You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #70: "Elizabeth Warren Appointment Dangles As Democrats Duck Recess Fight With Republicans" [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-16-11 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #54
70. "Elizabeth Warren Appointment Dangles As Democrats Duck Recess Fight With Republicans"
June 30, 2011:

Elizabeth Warren Appointment Dangles As Democrats Duck Recess Fight With Republicans

In a bid to stop President Obama from making Senate-circumventing appointments while Congress is out -- most notably Consumer Financial Protection Bureau architect Elizabeth Warren -- House Speaker John Boehner is banning his members -- and the Senate -- from going on holiday.


Just weeks ago she was the subject of the Recess battle with Republicans whose goal was to prevent the president from making recess appointments over the Memorial Day weekend, specifically Elizabeth Warren. If she was not interested in the job, she had not said so early this month. Not only that, but Liberal Groups were rallying support for her appointment which she surely knew.

From June 28, 2011:

Liberals push Elizabeth Warren nomination


“It’s time for President Obama to embrace the clear will of the American people and appoint Elizabeth Warren to stand up for consumers,” Green said.

Although Warren is the bureau’s chief architect and Democrats’ first choice to run it, Senate Republicans signaled they would wage a bruising confirmation fight if Obama nominated her. Instead, Obama tapped Warren to get the bureau up and running, and deferred his selection of a nominee.


Whatever the reason, she is now 'going home to spend time with her family'. But to say she 'never wanted the job' is not what we were hearing from her just weeks ago, nor from Barney Frank.

Why did she let this battle take place on her behalf if she had not interest in the job?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC