You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: Man shall not lay down with Verizon Wireless, for it is an abomination. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-16-11 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. Man shall not lay down with Verizon Wireless, for it is an abomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Woman Wants to Marry a Corporation The Straight Story  Jan-16-11 10:16 AM   #0 
  - ok that's just ingenious  steve2470   Jan-16-11 10:17 AM   #1 
  - lol n/t  Cetacea   Jan-16-11 11:24 AM   #22 
  - I've always said, ...  aggiesal   Jan-17-11 09:26 AM   #93 
  - corporation would not be allowed to testify against you. marriage tax breaks?  seabeyond   Jan-16-11 10:18 AM   #2 
  - CEO=  Jackpine Radical   Jan-16-11 10:21 AM   #7 
     - Bad, bad boy.  bobbolink   Jan-16-11 03:29 PM   #41 
     - rofl  liberal N proud   Jan-17-11 08:34 AM   #89 
  - If she married Sallie Mae or Liz Claiborne, Inc., is that a same-sex union?  Sabriel   Jan-16-11 10:19 AM   #3 
  - . . .  DenverDad   Jan-16-11 11:14 AM   #19 
  - +1  stevedeshazer   Jan-16-11 11:18 AM   #20 
  - "She mocketh our Borg. Crush her." - RepubliCorp & Cronies  SpiralHawk   Jan-16-11 10:20 AM   #4 
  - i think she's on to something.  xchrom   Jan-16-11 10:21 AM   #5 
  - I clicked "I'm Attending" on Facebook  FreakinDJ   Jan-16-11 10:21 AM   #6 
  - Where is she registered....  AnneD   Jan-16-11 09:54 PM   #74 
  - Don't forget a good prenup  somone   Jan-16-11 10:21 AM   #8 
  - So if two people of the same sex each form a corporation  drm604   Jan-16-11 10:24 AM   #9 
  - That would be called a "Conglomerate".  Ikonoklast   Jan-17-11 05:21 AM   #84 
     - Great... now we have to add another letter... GLBTC  OneTenthofOnePercent   Jan-17-11 09:29 AM   #94 
  - How will the corporation get a blood test?  LiberalEsto   Jan-16-11 10:25 AM   #10 
  - Blood tests are no longer required. n/t  Exilednight   Jan-16-11 03:13 PM   #33 
  - If they could, the blood that would come out is  TheEuclideanOne   Jan-16-11 07:11 PM   #62 
  - corporations suck plenty of blood from emplyees, suppliers, minority shareholders,  unblock   Jan-16-11 10:13 PM   #75 
  - I'm interested to see how this goes. I think there's a more serious side to this which is...  Poll_Blind   Jan-16-11 10:27 AM   #11 
  - Exactly. Are they 3/5's like slaves were? Or are they (more likely) 7/5's. Are they male or female?  bluerum   Jan-16-11 10:44 AM   #14 
     - As funny as this is  border_town   Jan-16-11 03:27 PM   #39 
     - Courts haven't ever seriously addressed this issue  Occulus   Jan-17-11 01:51 AM   #81 
     - welll, we *know* they already VOTE!  FirstLight   Jan-16-11 09:17 PM   #68 
     - Can they vote and have a drivers license?  AlbertCat   Jan-16-11 09:28 PM   #69 
  - Are corporations gendered?  bluerum   Jan-16-11 10:41 AM   #12 
  - Oh, yes.  Canuckistanian   Jan-16-11 10:43 AM   #13 
     - Well they have assholes too.  bluerum   Jan-16-11 10:46 AM   #15 
     - wrong  barbtries   Jan-16-11 11:42 AM   #24 
     - Are you sure?  jmowreader   Jan-16-11 07:50 PM   #64 
  - Isn't this exactly the slippery slope the Fundies were warning us about?  DCKit   Jan-16-11 10:47 AM   #16 
  - Man shall not lay down with Verizon Wireless, for it is an abomination.  Initech   Jan-16-11 11:37 AM   #23 
  - That's only until they upgarde to 5G networks. n/t  Exilednight   Jan-16-11 03:14 PM   #34 
     - If she switches phone providers, is that cheating?  Initech   Jan-16-11 03:57 PM   #44 
        - She could always get a dicorce, but then she has  Exilednight   Jan-16-11 04:04 PM   #47 
           - Could the Sprint $69 plan actually be a 69?  Initech   Jan-16-11 04:09 PM   #48 
           - She could always get a dicorce  AlbertCat   Jan-16-11 09:29 PM   #70 
  - Next up: Man on box turtle.  BlueIris   Jan-17-11 09:16 AM   #92 
  - In a hostile takeover would that be something like r@pe??  Angry Dragon   Jan-16-11 11:07 AM   #17 
  - and if a corporation owns another corporation or company is that not slavery  ThomThom   Jan-17-11 08:46 AM   #90 
  - No problem with consummation ...  silverlib   Jan-16-11 11:08 AM   #18 
  - Corporations are fucking all of us for free; why would a corp want to settle down  petronius   Jan-16-11 12:05 PM   #26 
  - So if they end up divorcing...  AC_Mem   Jan-16-11 11:20 AM   #21 
  - Go forth and create many subsidiaries.  JBoy   Jan-16-11 11:52 AM   #25 
  - That's ONE way to guarantee getting fucked regularly...  PurityOfEssence   Jan-16-11 12:48 PM   #27 
  - LOL  nilram   Jan-16-11 03:18 PM   #36 
  - Yeah, but I hope she's not expecting fidelity.  Jester Messiah   Jan-17-11 10:08 AM   #99 
  - If she gets this marriage, then another one will try the same corporation...  cascadiance   Jan-16-11 01:49 PM   #28 
  - I can think of two 'friends' of mine who would welcome that  comtec   Jan-16-11 06:06 PM   #58 
  - If you can't beat 'em join them'.  bluesmail   Jan-16-11 02:33 PM   #29 
  - Will the Board of Directors be able to ah..um. direct her? nt  pitchforksandtorches   Jan-16-11 03:01 PM   #30 
  - Maybe they're the in-laws ... just sayin ... (nt)  sunnystarr   Jan-17-11 08:30 AM   #88 
  - Funny n/t  davidwparker   Jan-16-11 03:08 PM   #31 
  - I now pronounce you Incorporated Personhood & Wife  Urban Prairie   Jan-16-11 03:09 PM   #32 
  - I know of a very nice abandoned corporation  yellerpup   Jan-16-11 03:15 PM   #35 
  - The only political stunt here is the Supreme Court "Citizens United" decision  B Calm   Jan-16-11 03:20 PM   #37 
  - Thank Jesus of Latter Day Saints!!! ... Become a Polygamist!!!  Swamp Rat   Jan-16-11 03:24 PM   #38 
  - Everyone will start looking alike after a period.  lonestarnot   Jan-16-11 03:34 PM   #43 
  - More baloney  skepticscott   Jan-16-11 03:28 PM   #40 
  - Speaking of "spewed by ignorant people about CU and the Constitution."  AlbertCat   Jan-16-11 09:36 PM   #72 
     - You're making a fool of yourself with that post  skepticscott   Jan-17-11 05:17 AM   #83 
        - You are devoid of a sense of whimsy. . . .n/t  annabanana   Jan-17-11 05:41 AM   #85 
  - Bravo!  indimuse   Jan-16-11 03:31 PM   #42 
  - Alito could marry them  lobodons   Jan-16-11 03:59 PM   #45 
  - Corporations have been fucking us for years, might as well have the right to marry them  Hugabear   Jan-16-11 03:59 PM   #46 
  - Can I marry Goldman Sachs, then?  Initech   Jan-16-11 04:10 PM   #49 
     - Sure, if I can marry Chase  Hugabear   Jan-16-11 04:12 PM   #50 
        - Fair trade!  Initech   Jan-16-11 04:13 PM   #51 
        - Just keep yer dirty mitts off of Victoria's Secrets.. she's mine!  Ghost in the Machine   Jan-16-11 05:31 PM   #54 
           - You can have Victoria's Secret, I want Flynt Publishing!  Initech   Jan-16-11 06:12 PM   #61 
  - Just as long as she and the corporation aren't gay it'll be o.k.  LastLiberal in PalmSprings   Jan-16-11 04:49 PM   #52 
  - reminds me of the Kids in the Hall sketch on Businessmen *video link*  tomm2thumbs   Jan-16-11 04:55 PM   #53 
  - I love that skit. "I'm just starting out" "Well that's a great way to break in"  BigAnth   Jan-16-11 05:37 PM   #55 
     - heh heh heh 'THAT is a merger... '  tomm2thumbs   Jan-17-11 03:19 PM   #103 
  - Don't Ask, Don't Publish an Annual Prospectus. n/t  MiddleFingerMom   Jan-16-11 05:39 PM   #56 
  - Good for her drawing attention to Citizens United. k&r  Little Star   Jan-16-11 05:40 PM   #57 
  - Two words: Community Property. (n/t)  Iggo   Jan-16-11 06:08 PM   #59 
  - This might give a whole new meaning to  man4allcats   Jan-16-11 06:09 PM   #60 
  - If a corporation can be a spouse...  Striker Davies   Jan-16-11 07:43 PM   #63 
  - Couldn't she incorporate as Sarah Echo Stiener Enterprises Inc.?  Historic NY   Jan-16-11 08:27 PM   #65 
  - Isn't there a legal precedent low concerning tax rates ?  TatonkaJames   Jan-16-11 08:46 PM   #66 
  - She should first ask for the parents' consent .... !!  defendandprotect   Jan-16-11 09:07 PM   #67 
  - Whatever corporation she finds....  DeSwiss   Jan-16-11 09:34 PM   #71 
  - Corporate "personhood" started out as a progressive idea  Recursion   Jan-16-11 09:41 PM   #73 
  - As long as she marries a MAN corporation, the RW won't mind. nt  valerief   Jan-16-11 10:25 PM   #76 
  - "political stunt", my ass...  MrMickeysMom   Jan-16-11 10:54 PM   #77 
  - SWEET!!!! Rec. nt  bertman   Jan-16-11 11:48 PM   #78 
  - Have the corporation obtain a dba as Man Co.  Festivito   Jan-16-11 11:52 PM   #79 
  - How about she does a spoof of the "Bachelorette" TV show and has 14 corporations as 'suiters'?  Turborama   Jan-17-11 12:04 AM   #80 
  - Oh, brava!  Le Taz Hot   Jan-17-11 05:08 AM   #82 
  - She should try to force a common law marriage  NobleCynic   Jan-17-11 06:11 AM   #86 
  - In Fl  quaker bill   Jan-17-11 06:26 AM   #87 
  - This should be brought, but NOT in Florida.  loudsue   Jan-17-11 09:09 AM   #91 
  - How would this interact with DOMA? n/t  JackintheGreen   Jan-17-11 09:35 AM   #95 
  - Maybe we can nominate Corporations for Presidential ballots  jeanmarc   Jan-17-11 09:58 AM   #96 
  - I want to marry Apple!  WinkyDink   Jan-17-11 10:06 AM   #97 
  - You'll have to ask Gweneth Paltrow first...  MrMickeysMom   Jan-17-11 10:11 AM   #100 
     - Yeah, I thought of this too late!  WinkyDink   Jan-17-11 10:16 AM   #101 
  - Good Luck to the Happy Couple  JawJaw   Jan-17-11 10:07 AM   #98 
  - Ooooh, I like this.  Lucian   Jan-17-11 10:20 AM   #102 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC