You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #37: "we may have to"? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-03-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
37. "we may have to"?
:evilfrown: no we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Historical U.S. Job Creation Under Democratic and Republican Presidents and President Obama Time for change  Sep-02-11 10:23 PM   #0 
  - None of this will matter Nov. 2012 if...  Crazy Dave   Sep-02-11 10:30 PM   #1 
  - What are you talking about?  Time for change   Sep-02-11 10:42 PM   #2 
  - Job creation by past Democratic Presidents matters not a whit.  cherokeeprogressive   Sep-02-11 11:15 PM   #4 
     - We may have to.  FarLeftFist   Sep-02-11 11:16 PM   #5 
     - "we may have to"?  russspeakeasy   Sep-03-11 11:42 AM   #37 
        - Vote a STRAIGHT DEMOCRATIC BALLOT - give Obama a real majority to work with and be happy again.  PonyJon   Sep-05-11 10:50 PM   #60 
     - You seem to have missed my point  Time for change   Sep-02-11 11:23 PM   #7 
     - You are not encouraging anyone to vote for Obama?  olegramps   Sep-03-11 08:51 AM   #17 
     - Deleted message  Name removed   Sep-03-11 09:06 AM   #21 
     - Evidently it is you that can't read, He states he wouldn't encourage anyone to vote for Obama.  olegramps   Sep-03-11 09:11 AM   #25 
        - Yes  Time for change   Sep-03-11 11:48 AM   #39 
        - uhh -- do you know the difference between the words *urge* and *encourage*?  Donnachaidh   Sep-03-11 02:08 PM   #45 
        - olegramps, how would you feel if Obama simply dropped out of the race?  JDPriestly   Sep-04-11 02:00 AM   #52 
     - Yes, I'm not encouraging anyone to vote for Obama  Time for change   Sep-03-11 11:46 AM   #38 
     - Good article though I do have a nitpic which is even if he were to suddenly do such a massive change  cstanleytech   Sep-03-11 11:55 PM   #50 
     - Hw did we get to the point where we have to vote for  truedelphi   Sep-03-11 02:14 PM   #46 
     - We can't end the wars, or the Great Depression will come back...  LooseWilly   Sep-04-11 03:27 AM   #56 
     - I do not have a high opinion of Obama  Time for change   Sep-03-11 08:08 PM   #49 
        - I'm with you, Time for a Change.  JDPriestly   Sep-04-11 02:05 AM   #53 
     - I 100% disagree with you. Go study FDR's job creation record during  bluestate10   Sep-03-11 09:13 AM   #26 
     - Are you serious?  Time for change   Sep-03-11 11:31 AM   #35 
     - RW solutions to RW-created problems begets more and worsening RW problems  indepat   Sep-03-11 11:41 AM   #36 
     - We couldn't HONESTLY use past D's records on job creation  LWolf   Sep-03-11 09:09 AM   #24 
     - You need look at FDR's job's record during his first term.  bluestate10   Sep-03-11 09:22 AM   #27 
        - FDR's job's record, according to the stats posted,  LWolf   Sep-03-11 09:48 AM   #28 
     - Vote a STRAIGHT DEMOCRATIC TICKET give Obama a real majority to work with and be happy!  PonyJon   Sep-05-11 10:35 PM   #59 
  - You clearly missed the point. nt  inna   Sep-02-11 11:26 PM   #8 
  - Excellent post.  madfloridian   Sep-02-11 11:11 PM   #3 
  - Thank you  Time for change   Sep-03-11 08:44 AM   #14 
  - Vote a STRAIGHT DEMOCRATIC TICKET give O a real majority to work with.  PonyJon   Sep-02-11 11:17 PM   #6 
  - He came in with a Dem majority.  Desertrose   Sep-03-11 12:57 AM   #10 
  - The point is  Time for change   Sep-03-11 06:26 AM   #11 
  - I would agree with you. nt  Desertrose   Sep-03-11 03:15 PM   #48 
  - not an effective majority, ever.  MH1   Sep-03-11 06:33 AM   #12 
  - The democratic Senate can be blamed for the 60 vote super majority rule.  bluestate10   Sep-03-11 09:06 AM   #22 
  - Bullshit basher meme, Obama had a controlling majority for 50 days  uponit7771   Sep-03-11 07:45 AM   #13 
  - Less than that. Nelson could never be counted on. Conrad could but only after arm twisting.  bluestate10   Sep-03-11 08:47 AM   #16 
     - You can't have it both ways. You can't tell people to vote straight Dem and then say  readmoreoften   Sep-03-11 10:16 AM   #30 
  - He barely had a Democratic majority. A boatload of them were right-wing Democrats.  Selatius   Sep-03-11 09:01 AM   #20 
     - Vote a STRAIGHT DEMOCRATIC TICKET, you will be happy.  PonyJon   Sep-05-11 10:23 PM   #58 
  - The Blue Dogs like Baucus might as well be Republicans.  JDPriestly   Sep-04-11 02:08 AM   #54 
  - China. China. China. Unless and until we recognize that  Flatulo   Sep-03-11 12:54 AM   #9 
  - The energy source that will save the planet has not been publicized yet.  bluestate10   Sep-03-11 08:58 AM   #18 
  - Agree with you on the smaller, smarter population front. Denmark has  Flatulo   Sep-03-11 11:12 AM   #34 
  - We could put a VAT on all manufactured goods, Chinese or domestic.  JDPriestly   Sep-04-11 02:12 AM   #55 
  - Your graphic on Obama is deceptive.  bluestate10   Sep-03-11 08:44 AM   #15 
  - Do all the others get their first quarters erased too then?  readmoreoften   Sep-03-11 10:20 AM   #31 
  - Obama's net job growth record is NEGATIVE  Time for change   Sep-03-11 11:55 AM   #40 
  - Who said anything about being fair? Have the Rethuglicans ever been fair?  Major Hogwash   Sep-03-11 02:19 PM   #47 
  - " Better than Hoover! "  GeorgeGist   Sep-03-11 09:00 AM   #19 
  - Much worse.  bluestate10   Sep-03-11 09:09 AM   #23 
  - What a steaming heap - we forget this - don't we. Unrec for shear and utter BS  jpak   Sep-03-11 10:04 AM   #29 
  - That's your rebuttal to this in-depth OP? A single chart with no links or context.  readmoreoften   Sep-03-11 10:24 AM   #32 
  - Can you read a chart? Can you interpret data?  jpak   Sep-03-11 10:42 AM   #33 
     - no one can read THAT chart  SwampG8r   Sep-06-11 10:56 AM   #62 
  - That is not impressive  Time for change   Sep-03-11 12:04 PM   #41 
     - Can you read the graph? Obama reversed job losses and created net job gains  jpak   Sep-03-11 12:08 PM   #42 
        - Absolutely  Time for change   Sep-03-11 12:12 PM   #43 
        - And by the way  Time for change   Sep-03-11 12:36 PM   #44 
  - The laissez faire -- let the private sector create jobs without  JDPriestly   Sep-04-11 01:58 AM   #51 
  - Corporations have told us that the world has changed and they're NOT GOING TO provide jobs anymore.  saras   Sep-04-11 10:47 AM   #57 
  - Excellent structural analysis  desertrat777   Sep-06-11 10:38 AM   #61 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC