You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #66: It's nothing new [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
LuckyTheDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #64
66. It's nothing new
just because a dem does it does not make war any different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Re: al-Awlaki ... you know who else was a U.S. citizen? Robert E. Lee LuckyTheDog  Oct-01-11 08:16 AM   #0 
  - ...  xchrom   Oct-01-11 08:18 AM   #1 
  - Problem with OP argument: Lee had the chance to get his mansion back facing the US Capitol  Leopolds Ghost   Oct-04-11 12:29 AM   #107 
  - There are consequences for committing treason. That shouldn't be a surprise.  Pirate Smile   Oct-01-11 08:24 AM   #2 
  - The constitution does not remove the obligation of the state to follow  Warren Stupidity   Oct-01-11 08:48 AM   #7 
     - I don't care if Lee was eating his breakfast...  LuckyTheDog   Oct-01-11 08:55 AM   #9 
     - Again the issue is the assertion by the executive branch that it can,  Warren Stupidity   Oct-01-11 12:29 PM   #31 
     - It is not at all troubling...  LuckyTheDog   Oct-02-11 11:14 PM   #41 
        - what nations army were these men in?  SwampG8r   Oct-02-11 11:34 PM   #53 
     - I suspect Lee would have been more valuable as a prisoner.  Bake   Oct-03-11 03:34 PM   #86 
        - actually he passed as a young-ish man at 63 years old. nt  GSLevel9   Oct-03-11 04:27 PM   #90 
        - Lee was more valuable to the US right where he was: leading Confederate forces!  ieoeja   Oct-03-11 04:33 PM   #92 
     - Out of curiosity, do you feel the same way every time a fugitive is killed by law enforcement?  TheWraith   Oct-03-11 12:27 AM   #58 
        - There is a HUGE difference...  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 04:59 PM   #100 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-01-11 08:29 AM   #3 
  - Unrec for whining and calling DUers cowards.  pintobean   Oct-01-11 08:42 AM   #6 
     - It's a pet peeve  LuckyTheDog   Oct-01-11 08:49 AM   #8 
        - click of the mouse bullying  pintobean   Oct-01-11 08:56 AM   #10 
        - Yep  LuckyTheDog   Oct-01-11 08:57 AM   #11 
           - Admins repeatedly say that 's so little, if at all  pintobean   Oct-01-11 09:03 AM   #13 
        - You're a Nazi.  Iggo   Oct-01-11 10:18 AM   #27 
  - You bring up something I hadn't thought of before.  classof56   Oct-01-11 08:34 AM   #4 
  - Robert E. Lee lost his citizenship.  enlightenment   Oct-01-11 09:02 AM   #12 
  - If I were President after Lee's side was defeated, I would have hung  bluestate10   Oct-01-11 09:12 AM   #14 
  - So you would have executed tens of thousands of prisoners or war?  Warren Stupidity   Oct-01-11 12:30 PM   #32 
  - I would've just kept the troops there as long as it took to deal with the Klan  Hippo_Tron   Oct-03-11 12:14 AM   #57 
  - Thank you for your response and the clarification.  classof56   Oct-01-11 11:54 AM   #28 
  - President Davis was the morwe interesting case  Yupster   Oct-02-11 11:29 PM   #49 
     - and why did they not want to go to court?  SwampG8r   Oct-02-11 11:37 PM   #54 
  - dont let facts get in the way of a blustery OP... nt  GSLevel9   Oct-03-11 04:29 PM   #91 
  - There were confederates that came from northern states that never seceded.  AngkorWot   Oct-01-11 10:14 AM   #26 
  - noshit, Sherlock. "war is hell" signed ~ Sherman.  Tuesday Afternoon   Oct-01-11 08:40 AM   #5 
  - Lee lost his citizenship  RetroLounge   Oct-01-11 09:16 AM   #15 
  - And? So?  LuckyTheDog   Oct-02-11 11:24 PM   #46 
  - Lee also led armies  SixthSense   Oct-01-11 09:25 AM   #16 
  - He was in the leadership...  LuckyTheDog   Oct-02-11 11:17 PM   #43 
     - we don't actually have any evidence of that  SixthSense   Oct-03-11 08:18 AM   #59 
     - WTF?  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 08:36 AM   #60 
        - That's not true at all  SixthSense   Oct-03-11 08:41 AM   #62 
           - All I am saying is...  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 03:31 PM   #85 
              - There is something quite new here  SixthSense   Oct-03-11 04:16 PM   #89 
                 - Nope.  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 04:46 PM   #97 
     - Actually, the Administration has been saying for years that AQ has been pinned down ineffectual  Leopolds Ghost   Oct-04-11 12:26 AM   #106 
  - unrec for false analogy.  obxhead   Oct-01-11 09:48 AM   #17 
  - Awlaki was a leader or terrorists directly ordering strikes against the US  AngkorWot   Oct-01-11 09:53 AM   #18 
  - Really? You have evidence of that?  obxhead   Oct-01-11 09:57 AM   #19 
     - This isn't a law enforcement exercise, stop pretending it is. - nt  badtoworse   Oct-01-11 10:09 AM   #22 
     - That is the problem: it really should be a law enforcement exercise.  Warren Stupidity   Oct-01-11 12:42 PM   #33 
        - "a small criminal gang" that has killed thousands in various terrorist acts  badtoworse   Oct-01-11 03:41 PM   #34 
     - Why wasn't Lee?  AngkorWot   Oct-01-11 10:09 AM   #23 
        - Lee wasn't tried for the same reason as Jefferson Davis  Yupster   Oct-02-11 11:32 PM   #52 
  - Ummmm...  LuckyTheDog   Oct-02-11 11:18 PM   #44 
  - al-Awlaki was a leader in a group waging war against the US  badtoworse   Oct-01-11 09:57 AM   #20 
  - Did he renounce his citizenship? I don't know. n/t  oneshooter   Oct-01-11 10:08 AM   #21 
  - If we was acting in concert with enemies, then yes, he renounced his citizenship.  badtoworse   Oct-01-11 10:13 AM   #25 
  - Why not? Don't we claim that terrorism isn't legitimate military action, but crime?  DirkGently   Oct-03-11 11:00 AM   #77 
  - So was Abraham Lincoln.  Tierra_y_Libertad   Oct-01-11 10:10 AM   #24 
  - Lincoln did NOT order the assassination of Robert E Lee.  bvar22   Oct-01-11 11:57 AM   #29 
  - Actually he ordered the killing of over 94,000 citizens....  whistler162   Oct-01-11 04:50 PM   #37 
  - Had Lee ben in the sights of any private on the battlfield...  LuckyTheDog   Oct-02-11 11:28 PM   #48 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Oct-01-11 12:00 PM   #30 
  - you are a huge bigot arent you?  SwampG8r   Oct-02-11 11:41 PM   #55 
  - You realized that the Confederacy act as a state despite us not recognizing them as such  TheKentuckian   Oct-01-11 04:09 PM   #35 
  - so what country was al-Awlaki fighting for?  provis99   Oct-01-11 04:45 PM   #36 
  - Ummmm.... Get a clue  LuckyTheDog   Oct-02-11 11:29 PM   #50 
  - This analogy fails in every possible way. This was not a battle. There is not a "war." We don't  DirkGently   Oct-01-11 08:40 PM   #38 
  - Exactly, the rational behind that action, as well as its legality,  Fool Count   Oct-01-11 09:35 PM   #39 
  - The comparison is dead-on  LuckyTheDog   Oct-02-11 11:23 PM   #45 
     - It is illegal. It is not war. But it is not new. It is what we call "terrorism" when others do it.  DirkGently   Oct-03-11 10:02 AM   #72 
        - You CAN make war on an organization  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 03:45 PM   #87 
           - HAve you seen the facts or are you just going on the information  Angry Dragon   Oct-03-11 04:09 PM   #88 
              - I've been to Ground Zero.  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 04:39 PM   #94 
                 - Yes I know that the towers are down  Angry Dragon   Oct-03-11 04:57 PM   #99 
                    - Save that for somebody more paranoid (nt)  LuckyTheDog   Oct-04-11 04:27 PM   #108 
  - Do you really believe anyone would have killed Lee though?  Puregonzo1188   Oct-01-11 09:39 PM   #40 
  - Of course they would have (nt)  LuckyTheDog   Oct-02-11 11:15 PM   #42 
  - Someone killed Lincoln. That, we know.  FrenchieCat   Oct-02-11 11:25 PM   #47 
  - uh. hell yeah.  Tuesday Afternoon   Oct-03-11 09:08 AM   #69 
  - that was a real declared war  SwampG8r   Oct-02-11 11:32 PM   #51 
  - OK, great  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 08:42 AM   #63 
     - organizations that kill americans?  SwampG8r   Oct-03-11 08:49 AM   #65 
     - When the the mafia kills 3,000 people ...  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 08:53 AM   #68 
        - war?  SwampG8r   Oct-03-11 09:59 AM   #70 
        - Here's a dollar  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 03:14 PM   #79 
        - Do you really think the Mafia hasn't killed 3,000 people & has no worldwide network?  DirkGently   Oct-03-11 10:10 AM   #73 
        - A terrrorist network? Out to kill innocent Americans at random?  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 03:15 PM   #80 
        - wake up  SwampG8r   Oct-04-11 12:02 AM   #103 
     - We arrest criminals. We prove their guilt. We leave blowing people up to terrorists.  DirkGently   Oct-03-11 10:15 AM   #74 
        - al Awlaki was a combatant  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 05:01 PM   #101 
  - i thought we had heard all the conservative bullshit about 9/11  SwampG8r   Oct-02-11 11:44 PM   #56 
  - This is not "consevative bullshit"  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 08:40 AM   #61 
     - did i spellit wrong?it is conservative bullshit  SwampG8r   Oct-03-11 08:47 AM   #64 
        - It's nothing new  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 08:49 AM   #66 
           - and just because a dem did it  SwampG8r   Oct-03-11 10:00 AM   # 
           - And ONCE AGAIN  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 03:17 PM   #81 
           - nor does it make it morally correct  SwampG8r   Oct-04-11 12:07 AM   #104 
  - it just bugs me that Obama has the guts to do this, but won't prosecute Cheney  librechik   Oct-03-11 08:49 AM   #67 
  - Very poor comparison...he was shooting at us...healthy unrec for this fail...nt  joeybee12   Oct-03-11 10:00 AM   #71 
  - No, he wasn't shooting at "us." His men were shooting at "you."  Honeycombe8   Oct-04-11 12:09 AM   #105 
  - Not sure analogy is totally comparable, but I don't see the problem with killing of this guy..  octothorpe   Oct-03-11 10:23 AM   #75 
  - actually, the rules of war for the Civil War forbade assassinations  fishwax   Oct-03-11 10:57 AM   #76 
  - Excellent point. Wars have rules of engagement. What's argued here is that there are no rules.  DirkGently   Oct-03-11 11:03 AM   #78 
  - So, in WWII, when the allies tried to kil Hitler...  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 03:26 PM   #84 
  - And yet, 600,000 people were killed  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 03:22 PM   #82 
     - Killed in battle and targeted for assassination are different things  fishwax   Oct-03-11 04:54 PM   #98 
  - They buried the war dead. Well many of them anyway, basically in his yard.  alphafemale   Oct-03-11 03:25 PM   #83 
  - This is a bizarre comparison. n/t  demmiblue   Oct-03-11 04:38 PM   #93 
  - Not if you think it through for 5 seconds (nt)  LuckyTheDog   Oct-03-11 04:40 PM   #95 
     - That is probably my problem... I thought about it for 2.5 seconds. n/t  demmiblue   Oct-03-11 04:44 PM   #96 
  - All well and good except R. E. Lee had given up his U.S. citizenship -  lynne   Oct-03-11 05:01 PM   #102 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC