You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #105: you're still in denial, despite being presented w/ evidence! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-22-11 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #104
105. you're still in denial, despite being presented w/ evidence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -This avid Obama fan knows its 50/50 - if we lose we are fucked for 12 years banned from Kos  Aug-22-11 08:05 PM   #0 
  - You are a pessimist.  undeterred   Aug-22-11 08:06 PM   #1 
  - I love your optimism. n/t  WhiteTara   Aug-22-11 08:41 PM   #19 
  - I have the perfect solution to this problem.....  DeSwiss   Aug-22-11 08:10 PM   #2 
  - thanks! this is my go-to site for Obama hatred!  banned from Kos   Aug-22-11 08:11 PM   #3 
     - You need to get around the Internet some more then.  sabrina 1   Aug-22-11 08:21 PM   #5 
     - maybe I should try DKos! Seriously - Anger vs Hatred?  banned from Kos   Aug-22-11 08:27 PM   #11 
     - Huh? "DU is mild" ??? LOL n/t  Tx4obama   Aug-22-11 08:28 PM   #12 
     - What you said sabrina 1! n/t  Little Star   Aug-22-11 10:21 PM   #89 
     - If that ones puts you on ignore, I don't think you're going to be missing much  Number23   Aug-23-11 04:20 AM   #117 
  - They said the same thing in 2000 about Al Gore  Ruby the Liberal   Aug-22-11 08:20 PM   #4 
  - We've been f*cked for 12 years?  WhiteTara   Aug-22-11 08:43 PM   #21 
  - And how did that work out? n/t  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 09:44 PM   #49 
  - K&R n/t  Tx4obama   Aug-22-11 08:21 PM   #6 
  - I Don't Think You Understand  NashVegas   Aug-22-11 08:21 PM   #7 
  - Then why bother? If it is BOHICA either way, what is the point?  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 08:26 PM   #9 
  - Oh that is just a bunch of bull.  Tx4obama   Aug-22-11 08:26 PM   #10 
     - I blame chemtrails.  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 08:36 PM   #16 
     - Few think both parties are the exact same. Just similar enough to fuck us.  TheKentuckian   Aug-22-11 10:21 PM   #87 
     - He's done a lot of good....if you're rich.  Joe Fields   Aug-22-11 11:06 PM   #103 
  - I'm sure shaking our collective fists in impotent rage as teapublicans sail to victory is satisfying  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 08:24 PM   #8 
  - I'm not entirely sure you belong here. nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Aug-22-11 08:28 PM   #13 
  - yeah! I don't belong here as an avid Obama supporter?  banned from Kos   Aug-22-11 08:33 PM   #14 
  - Hang in there. We always need more Obama supporters :) n/t  Tx4obama   Aug-22-11 08:39 PM   #17 
  - Plenty here feel as you do - haven't you noticed the divide? We all  gateley   Aug-22-11 08:40 PM   #18 
  - I'm not certain. What does your DU name mean exactly? nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Aug-22-11 08:48 PM   #27 
  - post removed - by council of a wise person  banned from Kos   Aug-22-11 08:51 PM   #30 
     - Please don't use that term. You have a point, but you will not help your case with that.  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 08:53 PM   #32 
  - Oh Snap!  Solomon   Aug-23-11 05:50 AM   #119 
  - I happen to agree with the OP and I'm not sure "casting aspargus" is called for.  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 08:41 PM   #20 
  - Yes, this pro-Democrat site is exclusively for those who bash Democrats.  TheWraith   Aug-22-11 10:40 PM   #96 
     - This pro democrat site really needs to rethink its identity.  Joe Fields   Aug-22-11 11:14 PM   #110 
     - I imagine that we're going to get the purge, once things get closer to the election.  TheWraith   Aug-22-11 11:24 PM   #111 
        - And that is the one rule that needs to be modified, or....  Joe Fields   Aug-22-11 11:34 PM   #113 
           - Right, I'm sure the 85% of Democrats who support Democrats can't do anything without you.  TheWraith   Aug-23-11 02:04 AM   #115 
           - Have you considered that it is emminently possible to have a site that is worth administering  BzaDem   Aug-23-11 03:54 AM   #116 
     - Oh boy. nt  Sarah Ibarruri   Aug-23-11 10:11 AM   #120 
  - Huh? I thought the president was powerless if the opposition holds one house of Congress.  Marr   Aug-22-11 08:34 PM   #15 
  - As far as I know, SCOTUS nominations don't require a vote by the House.  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 08:43 PM   #23 
  - The corpse of Leo Strauss is over there. Go bother him. Nt  xchrom   Aug-22-11 08:43 PM   #22 
  - that is really completely uncalled for  banned from Kos   Aug-22-11 08:46 PM   # 
  - It's not even close to 50/50.  Major Hogwash   Aug-22-11 08:43 PM   #24 
  - No kidding! With the GOP we'd get for-profit healthcare, cuts to SS, more war  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 08:44 PM   #25 
  - It took over 30 years for the republicans to screw things up...  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 08:50 PM   #29 
  - Took voters 2 election cycles to kill off the GOP. Why'd the Dems bring them back?  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 08:52 PM   #31 
     - What makes you think "the Dems" did any such thing?  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 08:59 PM   #33 
        - Obama's healthcare town halls made the 'tea party'  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 09:01 PM   #37 
           - Bullshit. The right wing media, Dick Armey, and the corporatists made that midden heap.  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 09:14 PM   #42 
              - Why didn't Obama and the Dems have Wall Street Bailout Town Halls?  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 09:15 PM   #44 
                 - When? During inaugural recess? While even people like Krugman were screaming "RED ALERT!"?  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 09:19 PM   #45 
                    - So thousands of anti-bailout protesters picked the wrong time to protest?  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 09:22 PM   #46 
                       - I don't understand the fixation on Wall St. bailouts that were started before Obama took office.  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 09:42 PM   #47 
                       - candidate Obama, in Fall of 2008, pressured senators to pass TARP  amborin   Aug-22-11 09:47 PM   #51 
                       - Yeah. Good for him. As most progressive economists said, it was absolutely necessary  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 09:47 PM   #53 
                          - So more Americans are drawing food assistance now because..........?  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 09:52 PM   #56 
                          - How many people do you think would be drawing food assistance if TARP never passed? n/t  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:01 PM   #61 
                             - How many hedge fund managers are there?  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 10:03 PM   #65 
                             - What about an answer to my question about food assistance?  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:05 PM   #67 
                                - ROFL: how many jobs could have been created w/ $23 trillion squandered on the bailout?  amborin   Aug-22-11 10:09 PM   #72 
                                   - We didn't spend anywhere close to 23 trillion. Most of that is guarantees that will NEVER be spent.  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:10 PM   #74 
                                      - keep telling yourself that....  amborin   Aug-22-11 10:14 PM   #80 
                                      - Indeed I will, and others. Because it happens to be the truth.  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:18 PM   #85 
                                      - "truthy" but not the truth; I feel your plight: it's painful to see $23 trill down the drain  amborin   Aug-22-11 10:22 PM   #90 
                                      - What's painful is to have someone put up a source that doesn't say REMOTELY what they claim it says,  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:28 PM   #93 
                                      - LOLOL; nonsense; you said you searched at "page not found"  amborin   Aug-22-11 11:01 PM   #99 
                                      - Even you have dropped your claim down to 14 trillion. Still absolute nonsense, but we're making  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 11:06 PM   #104 
                                      - you're still in denial, despite being presented w/ evidence!  amborin   Aug-22-11 11:08 PM   #105 
                                      - Someone sure is. n/t  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 11:10 PM   #108 
                             - $23 trillion = total cost of the bank bailout  amborin   Aug-22-11 10:06 PM   #68 
                                - Sure, if you include the full value of guarantees that will never be spent.  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:08 PM   #71 
                                - nope; that's the total amount already doled out  amborin   Aug-22-11 10:10 PM   #73 
                                   - Page not found, and page not found. n/t  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:10 PM   #75 
                                      - Try this link  Art_from_Ark   Aug-22-11 11:10 PM   #107 
                                      - Direct quote: "I will assume this is total exposure, commitments and not actual real costs."  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 11:12 PM   #109 
                                - That is a very worst case estimate. Not a hard number.  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 10:11 PM   #77 
                                   - LOL!  amborin   Aug-22-11 10:12 PM   #79 
                                      - Perhaps you would care to reread your sources.  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 10:17 PM   #83 
                                         - that's not remotely comforting; $23 trillion  amborin   Aug-22-11 10:34 PM   #94 
                                         - Under that metric, if I were to buy stock in a company, that would be considered a bailout.  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 11:04 PM   #100 
                          - not true at all; they said if a bailout, the gov't should have major ownership role; never  amborin   Aug-22-11 09:59 PM   #59 
                       - Obama & Dems blew off the huge anti-war, anti-Wall Street, anti-Neocon/Bush momentum  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 09:47 PM   #52 
                          - Not precisely an accurate summation of events.  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 10:07 PM   #69 
                             - It was a sideshow DESIGNED to give the opposition that opening  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 10:11 PM   #76 
                       - It isn't their timing so much as their message. Most progressive economists not only said the  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 09:46 PM   #50 
                          - Voters don't care what 'progressive economists' think n/t  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 09:49 PM   #54 
                          - Voters also don't really care what scientists think. Does that make the scientists wrong? n/t  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 09:50 PM   #55 
                             - You're blowing your own argument. Why do you always do this?  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 09:54 PM   #57 
                                - What exactly do you think my argument was?  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:00 PM   #60 
                                   - I try not to dwell on your thought processes n/t  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 10:02 PM   #62 
                                      - Perhaps that explains it then. n/t  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:03 PM   #64 
                          - wrong, again; they said, if a bailout, then gov't should have ownership stake in the banks  amborin   Aug-22-11 10:02 PM   #63 
                             - They said that given the choice between TARP and nothing, it wasn't even a close call. n/t  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:03 PM   #66 
                                - wrong, yet again; they said, " no equity, no bailout"  amborin   Aug-22-11 10:07 PM   #70 
                                   - We took equity in all of the big banks. n/t  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:11 PM   #78 
                                      - LOL  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 10:14 PM   #81 
                                      - If you didn't realize that we took preferred shares in all the big banks, maybe that's why you are  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:19 PM   #86 
                                         - Hey do you think if we gave banks more $$ we could eliminate all food assistance claims?  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 10:21 PM   #88 
                                            - I think you would admit that aiming a fire hose at a burning house saves lives, even if aiming a  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 10:25 PM   #92 
                                               - Did you say fire hose?  leftstreet   Aug-22-11 10:34 PM   #95 
                                      - ROFL....  amborin   Aug-22-11 10:15 PM   #82 
  - damn right  griffi94   Aug-22-11 09:00 PM   #35 
  - If the rich won't help ...  GeorgeGist   Aug-22-11 08:46 PM   #26 
  - No.  BulletproofLandshark   Aug-22-11 08:50 PM   #28 
  - In otherwords, some folks don't really give a rat's ass about the 2012 election  FrenchieCat   Aug-22-11 09:00 PM   #34 
  - We could be doomed for much longer. What too many activists  OHdem10   Aug-22-11 09:01 PM   #36 
  - You would think the party that prides itself on UNIONS might walk the walk...  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 09:05 PM   #40 
  - we're already fucked. i already see starving pets, multiple vans, tents, campers parked on people's  indurancevile   Aug-22-11 09:03 PM   #38 
  - Yep. The Bubble burst in September of 2008......  FrenchieCat   Aug-22-11 09:05 PM   #39 
     - i saw homeless; the many starving strays that were formerly pets & the multiple people camping on  indurancevile   Aug-22-11 09:08 PM   #41 
        - Tent city discovered in Ocean Co., New Jersey  kenny blankenship   Aug-22-11 11:50 PM   #114 
  - K & Fucking R!  lonestarnot   Aug-22-11 09:14 PM   #43 
  - We're damned if we do, damned if we don't.  Lucian   Aug-22-11 09:44 PM   #48 
  - "Get behind Obama for reelection now!"  unkachuck   Aug-22-11 09:54 PM   #58 
  - What you have to offer is FEAR and more FEAR ... let's try Sen. Bernie Sanders ...!!  defendandprotect   Aug-22-11 10:17 PM   #84 
  - If wishes were fishes we'd all cast nets.  Liberal Veteran   Aug-22-11 10:24 PM   #91 
     - I'm afraid of what Obama and Third Way are doing to the party and the nation ...!!  defendandprotect   Aug-23-11 10:13 AM   #121 
  - I agree...however, for the first time, recently, I started to think that  Laura PourMeADrink   Aug-22-11 10:47 PM   #97 
  - Hey look the guy that was banned from Kos is shouting out orders!  whatchamacallit   Aug-22-11 10:55 PM   #98 
  - There is so much more at stake than you can see.  Joe Fields   Aug-22-11 11:04 PM   #101 
  - For something to be "at stake," there has to be a chance that it might ever change. n/t  BzaDem   Aug-22-11 11:30 PM   #112 
  - Hopefully the dems keep one house of congress if it happens  Juche   Aug-22-11 11:06 PM   #102 
  - 12 years? Ha! more like 120!  0rganism   Aug-22-11 11:09 PM   #106 
  - Those are some scary thoughts. nt  mfcorey1   Aug-23-11 04:49 AM   #118 
  - I'm voting for Obama but don't worry about Ginsburg's seat.  Jim Lane   Aug-23-11 01:15 PM   #122 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC