ellisonz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-11 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 56. the so-called "law enforcement approach" |
|
Instead of full scale military onslaught.
|
| -Strike Three--Obama got the Planner, the Propagandist, and the PETN Lover--all in one strike. |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 08:39 PM |
#0 |
 -
Shouldn't the facts been presented in COURT? |
Vincardog |
Oct-01-11 08:41 PM |
#1 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-01-11 08:42 PM |
#3 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-01-11 08:45 PM |
#5 |
| -
No. Military targets don't need an indictment, or a trial. nt |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 08:53 PM |
#8 |
| -
The military is not lawless. There are Rules of Engagement |
ixion |
Oct-01-11 08:58 PM |
#11 |
| -
Yes, there are. Tell us how this violated them. nt |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 09:00 PM |
#12 |
| -
for starters, he violated the War Powers Act |
ixion |
Oct-01-11 09:04 PM |
#15 |
| -
Ok. How??? nt |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 09:06 PM |
#17 |
| -
See post #14 eom |
ixion |
Oct-01-11 09:10 PM |
#19 |
| -
That was a spectacular reading fail. |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 09:13 PM |
#23 |
| -
I don't support the Bush Doctrine |
ixion |
Oct-01-11 09:21 PM |
#29 |
| -
Neither do I. Bush started wars. Obama targeted actual terrorists. |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 09:26 PM |
#32 |
| -
If you think this assassination makes anything better, your mistaken |
ixion |
Oct-02-11 02:44 AM |
#48 |
| -
Well they won't be building any more bombs... |
ellisonz |
Oct-02-11 04:15 AM |
#54 |
| -
that's naive of you to say |
ixion |
Oct-02-11 05:27 AM |
#59 |
| -
lol |
ellisonz |
Oct-02-11 05:37 AM |
#61 |
| -
laugh it up, funnyboy |
ixion |
Oct-02-11 05:40 AM |
#63 |
| -
I am straight to my CIA trained bank of lulz. |
ellisonz |
Oct-02-11 06:00 AM |
#65 |
| -
why waste my time |
ixion |
Oct-02-11 06:07 AM |
#68 |
| -
you got nada |
ellisonz |
Oct-02-11 06:09 AM |
#69 |
| -
I've got better things to do |
ixion |
Oct-02-11 06:16 AM |
#70 |
| -
well done |
fascisthunter |
Oct-02-11 11:07 AM |
#75 |
| -
It's not the Bush Doctrine...stop parading it as such. |
ellisonz |
Oct-02-11 04:12 AM |
#53 |
| -
preemptive warfare is exactly the Bush Doctrine |
ixion |
Oct-02-11 05:26 AM |
#58 |
| -
I think you need to look up the definition of pre-emptive... |
ellisonz |
Oct-02-11 05:37 AM |
#60 |
| -
they are one in the same, and made popular by Bush |
ixion |
Oct-02-11 05:40 AM |
#62 |
| -
Not according to scholars of international relations... |
ellisonz |
Oct-02-11 05:55 AM |
#64 |
| -
Disagree with you and we support the bush doctrine?? |
cliffordu |
Oct-02-11 11:07 AM |
#76 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Oct-01-11 09:00 PM |
#13 |
| -
Anybody in Al-Qaeda is a military target under the AUMF of 9/18/2001. |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 09:05 PM |
#16 |
| -
And if they say YOU are in Al-Qaeda? |
Vincardog |
Oct-01-11 09:06 PM |
#18 |
| -
I think this guy was Al-Qaeda. Just a guess. nt |
gateley |
Oct-01-11 09:11 PM |
#22 |
| -
Well, I'm not gonna go in a convoy with the Al-Q online editor and bomb-maker, am I? |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 09:17 PM |
#25 |
| -
Maybe you're not, but if they SAY you did, you're fucking dead anyway. nt |
RaleighNCDUer |
Oct-01-11 10:12 PM |
#43 |
| -
Not really. Got an example? |
ellisonz |
Oct-02-11 04:17 AM |
#55 |
| -
Well, that's the poinst, isn't it? Once you are dead, and the government |
RaleighNCDUer |
Oct-03-11 10:43 AM |
#84 |
| -
The funny thing is who ya gonna complain to when you are a |
Vinnie From Indy |
Oct-01-11 10:19 PM |
#46 |
| -
Look, we're at war. 9-11 changed everything. |
BlueCheese |
Oct-01-11 09:28 PM |
#33 |
| -
the only thing it changed was a loss of civil liberty in the US |
ixion |
Oct-02-11 02:45 AM |
#49 |
| -
Can they use the Daily Mail in Court? n/t |
malaise |
Oct-01-11 09:18 PM |
#27 |
| -
What court gave the underwear bomber authority to blow up an airplane? |
Renew Deal |
Oct-01-11 09:22 PM |
#31 |
| -
when in any war did we not use combat and went for arrests? nt |
seabeyond |
Oct-01-11 10:00 PM |
#41 |
| -
Apparently |
Harmony Blue |
Oct-02-11 02:21 PM |
#80 |
| -
But Hussein had WMD!!! What does that have to do with your post? |
polly7 |
Oct-01-11 08:41 PM |
#2 |
| -
Had Bush target-killed OBL and more top AL-Qs, I think it would have been far more |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 08:57 PM |
#10 |
| -
Nobody with an IQ over 70 EVER thought Iraq had anything to |
RaleighNCDUer |
Oct-01-11 10:14 PM |
#44 |
| -
the so-called "law enforcement approach" |
ellisonz |
Oct-02-11 04:21 AM |
#56 |
| -
Go TEAM OBAMA! WHo cares about the fucking Constitution1!!????? |
MNBrewer |
Oct-01-11 08:43 PM |
#4 |
| -
+1 --- |
defendandprotect |
Oct-01-11 08:47 PM |
#6 |
| -
The Constitution was followed. The President has the power, under the AUMF issued under the War |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 08:54 PM |
#9 |
| -
no, he didn't. |
ixion |
Oct-01-11 09:00 PM |
#14 |
| -
Wow, Readng fail. Read the second sentence, where he needs Congressional authorization? |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 09:10 PM |
#21 |
| -
YOu keep saying AUMF authorizes what he did |
MNBrewer |
Oct-01-11 09:30 PM |
#34 |
| -
Well, I can only post the AUMF. I can't make you understand it. nt |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 09:34 PM |
#36 |
| -
You can't teach what you don't understand, I guess |
MNBrewer |
Oct-01-11 09:40 PM |
#38 |
| -
What, exactly, is the wording of the AUMF that allows attacks on |
RaleighNCDUer |
Oct-01-11 09:18 PM |
#26 |
| -
Here: |
msanthrope |
Oct-01-11 09:33 PM |
#35 |
| -
Have you really READ that POS? |
RaleighNCDUer |
Oct-01-11 09:55 PM |
#39 |
| -
exactly. |
ixion |
Oct-02-11 02:47 AM |
#50 |
| -
+1 |
fascisthunter |
Oct-02-11 11:07 AM |
#77 |
| -
Nice job, President Obama. The rule of law via the AUMF was followed, too. |
ClarkUSA |
Oct-01-11 08:51 PM |
#7 |
| -
Clinton only had cruise missiles. |
bluestate10 |
Oct-01-11 09:14 PM |
#24 |
| -
Rule of law is meaningless when the law is wrong. nt |
RaleighNCDUer |
Oct-01-11 10:16 PM |
#45 |
| -
Very nice! nt |
Lucky Luciano |
Oct-01-11 09:10 PM |
#20 |
| -
The government has targeted plenty of innocent people - |
gateley |
Oct-01-11 09:19 PM |
#28 |
| -
+100. Well said! n/t |
Tx4obama |
Oct-02-11 05:10 AM |
#57 |
| -
Obama is not our immortal President with and endless term. |
TheKentuckian |
Oct-02-11 08:33 AM |
#71 |
| -
Sounds good. |
Renew Deal |
Oct-01-11 09:21 PM |
#30 |
| -
Hat trick! |
Scurrilous |
Oct-01-11 09:34 PM |
#37 |
| -
USA USA ! we're #1 we're #1 |
bahrbearian |
Oct-01-11 09:56 PM |
#40 |
| -
No reason to go to Iraq, then. |
RaleighNCDUer |
Oct-01-11 10:10 PM |
#42 |
| -
K&R n/t |
Tx4obama |
Oct-01-11 10:59 PM |
#47 |
| -
You are so gullible and so willing to dispense with |
coalition_unwilling |
Oct-02-11 02:48 AM |
#51 |
| -
the wingnuts |
unionworks |
Oct-02-11 03:07 AM |
#52 |
| -
Tell them to Vote Romney in the primary. |
ellisonz |
Oct-02-11 06:05 AM |
#67 |
| -
If you don't trust Bush with this level of power and unchecked authority then it shouldn't |
TheKentuckian |
Oct-02-11 08:44 AM |
#72 |
| -
They now have the right to remain silent. |
Swede |
Oct-02-11 06:04 AM |
#66 |
| -
The legal justification for the "Unitary Executive"assassination of an American citizen. |
bvar22 |
Oct-02-11 10:59 AM |
#73 |
| -
you are my favorite poster |
unionworks |
Oct-02-11 02:07 PM |
#78 |
| -
what an idiotic attempt to argue in favor of unrestricted power |
fascisthunter |
Oct-02-11 11:02 AM |
#74 |
| -
P.S. |
unionworks |
Oct-02-11 02:19 PM |
#79 |
| -
Terrorists are not soldiers, they are criminals. |
Odin2005 |
Oct-02-11 02:41 PM |
#81 |
| -
now they are dead criminals |
unionworks |
Oct-02-11 02:45 PM |
#82 |
| -
Exactly and they should be treated as criminals, not raised to some mythic "terrorist" status |
dflprincess |
Oct-02-11 09:17 PM |
#83 |
| -
Hope he starts going after Bush and Cheney. |
deaniac21 |
Oct-03-11 11:22 AM |
#85 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread