You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #17: Were that true, it would be on RH's tax return, and more importantly EDWARDS does not claim as much. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » General Discussion

Maru Kitteh

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jun-04-11 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #14

17. Were that true, it would be on RH's tax return, and more importantly EDWARDS does not claim as much.

Edited on Sat Jun-04-11 01:23 AM by Maru Kitteh

JE is not claiming as a defense that it was a gift to the the adulteress. He's claiming he had no idea it was NOT given to HIM as personal gift.

If he didn't know it wasn't a personal gift, why isn't it included in his campaign accounting?

He's COOKED.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.