Horse with no Name
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
This has to do more to tarnish the brand Democrat than it does to tarnish a man who has already lost almost everything.
|
| -A Q? I've not seen asked yet - where was the Bunny money accounted? Gifts are taxable. |
Maru Kitteh |
Jun-03-11 11:24 PM |
#0 |
 -
Um, huh? Some context, please? Are we talking about Hugh Hefner?? |
kestrel91316 |
Jun-03-11 11:29 PM |
#1 |
| -
How many ledger lines? |
Skink |
Jun-03-11 11:29 PM |
#2 |
  -
I'll change the language. Apparently it's too archaic or regional. |
Maru Kitteh |
Jun-03-11 11:34 PM |
#5 |
| -
Checks written for "furniture" and passed to Edwards' aide |
frazzled |
Jun-03-11 11:32 PM |
#3 |
| -
This doesn't answer your question exactly but |
EFerrari |
Jun-03-11 11:34 PM |
#4 |
| -
The Bunny money was given to her, not him. |
RaleighNCDUer |
Jun-04-11 12:12 AM |
#6 |
| -
So did it, or did it not pass through JE's associates before it got to her? |
Maru Kitteh |
Jun-04-11 12:29 AM |
#7 |
| -
I don't think they have a case against Edwards. |
EFerrari |
Jun-04-11 12:45 AM |
#8 |
| -
I don't either, but OTOH look what they did with Siegelman. n/t |
pnwmom |
Jun-04-11 12:48 AM |
#11 |
| -
Uh. . that doesn't have anything to do with my question. |
Maru Kitteh |
Jun-04-11 12:48 AM |
#12 |
| -
Actually, I was agreeing with you. |
EFerrari |
Jun-04-11 10:29 AM |
#24 |
| -
Exactly. |
Horse with no Name |
Jun-04-11 01:07 AM |
#15 |
| -
after 'they' ruin him? |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Jun-04-11 01:09 AM |
#16 |
| -
I'm sorry, I can't get overheated about Edward's infidelity |
EFerrari |
Jun-04-11 10:37 AM |
#25 |
| -
I do get worked up over it... |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Jun-04-11 11:05 AM |
#27 |
| -
I imagine there are a lot of people who make other people's lives |
EFerrari |
Jun-04-11 02:11 PM |
#28 |
| -
you would be in deep denial to believe that most of the US |
ProdigalJunkMail |
Jun-04-11 04:53 PM |
#29 |
| -
No, you don't know what happened. |
EFerrari |
Jun-05-11 07:34 PM |
#32 |
| -
I tell you it is his slandering hypocrisy that should bother you. |
Bluenorthwest |
Jun-04-11 05:35 PM |
#30 |
| -
You are right about the hypocrisy. That's just nauseating. |
EFerrari |
Jun-04-11 09:34 PM |
#31 |
| -
Bunny, the giver, would have to file a gift tax return |
pnwmom |
Jun-04-11 12:47 AM |
#10 |
| -
Neither. A gift return and tax if required is filed by the giver. |
pnwmom |
Jun-04-11 12:46 AM |
#9 |
| -
Well, I think we can bet Bunny and her accountants have given a gift or two and knew the laws. |
Maru Kitteh |
Jun-04-11 12:55 AM |
#13 |
| -
But #4 would only apply if she directly gave to his campaign. |
pnwmom |
Jun-04-11 01:24 AM |
#18 |
| -
Why did JE go lean on a 100 year-old woman 1wk before he was federally indicted? |
Maru Kitteh |
Jun-04-11 01:55 AM |
#21 |
| -
Ok I can't source this because I saw it on the TV |
Horse with no Name |
Jun-04-11 01:05 AM |
#14 |
| -
Were that true, it would be on RH's tax return, and more importantly EDWARDS does not claim as much. |
Maru Kitteh |
Jun-04-11 01:19 AM |
#17 |
| -
No, it wouldn't be on Hunter's tax return. It would only be on Bunny's |
pnwmom |
Jun-04-11 01:28 AM |
#20 |
| -
His defense is that he could have never expected this to be a contribution rather than a gift. |
Maru Kitteh |
Jun-04-11 02:15 AM |
#22 |
| -
I haven't seen him say that he took the money at all. |
pnwmom |
Jun-04-11 09:25 AM |
#23 |
| -
If that TV report is correct, and also the reports about the depositions, |
pnwmom |
Jun-04-11 01:25 AM |
#19 |
| -
Bunny was 98 then. Just saying...... |
OmmmSweetOmmm |
Jun-04-11 10:46 AM |
#26 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread