Reply #31: Your missing the point.

[RandomThoughts]

How do you know that, or better how do I know that.

It was on the news.

The news has lied before.

So unless I talked to him, I would not make that assumption becuase it was on the news. Although it could be true, it might not be true, but it is not that relevant anyways.

That is how you fight blind, knowing that they are lying about many things on the news.


I support his stated views on poverty issues, I don't think it is wise to have affairs while running for office. That has nothing to do with him, or what is reported on him. Although if he believes those things, then it does have to do with him, not becuase I hear him say it, but becuase that is also what he feels about poverty issues.


But that does not have anything to do with Edwards, becuase he might not really support those poverty issues, since I only know that from seeing it on the news, and he might not have had an affair.


My point is, why do you believe the news, when they have lied to you.


If he says something that is credible, like policy comments on many topics, then I can believe the concept of an argument, but even that does not mean I think he said it, becuase that would be assuming that what is on the TV or the Internet is accurate.

And that has been shown to not be the case.

Because I am due beer and travel money.

Can you understand it is about what people support, not about the people that support those issues. When you support what it is reported that he says, you are working for the same goals, not for him, in the same way, he is working for those goals, if he feels that way, not working for you.

It is the entire concept of supporting ideas, not people.

Can't you understand that. And that is why the entire concept of not worshiping people is in many texts.