joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-25-11 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
| 33. I know, haha, I wanted to go back and figure out how many it would've taken... |
|
...to actually do that.
Distant Observer used to post Mathaba daily, I suspect he hasn't recently because even he realizes how absurd they are.
|
| -As NATO bombs began falling NKorea asked Libya "Hows that giving up your nukes working out for you?" |
NNN0LHI |
Aug-24-11 08:52 PM |
#0 |
-
I'd say N. Korea actually does have a point, sadly. (nt) |
scarletwoman |
Aug-24-11 08:57 PM |
#1 |
 -
Does anyone actually believe we would ever unilaterally give ours up? |
NNN0LHI |
Aug-24-11 09:00 PM |
#2 |
  -
Of course. If some kind super-power (china) promise us acceptance and forgiveness (of debt) |
Distant Observer |
Aug-24-11 10:45 PM |
#12 |
 -
Indeed, Ma'am: the International Equivalent of the Gadsen Flag... |
The Magistrate |
Aug-24-11 09:04 PM |
#3 |
  -
The timeless words of the Wicked Witch of the West constantly echo through my mind: |
scarletwoman |
Aug-24-11 09:10 PM |
#6 |
 -
Yes, this is true |
Taverner |
Aug-25-11 10:24 AM |
#41 |
-
Yes, because... |
Chan790 |
Aug-24-11 09:08 PM |
#4 |
-
Because letting every asshole dictator... |
Ozymanithrax |
Aug-24-11 09:09 PM |
#5 |
 -
What do you think of some rapture ready GOP president being in control of enough nuclear weapons .. |
NNN0LHI |
Aug-24-11 09:15 PM |
#7 |
  -
The phrase "asshole dictator" does not exclude rapture ready GOP... |
Ozymanithrax |
Aug-25-11 12:06 AM |
#23 |
 -
from the point of view of the asshole dictator, it is a good idea. |
provis99 |
Aug-24-11 10:58 PM |
#14 |
-
The U.S. isn't going to invade North Korea or Iran... |
Ozymanithrax |
Aug-25-11 12:24 AM |
#27 |
-
Nuclear weapons are good for the dictator, even if the dictator is not good for his people. |
pampango |
Aug-25-11 04:00 AM |
#36 |
-
I wonder how the North Korean PEOPLE feel about that |
Nuclear Unicorn |
Aug-25-11 10:59 AM |
#44 |
-
This is the political reality. |
Warren Stupidity |
Aug-24-11 09:33 PM |
#8 |
-
Brutally honest and logical. |
Arctic Dave |
Aug-24-11 09:44 PM |
#9 |
 -
I'm sure we will soon have an effective American-style Gov. in place to provide free healthcare, |
Distant Observer |
Aug-24-11 09:50 PM |
#10 |
  -
I see your sarcasm and raise you cynical. nt |
Arctic Dave |
Aug-24-11 11:00 PM |
#15 |
 -
Oh yes we will. Just like Iraq. |
Distant Observer |
Aug-24-11 11:16 PM |
#19 |
 -
And Afghanistan. |
Arctic Dave |
Aug-24-11 11:35 PM |
#21 |
 -
What an appalling statement. |
jaxx |
Aug-24-11 10:39 PM |
#11 |
  -
The appalling truth. The West doesn't care about integrity but about its strategic interest. |
Distant Observer |
Aug-24-11 10:53 PM |
#13 |
  -
I'm sorry reality is frightening for you. |
Arctic Dave |
Aug-24-11 11:06 PM |
#17 |
 -
The statement wasn't frightening, it was stupid. |
jaxx |
Aug-25-11 11:17 AM |
#46 |
 -
Gaddafi's nuclear program would still have been no where near capable of making a bomb... |
joshcryer |
Aug-25-11 12:25 AM |
#28 |
-
The reason he didn't have nuclear capability is because he stopped the program decades ago. |
Arctic Dave |
Aug-25-11 09:34 AM |
#37 |
-
Nuke up if you want to resist the NWO |
Cali_Democrat |
Aug-24-11 11:03 PM |
#16 |
-
The modern version of signing peace treaties with Indigenous Peoples... |
LooseWilly |
Aug-24-11 11:13 PM |
#18 |
-
Nukes don't stop internal rebellion. |
joshcryer |
Aug-24-11 11:31 PM |
#20 |
 -
"Internal Rebellion?" Very funny! After most of "enemy" has been killed, time to stop pretending |
Distant Observer |
Aug-24-11 11:51 PM |
#22 |
  -
Ha ha, where are Gaddafi's 65k troops in the nearly conquered Tripoli? |
joshcryer |
Aug-25-11 12:21 AM |
#26 |
 -
One propaganda report had the "one-half million strong" Gaddafi 'female brigades' ringing Tripoli |
pinboy3niner |
Aug-25-11 12:56 AM |
#32 |
 -
I know, haha, I wanted to go back and figure out how many it would've taken... |
joshcryer |
Aug-25-11 01:07 AM |
#33 |
 -
Color me not surprised |
pinboy3niner |
Aug-25-11 02:06 AM |
#34 |
 -
It sure as hell would make NATO think twice about dropping their bombs and launching their missiles |
Cali_Democrat |
Aug-25-11 12:10 AM |
#24 |
-
Of course I don't dispute that. |
joshcryer |
Aug-25-11 12:20 AM |
#25 |
-
working out a lot better for the people of Libya , not so great for the dictator, if only the people |
JI7 |
Aug-25-11 12:34 AM |
#29 |
 -
See post #30. The N. Koreans may be smiling some time this decade. |
joshcryer |
Aug-25-11 12:51 AM |
#31 |
-
What's hilarious about the timing of this story: NKorea reported ready to halt WMD tests |
joshcryer |
Aug-25-11 12:50 AM |
#30 |
-
A better lesson: maybe Gadaffi shouldn't have screwed over his people quite so bad. |
Waiting For Everyman |
Aug-25-11 03:56 AM |
#35 |
 -
pretty much |
Johonny |
Aug-25-11 03:03 PM |
#51 |
-
Honestly, NK didn't need nukes to keep the west at bay. |
Xithras |
Aug-25-11 09:50 AM |
#38 |
 -
Here is the problem I see with that line of reasoning |
NNN0LHI |
Aug-25-11 10:23 AM |
#40 |
-
Seoul would be obliterated by the time even half of NKs artillary... |
jayfish |
Aug-25-11 10:39 AM |
#43 |
-
Nope. |
Xithras |
Aug-25-11 11:00 AM |
#45 |
-
That "Korean Speedbump" theory came along way before we had today's capabilities and is outdated |
NNN0LHI |
Aug-25-11 11:38 AM |
#47 |
 -
U.S. military commanders in Korea disagree with you. |
Xithras |
Aug-25-11 12:01 PM |
#48 |
-
I don't believe the US military has ever told the truth about much of anything |
NNN0LHI |
Aug-25-11 12:35 PM |
#49 |
-
North Korea's switch to a nuclear deterrent might have a lot more to do with their own capabilities |
JVS |
Aug-25-11 02:58 PM |
#50 |
-
Ridiculous |
jayfish |
Aug-25-11 10:02 AM |
#39 |
-
Getting nukes was a very good move on North Korea's part. |
JVS |
Aug-25-11 10:33 AM |
#42 |
 -
Especially against one's own people.. |
LanternWaste |
Aug-25-11 03:12 PM |
#53 |
-
I remember Ray McGovern years ago when talking about Iran's nuclear ambitions, mentioning that if |
Puregonzo1188 |
Aug-25-11 03:05 PM |
#52 |