You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: And that was Obama's fault how? n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-10-11 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And that was Obama's fault how? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -The reason I think so many of us are mad at President Obama FarLeftFist  Aug-10-11 04:00 PM   #0 
  - The easiest job in the world? With a Senate that filibustered  pnwmom   Aug-10-11 04:03 PM   #1 
  - agreed.  flor-de-jasmim   Aug-10-11 04:05 PM   #2 
  - The truth is, is that I really like Obama. He's a HUGE breath of fresh air in DC.  FarLeftFist   Aug-11-11 12:09 PM   #96 
  - The Senate was never even expected to REALLY filibuster...  polichick   Aug-10-11 04:06 PM   #3 
  - And that was Obama's fault how? n/t  pnwmom   Aug-10-11 04:08 PM   #6 
  - Ever heard of leadership? Or the bully pulpit?  closeupready   Aug-10-11 04:17 PM   #12 
  - Leadership isn't dictatorship. And the bully pulpit barely exists in these days of 24 hour cable TV.  pnwmom   Aug-10-11 05:01 PM   #28 
     - Right, because when I said leadership, I actually meant dictatorship.  closeupready   Aug-11-11 10:07 AM   #88 
  - I didn't mention the prez - I was responding to a comment about the Senate.  polichick   Aug-10-11 07:09 PM   #56 
  - That has been a rule  polmaven   Aug-10-11 04:42 PM   #20 
     - Things have gotten too dysfunctional for that - it's time to get real.  polichick   Aug-10-11 07:10 PM   #57 
  - Was filibuster-proof there for a while buddy.  FarLeftFist   Aug-10-11 04:06 PM   #4 
  - Not for a single minute, pal.  pnwmom   Aug-10-11 04:09 PM   #7 
  - Lieberman wouldn't have mattered if the President had rallied his base into a frenzy  FarLeftFist   Aug-11-11 12:05 PM   #95 
  - That's your excuse?  bvar22   Aug-11-11 02:59 PM   #101 
  - no it was not  uponit7771   Aug-11-11 09:55 AM   #85 
  - The Republicans did not filibuster, they threatened to filibuster. nt  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 04:08 PM   #5 
  - According to the Senate rules -- which Obama had nothing to do with --  pnwmom   Aug-10-11 04:10 PM   #8 
  - Can I see the rule? I asked my Senator about it, and he did not mention any rules. nt  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 04:18 PM   #13 
  - Senate rule 22,  polmaven   Aug-10-11 04:47 PM   #22 
     - That says the filibuster is for debate. The Democrats did not make the Republicans debate,  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 04:56 PM   #24 
        - So you think there is no rule? It's all a big lie? n/t  pnwmom   Aug-10-11 04:57 PM   #25 
           - I don't think there is a rule saying the threat of a filibuster needs cloture.  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 05:01 PM   #27 
           - Cloture is a vote to cut off debate prior to a vote. And it requires 60 votes,  pnwmom   Aug-10-11 05:03 PM   #29 
              - Then make them stand and debate hour after hour. nt  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 05:14 PM   #36 
                 - Obama can't make Congress do anything. It's called "Separation of Powers."  pnwmom   Aug-10-11 06:16 PM   #53 
                    - I am not talking about President Obama. I am talking about the Senate Democrats. nt  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 07:54 PM   #64 
                       - But the OP is about why people are mad at Obama. n/t  pnwmom   Aug-10-11 11:53 PM   #73 
                          - Yes, that is true. I was just making a comment about the filibuster.  ZombieHorde   Aug-11-11 01:13 AM   #74 
           - I wouldn't say it's a BIG lie n/t  GOTV   Aug-11-11 11:11 AM   #92 
  - I agree.  Guilded Lilly   Aug-10-11 04:26 PM   #15 
  - We could actually make the Republicans filibuster, instead of just threatening to filibuster. nt  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 04:57 PM   #26 
     - Maybe "we" could have, but Obama couldn't have. n/t  pnwmom   Aug-10-11 05:04 PM   #30 
        - By "we," I meant Senate Democrats. nt  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 05:09 PM   #33 
  - Then why not MAKE them do a filibuster?  PVnRT   Aug-11-11 07:14 AM   #78 
  - Thanks for the reality check  texshelters   Aug-10-11 04:17 PM   #11 
  - If you're into "reality," I'd think you'd have objected  pnwmom   Aug-10-11 05:06 PM   #31 
     - Umm, I wasn't talking about that...  texshelters   Aug-12-11 12:58 PM   #103 
  - In the absence of a filibuster, there is another obstruction technique that the Republicans  Liberal_Stalwart71   Aug-10-11 05:16 PM   #37 
     - I am not trying to blame President Obama, I am trying to blame the Senate. nt  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 05:18 PM   #39 
        - Yeah, but you didn't know that there is more than just a filibuster available  Liberal_Stalwart71   Aug-10-11 05:35 PM   #46 
           - Holds are not official, and can be ignored.  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 05:41 PM   #49 
              - Yes, you're right. Holds *can* be ignored, but what typically follows  Liberal_Stalwart71   Aug-10-11 05:59 PM   #52 
                 - Think the Senate Democrats should make the Republicans actually filibuster.  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 07:53 PM   #63 
  - Yep.  Wait Wut   Aug-11-11 12:15 PM   #98 
  - The reason that people are angry is:  Sarah Ibarruri   Aug-10-11 04:14 PM   #9 
  - You made for me a condensed statement:  PufPuf23   Aug-10-11 04:17 PM   #10 
  - He IS being himself and he never HAD any principles.  Maven   Aug-10-11 04:22 PM   #14 
  - People blame Congress when Obama fails  texshelters   Aug-10-11 04:26 PM   #16 
  - Congress wanted Bush's agenda, for the most part  killbotfactory   Aug-10-11 04:40 PM   #19 
     - I am talking about people here at DU  texshelters   Aug-12-11 12:57 PM   #102 
  - Really good post  SmileyRose   Aug-10-11 04:26 PM   #17 
  - stick to his principles?  Coyote_Bandit   Aug-10-11 04:33 PM   #18 
  - The reason so many are mad at Obama is that there is one core  JoePhilly   Aug-10-11 04:47 PM   #21 
  - Well it's a two way street. Your "equivalency is false.  Armstead   Aug-10-11 05:21 PM   #40 
  - You are ABSOLUTELY right! When both sides share the same frame,  Liberal_Stalwart71   Aug-10-11 05:27 PM   #43 
     - Weeeelllll, I would challenge that assumption  Armstead   Aug-10-11 05:37 PM   #48 
     - O.K., I take that point because I'm also a political activist and very involved in  Liberal_Stalwart71   Aug-10-11 05:57 PM   #51 
        - Collectively, I agree with you.  Armstead   Aug-10-11 07:37 PM   #60 
     - "We" criticize the President to try and get things we want  PVnRT   Aug-11-11 07:17 AM   #79 
  - I think my frustration stems from his oratory skills.  Bonhomme Richard   Aug-10-11 04:51 PM   #23 
  - Explained it well -- I'm not "far left" but I totally agree about the lost opportunity  Armstead   Aug-10-11 05:08 PM   #32 
  - The "easiest job," eh? Unrec'ing based on that ridiculous statement alone! n/t  Liberal_Stalwart71   Aug-10-11 05:10 PM   #34 
  - I'm not mad. I'm disgusted.  DeSwiss   Aug-10-11 05:12 PM   #35 
  - So, what do you mean "he was also handed the easiest job in the world"?  ZombieHorde   Aug-10-11 05:16 PM   #38 
  - I'm not mad, just disappointed.  Rex   Aug-10-11 05:22 PM   #41 
  - The first sentence is so fucking stupid I didn't even get to the period.  DevonRex   Aug-10-11 05:24 PM   #42 
  - I'm not mad at him but I'm really disappointed in him  tularetom   Aug-10-11 05:28 PM   #44 
  - Being a candidate is much easier than being a president  loyalsister   Aug-10-11 05:35 PM   #45 
  - In 2008, The American People gave the Democratic Party:  bvar22   Aug-10-11 05:35 PM   #47 
  - Not Exactly  AndyTiedye   Aug-10-11 06:37 PM   #54 
     - I got it.  bvar22   Aug-10-11 06:43 PM   #55 
        - Actually bvar22  tgal   Aug-10-11 07:15 PM   #58 
        - I Can Totally Imagine LIEberman Saying Exactly That  AndyTiedye   Aug-10-11 07:34 PM   #59 
           - Obama didn't have to go along with selling us out to the insurance companies  dflprincess   Aug-10-11 09:50 PM   #65 
           - He Could Have Settled For Nothing, Which is What We Got Last Time  AndyTiedye   Aug-10-11 09:56 PM   #66 
              - Nothing is what most of us got this time  dflprincess   Aug-10-11 10:04 PM   #67 
                 - They Can't Blackball You for Pre-Existing Conditions Anymore  AndyTiedye   Aug-10-11 10:20 PM   #68 
                    - But they can jack the premium cost up so high you won't be able to afford it  dflprincess   Aug-10-11 10:45 PM   #69 
                    - It is a nice crumb,  bvar22   Aug-11-11 08:16 AM   #83 
           - The President & The Democratic Party could have CRUSHED Joe Lieberman  bvar22   Aug-11-11 07:53 AM   #80 
              - Not a Chance. AIPAC Would Never Allow That  AndyTiedye   Aug-11-11 11:28 AM   #94 
  - I think he thought if he was the nice guy  marlakay   Aug-10-11 05:44 PM   #50 
  - i like your post a lot. but why does everyone leave out congress?  dionysus   Aug-10-11 07:38 PM   #61 
  - Congress is to blame too....But as the leader of the nation and party....  Armstead   Aug-10-11 10:57 PM   #70 
     - None of the "Carrots" or "Sticks" Work on Teabaggers  AndyTiedye   Aug-11-11 02:56 AM   #76 
     - You should watch this video from Rachal Maddow last nite  Armstead   Aug-11-11 09:53 AM   #84 
     - perhaps in politics as it used to be. never before have we had a GOP that would fillibuster every  dionysus   Aug-11-11 07:58 AM   #81 
        - A video I suggest you watch from Rachael Maddow  Armstead   Aug-11-11 09:55 AM   #86 
  - The man has no spine. No balls. No fight.  Hotler   Aug-10-11 07:44 PM   #62 
  - I'll tell you why so many people are mad at President Obama...  MrScorpio   Aug-10-11 11:02 PM   #71 
  - My God. That is an absolutely brilliant insight! -11111  Armstead   Aug-10-11 11:03 PM   #72 
  - That's ridiculous. People have very valid and legitimate reasons.  Tatiana   Aug-11-11 11:25 AM   #93 
  - All the armchair Presidents have no idea what he's actually dealing with..  HipChick   Aug-11-11 01:17 AM   #75 
  - Maybe a little bit of positive strategizing instead of negative defeatism might help  Armstead   Aug-11-11 10:19 AM   #89 
  - I can boil it down to a very short paragraph.  JoeyT   Aug-11-11 07:05 AM   #77 
  - because the media keeps telling us he isn't doing anything...very effective  spanone   Aug-11-11 07:58 AM   #82 
  - Sorry, but I stopped reading after "the easiest job in the world" n/t  Inuca   Aug-11-11 09:57 AM   #87 
  - Yup, all he had to do was NOT be George Bush.  FarLeftFist   Aug-11-11 12:10 PM   #97 
     - Very superficial "analysis", sorry, you are wrong n/t  Inuca   Aug-11-11 12:36 PM   #100 
  - More magical thinking!  JNinWB   Aug-11-11 10:31 AM   #90 
  - Who in the party has the balls to primary Obama?  Hart2008   Aug-11-11 10:45 AM   #91 
  - Like Reagan, there will be huge payoff from Wall St when his terms end  dmosh42   Aug-11-11 12:24 PM   #99 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC