Erose999
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-06-11 06:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 41. He never said the pics weren't his. He might not have been straight up, but would you be if you were |
|
in that situation of having Andy Breitbart airing the skeletons in your closet for all the world to see.
Andrew Breitbart is a syphilitic bag of shit. And I've read unsubstantiated reports and seen circumstantial evidence that indicates he's a corpsefucker too.
|
| -Weiner......With Certitude He Just Lost all Credibility |
rsmith6621 |
Jun-06-11 03:40 PM |
#0 |
 -
pictures of weeners are to distracting |
meow mix |
Jun-06-11 03:42 PM |
#1 |
  -
Okay, this is totally inappropriate and I will be flamed (rightly so) |
LiberalLoner |
Jun-06-11 03:44 PM |
#7 |
| -
lol, wonder what the circumcision-shouter thinks now... |
meow mix |
Jun-06-11 03:46 PM |
#10 |
| -
Beg to differ. I think he's on the way back to regaining the credibility. |
no_hypocrisy |
Jun-06-11 03:43 PM |
#2 |
| -
I do give him credit for that. n/t |
LiberalLoner |
Jun-06-11 03:45 PM |
#9 |
| -
After playing a game of chicken where he called someone's bluff and lost |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody |
Jun-06-11 05:47 PM |
#34 |
| -
Yes. He made some terrible mistakes, all right. I don't know if he will even be able to |
LiberalLoner |
Jun-06-11 03:43 PM |
#3 |
| -
He didn't lose credibility with many of us. We're moving on, albeit |
monmouth |
Jun-06-11 03:44 PM |
#4 |
| -
Some, apparently, are neither shocked nor dismayed. |
Bake |
Jun-06-11 07:15 PM |
#47 |
| -
Definitely. He deliberately and callously played his loyal liberal base for fools. |
ClarkUSA |
Jun-06-11 03:44 PM |
#5 |
| -
Emotional problems apparently, maybe he can address them now.. nt |
flamingdem |
Jun-06-11 03:49 PM |
#15 |
| -
Yeah, I hope so, for his poor bride's sake. It's ironic that Huma is Hillary's personal aide. |
ClarkUSA |
Jun-06-11 03:52 PM |
#17 |
| -
And now Nancy Pelosi is on the warpath threatening an ethics review |
flamingdem |
Jun-06-11 05:43 PM |
#32 |
| -
I really felt he could have been the one to take over |
Hutzpa |
Jun-06-11 03:44 PM |
#6 |
| -
Yeah it is. :( n/t |
LiberalLoner |
Jun-06-11 03:45 PM |
#8 |
| -
The BIG PLUS is that we know now not later when he's presidential.. nt |
flamingdem |
Jun-06-11 03:50 PM |
#16 |
| -
Really sad to allow your manhood to get the better of you |
Hutzpa |
Jun-06-11 04:11 PM |
#23 |
| -
+1000 |
ClarkUSA |
Jun-06-11 04:13 PM |
#27 |
| -
Yep, unlike Edwards who "confined" the field too late in the game when his secret came out! |
cascadiance |
Jun-06-11 04:12 PM |
#25 |
| -
The difference between Edward and Weiner is that |
Hutzpa |
Jun-06-11 04:15 PM |
#28 |
| -
Certainly not trying to equivalence what Weiner did in terms of the actual event... |
cascadiance |
Jun-06-11 04:30 PM |
#31 |
| -
This whole "scandal" is a sham and a distraction - nobody cares, quite rightly, except |
leveymg |
Jun-06-11 03:47 PM |
#11 |
| -
Wouldn't that be "credibilitude"? (nt) |
Nye Bevan |
Jun-06-11 03:47 PM |
#12 |
| -
Now that piece of horse manure Breitbart will have some credibility. |
Dawson Leery |
Jun-06-11 03:47 PM |
#13 |
| -
Drudge had Bubba. National Enquirer had Edwards. Breitbart has Weiner. |
ClarkUSA |
Jun-06-11 04:01 PM |
#20 |
| -
The only thing Breitbart has is syphilis from fucking farm animals. |
Erose999 |
Jun-06-11 06:31 PM |
#46 |
| -
There's still more to the story. Funny, how this came up two... |
Zookeeper |
Jun-06-11 03:48 PM |
#14 |
| -
Enough with the baseless conspiracy theories. Haven't we seen enough of them here lately? |
ClarkUSA |
Jun-06-11 03:56 PM |
#18 |
| -
The timing was just a little too convenient, considering.... |
Zookeeper |
Jun-06-11 04:03 PM |
#21 |
| -
Not interested in yet another ludicrous conspiracy theory. Peddle that nonsense to someone else. |
ClarkUSA |
Jun-06-11 04:10 PM |
#22 |
| -
Then put me on "ignore." n/t |
Zookeeper |
Jun-06-11 04:12 PM |
#26 |
| -
If it wasn't now, it would have been some other time..... |
ProudToBeBlueInRhody |
Jun-06-11 05:49 PM |
#37 |
| -
I wanted to say this before |
lbrtbell |
Jun-06-11 03:59 PM |
#19 |
| -
I really thought it might be that he might have had some personal communication to his wife hijacked |
cascadiance |
Jun-06-11 04:18 PM |
#30 |
| -
no he didn't... |
fascisthunter |
Jun-06-11 04:11 PM |
#24 |
| -
Now he joins the Scott Ritter club for me... |
cascadiance |
Jun-06-11 04:16 PM |
#29 |
| -
Not with me, he didn't. (n/t) |
Iggo |
Jun-06-11 05:45 PM |
#33 |
| -
Damned If He Did, Damned If He Didn't |
KharmaTrain |
Jun-06-11 05:47 PM |
#35 |
| -
he sure as shit did lie about it. repeatedly. he said over and over that he was hacked |
cali |
Jun-06-11 05:49 PM |
#38 |
| -
We Don't Know How The Pictures Became Public... |
KharmaTrain |
Jun-06-11 06:07 PM |
#40 |
| -
He lost it with regard to sex. But my problem is with his judgment |
ecstatic |
Jun-06-11 05:48 PM |
#36 |
| -
Quoting a comment from a FB post: |
PeaceNikki |
Jun-06-11 05:53 PM |
#39 |
| -
He never said the pics weren't his. He might not have been straight up, but would you be if you were |
Erose999 |
Jun-06-11 06:22 PM |
#41 |
| -
Lying tends to make that happen. |
bighart |
Jun-06-11 06:23 PM |
#42 |
| -
On what subject? |
TygrBright |
Jun-06-11 06:25 PM |
#43 |
| -
don't agree - he will survive this |
lame54 |
Jun-06-11 06:26 PM |
#44 |
| -
I don't care if he lied about the photos. |
NYC Liberal |
Jun-06-11 06:27 PM |
#45 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread