You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #26: Are you fucking serious??? In essence you would abolish Double Jeopardy?? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-11 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Are you fucking serious??? In essence you would abolish Double Jeopardy??
You do realize that a disproportionate number of minorities would be affected by your blood lust.

Not to mention people who are actually INNOCENT would have this shit hanging over their heads for the rest of their lives.

The prosecutor should NEVER have taken this case to trial...yet.

He didn't have the evidence to convict and planned solely on emotion to get his sorry ass through it.

The fault lies with him and him alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Since when does someone that is prosecuted forced to pay costs of a trial?? LiberalFighter  Jul-08-11 11:44 AM   #0 
  - I don't believe it's "the cost of the trial"...  brooklynite   Jul-08-11 11:47 AM   #1 
  - I think they want to tag it to the four charges she  catabryna   Jul-08-11 11:48 AM   #2 
  - See my post below for an estimate  alcibiades_mystery   Jul-08-11 11:59 AM   #10 
  - Well, if she was found guilty I could *almost* see it  Horse with no Name   Jul-08-11 11:49 AM   #3 
  - The things they want to collect money for...  pipi_k   Jul-08-11 11:54 AM   #7 
     - Well lets be honest here  Horse with no Name   Jul-08-11 12:00 PM   #11 
        - The prosecution didn't spend ANY amount of time  pipi_k   Jul-08-11 02:08 PM   #27 
  - When you continually lie and mislead the  montanacowboy   Jul-08-11 11:49 AM   #4 
  - Since those  PATRICK   Jul-08-11 11:50 AM   #5 
  - Well people are ordered to pay court costs all the time  Drale   Jul-08-11 11:51 AM   #6 
  - She was already ordered to pay court costs in the amount of $600  alcibiades_mystery   Jul-08-11 11:59 AM   #9 
  - for civil court cases, yes. I don't believe I've ever heard of having to pay 4 criminal proceedings  librechik   Jul-08-11 12:02 PM   #13 
  - god know I've seen divorced people  Johonny   Jul-08-11 04:31 PM   #33 
  - The Ridiculous "Lawsuits" and other Punitive action against Casey Anthony  alcibiades_mystery   Jul-08-11 11:58 AM   #8 
  - Nice post... I agree.  catabryna   Jul-08-11 12:06 PM   #14 
  - I'm not sure I get what you are saying about #1  Hassin Bin Sober   Jul-08-11 12:10 PM   #15 
     - IMHO, Zenaida Gonzales was harmed  Horse with no Name   Jul-08-11 12:24 PM   #16 
        - Sounds like an iron clad case to me if those are the facts.  Hassin Bin Sober   Jul-08-11 12:29 PM   #17 
        - I am on the side of Gonzales.  RebelOne   Jul-08-11 12:36 PM   #18 
        - Ludicrous  alcibiades_mystery   Jul-08-11 12:47 PM   #21 
  - This is the Prosecutors being very small and vindictive..  OHdem10   Jul-08-11 12:02 PM   #12 
  - Everyone wants to get their claims in first.  lpbk2713   Jul-08-11 12:40 PM   #19 
  - Court Costs Are Standard Sentencing In ANY Case Where There Is A Conviction  ChoppinBroccoli   Jul-08-11 12:43 PM   #20 
  - Because she is a liar  Politicalboi   Jul-08-11 12:52 PM   #22 
  - Isn't time served her payment of debt to society?  dmr   Jul-08-11 01:01 PM   #23 
  - There should be a "No Verdict" choice for the jury.......  suston96   Jul-08-11 01:05 PM   #24 
  - Oh fer fuck's sake  alcibiades_mystery   Jul-08-11 01:25 PM   #25 
  - Are you fucking serious??? In essence you would abolish Double Jeopardy??  Horse with no Name   Jul-08-11 01:58 PM   #26 
  - Double jeopardy?  suston96   Jul-08-11 02:45 PM   #28 
     - If you gave twelve people the option of voting No Verdict, they'd do it all the time  alcibiades_mystery   Jul-08-11 02:52 PM   #29 
     - Try this.......  suston96   Jul-08-11 03:13 PM   #31 
        - What part of  alcibiades_mystery   Jul-08-11 04:00 PM   #32 
           - What I want the jury to do is stop listening to the.....  suston96   Jul-08-11 04:36 PM   #34 
              - "heinous murder or negligent homicide of that child"  alcibiades_mystery   Jul-08-11 05:08 PM   #35 
                 - Personally I believe it was a negligent homicide.....  suston96   Jul-08-11 05:41 PM   #37 
     - But this wasn't a hung jury. The prosecution failed to prove its case.  Horse with no Name   Jul-08-11 02:56 PM   #30 
  - There is a "no verdict" choice - it's called a hung jury.  COLGATE4   Jul-08-11 05:19 PM   #36 
     - The difference is there....  suston96   Jul-08-11 05:47 PM   #38 
  - I believe it's the cost of the investigation...  JuniperLea   Jul-08-11 05:48 PM   #39 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC