| 17. Yeah, it's almost as if I posted something that says vaccines prevent disease. |
|
Somehow science is ignored when it's convenient, even by some Dems.
It's frustrating to see. Where is the balance?
|
| - Pot Smoking May More Than Double Crash Risk |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:16 PM |
#0 |
-
Yep, definitely a "no shit" moment. |
TheWraith |
Oct-16-11 10:19 PM |
#1 |
-
unnhhReck |
leftstreet |
Oct-16-11 10:21 PM |
#2 |
-
Saw a post to the contrary here few days ago. |
elleng |
Oct-16-11 10:21 PM |
#3 |
 -
A post that showed a legitimate study on the matter? |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:26 PM |
#9 |
  -
Yes |
elleng |
Oct-16-11 10:30 PM |
# |
   -
No. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:37 PM |
#29 |
   -
No. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:37 PM |
#30 |
  -
mighty broad statement....depends on dosage, as in all drugs. |
spanone |
Oct-16-11 11:54 PM |
# |
 -
Hardly. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:02 AM |
#123 |
  -
you believe whatever you wish in your fantasy world. i offered you a link with proof. |
spanone |
Oct-18-11 02:04 PM |
#257 |
 -
+1 Thanks! /nt |
GliderGuider |
Oct-17-11 01:54 PM |
#211 |
 -
Here are 2 studies that suggests the risks are small |
BadDog40 |
Oct-17-11 12:18 AM |
#127 |
-
Thanks. The 'steady lateral position' sounds familiar. |
elleng |
Oct-17-11 11:38 AM |
#138 |
-
You have to go pretty far back then, to some small studies. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:23 PM |
#142 |
-
Really? |
demosincebirth |
Oct-16-11 10:22 PM |
#4 |
-
This "study" is a load of crap! |
Rageneau |
Oct-16-11 10:23 PM |
#5 |
 -
I followed the link, and there is plenty to back it up. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:28 PM |
#13 |
-
What about this statement from the article: |
leftstreet |
Oct-16-11 10:30 PM |
#16 |
 -
I love it when folks try to use a single line, as it means everything. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:33 PM |
#22 |
  -
Driving while impaired is already illegal. Doesn't matter what you're fucked up on |
leftstreet |
Oct-16-11 10:35 PM |
#25 |
 -
That's great. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:35 PM |
#26 |
 -
When you are so effin baked you can't even remember |
FrodosPet |
Oct-16-11 11:41 PM |
#95 |
-
Smoking pot has no negative effect on driving. |
Rageneau |
Oct-16-11 11:55 PM |
#115 |
-
It's funny that research appears to show otherwise. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:57 PM |
#118 |
-
i don't know about that. in general yes, you'll most likey be more careful and not speed. however, |
dionysus |
Oct-17-11 05:39 PM |
#238 |
-
Smoking affects people differently. |
tridim |
Oct-16-11 10:24 PM |
#6 |
 -
I know plenty of people who drink who say the same thing. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:27 PM |
#11 |
-
Try what again? I said I don't drive while stoned. |
tridim |
Oct-16-11 10:37 PM |
#28 |
-
I'm glad you don't. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:38 PM |
#32 |
-
Pot isn't heroin. |
tridim |
Oct-16-11 10:40 PM |
#34 |
-
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Oct-16-11 10:40 PM |
#35 |
-
Who said "Pot is heroin?" |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:54 PM |
#110 |
-
You're acting like it is |
BadDog40 |
Oct-17-11 12:20 AM |
#129 |
-
Goodness. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:24 PM |
#143 |
-
Yes, just a reminder: DON'T smoke pot then drive. Also, don't use a heat gun as a blow dryer. |
FarLeftFist |
Oct-16-11 10:24 PM |
#7 |
 -
Yup. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:54 PM |
#112 |
 -
What about using rubbing alcohol instead of vodka? |
Taverner |
Oct-17-11 05:20 PM |
#237 |
-
JFC... |
WillyT |
Oct-16-11 10:26 PM |
#8 |
 -
That's right, bang your head when reality hits. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:41 PM |
#36 |
-
No, I Bang My Head When Teh Stupid Succeed |
WillyT |
Oct-16-11 11:04 PM |
#63 |
-
That might make sense if you cared about "Teh Stupid." |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:26 PM |
#68 |
-
I call bullshit! |
markpkessinger |
Oct-16-11 10:27 PM |
#10 |
 -
So this expert says that the preponderance of evidence agrees with this study. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:44 PM |
#37 |
-
rec but you've been neg-recced to zero. |
Liberal_in_LA |
Oct-16-11 10:27 PM |
#12 |
 -
Yeah, it's almost as if I posted something that says vaccines prevent disease. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:30 PM |
#17 |
-
oh oh... now you've done it! |
Liberal_in_LA |
Oct-16-11 10:34 PM |
#24 |
-
Let me be honest. I've smoked MJ and drove a car. I became a better driver. |
FarLeftFist |
Oct-16-11 10:29 PM |
#14 |
 -
Post to that effect here a few days ago. |
elleng |
Oct-16-11 10:31 PM |
#19 |
  -
"Dude! I can drink a fifth of Jim Beam, and boy can I drive a straight line afterward!" |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:37 PM |
#27 |
 -
Means you're probably an alcoholic. |
elleng |
Oct-16-11 10:38 PM |
#31 |
 -
Perhaps. Certainly, it means anyone claiming that is an idiot. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:39 PM |
#33 |
 -
Then please don't drive at all. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:31 PM |
#20 |
 -
How do you know? |
Swede |
Oct-16-11 10:34 PM |
#23 |
-
I dunno about this. I feel more "impaired" after a single beer than I do after |
kestrel91316 |
Oct-16-11 10:29 PM |
#15 |
 -
That may be true, but that's not the point of the study. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:31 PM |
#18 |
-
FWIW, every last person I know who wants it legalized (and that's no small number) |
kestrel91316 |
Oct-16-11 10:46 PM |
#42 |
-
I stated that in the OP. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:49 PM |
#45 |
-
If you don't want OTHER people's opinion or perspective, you perhaps |
kestrel91316 |
Oct-17-11 01:48 PM |
#207 |
-
Is that your response whenever you push something completely baseless... |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:57 PM |
#214 |
-
Will eating a bag of Doritos bring the risk back down to normal? |
Fire Walk With Me |
Oct-16-11 10:31 PM |
#21 |
 -
+100 |
FirstLight |
Oct-16-11 10:45 PM |
#41 |
-
:) |
Monk06 |
Oct-16-11 10:44 PM |
#38 |
-
I am pro-legalization and anti-impaired driving, too. |
Warren DeMontague |
Oct-16-11 10:44 PM |
#39 |
 -
Yup. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:48 PM |
#44 |
  -
On the flip side, to be fair, this "what about stoned drivers" is clearly a talking point for |
Warren DeMontague |
Oct-16-11 10:54 PM |
#49 |
 -
Indeed. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:56 PM |
#51 |
 -
Like I said, impaired driving is already against the law. |
Warren DeMontague |
Oct-16-11 10:58 PM |
#56 |
 -
There should not be insurmountable challenges to enforcement. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:00 PM |
#58 |
 -
They have to do with the topic because it means we agree that the issue is already settled. |
Warren DeMontague |
Oct-16-11 11:05 PM |
#64 |
 -
Well, we do need to know what risks stoned providers provide. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:24 PM |
#66 |
 -
Because, like I said, it has come up as a big anti-legalization talking point. |
Warren DeMontague |
Oct-17-11 12:04 AM |
#125 |
 -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Oct-17-11 12:05 AM |
#126 |
 -
True. |
Rageneau |
Oct-17-11 01:23 AM |
#136 |
 -
I agree. Just because the drug war is bullshit and marijuana should be legal |
NYC Liberal |
Oct-17-11 02:08 PM |
#223 |
-
Oh please.... |
ohheckyeah |
Oct-16-11 10:45 PM |
#40 |
 -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Oct-16-11 10:47 PM |
#43 |
-
Bottom line: Inconclusive... |
Joe Fields |
Oct-16-11 10:50 PM |
#46 |
 -
Only if one chooses to go down the road of science is just "theory." |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:53 PM |
#47 |
-
It would take blind faith to believe |
ohheckyeah |
Oct-16-11 10:56 PM |
#52 |
 -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Oct-16-11 10:59 PM |
#57 |
-
Whose evidence? |
ohheckyeah |
Oct-16-11 11:04 PM |
#62 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-16-11 11:33 PM |
#80 |
-
Seriously? |
ohheckyeah |
Oct-16-11 11:39 PM |
#90 |
-
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Oct-16-11 11:42 PM |
#96 |
-
Other studies point the other way. |
Joe Fields |
Oct-16-11 11:42 PM |
#97 |
-
That's not unusual for science. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:44 PM |
#99 |
-
these studies reappear every so often |
mitchtv |
Oct-16-11 10:53 PM |
#48 |
 -
Single studies don't negate much. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:57 PM |
#53 |
-
Can you find some studies analyzing driving habits of med marijuana users? |
leftstreet |
Oct-16-11 11:01 PM |
#59 |
-
Can you offer any other red herrings? |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:29 PM |
#74 |
-
You're high! |
leftstreet |
Oct-17-11 12:21 AM |
#130 |
-
Not high, just incredibly ignorant. |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 01:07 PM |
#169 |
-
Yeah, that must be it. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:15 PM |
#178 |
-
Considering that your "scientific knowledge" and "debate skills" consist entirely of smilies. |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 01:16 PM |
#179 |
-
Uh huh. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:18 PM |
#182 |
-
You've spent plenty of time responding with snark and smileys. |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 01:24 PM |
#190 |
-
Don't drive high (on anything) and you'll be fine. |
Throd |
Oct-16-11 10:55 PM |
#50 |
 -
+1 |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:57 PM |
#54 |
 -
+1 |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 10:57 PM |
#55 |
 -
Yep no accidents happen if your straight. Right. |
RegieRocker |
Oct-17-11 12:51 PM |
#159 |
-
And... |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:04 PM |
#167 |
-
Do you shave and text with your eyes closed? |
RegieRocker |
Oct-17-11 01:10 PM |
#171 |
-
Do you? |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:34 PM |
#196 |
-
Conversation doesn't work that way. You need to answer first. |
RegieRocker |
Oct-17-11 04:36 PM |
#233 |
-
From the report: |
SHRED |
Oct-16-11 11:01 PM |
#60 |
 -
Thank you. n/t |
ohheckyeah |
Oct-16-11 11:07 PM |
#65 |
-
ur welcome |
SHRED |
Oct-16-11 11:28 PM |
#72 |
-
It also doubles Ding Dong consumption |
CreekDog |
Oct-16-11 11:02 PM |
#61 |
-
OP as Drug Warrior propaganda? "this study...was not designed to capture and effect." |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:25 PM |
#67 |
 -
The only propaganda being offered... |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:27 PM |
#69 |
  -
As I asked before.... |
ohheckyeah |
Oct-16-11 11:29 PM |
#73 |
   -
In other words.... |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:30 PM |
#75 |
  -
THERE IS NO FUCKING EVIDENCE. |
ohheckyeah |
Oct-16-11 11:32 PM |
#78 |
   -
ROTFLMAO! |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:34 PM |
#83 |
  -
Oh, isn't that cute? |
ohheckyeah |
Oct-16-11 11:40 PM |
#93 |
  -
I get it. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:45 PM |
#102 |
  -
In other words, you haven't provided anything even approaching evidence. |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 01:08 PM |
#170 |
  -
In other words, evidence does not matter to you. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:19 PM |
#184 |
  -
Says the ignoramus who constantly screams "evidence!" while not providing a shred of it. |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 01:22 PM |
#188 |
  -
Have you written USA Today to tell them that this story is about a fictional study? |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:37 PM |
#198 |
  -
It's a few people who are making assertions with nothing to back up their assertions. |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 01:50 PM |
#208 |
  -
Say what? |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:54 PM |
#212 |
  -
Exactly. NT |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 01:58 PM |
#216 |
  -
Oh, that is rich. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:59 PM |
#218 |
  -
So...the concepts of "cause and effect" aren't familiar to you? |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:32 PM |
#79 |
   -
I'm quite familiar. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:37 PM |
#87 |
  -
You're asserting cause and effect from studies that did not capture cause and effect. |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:39 PM |
#91 |
  -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-16-11 11:50 PM |
#108 |
  -
You don't even seem to have the basic scientific literacy to understand how "studies" work. |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:57 PM |
#117 |
  -
Says someone who has shown ZERO scientific literacy, thus fan. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:58 PM |
#119 |
  -
What science? Please, cite the studies that this 'study' references. |
RaleighNCDUer |
Oct-17-11 05:11 PM |
#235 |
 -
Uh oh... |
ohheckyeah |
Oct-16-11 11:28 PM |
#71 |
-
Well, when that's shown, why shouldn't it be pointed out? |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:31 PM |
#76 |
-
Your argument is similar to the Queen of Hearts: First the Verdict, THEN the trial, eh? |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:33 PM |
#81 |
 -
Only if you're ignoring, well, almost everything. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:35 PM |
#84 |
-
I don't do "Faith Based" reasoning. Link to a scientific study, or it didn't happen. |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:36 PM |
#86 |
-
The article links to one, which links to several. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:38 PM |
#89 |
-
Right. But the scientists aren't asserting what you Drug Warriors are. That's the problem. nt |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:39 PM |
#92 |
 -
"Drug Warriors." |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:44 PM |
#101 |
-
Right. DU is the home away from home for Drug Warriors and other fascists. |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:46 PM |
#103 |
-
In other words, your only response to science is a personal attack. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:48 PM |
#104 |
-
Nonsense. I'm still waiting for you to digest and respond to the "cause and effect" issue. |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:49 PM |
#105 |
-
You don't even know what that means. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:50 PM |
#107 |
-
You are very lazy, for a provocateur. Your schtick isn't even interesting. |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:55 PM |
#113 |
-
That's funny. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:56 PM |
#116 |
-
The only link the article goes to the website of the Governors Highway Safety Association |
Occulus |
Oct-17-11 02:40 PM |
#225 |
-
It's only been |
ohheckyeah |
Oct-16-11 11:34 PM |
#82 |
-
Says the guy who lives in fantasy land. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:36 PM |
#85 |
-
I don't even smoke pot, and I wish |
Aerows |
Oct-16-11 11:28 PM |
#70 |
 -
So do the rest of us. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:32 PM |
#77 |
-
I'm 100% serious |
Aerows |
Oct-16-11 11:44 PM |
#100 |
-
So am I. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:49 PM |
#106 |
-
Is it frustrating to throw a reasoned response down a black hole? |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:58 PM |
#120 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-17-11 12:00 AM |
#121 |
 -
That's rich, coming from you. |
Rageneau |
Oct-17-11 01:51 AM |
#137 |
-
No, I've noted what the science shows. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:29 PM |
# |
-
You know |
Aerows |
Oct-17-11 05:41 PM |
#239 |
-
I wasn't interested in "rule-breaking" etc. |
Aerows |
Oct-17-11 01:51 PM |
#209 |
-
Notice the OP isn't engaging in any reasoned discussion? Unsubtle Flame bait. nt |
Romulox |
Oct-16-11 11:38 PM |
#88 |
 -
Prove it. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:41 PM |
#94 |
  -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Oct-17-11 01:11 PM |
#172 |
 -
But yet declares himself the winner |
ohheckyeah |
Oct-16-11 11:42 PM |
#98 |
-
This is not about winning. |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:51 PM |
#109 |
-
Big pharma thanks you for your contribution. |
JTFrog |
Oct-16-11 11:54 PM |
#111 |
 -
YOU WIN POINTLESS RED HERRING POST OF THE NIGHT! |
HuckleB |
Oct-16-11 11:55 PM |
#114 |
-
Enjoy. |
JTFrog |
Oct-17-11 12:19 AM |
#128 |
-
... |
SammyWinstonJack |
Oct-17-11 01:57 PM |
#215 |
-
Not surprising. |
Zoeisright |
Oct-17-11 12:01 AM |
#122 |
 -
No, it's not exactly surprising. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:03 AM |
#124 |
  -
I figured someone of your scientific "knowledge" would consider that to be "results". |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 01:13 PM |
#175 |
 -
I see that you have a little bit of knowledge. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:16 PM |
#180 |
 -
Please demonstrate your knowledge and credentials. |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 01:19 PM |
#183 |
 -
No one has bothered to enter into a debate here. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:42 PM |
#203 |
 -
Your debate style is exactly this: |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 01:48 PM |
#206 |
 -
Get a mirror. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:53 PM |
#210 |
 -
And once again you're only capable of responding with smilies. |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 01:57 PM |
#213 |
 -
And you've offered more? |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:58 PM |
#217 |
 -
Ahhh, so you admit that you've provided nothing. |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 02:05 PM |
#220 |
 -
i bet they drank lots of water and breathed plenty of oxygen as well |
frylock |
Oct-17-11 03:07 PM |
#226 |
-
Things that I've done while driving stoned... |
cherokeeprogressive |
Oct-17-11 12:34 AM |
#131 |
 -
Anecdotes are meaningless. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:27 PM |
#146 |
  -
See post #285. I posted it in the wrong place. |
cherokeeprogressive |
Oct-17-11 08:01 PM |
#243 |
 -
Maybe I should have added the sarcasm smiley? |
cherokeeprogressive |
Oct-17-11 07:59 PM |
#242 |
-
dupe |
RainDog |
Oct-17-11 12:40 AM |
#132 |
-
I wish the OP would contribute something meaningful |
BadDog40 |
Oct-17-11 12:50 AM |
#133 |
 -
You've yet to offer anything useful. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:26 PM |
#144 |
-
And it may not. |
Iggo |
Oct-17-11 01:07 AM |
#134 |
 -
But the evidence indicates that it probably does. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:28 PM |
#147 |
-
...unless it doesn't. |
Iggo |
Oct-17-11 12:56 PM |
#162 |
-
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Oct-17-11 01:00 PM |
#165 |
-
Back in my younger (read: stupider) days we all drove around as |
Faux pas |
Oct-17-11 01:16 AM |
#135 |
-
Tax it and Legalize it stop the weed prohibition. |
sarcasmo |
Oct-17-11 11:40 AM |
#139 |
 -
+1 |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:26 PM |
#145 |
-
LOL |
JuniperLea |
Oct-17-11 11:41 AM |
#140 |
-
Oops... Sacred Cow time. |
LanternWaste |
Oct-17-11 11:46 AM |
#141 |
 -
+1 |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:28 PM |
#148 |
 -
+2 nt |
Codeine |
Oct-17-11 01:17 PM |
#181 |
-
This is Bullspin again... |
DreamSmoker |
Oct-17-11 12:29 PM |
#149 |
 -
It's unfortunate that NORML chooses to act like an anti-vax organization when it comes to this. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:31 PM |
#150 |
  -
More of that supposedly biased view of NORML for ya |
robdogbucky |
Oct-17-11 12:45 PM |
#153 |
   -
Yup. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:48 PM |
#157 |
  -
More from that same page, care to read it? |
robdogbucky |
Oct-17-11 12:47 PM |
#155 |
 -
Again, small, self-selected studies are meaningless. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 12:49 PM |
#158 |
 -
'Aware of their impairment'? |
randome |
Oct-17-11 12:45 PM |
#154 |
-
I used to drive stoned regularly when I was young and stupid. |
Xithras |
Oct-17-11 12:34 PM |
#151 |
-
Oh, really? I think this new data is being supported more and more |
robdogbucky |
Oct-17-11 12:41 PM |
#152 |
 -
'a negative impact on decision time and trajectory' |
randome |
Oct-17-11 12:51 PM |
#160 |
-
I have to drink and smoke pot to tolerate most of you inept drivers |
RegieRocker |
Oct-17-11 12:47 PM |
#156 |
 -
Yeah? |
randome |
Oct-17-11 12:55 PM |
#161 |
-
You're that crazy driver I see weaving all over the road! |
RegieRocker |
Oct-17-11 12:59 PM |
#164 |
-
That was a joke. |
randome |
Oct-17-11 01:39 PM |
#200 |
-
I haven't smoked in years, but my experience I drove the speed limit |
B Calm |
Oct-17-11 12:58 PM |
#163 |
 -
So you think an anecdote outweighs actual research? |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:01 PM |
#166 |
-
I'm a professional driver. I drive approx. 600 miles everyday. Don't |
B Calm |
Oct-17-11 01:13 PM |
#173 |
 -
No, they're not the same. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:14 PM |
#176 |
  -
Sitting high above the ground and I see people doing much worse things. I have |
B Calm |
Oct-17-11 01:20 PM |
#185 |
   -
So you know what everyone has ingested before driving, because you're above the ground? |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:38 PM |
#199 |
  -
No, but I know when someone is getting a BJ |
B Calm |
Oct-18-11 01:27 PM |
#256 |
  -
I'm sure if MJ were legalized it would be illegal to drive while under |
RegieRocker |
Oct-17-11 01:24 PM |
#191 |
 -
Well, I have a few friends who believe that driving while stoned is fine and dandy. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:40 PM |
#201 |
 -
No one should drive under the influence of anything period. |
RegieRocker |
Oct-17-11 04:33 PM |
#230 |
 -
Rational statements are not readily absorbed by anti marijuana |
RegieRocker |
Oct-17-11 01:21 PM |
#186 |
-
Where are these anti-marijuana advocates? |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:36 PM |
#197 |
-
Just the fact you ask where they are like there are none |
RegieRocker |
Oct-17-11 04:35 PM |
#231 |
-
Or people who text and shave while driving |
RegieRocker |
Oct-17-11 01:13 PM |
#174 |
-
B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T! I know for a fact, that report is total |
in_cog_ni_to |
Oct-17-11 01:06 PM |
#168 |
 -
What an intelligent to response to information that goes against your preconceived notions. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:15 PM |
#177 |
-
Thank you. They aren't "preconceived notions." It's from EXPERIENCE. |
in_cog_ni_to |
Oct-17-11 01:29 PM |
#193 |
 -
The plural of anecdote is not evidence. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:33 PM |
#195 |
-
reading through your posts here, you wouldn't know an intelligent response.. |
frylock |
Oct-17-11 03:43 PM |
#229 |
-
imo |
negativenihil |
Oct-17-11 01:21 PM |
#187 |
 -
Of course. That potent the ops motive here. |
RegieRocker |
Oct-17-11 01:25 PM |
#192 |
 -
Yup. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:46 PM |
#204 |
-
Thats total Bullshit with a capital B |
madokie |
Oct-17-11 01:23 PM |
#189 |
 -
No one was talking about you. |
randome |
Oct-17-11 01:41 PM |
#202 |
 -
there's a lot of things people can do, and do well stoned. but to say it doesn't affect people at |
dionysus |
Oct-18-11 07:50 AM |
#246 |
-
Since some folks think this is all made up, here's a short list of studies... |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 01:31 PM |
#194 |
-
Has anyone done a full double-blind study? |
backscatter712 |
Oct-17-11 01:46 PM |
#205 |
 -
There is only one reason people smoke pot. |
randome |
Oct-17-11 02:08 PM |
#222 |
  -
So everything that alters your mind negatively effects driving ability? |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 03:20 PM |
#227 |
   -
No, of course not. |
randome |
Oct-17-11 03:29 PM |
#228 |
  -
And caffeine can also positively affect one's driving ability. |
EOTE |
Oct-17-11 04:35 PM |
#232 |
  -
Alcohol alters your mind too. And alcohol DUIs kill thousands each year. Yet it's legal... |
backscatter712 |
Oct-17-11 10:47 PM |
#245 |
 -
Double-blind with placebo? Here you go..... |
robdogbucky |
Oct-18-11 11:17 AM |
#250 |
-
That's what I was looking for! n/t |
backscatter712 |
Oct-18-11 11:18 AM |
#251 |
-
Thanks for this. |
Ignis |
Oct-18-11 07:00 PM |
#258 |
-
Goodbye. |
HuckleB |
Oct-17-11 02:02 PM |
#219 |
 -
BYE! |
in_cog_ni_to |
Oct-17-11 02:06 PM |
#221 |
 -
Hey, you started it. |
Iggo |
Oct-17-11 04:39 PM |
#234 |
 -
Thank you for showing your true intentions with this post. |
Rex |
Oct-17-11 05:48 PM |
#241 |
-
Has there ever been a poll? |
Common Sense Party |
Oct-18-11 11:22 AM |
#253 |
-
This study does fly in the face of other prior studies showing the exact opposite. Just sayin' nt |
99th_Monkey |
Oct-17-11 02:24 PM |
#224 |
-
No, don't smoke and drive |
Taverner |
Oct-17-11 05:19 PM |
#236 |
-
It is a narcotic, so no shit. |
Rex |
Oct-17-11 05:46 PM |
#240 |
-
yeah and? |
SomethingFishy |
Oct-17-11 08:34 PM |
#244 |
-
Kick |
Scurrilous |
Oct-18-11 10:52 AM |
#247 |
 -
You just had to kick this thread to the top again, |
randome |
Oct-18-11 11:26 AM |
#254 |
-
Marijuana is a magical drug. It has 100% POSITIVE effects, 0 negative. |
Common Sense Party |
Oct-18-11 11:12 AM |
#248 |
 -
Yes, it's like aspirin , only better. It does everything and takes the stains out of carpets too! |
Safetykitten |
Oct-18-11 11:15 AM |
#249 |
  -
New Shimmer is a floor wax! |
Common Sense Party |
Oct-18-11 11:20 AM |
#252 |
 -
In the new "Bong" applicator! |
Safetykitten |
Oct-18-11 11:28 AM |
#255 |
 -
I should have read first |
hughee99 |
Oct-18-11 07:12 PM |
#261 |
-
I can't believe this thread is still here. |
kayakjohnny |
Oct-18-11 07:01 PM |
#259 |
-
There are NO negative consequences to smoking marijuana, |
hughee99 |
Oct-18-11 07:11 PM |
#260 |