You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #33: I hate to say this but given a choice between a computer model and actual data ... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-11 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. I hate to say this but given a choice between a computer model and actual data ...
Edited on Thu Jul-28-11 07:37 PM by spin
I have to go with the data.

Hell our computer models can't even tell precisely where a hurricane is going to hit five days before landfall. They really have a hard time predicting storm intensity.

I remember evacuating Tampa Florida in 2004 along with 300,000 other people and heading south to my daughter's home in Lee county. I was sitting watching TV as the storm decided to take a sharp right turn and ran over Captiva Island and then Port Charlotte Florida. I ended up on the outskirts of this very small and intense hurricane.


The rapid strengthening of Charley in the eastern Gulf of Mexico caught many by surprise. Around five hours before its Florida landfall, Charley was a strong Category 2 hurricane predicted to strengthen its strongest winds to 115 mph (185 km/h) upon its landfall in the Tampa-Saint Petersburg area.<18> About two hours before landfall, the National Hurricane Center issued a special advisory, notifying the public that Charley had become a 145 mph (230 km/h) Category 4 hurricane, with a predicted landfall location in the Port Charlotte area.<19> As a result of this change in forecast, numerous people in the Charlotte County area were unprepared for the hurricane, despite the fact that the new track prediction was well within the previous forecast's margin of error. National Hurricane Center forecasting intern Robbie Berg publicly blamed the media for misleading residents into believing that a Tampa landfall was inevitable. In addition, he also stated that residents of Port Charlotte had ample warning,<20> as a hurricane warning had been issued for the landfall area 23 hours before, and a hurricane watch had existed for 35 hours.<1>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Charley


The experts and their computer models appeared fairly certain that landfall would be in the Tampa Bay area and the wind strength would be around 115 mph which is a strong Category 2 hurricane. Instead the hurricane made landfall 70 miles south with a wind speed of 145 mph which is a category 4. It actually passed over Captiva Island with a wind speed of 150 mph, 5 mph short of a category 5.

Here's the latest computer models for tropical storm Don which is only couple of days from landfall. I'm sure that they have improved the computer programs significantly in the last few years by analyzing the actual results compared to the models. Still, they have a ways to go.



Computer models are great and when compared to actual results they can be improved to be more accurate.

By the way, I am not a person who denies global warming or climate change exists. I do value scientific facts more than computer models. All this data might show is that we have a little more time to figure out how to reduce our dependence on fossil fuel. We need to rapidly develop alternative energy sources and there is little time to waste.

edited to correct typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism The Straight Story  Jul-28-11 05:28 PM   #0 
  - "alarmist?" fucking bullshit agenda much?  enki23   Jul-28-11 05:29 PM   #1 
  - No shit...  haikugal   Jul-28-11 05:31 PM   #5 
  - LOL. "the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing"  Cetacea   Jul-29-11 04:05 PM   #46 
  - why 'nuff said?  Bosonic   Jul-29-11 07:44 PM   #52 
  - Removed to post below.  enki23   Jul-29-11 08:08 PM   #53 
  - I wonder if the wording of that article could be any more slanted.  FiveGoodMen   Jul-28-11 05:30 PM   #2 
  - Here's who wrote it (link):  FormerDittoHead   Jul-28-11 05:45 PM   #21 
     - Thank you, FormerDittoHead!  Octafish   Jul-28-11 07:33 PM   #32 
     - SourceWatch for the win, yet again.  Ignis   Jul-28-11 08:08 PM   #40 
  - This is how cynical I've become:  snappyturtle   Jul-28-11 05:30 PM   #3 
  - Note Yahoo's headline about "alarmism" was written by Forbes, whose version they run  villager   Jul-28-11 05:31 PM   #4 
  - ...which was written by a "senior fellow" at "The Heartland Institute"  foo_bar   Jul-28-11 05:33 PM   #11 
  - That is some slanted-ass reporting. It says "alarmist" 13 times. Agenda driven much?  bullimiami   Jul-28-11 05:31 PM   #6 
  - Amazing. We are all synchronized.  bullimiami   Jul-28-11 05:32 PM   #7 
  - I've noticed an obvious slant to the right on yahoo news. Who owns them?  Cannikin   Jul-28-11 05:32 PM   #8 
  - Here is some info:  The Straight Story   Jul-28-11 05:37 PM   #16 
  - Dr. Spencer is roundly criticized by his peers  Vinnie From Indy   Jul-28-11 05:33 PM   #9 
  - +1  Johonny   Jul-28-11 05:42 PM   #18 
  - Thanks. I've heard of Roy Spencer and I figured this would be debunked. - n/t  Jim__   Jul-28-11 06:18 PM   #28 
  - Thanks - Joe Romm has more  bananas   Jul-29-11 04:18 PM   #47 
  - I have to say  drm604   Jul-28-11 05:33 PM   #10 
  - I haven't seen the paper but it strikes me that there are two ways to look at those data....  mike_c   Jul-28-11 05:34 PM   #12 
  - Three things:  lumberjack_jeff   Jul-28-11 05:35 PM   #13 
  - No thanks...the use of the word 'alarmist' qualifies the article as BS  Rex   Jul-28-11 05:35 PM   #14 
  - Yahoo running a hoax  gratuitous   Jul-28-11 05:37 PM   #15 
  - Instead of Googling it, just go to the journal's page...  JHB   Jul-28-11 07:54 PM   #36 
  - I scanned through the report, it's a bit dense for me...  arcane1   Jul-28-11 05:41 PM   #17 
  - Dense is a good word to describe the authors  izquierdista   Jul-28-11 06:42 PM   #30 
  - The Heartland Institute. LOL...  SidDithers   Jul-28-11 05:43 PM   #19 
  - Bookmarking for responses...  silverweb   Jul-28-11 05:43 PM   #20 
  - Boys what you are talking about is Albedo  nadinbrzezinski   Jul-28-11 05:46 PM   #22 
  - Sourcewatch.org  Gormy Cuss   Jul-28-11 05:50 PM   #23 
  - Fuck those assholes.  PeaceNikki   Jul-28-11 05:55 PM   #26 
  - Is this article some kind of a joke??  Dappleganger   Jul-28-11 05:51 PM   #24 
  - I knew the ice isn't melting...those polar bears  WhiteTara   Jul-28-11 05:54 PM   #25 
  - The worst part is the comments section  AmericaIsGreat   Jul-28-11 05:59 PM   #27 
  - It's the "boiling pot" spin!  sofa king   Jul-28-11 06:28 PM   #29 
  - I'm glad you posted this article so I didn't have to! Thanks. LOL eom  Purveyor   Jul-28-11 06:57 PM   #31 
  - I hate to say this but given a choice between a computer model and actual data ...  spin   Jul-28-11 07:36 PM   #33 
  - Oops. Gaia's gonna get you for that. n/t  cherokeeprogressive   Jul-28-11 07:59 PM   #37 
  - I believe in global warming but I am not a member of the religion ...  spin   Jul-28-11 08:16 PM   #43 
  - believe in the scientific peocess not in scientists  Johonny   Jul-28-11 08:14 PM   #42 
     - To be fair we will have to wait for other reputable experts to voice their conclusions ...  spin   Jul-28-11 08:23 PM   #44 
        - not really  Johonny   Jul-29-11 07:35 PM   #50 
  - Well........  AverageJoe90   Jul-28-11 07:36 PM   #34 
  - But the Polar Ice Caps and Major Glaciers ARE melting.  bvar22   Jul-28-11 07:37 PM   #35 
  - Solar Cycles  DreamSmoker   Jul-28-11 07:59 PM   #38 
  - Nope, sorry  Motown_Johnny   Jul-28-11 08:03 PM   #39 
  - Noticed something peculiar....  JHB   Jul-28-11 08:12 PM   #41 
  - Probably because the author was on Coast-to-Coast Radio last night  bananas   Jul-29-11 04:21 PM   #48 
     - It was happening even before then. n/t  JHB   Jul-29-11 07:29 PM   #49 
  - Here's a little of what you need to know about Mr. Spencer  NickB79   Jul-29-11 04:00 PM   #45 
  - Loss of habitat and subsequent extinctions and narrowed DNA pool is more significant than  PufPuf23   Jul-29-11 07:40 PM   #51 
  - There is an unbelievable amount of ignorance about what a "computer model" is, even here.  enki23   Jul-29-11 08:09 PM   #54 
  - What a ridiculous headline...  ljm2002   Jul-29-11 08:19 PM   #55 
  - Spencer's books are published by the Koch brothers.  FloridaJudy   Jul-29-11 08:21 PM   #56 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC