Straw Man
(986 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jan-16-11 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 44. You'll never convince control fetishists... |
|
Edited on Sun Jan-16-11 12:16 AM by Straw Man
...that control is their fetish.
|
| -Sparky tells the truth about the gun debate |
texshelters |
Jan-15-11 10:16 AM |
#0 |
 -
I don't think so.. some people will still try to exploit the tragedy |
aikoaiko |
Jan-15-11 10:34 AM |
#1 |
 -
LOL! Proving the point of the cartoon right out of the gate! |
Hello_Kitty |
Jan-15-11 10:36 AM |
#2 |
 -
You'll never convince a gun fetishist that their gun is their fetish. |
PSPS |
Jan-15-11 10:41 AM |
#3 |
| -
or convince others that gun magazines aren't eeeeeeeevil. |
aikoaiko |
Jan-15-11 10:47 AM |
#6 |
| -
Who said they are evil |
texshelters |
Jan-15-11 11:23 AM |
#16 |
| -
At least he said tragedy and not incident. |
Rex |
Jan-15-11 11:27 AM |
#19 |
| -
Let me ask, do you think 10 rounds is enough if someone with malice breaks into your house? |
aikoaiko |
Jan-15-11 11:27 AM |
#20 |
| -
I just need two ... |
spin |
Jan-15-11 01:00 PM |
#23 |
| -
not fair if you use OO buck with 9 lead balls (each about 9mm in diameter) per round. |
aikoaiko |
Jan-15-11 03:40 PM |
#38 |
| -
Fair? If you are in a fair fight you are doing something wrong. (n/t) |
spin |
Jan-16-11 10:46 AM |
#48 |
| -
I'm sorry, you misinterpret my joke. |
aikoaiko |
Jan-16-11 11:44 AM |
#49 |
| -
You missed my point ... |
spin |
Jan-16-11 12:16 PM |
#50 |
| -
Really, I got it. off course the home defenders should have the odds on their side. |
aikoaiko |
Jan-16-11 12:21 PM |
#52 |
| -
You'll never convince control fetishists... |
Straw Man |
Jan-16-11 12:16 AM |
#44 |
| -
Again, more paranoia |
texshelters |
Jan-15-11 11:22 AM |
#15 |
| -
What do you think I'm paranoid about? |
aikoaiko |
Jan-15-11 11:29 AM |
#21 |
| -
God, That's Perfect. Highly Rec'd. |
Paladin |
Jan-15-11 10:41 AM |
#4 |
| -
You're just sore because you can't get more gun control passed. |
aikoaiko |
Jan-15-11 10:46 AM |
#5 |
| -
a horrific act of gun violence |
DrDan |
Jan-15-11 10:49 AM |
#8 |
| -
Yes, he used a gun. |
aikoaiko |
Jan-15-11 10:53 AM |
#10 |
| -
If you believe that strict gun laws do not prevent violence, then your sanity needs to be |
Exilednight |
Jan-16-11 08:07 AM |
#47 |
| -
I think you underestimate how easily criminals will be able to get guns in the US under total bans |
aikoaiko |
Jan-16-11 12:17 PM |
#51 |
| -
Comparing drugs and guns is like comparing |
Exilednight |
Jan-16-11 02:37 PM |
#53 |
| -
You probably don't know this |
aikoaiko |
Jan-16-11 03:33 PM |
#54 |
| -
Look up the facts. The majority of guns in Mexico come from |
Exilednight |
Jan-16-11 03:55 PM |
#55 |
| -
That is not how I understand it. Successful prosecution is not required to submit gun trace request |
aikoaiko |
Jan-16-11 06:05 PM |
#56 |
| -
Then you do not understand it. n/t |
Exilednight |
Jan-16-11 06:30 PM |
#57 |
| -
Then show me where any policy or law says that mexican crime guns can't be traced until a successful |
aikoaiko |
Jan-16-11 07:06 PM |
#58 |
| -
Gun violence |
proud2BlibKansan |
Jan-15-11 10:51 AM |
#9 |
| -
Yes, he used a gun. |
aikoaiko |
Jan-15-11 10:54 AM |
#12 |
| -
Yep, that would be a start |
texshelters |
Jan-15-11 11:24 AM |
#17 |
| -
Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed |
Jan-15-11 01:07 PM |
#24 |
| -
excellent |
DrDan |
Jan-15-11 10:48 AM |
#7 |
| -
"No one is going to take your guns away" only helps people who own all the guns they could ever want |
Taitertots |
Jan-15-11 10:53 AM |
#11 |
| -
laughable? Pretending there is not paranoia over having guns taken away is what is laughable |
DrDan |
Jan-15-11 11:00 AM |
#13 |
| -
According to who? I've seen the obvious response to a President that calls for assault weapons bans |
Taitertots |
Jan-15-11 12:29 PM |
#22 |
| -
Yeah really. Nobody wants to take anyones guns away. |
beevul |
Jan-15-11 05:31 PM |
#40 |
| -
Actually .. I thought it was spot on |
Trajan |
Jan-15-11 11:19 AM |
#14 |
| -
There is no causation between gun laws and mass murder |
Taitertots |
Jan-15-11 01:16 PM |
#25 |
| -
please show the reseach that proves there is no causation |
DrDan |
Jan-15-11 01:39 PM |
#27 |
| -
Kinda like asking people to prove there is no God. |
Kaleva |
Jan-15-11 02:20 PM |
#28 |
| -
proves my point - thank you |
DrDan |
Jan-15-11 03:24 PM |
#37 |
| -
Your line of argument suggests that unicorns did indeed or do exist |
Kaleva |
Jan-15-11 09:05 PM |
#42 |
| -
you are wrong - read the thread |
DrDan |
Jan-16-11 07:36 AM |
#46 |
| -
It is fallacious thinking for you to think that would be provable |
Taitertots |
Jan-15-11 02:51 PM |
#31 |
| -
thank you - so you agree that you mistated a lack of causation - thank you |
DrDan |
Jan-15-11 03:23 PM |
#36 |
| -
But you're completely mistaking the counter-argument |
Recursion |
Jan-15-11 03:15 PM |
#33 |
| -
Understood ... |
Trajan |
Jan-15-11 06:24 PM |
#41 |
| -
I wish I could rec individual posts |
gaspee |
Jan-15-11 04:43 PM |
#39 |
| -
You are so right. The gun-thumpers make |
madinmaryland |
Jan-16-11 12:38 AM |
#45 |
| -
I would call that comment a paranoid one just like Sparky suggested
|
texshelters |
Jan-15-11 11:27 AM |
#18 |
| -
That is some funny double think you have there |
Taitertots |
Jan-15-11 01:31 PM |
#26 |
| -
Of course, you delicate flower, you. |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag |
Jan-15-11 02:29 PM |
#29 |
| -
Rarely save them, but this one is PUUURRRRFFFFEEECCTTT |
nadinbrzezinski |
Jan-15-11 02:32 PM |
#30 |
| -
Recommend |
xchrom |
Jan-15-11 03:02 PM |
#32 |
| -
AWESOME! (nt) |
fascisthunter |
Jan-15-11 03:16 PM |
#34 |
| -
How about just coming down hard on mandatory psych background checks? |
NuclearDem |
Jan-15-11 03:19 PM |
#35 |
| -
There's a psych check component in there already. |
boppers |
Jan-15-11 09:17 PM |
#43 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread