You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #11: Spell check is your friend. Use it. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. Spell check is your friend. Use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -to those opposed to killing terrorists rdking647  Oct-02-11 09:57 AM   #0 
  - Does that go for the CIA terrorists who plan the murder of innocents via drones?  Tierra_y_Libertad   Oct-02-11 10:22 AM   #1 
  - You don't believe in the Constitution, then. Only when it's  sabrina 1   Oct-02-11 10:28 AM   #2 
  - Why do you go on repeating the same false, bullshit claims?  TheWraith   Oct-02-11 01:08 PM   #38 
  - The poster also thought Al-Awlaki had been here until a couple of years ago, and posted  msanthrope   Oct-02-11 01:51 PM   #44 
     - I wouldn't be surprised if she still believes that, and says it again.  TheWraith   Oct-02-11 03:37 PM   #51 
  - We also paid 25,000.00 cash for "Terrorists" in Iraq, tortured some to death  rustydog   Oct-02-11 09:00 PM   #70 
  - Many fail to understand or refuse to understand this was a unique case..  DCBob   Oct-02-11 10:31 AM   #3 
  - Oh  Randypiper   Oct-02-11 10:34 AM   #5 
  - an exception, if you will, due to the nature and seriousness of the crime.  DCBob   Oct-02-11 10:38 AM   #7 
     - Does the nature and seriousness of the crime over rule a trial?  Randypiper   Oct-02-11 10:44 AM   #9 
     - yes, if it is deemed a threat to national security.  DCBob   Oct-02-11 10:53 AM   #14 
        - The terrorist really have won  Randypiper   Oct-02-11 11:08 AM   #19 
        - The terrorists will have won when we are forced to follow a religion not of our choice.  DCBob   Oct-02-11 11:14 AM   #21 
        - Nope. The EXISTENCE of "national security" is a radical-right meme. The CONCEPT is wrong.  saras   Oct-02-11 02:07 PM   #48 
           - The war powers act also specifically authorizes the President to go after individuals like Al-Awlaki  DCBob   Oct-02-11 08:50 PM   #66 
     - Except the next one will also be a 'unique case', don't trouble  COLGATE4   Oct-02-11 10:52 AM   #13 
        - There are probably hundreds perhaps thousands of cases that are currently being reviewed.  DCBob   Oct-02-11 10:58 AM   #16 
           - What was unique about this case? I read the Constitution and I  sabrina 1   Oct-02-11 12:08 PM   #34 
              - There's an exception to the rule when the President says it, remember?  neverforget   Oct-02-11 08:53 PM   #67 
  - How many other "unique cases" do you think can be cooked up?  TroglodyteScholar   Oct-02-11 11:18 AM   #22 
  - I dont believe anything is being "cooked up".  DCBob   Oct-02-11 11:21 AM   #24 
     - That's irrelevant.  TroglodyteScholar   Oct-02-11 11:28 AM   #25 
     - there have always been "special cases" and always will be..  DCBob   Oct-02-11 11:35 AM   #28 
        - Special cases, though, are not self-justifying as you seem to suggest.  TroglodyteScholar   Oct-02-11 11:46 AM   #29 
           - Of course not and if a President is found to be abusing that power..  DCBob   Oct-02-11 11:49 AM   #30 
     - What we believe about the guilt of innocence of anyone based only  sabrina 1   Oct-02-11 12:11 PM   #35 
     - But if there was there would be nothing to do about nor even opportunity for future correction  TheKentuckian   Oct-02-11 01:53 PM   #45 
  - Explain how it was unique. That is what Bush used to say  sabrina 1   Oct-02-11 12:01 PM   #33 
  - How do you know he was an insignfiicant "dime a dozen" "raving fundamentalist preacher"  DCBob   Oct-02-11 08:31 PM   #63 
  - Kinda like SCOTUS selecting Bush to be President ...  GeorgeGist   Oct-02-11 08:24 PM   #62 
  - His MO was talking a tough fight. he killed no one. he did not have explosives  rustydog   Oct-02-11 09:06 PM   #72 
     - AQ leadership dont do the dirty work..  DCBob   Oct-02-11 10:08 PM   #73 
  - Funny how people attempt to define others who ask questions.  mmonk   Oct-02-11 10:32 AM   #4 
  - I expect you to fully support the next Republican to exercise  obxhead   Oct-02-11 10:37 AM   #6 
  - To you so opposed to following the law of the U.S. Constitution...  Melinda   Oct-02-11 10:41 AM   #8 
  - He declared war against the U.S., therefore he is an enemy combatant and fair game.  FarLeftFist   Oct-02-11 10:45 AM   #10 
  - Says who?  COLGATE4   Oct-02-11 10:50 AM   #12 
  - Fair Game - just like Valerie Plame? The neocons considered her a traitor and an enemy. nt  bananas   Oct-02-11 04:33 PM   #59 
  - FarWhatFist? n/t  whatchamacallit   Oct-02-11 08:58 PM   #69 
  - Spell check is your friend. Use it.  COLGATE4   Oct-02-11 10:49 AM   #11 
  - I am not against killing terrorists I am against  nineteen50   Oct-02-11 10:58 AM   #15 
  - well said.  nashville_brook   Oct-02-11 04:19 PM   #56 
  - Are we becoming  nineteen50   Oct-02-11 11:01 AM   #17 
  - This is akin to a partial support of the death penalty...  Earth_First   Oct-02-11 11:01 AM   #18 
  - Would you support the terrorists targeting and killing our recruiters?  Vincardog   Oct-02-11 11:11 AM   #20 
  - Do you want the same standard applied to  Marnie   Oct-02-11 11:19 AM   #23 
  - Lots of good questions in this thread  Tsiyu   Oct-02-11 11:31 AM   #27 
  - What if you are accused of being an Al Queda member?  Vinnie From Indy   Oct-02-11 11:28 AM   #26 
  - You ask a Lawyer to help you, and don't fly out to a terrorist camp.  Amonester   Oct-02-11 11:52 AM   #31 
  - really?  Vinnie From Indy   Oct-02-11 12:19 PM   #36 
  - IF the President puts...  Amonester   Oct-02-11 01:07 PM   #37 
     - What a thoroughly disjointed reply!  Vinnie From Indy   Oct-02-11 01:11 PM   #39 
  - Of course if you aren't a famous "slam dunk" case you could have no idea and no involvement  TheKentuckian   Oct-02-11 05:32 PM   #60 
  - since im not hanging out with terrorists in tyemen im not worried  rdking647   Oct-02-11 01:48 PM   #43 
  - Under the US government definiton of Terrorism, President Obama could be  Zorra   Oct-02-11 11:57 AM   #32 
  - "An enemy of the state is whoever the state tells you is an enemy of the state."  Better Believe It   Oct-02-11 01:12 PM   #40 
  - I oppose killing, period. I don't think it benefits anything or anyone.  LWolf   Oct-02-11 01:36 PM   #41 
  - since there are so many claiming that Obama violated the constitution by killing our enemy  rdking647   Oct-02-11 01:46 PM   #42 
  - That's right! Who the hell does the ACLU think they are anyway? Under the bus with them!  Better Believe It   Oct-02-11 02:21 PM   #49 
  - The right to have Due Process before your life is taken by the State  COLGATE4   Oct-02-11 03:45 PM   #53 
  - That's such a false analogy I don't know where to begin.  JackDragna   Oct-02-11 04:31 PM   #58 
  - Consider The Company You're Now Keeping.  Paladin   Oct-02-11 01:53 PM   #46 
  - and ron paul shares yours  rdking647   Oct-02-11 01:54 PM   #47 
     - Nyah Nyah. Ron Paul says it so you must be wrong, In this case  COLGATE4   Oct-02-11 03:46 PM   #54 
  - " when your a terrorists" "glad hes dead"  Matariki   Oct-02-11 03:13 PM   #50 
  - so grammer counts in politics ???  rdking647   Oct-02-11 03:44 PM   #52 
  - By their SPELLING ye shall know them. Yea, by their spelling.  Matariki   Oct-02-11 04:20 PM   #57 
  - self delete  Matariki   Oct-02-11 04:17 PM   #55 
  - The Constitution is just a Gawd Damned piece of paper!  Xicano   Oct-02-11 05:42 PM   #61 
  - Did he make an official confession to US authoities?  Canuckistanian   Oct-02-11 08:37 PM   #64 
  - What? How the fuck you know who is a terrorist?  akbacchus_BC   Oct-02-11 08:39 PM   #65 
  - If a SUSPECT is FOUND GUILTY IN TRIAL  whatchamacallit   Oct-02-11 08:56 PM   #68 
  - So...his actual crime is Thought?  Shandris   Oct-02-11 09:01 PM   #71 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC