You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: Too large, whatever the actual number (nt) [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Penguin31 Donating Member (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Too large, whatever the actual number (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -How large is the homeless population in the USA? LoZoccolo  Jun-26-11 07:39 PM   #0 
  - homelessness is no joke n/t  Enrique   Jun-26-11 07:41 PM   #1 
  - Odd question. N/T  greytdemocrat   Jun-26-11 07:42 PM   #2 
  - No it isn't. To read some DU'rs, you would think it was 60%.  A HERETIC I AM   Jun-26-11 07:45 PM   #3 
     - No one here is that willfully stupid. n/t  greytdemocrat   Jun-26-11 07:51 PM   #8 
     - LOL!!!  A HERETIC I AM   Jun-26-11 07:55 PM   #11 
        - That's ridiculous  obliviously   Jun-26-11 08:02 PM   #15 
        - lol....yup.  A HERETIC I AM   Jun-26-11 08:05 PM   #17 
        - Ok...  greytdemocrat   Jun-26-11 08:08 PM   #19 
        - Some on this board were CONVINCED that a small impact probe shot into the polar region of the moon  Lenomsky   Jun-26-11 08:12 PM   #21 
        - I chalk those up to Poe's Law  Electric Monk   Jun-27-11 12:08 AM   #27 
        - you forgot to work Bill Gates and farm land speculation in urban Detroit into that conspircy,  Sen. Walter Sobchak   Jun-27-11 12:25 AM   #29 
     - Wrong ..  Lenomsky   Jun-26-11 08:10 PM   #20 
        - You used one of your incredibly rare posts to respond to MOI?!?  A HERETIC I AM   Jun-26-11 08:15 PM   #22 
           - Possibly one of the funniest posts I've ever read on DU...  trumad   Jun-27-11 06:43 AM   #34 
              - Yup....sure is.  A HERETIC I AM   Jun-27-11 07:18 AM   #36 
  - It depends on how you define it. People without shelter, people  tekisui   Jun-26-11 07:46 PM   #4 
  - What's your point? nt  MannyGoldstein   Jun-26-11 07:46 PM   #5 
  - It's a how-to-waste-bandwidth demo.  marmar   Jun-26-11 07:52 PM   #9 
  - Perhaps the point is that under 25% is OK?  MannyGoldstein   Jun-26-11 07:54 PM   #10 
  - It's a call out of the author of another thread.  QC   Jun-26-11 07:58 PM   #13 
     - Wow. Thanks. nt  MannyGoldstein   Jun-26-11 08:01 PM   #14 
        - It's Okay If...  AlabamaLibrul   Jun-27-11 05:10 AM   #32 
           - they're a blatant hypocrite?  Electric Monk   Jun-28-11 03:11 PM   #43 
  - I haven't heard a word  obliviously   Jun-26-11 07:49 PM   #6 
  - Less than 25%  JonLP24   Jun-26-11 07:51 PM   #7 
  - .  leeroysphitz   Jun-26-11 07:57 PM   #12 
  - Too large, whatever the actual number (nt)  Penguin31   Jun-26-11 08:04 PM   #16 
  - So in a wealthy country that hasn't been the scene of a war in over 100 years  dsc   Jun-26-11 08:07 PM   #18 
  - If there were only some way  obliviously   Jun-26-11 08:17 PM   #23 
  - Before Reagan, it was effectively zero.  Rageneau   Jun-26-11 10:07 PM   #24 
  - that was Jimmy carter  obliviously   Jun-26-11 11:49 PM   #25 
     - I don't think what you posted  JonLP24   Jun-27-11 04:46 AM   #31 
  - It REALLY depends on how you define homeless, which you failed to do.  Electric Monk   Jun-27-11 12:05 AM   #26 
  - It is way too high. It is nowhere near 25%.  trackfan   Jun-27-11 12:18 AM   #28 
  - Larger than it should be.  devilgrrl   Jun-27-11 12:29 AM   #30 
  - Good answer.  woo me with science   Jun-28-11 03:01 PM   #42 
  - Too large  quaker bill   Jun-27-11 06:22 AM   #33 
  - All renters are Homeless, all they have is a box they live in - if they can pay month to month.  ThomWV   Jun-27-11 07:00 AM   #35 
  - thank you. I am a renter, and was almost kicked out when I got sick  w8liftinglady   Jun-27-11 07:53 AM   #38 
  - it is difficult to measure...especially homeless families.  w8liftinglady   Jun-27-11 07:52 AM   #37 
  - If you count children, old people in nursing homes, and renters  ileus   Jun-27-11 09:20 AM   #39 
     - Why would you count renters?  leeroysphitz   Jun-28-11 02:47 PM   #40 
        - Also if you count people who are not at this exact moment in their homes  WatsonT   Jun-28-11 02:59 PM   #41 
        - see and even better point....maybe 85% of us are homeless.  ileus   Jun-28-11 03:15 PM   #44 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC