You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #3: Ex-actly correct. n/t [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ex-actly correct. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -"President Palin?" "President Palin??" C'mon. Cyrano  May-27-11 12:08 PM   #0 
  - "President Reagan?" "President Reagain?? C'mon.  The Green Manalishi   May-27-11 12:11 PM   #1 
  - That is EXACTLY the phrase that came to mind  timtom   May-27-11 02:16 PM   #25 
  - I remember  Viking 1   May-27-11 02:18 PM   #26 
  - I wouldn't know, but Bush 2.0 wasn't any more credible, really.  phantom power   May-27-11 12:14 PM   #2 
  - Ex-actly correct. n/t  PCIntern   May-27-11 12:17 PM   #3 
  - Reagan was an amiable imbecile who actually won (as far as we know).  Cyrano   May-27-11 12:20 PM   #4 
     - Maybe. My take is that the MSM *made* it close for Bush. You know... "Earth Tones -- tee hee!"  phantom power   May-27-11 12:30 PM   #9 
  - I remember in 1980 when the republicans nominated  samrock   May-27-11 12:24 PM   #5 
  - "Never underestimate the stupidity of the American people"  FiveGoodMen   May-27-11 12:54 PM   #15 
  - I'm throwing a complacency party and you're all invited.  Shagbark Hickory   May-27-11 12:24 PM   #6 
  - She's not running.  obxhead   May-27-11 12:26 PM   #7 
  - If the powers that be decide they're going to install her, they'll install her  saras   May-27-11 12:27 PM   #8 
  - It's possible that the GOP fears a Palin presidency as much as we do  Cyrano   May-27-11 12:36 PM   #10 
     - True, that.  hifiguy   May-27-11 02:16 PM   #24 
  - In 1999 did anyone think that George W. Bu$h would be President?  liberal N proud   May-27-11 12:40 PM   #11 
  - Yes, but!!! Bush Jr. was controllable. As far as we know, Cheney and Rove  Cyrano   May-27-11 12:45 PM   #12 
     - Like I said, the voters are gullible and stupid  liberal N proud   May-27-11 01:04 PM   #18 
  - It's a challenge and a test for the "liberal media"  maxrandb   May-27-11 12:48 PM   #13 
  - It doesn't depend on Palin.  GSLevel9   May-27-11 12:50 PM   #14 
  - Now that would be an election for the ages.  Cyrano   May-27-11 12:59 PM   #17 
  - Here is what the electorate is capable of.  leeroysphitz   May-27-11 12:57 PM   #16 
  - What? I think Michael Palin could make a fine president  Gamow   May-27-11 01:11 PM   #19 
  - She knows she can't win.  Wait Wut   May-27-11 01:14 PM   #20 
  - Absolutely right  Egnever   May-27-11 02:10 PM   #23 
  - you don't think...  IcyPeas   May-27-11 01:18 PM   #21 
  - I don't see it happening  MyshkinCommaPrince   May-27-11 02:06 PM   #22 
  - If she does run, I don't see  cordelia   May-27-11 02:22 PM   #27 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC