You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #85: yes. in japan as well -- typically one didn't use to smile for a formal posed photo. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-30-11 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #71
85. yes. in japan as well -- typically one didn't use to smile for a formal posed photo.
Edited on Mon May-30-11 02:00 AM by Hannah Bell
and in fact that used to be the case in the us/europe as well. i speculate that the reason, at root, was the same in all cultures -- economics, the technical requirements of photography originally, and the custom that outlives economic/technical necessity.

more generally, it could also be that the people feel it's rude for strangers to take their picture, are wary of strangers/foreigners, didn't like this *particular* photographer...or that the photographer *asked* them to pose that way. also, as another poster said, in japan lots of women still cover their mouths when smiling/laughing (they used to *black* their teeth) -- common enough that i myself started doing it when i lived there too. perhaps similar customs obtain elsewhere in asia.

there could be lots of things other than that they are some gray people who've had all the life sucked out of them by the terrible nk regime.

but other photographers in nk have been able to get candid shots with people smiling -- workers, housewives, military men & women, old people, rural residents, and schoolchildren. smiling in an unforced way.

so my question would be, what is *this* photographer's problem? why does he give us this collection of posed shots & tell us this represents daily life in nk?

and why are people so quick to believe that they *know* something about nk after looking at 15 photos from a single photographer?

i think it's pretty obvious why. they've been propagandized into that bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC