leftstreet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-22-11 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #86 |
| 88. Hey do you think if we gave banks more $$ we could eliminate all food assistance claims? |
|
I see now where you're going
brilliant
|
| -This avid Obama fan knows its 50/50 - if we lose we are fucked for 12 years |
banned from Kos |
Aug-22-11 08:05 PM |
#0 |
-
You are a pessimist. |
undeterred |
Aug-22-11 08:06 PM |
#1 |
 -
I love your optimism. n/t |
WhiteTara |
Aug-22-11 08:41 PM |
#19 |
-
I have the perfect solution to this problem..... |
DeSwiss |
Aug-22-11 08:10 PM |
#2 |
 -
thanks! this is my go-to site for Obama hatred! |
banned from Kos |
Aug-22-11 08:11 PM |
#3 |
-
You need to get around the Internet some more then. |
sabrina 1 |
Aug-22-11 08:21 PM |
#5 |
 -
maybe I should try DKos! Seriously - Anger vs Hatred? |
banned from Kos |
Aug-22-11 08:27 PM |
#11 |
 -
Huh? "DU is mild" ??? LOL n/t |
Tx4obama |
Aug-22-11 08:28 PM |
#12 |
 -
What you said sabrina 1! n/t |
Little Star |
Aug-22-11 10:21 PM |
#89 |
-
If that ones puts you on ignore, I don't think you're going to be missing much |
Number23 |
Aug-23-11 04:20 AM |
#117 |
-
They said the same thing in 2000 about Al Gore |
Ruby the Liberal |
Aug-22-11 08:20 PM |
#4 |
 -
We've been f*cked for 12 years? |
WhiteTara |
Aug-22-11 08:43 PM |
#21 |
 -
And how did that work out? n/t |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 09:44 PM |
#49 |
-
K&R n/t |
Tx4obama |
Aug-22-11 08:21 PM |
#6 |
-
I Don't Think You Understand |
NashVegas |
Aug-22-11 08:21 PM |
#7 |
 -
Then why bother? If it is BOHICA either way, what is the point? |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 08:26 PM |
#9 |
 -
Oh that is just a bunch of bull. |
Tx4obama |
Aug-22-11 08:26 PM |
#10 |
-
I blame chemtrails. |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 08:36 PM |
#16 |
 -
Few think both parties are the exact same. Just similar enough to fuck us. |
TheKentuckian |
Aug-22-11 10:21 PM |
#87 |
-
He's done a lot of good....if you're rich. |
Joe Fields |
Aug-22-11 11:06 PM |
#103 |
-
I'm sure shaking our collective fists in impotent rage as teapublicans sail to victory is satisfying |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 08:24 PM |
#8 |
-
I'm not entirely sure you belong here. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Aug-22-11 08:28 PM |
#13 |
 -
yeah! I don't belong here as an avid Obama supporter? |
banned from Kos |
Aug-22-11 08:33 PM |
#14 |
  -
Hang in there. We always need more Obama supporters :) n/t |
Tx4obama |
Aug-22-11 08:39 PM |
#17 |
  -
Plenty here feel as you do - haven't you noticed the divide? We all |
gateley |
Aug-22-11 08:40 PM |
#18 |
  -
I'm not certain. What does your DU name mean exactly? nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Aug-22-11 08:48 PM |
#27 |
   -
post removed - by council of a wise person |
banned from Kos |
Aug-22-11 08:51 PM |
#30 |
  -
Please don't use that term. You have a point, but you will not help your case with that. |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 08:53 PM |
#32 |
  -
Oh Snap! |
Solomon |
Aug-23-11 05:50 AM |
#119 |
 -
I happen to agree with the OP and I'm not sure "casting aspargus" is called for. |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 08:41 PM |
#20 |
 -
Yes, this pro-Democrat site is exclusively for those who bash Democrats. |
TheWraith |
Aug-22-11 10:40 PM |
#96 |
-
This pro democrat site really needs to rethink its identity. |
Joe Fields |
Aug-22-11 11:14 PM |
#110 |
 -
I imagine that we're going to get the purge, once things get closer to the election. |
TheWraith |
Aug-22-11 11:24 PM |
#111 |
-
And that is the one rule that needs to be modified, or.... |
Joe Fields |
Aug-22-11 11:34 PM |
#113 |
-
Right, I'm sure the 85% of Democrats who support Democrats can't do anything without you. |
TheWraith |
Aug-23-11 02:04 AM |
#115 |
-
Have you considered that it is emminently possible to have a site that is worth administering |
BzaDem |
Aug-23-11 03:54 AM |
#116 |
-
Oh boy. nt |
Sarah Ibarruri |
Aug-23-11 10:11 AM |
#120 |
-
Huh? I thought the president was powerless if the opposition holds one house of Congress. |
Marr |
Aug-22-11 08:34 PM |
#15 |
 -
As far as I know, SCOTUS nominations don't require a vote by the House. |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 08:43 PM |
#23 |
-
The corpse of Leo Strauss is over there. Go bother him. Nt |
xchrom |
Aug-22-11 08:43 PM |
#22 |
 -
that is really completely uncalled for |
banned from Kos |
Aug-22-11 08:46 PM |
# |
-
It's not even close to 50/50. |
Major Hogwash |
Aug-22-11 08:43 PM |
#24 |
-
No kidding! With the GOP we'd get for-profit healthcare, cuts to SS, more war |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 08:44 PM |
#25 |
 -
It took over 30 years for the republicans to screw things up... |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 08:50 PM |
#29 |
  -
Took voters 2 election cycles to kill off the GOP. Why'd the Dems bring them back? |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 08:52 PM |
#31 |
 -
What makes you think "the Dems" did any such thing? |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 08:59 PM |
#33 |
 -
Obama's healthcare town halls made the 'tea party' |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 09:01 PM |
#37 |
 -
Bullshit. The right wing media, Dick Armey, and the corporatists made that midden heap. |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 09:14 PM |
#42 |
 -
Why didn't Obama and the Dems have Wall Street Bailout Town Halls? |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 09:15 PM |
#44 |
 -
When? During inaugural recess? While even people like Krugman were screaming "RED ALERT!"? |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 09:19 PM |
#45 |
 -
So thousands of anti-bailout protesters picked the wrong time to protest? |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 09:22 PM |
#46 |
 -
I don't understand the fixation on Wall St. bailouts that were started before Obama took office. |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 09:42 PM |
#47 |
  -
candidate Obama, in Fall of 2008, pressured senators to pass TARP |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 09:47 PM |
#51 |
   -
Yeah. Good for him. As most progressive economists said, it was absolutely necessary |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 09:47 PM |
#53 |
  -
So more Americans are drawing food assistance now because..........? |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 09:52 PM |
#56 |
   -
How many people do you think would be drawing food assistance if TARP never passed? n/t |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:01 PM |
#61 |
  -
How many hedge fund managers are there? |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 10:03 PM |
#65 |
   -
What about an answer to my question about food assistance? |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:05 PM |
#67 |
  -
ROFL: how many jobs could have been created w/ $23 trillion squandered on the bailout? |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 10:09 PM |
#72 |
  -
We didn't spend anywhere close to 23 trillion. Most of that is guarantees that will NEVER be spent. |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:10 PM |
#74 |
  -
keep telling yourself that.... |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 10:14 PM |
#80 |
  -
Indeed I will, and others. Because it happens to be the truth. |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:18 PM |
#85 |
  -
"truthy" but not the truth; I feel your plight: it's painful to see $23 trill down the drain |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 10:22 PM |
#90 |
  -
What's painful is to have someone put up a source that doesn't say REMOTELY what they claim it says, |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:28 PM |
#93 |
  -
LOLOL; nonsense; you said you searched at "page not found" |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 11:01 PM |
#99 |
  -
Even you have dropped your claim down to 14 trillion. Still absolute nonsense, but we're making |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 11:06 PM |
#104 |
  -
you're still in denial, despite being presented w/ evidence! |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 11:08 PM |
#105 |
  -
Someone sure is. n/t |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 11:10 PM |
#108 |
  -
$23 trillion = total cost of the bank bailout |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 10:06 PM |
#68 |
  -
Sure, if you include the full value of guarantees that will never be spent. |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:08 PM |
#71 |
   -
nope; that's the total amount already doled out |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 10:10 PM |
#73 |
  -
Page not found, and page not found. n/t |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:10 PM |
#75 |
  -
Try this link |
Art_from_Ark |
Aug-22-11 11:10 PM |
#107 |
  -
Direct quote: "I will assume this is total exposure, commitments and not actual real costs." |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 11:12 PM |
#109 |
  -
That is a very worst case estimate. Not a hard number. |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 10:11 PM |
#77 |
  -
LOL! |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 10:12 PM |
#79 |
  -
Perhaps you would care to reread your sources. |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 10:17 PM |
#83 |
  -
that's not remotely comforting; $23 trillion |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 10:34 PM |
#94 |
  -
Under that metric, if I were to buy stock in a company, that would be considered a bailout. |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 11:04 PM |
#100 |
  -
not true at all; they said if a bailout, the gov't should have major ownership role; never |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 09:59 PM |
#59 |
  -
Obama & Dems blew off the huge anti-war, anti-Wall Street, anti-Neocon/Bush momentum |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 09:47 PM |
#52 |
 -
Not precisely an accurate summation of events. |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 10:07 PM |
#69 |
 -
It was a sideshow DESIGNED to give the opposition that opening |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 10:11 PM |
#76 |
 -
It isn't their timing so much as their message. Most progressive economists not only said the |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 09:46 PM |
#50 |
 -
Voters don't care what 'progressive economists' think n/t |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 09:49 PM |
#54 |
  -
Voters also don't really care what scientists think. Does that make the scientists wrong? n/t |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 09:50 PM |
#55 |
 -
You're blowing your own argument. Why do you always do this? |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 09:54 PM |
#57 |
 -
What exactly do you think my argument was? |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:00 PM |
#60 |
 -
I try not to dwell on your thought processes n/t |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 10:02 PM |
#62 |
 -
Perhaps that explains it then. n/t |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:03 PM |
#64 |
 -
wrong, again; they said, if a bailout, then gov't should have ownership stake in the banks |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 10:02 PM |
#63 |
 -
They said that given the choice between TARP and nothing, it wasn't even a close call. n/t |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:03 PM |
#66 |
 -
wrong, yet again; they said, " no equity, no bailout" |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 10:07 PM |
#70 |
 -
We took equity in all of the big banks. n/t |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:11 PM |
#78 |
 -
LOL |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 10:14 PM |
#81 |
  -
If you didn't realize that we took preferred shares in all the big banks, maybe that's why you are |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:19 PM |
#86 |
 -
Hey do you think if we gave banks more $$ we could eliminate all food assistance claims? |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 10:21 PM |
#88 |
 -
I think you would admit that aiming a fire hose at a burning house saves lives, even if aiming a |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 10:25 PM |
#92 |
 -
Did you say fire hose? |
leftstreet |
Aug-22-11 10:34 PM |
#95 |
 -
ROFL.... |
amborin |
Aug-22-11 10:15 PM |
#82 |
 -
damn right |
griffi94 |
Aug-22-11 09:00 PM |
#35 |
-
If the rich won't help ... |
GeorgeGist |
Aug-22-11 08:46 PM |
#26 |
-
No. |
BulletproofLandshark |
Aug-22-11 08:50 PM |
#28 |
-
In otherwords, some folks don't really give a rat's ass about the 2012 election |
FrenchieCat |
Aug-22-11 09:00 PM |
#34 |
-
We could be doomed for much longer. What too many activists |
OHdem10 |
Aug-22-11 09:01 PM |
#36 |
 -
You would think the party that prides itself on UNIONS might walk the walk... |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 09:05 PM |
#40 |
-
we're already fucked. i already see starving pets, multiple vans, tents, campers parked on people's |
indurancevile |
Aug-22-11 09:03 PM |
#38 |
 -
Yep. The Bubble burst in September of 2008...... |
FrenchieCat |
Aug-22-11 09:05 PM |
#39 |
-
i saw homeless; the many starving strays that were formerly pets & the multiple people camping on |
indurancevile |
Aug-22-11 09:08 PM |
#41 |
-
Tent city discovered in Ocean Co., New Jersey |
kenny blankenship |
Aug-22-11 11:50 PM |
#114 |
-
K & Fucking R! |
lonestarnot |
Aug-22-11 09:14 PM |
#43 |
-
We're damned if we do, damned if we don't. |
Lucian |
Aug-22-11 09:44 PM |
#48 |
-
"Get behind Obama for reelection now!" |
unkachuck |
Aug-22-11 09:54 PM |
#58 |
-
What you have to offer is FEAR and more FEAR ... let's try Sen. Bernie Sanders ...!! |
defendandprotect |
Aug-22-11 10:17 PM |
#84 |
 -
If wishes were fishes we'd all cast nets. |
Liberal Veteran |
Aug-22-11 10:24 PM |
#91 |
-
I'm afraid of what Obama and Third Way are doing to the party and the nation ...!! |
defendandprotect |
Aug-23-11 10:13 AM |
#121 |
-
I agree...however, for the first time, recently, I started to think that |
Laura PourMeADrink |
Aug-22-11 10:47 PM |
#97 |
-
Hey look the guy that was banned from Kos is shouting out orders! |
whatchamacallit |
Aug-22-11 10:55 PM |
#98 |
-
There is so much more at stake than you can see. |
Joe Fields |
Aug-22-11 11:04 PM |
#101 |
 -
For something to be "at stake," there has to be a chance that it might ever change. n/t |
BzaDem |
Aug-22-11 11:30 PM |
#112 |
-
Hopefully the dems keep one house of congress if it happens |
Juche |
Aug-22-11 11:06 PM |
#102 |
-
12 years? Ha! more like 120! |
0rganism |
Aug-22-11 11:09 PM |
#106 |
-
Those are some scary thoughts. nt |
mfcorey1 |
Aug-23-11 04:49 AM |
#118 |
-
I'm voting for Obama but don't worry about Ginsburg's seat. |
Jim Lane |
Aug-23-11 01:15 PM |
#122 |