Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-29-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
| -Obama nominates opponent of minimum wage, and unemployment insurance to council of economic advisors |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 07:41 PM |
#0 |
-
krugman likes this guy. n/t |
dionysus |
Aug-29-11 07:44 PM |
#1 |
 -
He likes Bernanke too because he taught at Princeton. |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 07:49 PM |
#4 |
-
lol, bus meets krugman, in reverse... |
dionysus |
Aug-29-11 08:04 PM |
#9 |
-
"He wrote one study which found that a higher minimum was associated with higher employment...." |
WinkyDink |
Aug-29-11 07:47 PM |
#2 |
-
Actually, what I read was that he's argued against the idea that raising the minimum |
Marr |
Aug-29-11 07:48 PM |
#3 |
 -
That is what I heard on Democracy Now. |
rurallib |
Aug-29-11 08:24 PM |
#12 |
-
So does anybody know the real truth about this guy? |
Shagbark Hickory |
Aug-29-11 07:52 PM |
#5 |
 -
Clinton retread |
Demeter |
Aug-29-11 08:10 PM |
#10 |
-
Okay, so I'm confused, where did you get "opponent of minimum wage" out of |
patrice |
Aug-29-11 07:54 PM |
#6 |
 -
your right |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 08:49 PM |
#14 |
-
Yes, he does and that's unsupportable!! Especially since the Kleptocracy has stolen our jobs AND |
patrice |
Aug-29-11 09:13 PM |
#17 |
-
No, he's not "arguing against unemployment insurance." |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 09:36 PM |
#24 |
-
Is this guilt by association with Bernanke? That's about the only other thing the article reports.nt |
patrice |
Aug-29-11 07:56 PM |
#7 |
-
K&R. |
William769 |
Aug-29-11 08:02 PM |
#8 |
-
He worked for one of DU's favorite Obama bashers - Robert Reich. |
BumRushDaShow |
Aug-29-11 08:23 PM |
#11 |
-
Complete bullshit |
Hippo_Tron |
Aug-29-11 08:26 PM |
#13 |
 -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-29-11 09:01 PM |
#16 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-29-11 09:00 PM |
#15 |
-
Obama doesn't like poor people. |
undeterred |
Aug-29-11 09:16 PM |
#18 |
 -
Another one that refuse to actually read. |
ingac70 |
Aug-29-11 09:22 PM |
#19 |
-
+1 nt |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 09:32 PM |
#22 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-29-11 09:22 PM |
#20 |
-
If this guy thinks a higher minimum wage is associated with higher employment, how do you conclude |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 09:30 PM |
#21 |
 -
apparently you did not read the thread |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 09:36 PM |
#23 |
-
There IS a time limit. Your OP still sucks. |
ingac70 |
Aug-29-11 09:38 PM |
#27 |
 -
i oppose them, and advocate for extensions which obama |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 09:40 PM |
#30 |
 -
i did not catch it until it was too late |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 09:47 PM |
#36 |
-
Is he advocating for lowering limits on unemployment benefits in America, in this economy? |
BzaDem |
Aug-29-11 09:39 PM |
#28 |
-
I hate to tell you this, but our country DOES THAT ALREADY. |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 09:39 PM |
#29 |
-
i wish i could edit it for the minimum wage part, it is past the time limit. |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 09:41 PM |
#32 |
-
This headline is so misleading in so many ways. |
BzaDem |
Aug-29-11 09:36 PM |
#25 |
-
This thread has turned into an 8th grade reading comprehension test. |
jwhitesj |
Aug-29-11 09:36 PM |
#26 |
 -
If this is eighth grade work, I despair for our nation--fourth grade where I come from! nt |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 09:41 PM |
#31 |
-
as if you have never made mistakes in you posts. |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 09:42 PM |
#33 |
-
That wasn't a mistake, it was intentional. |
ingac70 |
Aug-29-11 09:46 PM |
#35 |
 -
if it was intentional i would not have quoted the mistake |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 09:48 PM |
#39 |
-
No one is insulting you--they are pointing out that your grammar and |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 09:49 PM |
#41 |
-
whatever! |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 09:50 PM |
#42 |
 -
Whatever, indeed. Instead of getting angry at people, you should |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 09:53 PM |
#43 |
-
a guy in this thread tells me i am doing it intentionally and you |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 09:55 PM |
#44 |
-
I can't see inside your head. I have no way of knowing if you are a disruptor, an |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 10:03 PM |
#45 |
-
and you did not have good enough reading comprehsion skills to |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:06 PM |
#47 |
-
No one was insulting you. You've admitted that you don't like Obama, |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 10:09 PM |
#49 |
-
you have demonstrated that you do not know what an insult is |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:11 PM |
#50 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-29-11 10:14 PM |
#51 |
 -
that was just a critique of my grammar n/t |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:16 PM |
#53 |
-
I know what an insult is, and you have not yet been insulted. |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 10:16 PM |
#52 |
-
this is not questioning |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:18 PM |
#54 |
 -
That's a statement of opinion, and it's a reasonable one, given your |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 10:20 PM |
#55 |
-
my opinion is that you are paid shills for the new democrats |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:22 PM |
#57 |
-
Well, golly gee, those sonsabitches never sent me my CHECK! EVER! |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 10:29 PM |
#58 |
 -
i was just stating my opinion. |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:32 PM |
#59 |
-
You don't, apparently, have a clear understanding as to what an OPINION is, either. |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 10:39 PM |
#64 |
-
i cant cite your post. i would have to be able to look them up |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:47 PM |
#68 |
-
So you, in essence, told a falsehood. You've seen them before, you claim? Well, what did I say in |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 11:01 PM |
#82 |
-
i may conclude that you are a nitpicking point scoring bully |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:08 PM |
#89 |
-
You might conclude that, but it would not be based any logical thought process. |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 11:13 PM |
#94 |
-
i am visually impaired as if that is any of your business. |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:17 PM |
#98 |
-
Might I recommend DRAGON Naturally Speaking or some other assistive software. |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 11:34 PM |
#109 |
-
dragon is too expensive |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:36 PM |
#111 |
-
Something to save for, then. |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 11:39 PM |
#113 |
-
My opinion is that you're a Green Party supporter |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 10:39 PM |
#65 |
-
i support greens when a good dem is not available. |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:43 PM |
#66 |
 -
Bah. You said this on Twitter |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 10:49 PM |
#72 |
-
the link was not to me |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:56 PM |
#76 |
-
LOL You linked approvingly to this pro-Green Party post! |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 10:58 PM |
#78 |
-
i am proprogressive and will vote for a progressive dem preferrably |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:02 PM |
#83 |
-
Anybody but the Democrats, then! n/t |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 11:04 PM |
#85 |
-
i dont see how you can read voting for dems preferrably as anybody but |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:14 PM |
#95 |
-
I've seen your Twitter feed! |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 11:20 PM |
#102 |
-
when did i ever say anyone but democrats. |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:21 PM |
#103 |
-
OK, if you're doubling down, I'm in for just one more then I AM out |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 11:23 PM |
#105 |
-
i support my own senator tom harkin |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:30 PM |
#106 |
-
"obomatics" LOL Enjoy your stay. n/t and out |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 11:32 PM |
#107 |
-
do you think i might be tempted to vote freen because of the |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:39 PM |
#114 |
-
what are your motivations |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:21 PM |
#56 |
-
Why are you hyperposting? |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 10:35 PM |
#61 |
-
well since poll after poll shows most here do not like dlc |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:38 PM |
#62 |
-
That would be "purging" but I can see you and spellcheck are not on speaking terms. |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 10:46 PM |
#67 |
 -
i am a progressive democrat. |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:53 PM |
#74 |
-
Why did you write a treatise entitled "Why I Joined The Green Party" then? |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 11:05 PM |
#86 |
-
To be fair, she didn't write it, she linked to it (approvingly) n/t |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 11:08 PM |
#88 |
-
i did not write it |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:11 PM |
#92 |
-
I stand corrected. You linked to it. NT |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 11:15 PM |
#97 |
-
hmm |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:18 PM |
#100 |
-
You linked to something that said "democrats should join the #greenparty and encourage others to." |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 11:20 PM |
#101 |
-
i am exploring all possibilities from primary challenges to joining the |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:22 PM |
#104 |
-
Well,let me echo Denzil....Enjoy your stay. NT |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 11:38 PM |
#112 |
-
From your Twitter feed - "join the Green Party" |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 10:48 PM |
#70 |
-
i was posting a link arguing for it |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:55 PM |
#75 |
-
Weak. Read it again |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 10:59 PM |
#79 |
-
read the link |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:00 PM |
#81 |
-
I did! It's titled "Why I Joined the Green Party" n/t |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 11:03 PM |
#84 |
-
and it was not written by me. |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:10 PM |
#91 |
-
I never said it was. But you promoted it n/t |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 11:11 PM |
#93 |
-
To be fair MADem, I think it's confirmation bias more than anything. |
joshcryer |
Aug-30-11 01:34 AM |
#120 |
-
Typical loser appointment from O. |
girl gone mad |
Aug-29-11 09:43 PM |
#34 |
 -
Typical loser comment. |
geek tragedy |
Aug-29-11 10:33 PM |
#60 |
 -
Is there anything "O" haters will not believe? |
mzmolly |
Aug-30-11 12:58 AM |
#117 |
-
How is your comment relevant to my post? |
girl gone mad |
Aug-30-11 02:35 AM |
#121 |
-
This thread represents a classic example of Obama Derangement Syndrome (ODS) Unrec!!! |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Aug-29-11 09:47 PM |
#37 |
 -
i dont like the guy |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 09:49 PM |
#40 |
  -
Welcome to DU. Stick around here long enough and you'll see exactly what I mean. |
Liberal_Stalwart71 |
Aug-29-11 10:06 PM |
#46 |
   -
i will vote for other dems |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:08 PM |
#48 |
  -
not really. when you're so desperate to fucking spin shit that you can't even read |
cali |
Aug-30-11 04:02 AM |
#124 |
 -
I'm a major Obama critic and I thought the OP was dumb. |
Odin2005 |
Aug-29-11 11:09 PM |
#90 |
 -
Yes |
mzmolly |
Aug-30-11 12:59 AM |
#118 |
-
Unrec. I suggest you go back to the drawing board on this guy. |
Luminous Animal |
Aug-29-11 09:48 PM |
#38 |
-
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Aug-29-11 10:39 PM |
#63 |
 -
+1 nt |
MADem |
Aug-29-11 10:48 PM |
#69 |
 -
+1 |
ingac70 |
Aug-29-11 10:52 PM |
#73 |
-
You acknowledged your error, but I am unrecing because this should not |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-29-11 10:48 PM |
#71 |
 -
yes it is a legitmate criticism since unemployment in this depression |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 10:59 PM |
#80 |
-
We have welfare and food stamps to help those in need. nt |
ZombieHorde |
Aug-30-11 01:31 AM |
#119 |
-
welfare is only for single women and has time limits as well |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-30-11 03:11 AM |
#122 |
-
I feel so burned all the time |
SavWriter |
Aug-29-11 10:57 PM |
#77 |
 -
i understand this sentiment. |
dameocrat67 |
Aug-29-11 11:34 PM |
#110 |
-
Reading Comprehension FAIL. |
Odin2005 |
Aug-29-11 11:08 PM |
#87 |
-
Laugh out loud funny thread ! |
bhikkhu |
Aug-29-11 11:14 PM |
#96 |
 -
Did it get 6 recs for the comedy value? ;) n/t |
Denzil_DC |
Aug-29-11 11:17 PM |
#99 |
-
I certainly hope so |
bhikkhu |
Aug-30-11 12:42 AM |
#115 |
-
Unrec. The article says nothing like this man opposes the minimum wage |
TheKentuckian |
Aug-29-11 11:33 PM |
#108 |
-
Absolute bullcrap. See here for what Krueger actually argues with his research: |
mzmolly |
Aug-30-11 12:56 AM |
#116 |
-
I have great contempt for dishonest ops. |
cali |
Aug-30-11 03:51 AM |
#123 |
-
Locked by OP's request |
dmr |
Aug-30-11 04:40 AM |
#125 |