You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #52: Oh, about a third of the world's population. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-05-11 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
52. Oh, about a third of the world's population.
2/3 isn't Christian. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Vatican newspaper criticizes BBC change to 'common era' dating The Straight Story  Oct-05-11 08:52 AM   #0 
  - If I were the BBC, I'd change it to "Before Catholicism."  MineralMan   Oct-05-11 08:54 AM   #1 
  - That would indicate a date hundreds of years later than  Bluenorthwest   Oct-05-11 09:14 AM   #7 
     - it would move "year 1" to the date of the Nicean Council. nt  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-05-11 10:25 AM   #21 
     - It was a joke.  MineralMan   Oct-05-11 03:23 PM   #51 
  - I'm sort of split on this one...part of me thinks that we should leave it BC/AD  truebrit71   Oct-05-11 08:56 AM   #2 
  - BSM/ ASM?  xocet   Oct-05-11 12:56 PM   #46 
  - What does Christianism have that other religions do not have?  RC   Oct-05-11 08:59 AM   #3 
  - The world's most powerful PR machine?  Mac1949   Oct-05-11 09:27 AM   #9 
  - Oh, about a third of the world's population.  MineralMan   Oct-05-11 03:24 PM   #52 
  - Another fine whine from the west side of the Tiber.  marmar   Oct-05-11 09:04 AM   #4 
  - Is there anyone who is really offended by "BC" and "AD"?  Nye Bevan   Oct-05-11 09:05 AM   #5 
  - The Romans aren't around anymore and nobody believes in their gods.  NYC Liberal   Oct-05-11 09:09 AM   #6 
  - May The Almighty Jupiter Smite You For Your Insolence.  Ikonoklast   Oct-05-11 10:15 AM   #18 
  - You should see the way they drive in Naples.  hobbit709   Oct-05-11 11:53 AM   #30 
  - Thor is way cooler than Jupiter!  NYC Liberal   Oct-05-11 12:06 PM   #32 
     - Best Thor picture, ever---  msanthrope   Oct-05-11 12:23 PM   #37 
        - +10  RC   Oct-05-11 12:26 PM   #39 
  - I take it that you have never heard of Pagans or the various  LibertyLover   Oct-05-11 01:48 PM   #48 
  - Yep. It ain't the "Year of My Lord" 2011  panzerfaust   Oct-05-11 09:30 AM   #10 
  - er.... OK. Not sure that using "BC" and "AD" is actually "forcing all to kneel",  Nye Bevan   Oct-05-11 09:42 AM   #13 
  - Offended? Not really. But, I prefer the Common Era system.  MineralMan   Oct-05-11 09:35 AM   #12 
  - I really don't care, but I don't see the point. To me it's like changing the name of St. Paul, MN,  Nye Bevan   Oct-05-11 09:45 AM   #14 
     - Oh, dear. I'm not "highly offended"  MineralMan   Oct-05-11 12:53 PM   #45 
  - I have ALWAYS been offended by it. At least since I was ten or so,  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-05-11 09:50 AM   #15 
  - So you probably want San Francisco to be renamed, too.  Nye Bevan   Oct-05-11 10:06 AM   #16 
  - OK. Suppose you, as a christian, lived somewhere like, say, Burm,a,  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-05-11 10:24 AM   #20 
     - When you write "AD", you don't think about "the Lord"  Nye Bevan   Oct-05-11 10:33 AM   #22 
        - Wrong. YOU don't think that.  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-05-11 10:56 AM   #26 
           - "Place names for historical or mythological figure do not imply worship of those figures".  Nye Bevan   Oct-05-11 11:25 AM   #28 
              - So, you go around claiming Buddha to be your god? nt  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-05-11 11:50 AM   #29 
                 - No, but I *do* postively affirm the Christian Sainthood of the venerated Francis of Assisi  Nye Bevan   Oct-05-11 11:56 AM   #31 
                    - You are being deliberately obtuse -  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-05-11 12:15 PM   #33 
                       - You don't have to write "A.D." If you just write a year number, the "A.D." is implied.  Nye Bevan   Oct-05-11 12:27 PM   #40 
                          - No, most CHRISTIAN historians concur that there was a historical Christ.  RaleighNCDUer   Oct-05-11 12:44 PM   #43 
                             - Seriously? You put "CE" on your checks? (nt)  Nye Bevan   Oct-05-11 12:52 PM   #44 
  - ....must have been a fun kid...  Union Scribe   Oct-05-11 12:30 PM   #41 
  - post 15 aside,  Bill McBlueState   Oct-05-11 10:11 AM   #17 
  - I am.  Lucian   Oct-05-11 10:41 AM   #25 
  - +1  treestar   Oct-05-11 04:27 PM   #53 
  - Calling BCE and CE 'new terms' is incorrect  Bluenorthwest   Oct-05-11 09:22 AM   #8 
  - Exactly  RZM   Oct-05-11 12:18 PM   #36 
  - Dup:  panzerfaust   Oct-05-11 09:31 AM   #11 
  - Points to the BBC for accuracy. Christianity doesn't define history.  DirkGently   Oct-05-11 10:23 AM   #19 
  - Except, it's still the same system.  Union Scribe   Oct-05-11 12:26 PM   #38 
     - Changing the nomenclature's a good first step to chucking the whole bag of nonsense.  DirkGently   Oct-05-11 12:34 PM   #42 
  - does this mean my wireless contract will go on longer????  dembotoz   Oct-05-11 10:36 AM   #23 
  - The Vatican is just upset because they know they're becoming increasingly insignificant.  Lucian   Oct-05-11 10:38 AM   #24 
  - Good point....  truebrit71   Oct-05-11 12:16 PM   #34 
  - Time Zero translates to 00:00 January 1, 1970 UTC  hunter   Oct-05-11 11:00 AM   #27 
  - Pretty sure most of England doesn't give a shit what Pope Prada thinks.  Marrah_G   Oct-05-11 12:16 PM   #35 
  - I subscribe to Biblical Archeology Review  LibertyLover   Oct-05-11 01:46 PM   #47 
  - It is, in the words of that great philosopher  hifiguy   Oct-05-11 01:54 PM   #49 
  - Christianity has no part in our time telling. Buh-Bye!  HighContext   Oct-05-11 01:55 PM   #50 
  - "cancel every trace of Christianity from Western culture."  Puregonzo1188   Oct-05-11 04:28 PM   #54 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC