You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Reply #54: you are right. and again, this is opinion. i am not sittin as judge or juror [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-25-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. you are right. and again, this is opinion. i am not sittin as judge or juror
but like the dks rapist.... we like to quibble what is is.

since almost all that has been exposed is not crime and is stuff that is already known, i would say that alone says he didnt know what the fuck they had and it is a fuckin game that he had no right to play nor assange....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
  -Assange: Obama looks to put a chill across all investigative journalism Playinghardball  May-25-11 12:56 PM   #0 
  - Not the first time Obama has slammed his foot in his mouth over a legal issue..  truebrit71   May-25-11 01:01 PM   #1 
  - How'd you like that speech at Parliament? First US President to do so.  Eagle Mall   May-25-11 01:25 PM   #2 
  - Yeah! And what about this?!  Marr   May-25-11 01:27 PM   #3 
  - you guys are really having a run of bad luck lately, huh?  Eagle Mall   May-25-11 01:35 PM   #5 
     - An "enemy"?  Marr   May-25-11 01:40 PM   #8 
        - what else do you call someone who you revile?  Eagle Mall   May-25-11 02:12 PM   #13 
  - "bitter Obama hating route"  truebrit71   May-25-11 01:34 PM   #4 
  - sorry, you don't get to muzzle our President.  Eagle Mall   May-25-11 01:37 PM   #6 
     - +1  Wait Wut   May-25-11 01:42 PM   #10 
     - WTF are you talking about?  truebrit71   May-25-11 02:56 PM   #15 
     - careful..  frylock   May-25-11 02:58 PM   #17 
        - I know, right?  truebrit71   May-25-11 03:31 PM   #24 
     - LOL. It's too bad a president with a law degree has to be reminded  EFerrari   May-25-11 03:18 PM   #21 
  - it's more of a bitter, freedom-loving route  frylock   May-25-11 02:54 PM   #14 
  - So to you, because the Colonial, Imperial ruling class of Britain  sabrina 1   May-25-11 07:10 PM   #49 
  - I disagree  JonLP24   May-25-11 01:43 PM   #11 
  - manning was not a whistleblower. he down loaded hundreds of thousands with hope of gotcha  seabeyond   May-25-11 01:39 PM   #7 
  - daniel ellsberg would vehemently disagree..  frylock   May-25-11 02:57 PM   #16 
     - betcha there are a lot that would disagree with him. hey, obama is a constitutional scholar, too.  seabeyond   May-25-11 04:05 PM   #32 
        - that whooshing sound you hear?  frylock   May-25-11 04:51 PM   #43 
           - no. it is merely that there are people that disagree with your position  seabeyond   May-25-11 05:57 PM   #44 
              - If Manning did as alleged, what evidence do you have that he did it as a "gotcha".  Luminous Animal   May-25-11 06:14 PM   #45 
                 - i could say it slower i guess.... he did not go after anything specific. he pulled down hundreds  seabeyond   May-25-11 06:25 PM   #46 
                    - You are presenting nothing but mere speculation. You have no clue what the leaker  Luminous Animal   May-25-11 06:54 PM   #48 
                       - the FACT is he downloaded hundreds of thousands of cable, clueless what was on them  seabeyond   May-25-11 07:13 PM   #50 
                          - So you are saying with 100% certainty that whoever leaked these cables  Luminous Animal   May-25-11 07:16 PM   #51 
                             - if a person read three cables then they hand off 3, if that is what they are blowing the whistle  seabeyond   May-25-11 07:18 PM   #52 
                                - Nobody has been charged with treason. Not even Manning.  Luminous Animal   May-25-11 07:24 PM   #53 
                                   - you are right. and again, this is opinion. i am not sittin as judge or juror  seabeyond   May-25-11 07:29 PM   #54 
  - only in the US, and we haven't done any real investigative journalism here for decades  TorchTheWitch   May-25-11 01:40 PM   #9 
  - Assange is not even close to being an investigative journalist  Dreamer Tatum   May-25-11 01:45 PM   #12 
  - actually he provided news agencies with scads of stolen documents to vet..  frylock   May-25-11 03:00 PM   #18 
  - He's more of a trafficker of stolen documents than journalist.  Dreamer Tatum   May-25-11 03:30 PM   #23 
  - Keep telling yourself that.  krabigirl   May-25-11 03:32 PM   #26 
  - Only needed to tell myself that once.  Dreamer Tatum   May-25-11 04:02 PM   #30 
  - Who does Wikileaks traffic to?  Luminous Animal   May-25-11 03:33 PM   #28 
  - So he is a SOURCE not a JOURNALIST  NavyDem   May-25-11 03:47 PM   #29 
     - He and other Wikileaks members produced the collateral murder video.  Luminous Animal   May-25-11 04:26 PM   #36 
  - Tell that to Iceland. As a direct result of Wikileaks  EFerrari   May-25-11 03:01 PM   #20 
  - Again, that makes him a trafficker of stolen documents.  Dreamer Tatum   May-25-11 04:04 PM   #31 
     - LOL. Pathetic and likely neck breaking.  EFerrari   May-25-11 04:17 PM   #34 
     - Yes, it would break your neck to find anything he's written  Dreamer Tatum   May-25-11 04:27 PM   #37 
     - Please see post #36  Luminous Animal   May-25-11 04:28 PM   #38 
  - First of all, Assange is not Wikileaks and second, you are wrong...  Luminous Animal   May-25-11 03:18 PM   #22 
  - You are talking to kitchen tables. Try again when a TeaPubliKlan is in office for a different tune.  TheKentuckian   May-25-11 04:34 PM   #40 
  - Those scads of documents are much more informative than the crap the msm pushes as news.  krabigirl   May-25-11 03:32 PM   #25 
  - Gee, then you'd think Assange would frickin' READ one or two and write something on his own?  Dreamer Tatum   May-25-11 04:29 PM   #39 
  - Oh Jeebus Christ.  Forkboy   May-25-11 04:21 PM   #35 
  - Department of Justice Subpoenas a New York Times Reporter  EFerrari   May-25-11 03:00 PM   #19 
  - K & R.  krabigirl   May-25-11 03:33 PM   #27 
  - Julian doesn't understand our legal system  treestar   May-25-11 04:07 PM   #33 
  - No he is not admitting to anything. Raw Story journalists are extremely sloppy.  Luminous Animal   May-25-11 04:39 PM   #42 
  - If the President says he's guilty, then he's guilty. That's the way it works  grahamhgreen   May-25-11 04:36 PM   #41 
     - "If they weren't guilty, they wouldn't be suspects" -Ed Meese..  Fumesucker   May-25-11 06:35 PM   #47 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC