EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-17-11 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #46 |
|
At the moment, the supporters of this sacking are given attention because they are useful. The minute they stop being useful, they'll get as much attention as the millions of people who protested Iraq -- zip to none.
|
| -The war in Libya is about imperialism. |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 12:03 PM |
#0 |
 -
Just a theory - no evidence. |
tabatha |
Jun-16-11 12:12 PM |
#1 |
 -
U.S. and Europe is worried about the Chinese gaining access to oil. |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 12:15 PM |
#4 |
| -
Since most countries have some oil, its easy to generalize that all wars are about oil. |
stevenleser |
Jun-16-11 01:23 PM |
#18 |
| -
The African Union is against this war, but they do not matter, because it is |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 01:28 PM |
#19 |
 -
The African Union doesnt decide International law anymore than the South decides US law |
stevenleser |
Jun-16-11 01:33 PM |
#20 |
| -
Are you sure about that. |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 01:37 PM |
#22 |
| -
100% sure. None of what you assert makes sense at all. Not even a little. n/t |
stevenleser |
Jun-16-11 01:39 PM |
#23 |
| -
The western nations do not care about Africa, but they want the resources. |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 01:43 PM |
#26 |
| -
You keep saying that with zero evidence in your favor. n/t |
stevenleser |
Jun-16-11 02:48 PM |
#29 |
| -
US Authorizes Oil Deals With Libyan Rebels |
EFerrari |
Jun-17-11 12:30 AM |
#48 |
| -
Countries opposed to war on Libya: |
KurtNYC |
Jun-16-11 05:07 PM |
#36 |
| -
Is there a report that states that? Any verification whatsoever - or just a theory? |
tabatha |
Jun-16-11 01:43 PM |
#25 |
| -
Why hasn't NATO intervened with the Congo. |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 01:48 PM |
#28 |
| -
The UN has intervened in Congo and the Ivory Coast. What was that about oil? |
pampango |
Jun-16-11 05:04 PM |
#35 |
| -
You want to look at a couple of those statements? |
RaleighNCDUer |
Jun-16-11 03:19 PM |
#31 |
| -
If it was about stopping massacres, why aren't these same countries pounding on Syria? |
tabatha |
Jun-16-11 10:10 PM |
#41 |
| -
China was the first to sign a deal for Iraqi oil after our invasion. |
pampango |
Jun-16-11 05:19 PM |
#39 |
| -
Look at it again - |
RaleighNCDUer |
Jun-17-11 11:06 AM |
#53 |
| -
"Libya will no longer control its own oil." Then they are not as adept as Iraqis. |
pampango |
Jun-17-11 11:24 AM |
#55 |
| -
You do understand that before the war (that is, before the first Iraq |
RaleighNCDUer |
Jun-17-11 12:43 PM |
#56 |
| -
Or maybe NATO should talk to the millions of families that have been affected |
eridani |
Jun-16-11 05:12 PM |
#38 |
| -
NATO does not have the resources for more than one undertaking like this |
tabatha |
Jun-16-11 10:14 PM |
#42 |
| -
Do you seriously believe that "requests" from any opposition leaders in the Mideast-- |
eridani |
Jun-17-11 12:40 AM |
#49 |
| -
Libya defiant as NATO widens war |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 12:14 PM |
#2 |
| -
Ah yes, all wars are about imperialism. LMAO. |
stevenleser |
Jun-16-11 12:15 PM |
#3 |
| -
Yes when the U.S. is involved. |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 12:16 PM |
#5 |
| -
You realize you just proved that your opinion is hopelessly biased and should be discounted, right? |
stevenleser |
Jun-16-11 12:49 PM |
#9 |
| -
You believe the President, because he is a democrat if Bush did the same thing you would be |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 12:52 PM |
#10 |
| -
Not true. I judge by the situation. I supported Bush on Afghanistan and opposed him on Iraq |
stevenleser |
Jun-16-11 01:08 PM |
#13 |
| -
Except Afghanistan was about the oil pipeline to the Caspian sea. |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 01:10 PM |
#14 |
| -
Except I disagree. n/t |
stevenleser |
Jun-16-11 01:14 PM |
#15 |
| -
it was also about reversing the taliban's ban on opium-poppy cultivation |
BOG PERSON |
Jun-16-11 01:19 PM |
#16 |
| -
So true, the drug warlord from Fremont, Ca received immense help |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 01:23 PM |
#17 |
| -
That was going to link oil from Khazakstan to India. |
pampango |
Jun-16-11 05:22 PM |
#40 |
| -
No to Imperialist Intervention! Down With Gaddafi! — Libya and the Left |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 12:24 PM |
#6 |
| -
All wars are about 'the stuff' or control of territory. |
Mimosa |
Jun-16-11 12:33 PM |
#7 |
| -
I agree, but there are people on the left who believe we are in Libya to liberate them from |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 12:39 PM |
#8 |
| -
we call those people "shachtmanites" aka budding neoconservatives |
BOG PERSON |
Jun-16-11 12:54 PM |
#11 |
| -
There are a lot of those people around. In my opinion it is another reason |
ej510 |
Jun-16-11 12:59 PM |
#12 |
| -
+1 |
KurtNYC |
Jun-16-11 04:55 PM |
#33 |
| -
War is psychopathic! |
Emelina |
Jun-16-11 01:36 PM |
#21 |
| -
I don't take the opinion of Soviet apologists very seriously. |
tritsofme |
Jun-16-11 01:40 PM |
#24 |
| -
Soviet apologists like Time magazine? |
EFerrari |
Jun-16-11 01:47 PM |
#27 |
| -
After I stopped laughing, I stopped reading the OP |
tritsofme |
Jun-16-11 02:53 PM |
#30 |
| -
My post doesn't refer to the OP. |
EFerrari |
Jun-16-11 04:05 PM |
#32 |
| -
Good, and I hope the Libyans themselves that get it. |
tabatha |
Jun-16-11 10:24 PM |
#43 |
| -
That article is about the sacking of Libya, not about some windfall |
EFerrari |
Jun-16-11 10:52 PM |
#45 |
| -
Dreams |
tabatha |
Jun-16-11 11:26 PM |
#46 |
| -
That's very naive. |
EFerrari |
Jun-17-11 12:04 AM |
#47 |
| -
Its plain as day to most in this world. If it was not action in Bahrain, Yemen, and Syria would be |
Distant Observer |
Jun-16-11 05:02 PM |
#34 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jun-16-11 10:28 PM |
#44 |
| -
This should be alerted, but more importantly, it should be read by all |
PurityOfEssence |
Jun-17-11 01:30 AM |
#50 |
| -
Oh.... |
SDuderstadt |
Jun-16-11 05:08 PM |
#37 |
| -
What a crock of shit! n/t |
backscatter712 |
Jun-17-11 03:48 AM |
#51 |
| -
LOL, this article is hilarious in light of the NATO-critical articles I've been reading today. |
joshcryer |
Jun-17-11 03:54 AM |
#52 |
| -
Not to mention all the other's carried out in our empire's name |
peace4ever |
Jun-17-11 11:07 AM |
#54 |
| -
There is no imperialism, no empires, and no nationhood anymore. |
Waiting For Everyman |
Jun-17-11 01:01 PM |
#57 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread