Melinda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
| 8. To you so opposed to following the law of the U.S. Constitution... |
|
To whom will you turn when they come for YOU? Careful now, watch what you say....
|
| -to those opposed to killing terrorists |
rdking647 |
Oct-02-11 09:57 AM |
#0 |
 -
Does that go for the CIA terrorists who plan the murder of innocents via drones? |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Oct-02-11 10:22 AM |
#1 |
| -
You don't believe in the Constitution, then. Only when it's |
sabrina 1 |
Oct-02-11 10:28 AM |
#2 |
 -
Why do you go on repeating the same false, bullshit claims? |
TheWraith |
Oct-02-11 01:08 PM |
#38 |
 -
The poster also thought Al-Awlaki had been here until a couple of years ago, and posted |
msanthrope |
Oct-02-11 01:51 PM |
#44 |
| -
I wouldn't be surprised if she still believes that, and says it again. |
TheWraith |
Oct-02-11 03:37 PM |
#51 |
| -
We also paid 25,000.00 cash for "Terrorists" in Iraq, tortured some to death |
rustydog |
Oct-02-11 09:00 PM |
#70 |
| -
Many fail to understand or refuse to understand this was a unique case.. |
DCBob |
Oct-02-11 10:31 AM |
#3 |
| -
Oh |
Randypiper |
Oct-02-11 10:34 AM |
#5 |
| -
an exception, if you will, due to the nature and seriousness of the crime. |
DCBob |
Oct-02-11 10:38 AM |
#7 |
| -
Does the nature and seriousness of the crime over rule a trial? |
Randypiper |
Oct-02-11 10:44 AM |
#9 |
| -
yes, if it is deemed a threat to national security. |
DCBob |
Oct-02-11 10:53 AM |
#14 |
| -
The terrorist really have won |
Randypiper |
Oct-02-11 11:08 AM |
#19 |
| -
The terrorists will have won when we are forced to follow a religion not of our choice. |
DCBob |
Oct-02-11 11:14 AM |
#21 |
| -
Nope. The EXISTENCE of "national security" is a radical-right meme. The CONCEPT is wrong. |
saras |
Oct-02-11 02:07 PM |
#48 |
| -
The war powers act also specifically authorizes the President to go after individuals like Al-Awlaki |
DCBob |
Oct-02-11 08:50 PM |
#66 |
| -
Except the next one will also be a 'unique case', don't trouble |
COLGATE4 |
Oct-02-11 10:52 AM |
#13 |
| -
There are probably hundreds perhaps thousands of cases that are currently being reviewed. |
DCBob |
Oct-02-11 10:58 AM |
#16 |
| -
What was unique about this case? I read the Constitution and I |
sabrina 1 |
Oct-02-11 12:08 PM |
#34 |
| -
There's an exception to the rule when the President says it, remember? |
neverforget |
Oct-02-11 08:53 PM |
#67 |
| -
How many other "unique cases" do you think can be cooked up? |
TroglodyteScholar |
Oct-02-11 11:18 AM |
#22 |
| -
I dont believe anything is being "cooked up". |
DCBob |
Oct-02-11 11:21 AM |
#24 |
| -
That's irrelevant. |
TroglodyteScholar |
Oct-02-11 11:28 AM |
#25 |
| -
there have always been "special cases" and always will be.. |
DCBob |
Oct-02-11 11:35 AM |
#28 |
| -
Special cases, though, are not self-justifying as you seem to suggest. |
TroglodyteScholar |
Oct-02-11 11:46 AM |
#29 |
| -
Of course not and if a President is found to be abusing that power.. |
DCBob |
Oct-02-11 11:49 AM |
#30 |
| -
What we believe about the guilt of innocence of anyone based only |
sabrina 1 |
Oct-02-11 12:11 PM |
#35 |
| -
But if there was there would be nothing to do about nor even opportunity for future correction |
TheKentuckian |
Oct-02-11 01:53 PM |
#45 |
| -
Explain how it was unique. That is what Bush used to say |
sabrina 1 |
Oct-02-11 12:01 PM |
#33 |
| -
How do you know he was an insignfiicant "dime a dozen" "raving fundamentalist preacher" |
DCBob |
Oct-02-11 08:31 PM |
#63 |
| -
Kinda like SCOTUS selecting Bush to be President ... |
GeorgeGist |
Oct-02-11 08:24 PM |
#62 |
| -
His MO was talking a tough fight. he killed no one. he did not have explosives |
rustydog |
Oct-02-11 09:06 PM |
#72 |
| -
AQ leadership dont do the dirty work.. |
DCBob |
Oct-02-11 10:08 PM |
#73 |
| -
Funny how people attempt to define others who ask questions. |
mmonk |
Oct-02-11 10:32 AM |
#4 |
| -
I expect you to fully support the next Republican to exercise |
obxhead |
Oct-02-11 10:37 AM |
#6 |
| -
To you so opposed to following the law of the U.S. Constitution... |
Melinda |
Oct-02-11 10:41 AM |
#8 |
| -
He declared war against the U.S., therefore he is an enemy combatant and fair game. |
FarLeftFist |
Oct-02-11 10:45 AM |
#10 |
| -
Says who? |
COLGATE4 |
Oct-02-11 10:50 AM |
#12 |
| -
Fair Game - just like Valerie Plame? The neocons considered her a traitor and an enemy. nt |
bananas |
Oct-02-11 04:33 PM |
#59 |
| -
FarWhatFist? n/t |
whatchamacallit |
Oct-02-11 08:58 PM |
#69 |
| -
Spell check is your friend. Use it. |
COLGATE4 |
Oct-02-11 10:49 AM |
#11 |
| -
I am not against killing terrorists I am against |
nineteen50 |
Oct-02-11 10:58 AM |
#15 |
| -
well said. |
nashville_brook |
Oct-02-11 04:19 PM |
#56 |
| -
Are we becoming |
nineteen50 |
Oct-02-11 11:01 AM |
#17 |
| -
This is akin to a partial support of the death penalty... |
Earth_First |
Oct-02-11 11:01 AM |
#18 |
| -
Would you support the terrorists targeting and killing our recruiters? |
Vincardog |
Oct-02-11 11:11 AM |
#20 |
| -
Do you want the same standard applied to |
Marnie |
Oct-02-11 11:19 AM |
#23 |
| -
Lots of good questions in this thread |
Tsiyu |
Oct-02-11 11:31 AM |
#27 |
| -
What if you are accused of being an Al Queda member? |
Vinnie From Indy |
Oct-02-11 11:28 AM |
#26 |
| -
You ask a Lawyer to help you, and don't fly out to a terrorist camp. |
Amonester |
Oct-02-11 11:52 AM |
#31 |
| -
really? |
Vinnie From Indy |
Oct-02-11 12:19 PM |
#36 |
| -
IF the President puts... |
Amonester |
Oct-02-11 01:07 PM |
#37 |
| -
What a thoroughly disjointed reply! |
Vinnie From Indy |
Oct-02-11 01:11 PM |
#39 |
| -
Of course if you aren't a famous "slam dunk" case you could have no idea and no involvement |
TheKentuckian |
Oct-02-11 05:32 PM |
#60 |
| -
since im not hanging out with terrorists in tyemen im not worried |
rdking647 |
Oct-02-11 01:48 PM |
#43 |
| -
Under the US government definiton of Terrorism, President Obama could be |
Zorra |
Oct-02-11 11:57 AM |
#32 |
| -
"An enemy of the state is whoever the state tells you is an enemy of the state." |
Better Believe It |
Oct-02-11 01:12 PM |
#40 |
| -
I oppose killing, period. I don't think it benefits anything or anyone. |
LWolf |
Oct-02-11 01:36 PM |
#41 |
| -
since there are so many claiming that Obama violated the constitution by killing our enemy |
rdking647 |
Oct-02-11 01:46 PM |
#42 |
| -
That's right! Who the hell does the ACLU think they are anyway? Under the bus with them! |
Better Believe It |
Oct-02-11 02:21 PM |
#49 |
| -
The right to have Due Process before your life is taken by the State |
COLGATE4 |
Oct-02-11 03:45 PM |
#53 |
| -
That's such a false analogy I don't know where to begin. |
JackDragna |
Oct-02-11 04:31 PM |
#58 |
| -
Consider The Company You're Now Keeping. |
Paladin |
Oct-02-11 01:53 PM |
#46 |
| -
and ron paul shares yours |
rdking647 |
Oct-02-11 01:54 PM |
#47 |
| -
Nyah Nyah. Ron Paul says it so you must be wrong, In this case |
COLGATE4 |
Oct-02-11 03:46 PM |
#54 |
| -
" when your a terrorists" "glad hes dead" |
Matariki |
Oct-02-11 03:13 PM |
#50 |
| -
so grammer counts in politics ??? |
rdking647 |
Oct-02-11 03:44 PM |
#52 |
| -
By their SPELLING ye shall know them. Yea, by their spelling. |
Matariki |
Oct-02-11 04:20 PM |
#57 |
| -
self delete |
Matariki |
Oct-02-11 04:17 PM |
#55 |
| -
The Constitution is just a Gawd Damned piece of paper! |
Xicano |
Oct-02-11 05:42 PM |
#61 |
| -
Did he make an official confession to US authoities? |
Canuckistanian |
Oct-02-11 08:37 PM |
#64 |
| -
What? How the fuck you know who is a terrorist? |
akbacchus_BC |
Oct-02-11 08:39 PM |
#65 |
| -
If a SUSPECT is FOUND GUILTY IN TRIAL |
whatchamacallit |
Oct-02-11 08:56 PM |
#68 |
| -
So...his actual crime is Thought? |
Shandris |
Oct-02-11 09:01 PM |
#71 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread