LooseWilly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-10-11 03:49 AM
Response to Original message |
| 57. No you don't. You stand with those who are pledging loyalty to the Democratic property... you don't |
|
give a shit about labor.
How about a moment of honesty? Maybe even two moments of honesty.
If some leaders of labor are flirting with the "lesser evil"... standing with them does not equate with educating yourself or them... it's more of a case of encouraging mouth-breathing...
I'll await a criticism by lackeys of capital, to give voice to the governmental powers to take people's shit away and give it to conglomerated collectives.... (damned tough to strike...)
|
| -I stand with labor. |
Robb |
Sep-09-11 10:43 AM |
#0 |
-
The problem is is that they're yet again buying stuff peddled by someone who says one thing and does |
FLAprogressive |
Sep-09-11 10:46 AM |
#1 |
 -
yes, we get it, that mean 'ol lyin; obama again. |
dionysus |
Sep-09-11 10:47 AM |
#2 |
  -
If Obama passes anything of the sort... it'll be a friggin' miracle. |
LooseWilly |
Sep-10-11 03:41 AM |
#56 |
 -
obama |
demoblemocratic |
Sep-11-11 04:45 PM |
#69 |
 -
Yawn. Nt |
DevonRex |
Sep-09-11 10:52 AM |
#4 |
 -
Too bad replies can't be unrec'd. n/t |
Avalux |
Sep-09-11 11:26 AM |
#9 |
-
As do I. BTW |
DevonRex |
Sep-09-11 10:52 AM |
#3 |
 -
flattery will get you nowhere, you know. |
mopinko |
Sep-09-11 11:24 AM |
#5 |
  -
Heh heh. |
DevonRex |
Sep-09-11 11:41 AM |
#11 |
 -
Oh, noes! Cooties! LOL. |
Rhiannon12866 |
Sep-09-11 01:39 PM |
#16 |
-
Nah. |
DevonRex |
Sep-09-11 06:20 PM |
#34 |
 -
Well, that makes one out of 175,040!!! |
Rhiannon12866 |
Sep-10-11 03:18 AM |
#55 |
-
Speaking of Cooties... |
NYC_SKP |
Sep-09-11 09:06 PM |
#46 |
-
I'm not naming names, but I think a certain person filled it with green tea... |
Rhiannon12866 |
Sep-10-11 03:14 AM |
#54 |
-
Kick |
pinto |
Sep-09-11 11:25 AM |
#6 |
-
K&R...nt |
SidDithers |
Sep-09-11 11:25 AM |
#7 |
-
So do I. nt |
sufrommich |
Sep-09-11 11:25 AM |
#8 |
-
conditionally |
Claudia Jones |
Sep-09-11 11:28 AM |
#10 |
 -
I don't see how you can imply that when it's pretty much quotes and their sources. n/t |
LoZoccolo |
Sep-09-11 12:16 PM |
#13 |
-
yes you do |
Claudia Jones |
Sep-09-11 12:27 PM |
#15 |
-
Not really, because I saw this about two weeks ago. |
LoZoccolo |
Sep-09-11 02:27 PM |
#18 |
-
More stood with Labor before Labor stood with the jobs bill. |
Robb |
Sep-09-11 04:45 PM |
#19 |
 -
so clever |
Claudia Jones |
Sep-09-11 04:59 PM |
#22 |
-
Thank you Claudia |
tgal |
Sep-09-11 05:00 PM |
#23 |
-
Democrats are just lucky, I suppose. |
Robb |
Sep-09-11 05:05 PM |
#25 |
-
We have a traditional alliance founded on mutual self-interest |
Generic Other |
Sep-09-11 05:27 PM |
#32 |
-
You are able to read people's minds?! Don't state something as a fact unless it is. |
FarLeftFist |
Sep-09-11 06:54 PM |
#36 |
-
read people's minds? |
Claudia Jones |
Sep-09-11 07:06 PM |
#40 |
-
Then how can you state as fact that people only support Labor b/c they support Dems? |
FarLeftFist |
Sep-09-11 07:50 PM |
#41 |
-
easy |
Claudia Jones |
Sep-09-11 07:54 PM |
#43 |
-
So you think people only support Labor b/c they support Dems?! |
FarLeftFist |
Sep-09-11 09:06 PM |
#47 |
-
some, yes |
Claudia Jones |
Sep-09-11 10:04 PM |
#48 |
-
I'm interested in your profiling techniques. |
FarLeftFist |
Sep-10-11 02:42 PM |
#65 |
-
that is interesting |
Claudia Jones |
Sep-11-11 04:36 PM |
#68 |
-
You have never (not once) seen an anti-labor post here? Yikes, that |
coalition_unwilling |
Sep-11-11 04:50 PM |
#70 |
-
A lot of HUGE K&R'ing in that thread... |
Bobbie Jo |
Sep-09-11 05:57 PM |
#33 |
-
It's so very, very innnnnteresting, isn't it? |
Number23 |
Sep-09-11 06:26 PM |
#35 |
-
Quite. |
Bobbie Jo |
Sep-09-11 08:02 PM |
#44 |
-
k&r |
HappyMe |
Sep-09-11 12:11 PM |
#12 |
-
K&R! |
LoZoccolo |
Sep-09-11 12:17 PM |
#14 |
-
I stand firmly with labor. No exceptions. Let's hope the chess game plays out well. n/t |
AverageJoe90 |
Sep-09-11 01:41 PM |
#17 |
-
Same here. |
Rex |
Sep-09-11 04:46 PM |
#20 |
-
I can understand why they are all singing this song.... |
Little Star |
Sep-09-11 04:56 PM |
#21 |
 -
Perhaps they're playing the Obama game on O. Talk a lot but do nothing. |
Divernan |
Sep-09-11 08:14 PM |
#45 |
 -
I actually wish they'd send Obama a message. Either strongly support Unionized labor in your jobs |
MessiahRp |
Sep-10-11 01:32 AM |
#52 |
-
You mean you stand with the union leadership, don't you? That doesn't necessarily translate the |
DrunkenBoat |
Sep-09-11 05:04 PM |
#24 |
 -
Ah, yes, the "union aristocracy" gambit. |
Robb |
Sep-09-11 05:06 PM |
#26 |
-
Not a gambit at all, though I don't expect you to acknowledge the fact. |
DrunkenBoat |
Sep-09-11 05:10 PM |
#30 |
 -
Yeah, surely the reason membership has dropped is because of the leadership. Riiiiiiiight. |
FarLeftFist |
Sep-09-11 06:59 PM |
#38 |
-
I said one of the *main* reasons, not the only reason. But yeah, collusionary leadership *is* |
DrunkenBoat |
Sep-09-11 07:53 PM |
#42 |
-
Labor stands with Democrats as it has since FDR's day |
Generic Other |
Sep-09-11 05:17 PM |
#31 |
-
labor is totally under the thumb of the democratic party for the foreseeable future |
BOG PERSON |
Sep-09-11 05:07 PM |
#27 |
-
I'm in |
Omaha Steve |
Sep-09-11 05:07 PM |
#28 |
-
I wish I could be a labor lawyer. |
Initech |
Sep-09-11 05:10 PM |
#29 |
-
great quotes. Thanks. |
cally |
Sep-09-11 06:58 PM |
#37 |
-
Here's another post with more links |
Number23 |
Sep-09-11 07:02 PM |
#39 |
-
It's easy to stand with labor when labor is doing what you want them to do. |
Lyric |
Sep-09-11 10:10 PM |
#49 |
-
Good, as we all ought to. I trust you also oppose the proposed FTAs. |
Union Scribe |
Sep-09-11 10:19 PM |
#50 |
-
I stand with labor too, whether or not they praise Obama. |
Maven |
Sep-09-11 11:01 PM |
#51 |
-
I stand with the working poor, of which I am a card carrying member |
hfojvt |
Sep-10-11 02:12 AM |
#53 |
 -
The members of the unions who voted them into leadership positions with those salaries... |
MilesColtrane |
Sep-10-11 08:25 AM |
#58 |
  -
the working poor are unable to join unions |
hfojvt |
Sep-10-11 11:05 AM |
#62 |
 -
"the working poor are unable to join unions... |
MilesColtrane |
Sep-10-11 12:40 PM |
#64 |
 -
"Union fat cats." Straight from the playbook. |
Robb |
Sep-10-11 08:33 AM |
#60 |
-
yeah, sure |
hfojvt |
Sep-10-11 10:56 AM |
#61 |
-
No you don't. You stand with those who are pledging loyalty to the Democratic property... you don't |
LooseWilly |
Sep-10-11 03:49 AM |
#57 |
 -
Pretty tough words. |
Robb |
Sep-10-11 08:31 AM |
#59 |
-
Uh. Where would you stand it they dissed the president's plan? |
Jakes Progress |
Sep-10-11 11:07 AM |
#63 |
 -
Precisely where I stood before. |
Robb |
Sep-10-11 07:11 PM |
#66 |
-
That's good. Let's see how it swings. |
Jakes Progress |
Sep-11-11 04:03 PM |
#67 |
-
.. |
mdmc |
Sep-15-11 06:45 AM |
#71 |