12:21 AM   #130 
              - Not high, just incredibly ignorant.  EOTE   Oct-17-11 01:07 PM   #169 
                 - Yeah, that must be it.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:15 PM   #178 
                    - Considering that your "scientific knowledge" and "debate skills" consist entirely of smilies.  EOTE   Oct-17-11 01:16 PM   #179 
                       - Uh huh.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:18 PM   #182 
                          - You've spent plenty of time responding with snark and smileys.  EOTE   Oct-17-11 01:24 PM   #190 
  - Don't drive high (on anything) and you'll be fine.  Throd   Oct-16-11 10:55 PM   #50 
  - +1  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:57 PM   #54 
  - +1  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 10:57 PM   #55 
  - Yep no accidents happen if your straight. Right.  RegieRocker   Oct-17-11 12:51 PM   #159 
     - And...  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:04 PM   #167 
        - Do you shave and text with your eyes closed?  RegieRocker   Oct-17-11 01:10 PM   #171 
           - Do you?  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:34 PM   #196 
              - Conversation doesn't work that way. You need to answer first.  RegieRocker   Oct-17-11 04:36 PM   #233 
  - From the report:  SHRED   Oct-16-11 11:01 PM   #60 
  - Thank you. n/t  ohheckyeah   Oct-16-11 11:07 PM   #65 
     - ur welcome  SHRED   Oct-16-11 11:28 PM   #72 
  - It also doubles Ding Dong consumption  CreekDog   Oct-16-11 11:02 PM   #61 
  - OP as Drug Warrior propaganda? "this study...was not designed to capture and effect."  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:25 PM   #67 
  - The only propaganda being offered...  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:27 PM   #69 
  - As I asked before....  ohheckyeah   Oct-16-11 11:29 PM   #73 
  - In other words....  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:30 PM   #75 
     - THERE IS NO FUCKING EVIDENCE.  ohheckyeah   Oct-16-11 11:32 PM   #78 
     - ROTFLMAO!  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:34 PM   #83 
        - Oh, isn't that cute?  ohheckyeah   Oct-16-11 11:40 PM   #93 
           - I get it.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:45 PM   #102 
     - In other words, you haven't provided anything even approaching evidence.  EOTE   Oct-17-11 01:08 PM   #170 
        - In other words, evidence does not matter to you.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:19 PM   #184 
           - Says the ignoramus who constantly screams "evidence!" while not providing a shred of it.  EOTE   Oct-17-11 01:22 PM   #188 
              - Have you written USA Today to tell them that this story is about a fictional study?  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:37 PM   #198 
                 - It's a few people who are making assertions with nothing to back up their assertions.  EOTE   Oct-17-11 01:50 PM   #208 
                    - Say what?  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:54 PM   #212 
                       - Exactly. NT  EOTE   Oct-17-11 01:58 PM   #216 
                          - Oh, that is rich.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:59 PM   #218 
  - So...the concepts of "cause and effect" aren't familiar to you?  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:32 PM   #79 
  - I'm quite familiar.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:37 PM   #87 
     - You're asserting cause and effect from studies that did not capture cause and effect.  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:39 PM   #91 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-16-11 11:50 PM   #108 
           - You don't even seem to have the basic scientific literacy to understand how "studies" work.  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:57 PM   #117 
              - Says someone who has shown ZERO scientific literacy, thus fan.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:58 PM   #119 
  - What science? Please, cite the studies that this 'study' references.  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-17-11 05:11 PM   #235 
  - Uh oh...  ohheckyeah   Oct-16-11 11:28 PM   #71 
     - Well, when that's shown, why shouldn't it be pointed out?  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:31 PM   #76 
        - Your argument is similar to the Queen of Hearts: First the Verdict, THEN the trial, eh?  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:33 PM   #81 
        - Only if you're ignoring, well, almost everything.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:35 PM   #84 
           - I don't do "Faith Based" reasoning. Link to a scientific study, or it didn't happen.  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:36 PM   #86 
              - The article links to one, which links to several.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:38 PM   #89 
                 - Right. But the scientists aren't asserting what you Drug Warriors are. That's the problem. nt  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:39 PM   #92 
                 - "Drug Warriors."  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:44 PM   #101 
                    - Right. DU is the home away from home for Drug Warriors and other fascists.  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:46 PM   #103 
                       - In other words, your only response to science is a personal attack.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:48 PM   #104 
                          - Nonsense. I'm still waiting for you to digest and respond to the "cause and effect" issue.  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:49 PM   #105 
                             - You don't even know what that means.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:50 PM   #107 
                                - You are very lazy, for a provocateur. Your schtick isn't even interesting.  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:55 PM   #113 
                                   - That's funny.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:56 PM   #116 
                 - The only link the article goes to the website of the Governors Highway Safety Association  Occulus   Oct-17-11 02:40 PM   #225 
        - It's only been  ohheckyeah   Oct-16-11 11:34 PM   #82 
           - Says the guy who lives in fantasy land.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:36 PM   #85 
  - I don't even smoke pot, and I wish  Aerows   Oct-16-11 11:28 PM   #70 
  - So do the rest of us.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:32 PM   #77 
     - I'm 100% serious  Aerows   Oct-16-11 11:44 PM   #100 
        - So am I.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:49 PM   #106 
        - Is it frustrating to throw a reasoned response down a black hole?  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:58 PM   #120 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-17-11 12:00 AM   #121 
           - That's rich, coming from you.  Rageneau   Oct-17-11 01:51 AM   #137 
              - No, I've noted what the science shows.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:29 PM   # 
                 - You know  Aerows   Oct-17-11 05:41 PM   #239 
           - I wasn't interested in "rule-breaking" etc.  Aerows   Oct-17-11 01:51 PM   #209 
  - Notice the OP isn't engaging in any reasoned discussion? Unsubtle Flame bait. nt  Romulox   Oct-16-11 11:38 PM   #88 
  - Prove it.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:41 PM   #94 
  - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Oct-17-11 01:11 PM   #172 
  - But yet declares himself the winner  ohheckyeah   Oct-16-11 11:42 PM   #98 
     - This is not about winning.  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:51 PM   #109 
  - Big pharma thanks you for your contribution.  JTFrog   Oct-16-11 11:54 PM   #111 
  - YOU WIN POINTLESS RED HERRING POST OF THE NIGHT!  HuckleB   Oct-16-11 11:55 PM   #114 
     - Enjoy.  JTFrog   Oct-17-11 12:19 AM   #128 
        - ...  SammyWinstonJack   Oct-17-11 01:57 PM   #215 
  - Not surprising.  Zoeisright   Oct-17-11 12:01 AM   #122 
  - No, it's not exactly surprising.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:03 AM   #124 
  - I figured someone of your scientific "knowledge" would consider that to be "results".  EOTE   Oct-17-11 01:13 PM   #175 
     - I see that you have a little bit of knowledge.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:16 PM   #180 
        - Please demonstrate your knowledge and credentials.  EOTE   Oct-17-11 01:19 PM   #183 
           - No one has bothered to enter into a debate here.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:42 PM   #203 
              - Your debate style is exactly this:  EOTE   Oct-17-11 01:48 PM   #206 
                 - Get a mirror.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:53 PM   #210 
                    - And once again you're only capable of responding with smilies.  EOTE   Oct-17-11 01:57 PM   #213 
                       - And you've offered more?  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:58 PM   #217 
                          - Ahhh, so you admit that you've provided nothing.  EOTE   Oct-17-11 02:05 PM   #220 
  - i bet they drank lots of water and breathed plenty of oxygen as well  frylock   Oct-17-11 03:07 PM   #226 
  - Things that I've done while driving stoned...  cherokeeprogressive   Oct-17-11 12:34 AM   #131 
  - Anecdotes are meaningless.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:27 PM   #146 
  - See post #285. I posted it in the wrong place.  cherokeeprogressive   Oct-17-11 08:01 PM   #243 
  - Maybe I should have added the sarcasm smiley?  cherokeeprogressive   Oct-17-11 07:59 PM   #242 
  - dupe  RainDog   Oct-17-11 12:40 AM   #132 
  - I wish the OP would contribute something meaningful  BadDog40   Oct-17-11 12:50 AM   #133 
  - You've yet to offer anything useful.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:26 PM   #144 
  - And it may not.  Iggo   Oct-17-11 01:07 AM   #134 
  - But the evidence indicates that it probably does.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:28 PM   #147 
     - ...unless it doesn't.  Iggo   Oct-17-11 12:56 PM   #162 
        - Deleted sub-thread  Name removed   Oct-17-11 01:00 PM   #165 
  - Back in my younger (read: stupider) days we all drove around as  Faux pas   Oct-17-11 01:16 AM   #135 
  - Tax it and Legalize it stop the weed prohibition.  sarcasmo   Oct-17-11 11:40 AM   #139 
  - +1  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:26 PM   #145 
  - LOL  JuniperLea   Oct-17-11 11:41 AM   #140 
  - Oops... Sacred Cow time.  LanternWaste   Oct-17-11 11:46 AM   #141 
  - +1  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:28 PM   #148 
  - +2 nt  Codeine   Oct-17-11 01:17 PM   #181 
  - This is Bullspin again...  DreamSmoker   Oct-17-11 12:29 PM   #149 
  - It's unfortunate that NORML chooses to act like an anti-vax organization when it comes to this.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:31 PM   #150 
  - More of that supposedly biased view of NORML for ya  robdogbucky   Oct-17-11 12:45 PM   #153 
  - Yup.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:48 PM   #157 
  - More from that same page, care to read it?  robdogbucky   Oct-17-11 12:47 PM   #155 
     - Again, small, self-selected studies are meaningless.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 12:49 PM   #158 
  - 'Aware of their impairment'?  randome   Oct-17-11 12:45 PM   #154 
  - I used to drive stoned regularly when I was young and stupid.  Xithras   Oct-17-11 12:34 PM   #151 
  - Oh, really? I think this new data is being supported more and more  robdogbucky   Oct-17-11 12:41 PM   #152 
  - 'a negative impact on decision time and trajectory'  randome   Oct-17-11 12:51 PM   #160 
  - I have to drink and smoke pot to tolerate most of you inept drivers  RegieRocker   Oct-17-11 12:47 PM   #156 
  - Yeah?  randome   Oct-17-11 12:55 PM   #161 
     - You're that crazy driver I see weaving all over the road!  RegieRocker   Oct-17-11 12:59 PM   #164 
        - That was a joke.  randome   Oct-17-11 01:39 PM   #200 
  - I haven't smoked in years, but my experience I drove the speed limit  B Calm   Oct-17-11 12:58 PM   #163 
  - So you think an anecdote outweighs actual research?  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:01 PM   #166 
     - I'm a professional driver. I drive approx. 600 miles everyday. Don't  B Calm   Oct-17-11 01:13 PM   #173 
     - No, they're not the same.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:14 PM   #176 
     - Sitting high above the ground and I see people doing much worse things. I have  B Calm   Oct-17-11 01:20 PM   #185 
     - So you know what everyone has ingested before driving, because you're above the ground?  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:38 PM   #199 
        - No, but I know when someone is getting a BJ  B Calm   Oct-18-11 01:27 PM   #256 
     - I'm sure if MJ were legalized it would be illegal to drive while under  RegieRocker   Oct-17-11 01:24 PM   #191 
        - Well, I have a few friends who believe that driving while stoned is fine and dandy.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:40 PM   #201 
           - No one should drive under the influence of anything period.  RegieRocker   Oct-17-11 04:33 PM   #230 
     - Rational statements are not readily absorbed by anti marijuana  RegieRocker   Oct-17-11 01:21 PM   #186 
        - Where are these anti-marijuana advocates?  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:36 PM   #197 
           - Just the fact you ask where they are like there are none  RegieRocker   Oct-17-11 04:35 PM   #231 
     - Or people who text and shave while driving  RegieRocker   Oct-17-11 01:13 PM   #174 
  - B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T! I know for a fact, that report is total  in_cog_ni_to   Oct-17-11 01:06 PM   #168 
  - What an intelligent to response to information that goes against your preconceived notions.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:15 PM   #177 
     - Thank you. They aren't "preconceived notions." It's from EXPERIENCE.  in_cog_ni_to   Oct-17-11 01:29 PM   #193 
     - The plural of anecdote is not evidence.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:33 PM   #195 
     - reading through your posts here, you wouldn't know an intelligent response..  frylock   Oct-17-11 03:43 PM   #229 
  - imo  negativenihil   Oct-17-11 01:21 PM   #187 
  - Of course. That potent the ops motive here.  RegieRocker   Oct-17-11 01:25 PM   #192 
  - Yup.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:46 PM   #204 
  - Thats total Bullshit with a capital B  madokie   Oct-17-11 01:23 PM   #189 
  - No one was talking about you.  randome   Oct-17-11 01:41 PM   #202 
  - there's a lot of things people can do, and do well stoned. but to say it doesn't affect people at  dionysus   Oct-18-11 07:50 AM   #246 
  - Since some folks think this is all made up, here's a short list of studies...  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 01:31 PM   #194 
  - Has anyone done a full double-blind study?  backscatter712   Oct-17-11 01:46 PM   #205 
  - There is only one reason people smoke pot.  randome   Oct-17-11 02:08 PM   #222 
  - So everything that alters your mind negatively effects driving ability?  EOTE   Oct-17-11 03:20 PM   #227 
  - No, of course not.  randome   Oct-17-11 03:29 PM   #228 
     - And caffeine can also positively affect one's driving ability.  EOTE   Oct-17-11 04:35 PM   #232 
  - Alcohol alters your mind too. And alcohol DUIs kill thousands each year. Yet it's legal...  backscatter712   Oct-17-11 10:47 PM   #245 
  - Double-blind with placebo? Here you go.....  robdogbucky   Oct-18-11 11:17 AM   #250 
     - That's what I was looking for! n/t  backscatter712   Oct-18-11 11:18 AM   #251 
     - Thanks for this.  Ignis   Oct-18-11 07:00 PM   #258 
  - Goodbye.  HuckleB   Oct-17-11 02:02 PM   #219 
  - BYE!  in_cog_ni_to   Oct-17-11 02:06 PM   #221 
  - Hey, you started it.  Iggo   Oct-17-11 04:39 PM   #234 
  - Thank you for showing your true intentions with this post.  Rex   Oct-17-11 05:48 PM   #241 
     - Has there ever been a poll?  Common Sense Party   Oct-18-11 11:22 AM   #253 
  - This study does fly in the face of other prior studies showing the exact opposite. Just sayin' nt  99th_Monkey   Oct-17-11 02:24 PM   #224 
  - No, don't smoke and drive  Taverner   Oct-17-11 05:19 PM   #236 
  - It is a narcotic, so no shit.  Rex   Oct-17-11 05:46 PM   #240 
  - yeah and?  SomethingFishy   Oct-17-11 08:34 PM   #244 
  - Kick  Scurrilous   Oct-18-11 10:52 AM   #247 
  - You just had to kick this thread to the top again,  randome   Oct-18-11 11:26 AM   #254 
  - Marijuana is a magical drug. It has 100% POSITIVE effects, 0 negative.  Common Sense Party   Oct-18-11 11:12 AM   #248 
  - Yes, it's like aspirin , only better. It does everything and takes the stains out of carpets too!  Safetykitten   Oct-18-11 11:15 AM   #249 
  - New Shimmer is a floor wax!  Common Sense Party   Oct-18-11 11:20 AM   #252 
     - In the new "Bong" applicator!  Safetykitten   Oct-18-11 11:28 AM   #255 
  - I should have read first  hughee99   Oct-18-11 07:12 PM   #261 
  - I can't believe this thread is still here.  kayakjohnny   Oct-18-11 07:01 PM   #259 
  - There are NO negative consequences to smoking marijuana,  hughee99   Oct-18-11 07:11 PM   #260 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC