stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-03-11 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
| 32. Yes, it is complete garbage. None of these accusations have any meat whatsoever. |
|
I am the only person in this thread who has pointed out a specific reason why people might want to take issue with this person and that reason is explainable.
The vitriol against the choice of this person in the absence of any wrongdoing attributed to him is amazing. I thought we were better than this.
|
| -X JP Morgan exec being considered for WH Chief of Staff |
lonestarnot |
Jan-03-11 10:18 PM |
#0 |
 -
LOL |
Skittles |
Jan-03-11 10:20 PM |
#1 |
 -
Just untotallyfuckingbelievable! WTF! |
lonestarnot |
Jan-03-11 10:21 PM |
# |
 -
Nothing surprises me anymore n/t |
OhioChick |
Jan-03-11 10:57 PM |
#18 |
| -
I guess nobody at Goldman Sachs wanted the job. n/t |
QC |
Jan-03-11 10:21 PM |
#2 |
| -
And what if they had? It means nothing. n/t |
stevenleser |
Jan-03-11 10:36 PM |
#10 |
| -
True. What's one more when the government is filled with them top to bottom? n/t |
QC |
Jan-03-11 11:35 PM |
#27 |
| -
Yes, the government is filled with people from top to bottom. Or isn't that what you meant? |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:02 AM |
#34 |
| -
*facepalm* |
sakabatou |
Jan-03-11 10:21 PM |
#3 |
| -
Besides the name of the firm and job title, is there some specific reason why we shouldnt like him? |
stevenleser |
Jan-03-11 10:21 PM |
#4 |
| -
No reason, of course. He's competent and informed, |
elleng |
Jan-03-11 10:31 PM |
#7 |
| -
LOLOLOL |
Skittles |
Jan-03-11 10:32 PM |
#8 |
| -
Skittles, I am a fan of yours, help me understand this. |
stevenleser |
Jan-03-11 10:40 PM |
#13 |
| -
And you don't think as a once upon a timer that he doesn't still have ties that bind more than a |
lonestarnot |
Jan-03-11 10:56 PM |
#17 |
| -
Like what? |
stevenleser |
Jan-03-11 11:04 PM |
#19 |
| -
Live bodies, scammer banksters ties in high places. That's what. |
lonestarnot |
Jan-03-11 11:07 PM |
#21 |
| -
Meaning what? |
stevenleser |
Jan-03-11 11:51 PM |
#29 |
| -
Yes, that knee jerk reaction is really something. Did you see the thread that |
stevenleser |
Jan-03-11 10:33 PM |
#9 |
| -
big banks and big corporations have absolutely TRASHED America |
Skittles |
Jan-03-11 11:56 PM |
#31 |
| -
SOME people at SOME banks, yes, that is true. It does not come close a reason to |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:00 AM |
#33 |
| -
SYMBOLISM and PERCEPTION are very IMPORTANT |
Skittles |
Jan-04-11 12:02 AM |
#35 |
| -
How is he collaborating with them by appointing this person. You still have no specific accusations |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:05 AM |
#38 |
| -
look at the RESULTS thus far |
Skittles |
Jan-04-11 12:08 AM |
#40 |
| -
If you tied all of those things together with specifics, and tied that to this candidate, we might |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:11 AM |
#43 |
| -
he is a fucking tool |
Skittles |
Jan-04-11 12:42 AM |
#58 |
| -
"..trash everyone who worked at a bank..." |
hulka38 |
Jan-04-11 01:00 AM |
#62 |
| -
He's a bankster. Get the picture? |
phasma ex machina |
Jan-03-11 11:05 PM |
#20 |
| -
Perfect depiction! |
lonestarnot |
Jan-03-11 11:08 PM |
#22 |
| -
No, I dont. Your picture has nothing to do with any specific people. |
stevenleser |
Jan-03-11 11:53 PM |
#30 |
| -
Our Democratic President has been picking cabinet members |
hulka38 |
Jan-04-11 01:13 AM |
#64 |
| -
disgusting and very disturbing |
xiamiam |
Jan-03-11 10:25 PM |
#5 |
| -
Why the hell not |
notesdev |
Jan-03-11 10:28 PM |
#6 |
| -
He wants them around him. |
emilyg |
Jan-03-11 10:39 PM |
#12 |
| -
Every time I think things can't get any more, eh, Rockefellerian, they do. |
Octafish |
Jan-03-11 10:38 PM |
#11 |
| -
Could it be a case of keeping your friends close and your enemies closer or am I making excuses? |
lonestarnot |
Jan-03-11 10:41 PM |
#14 |
| -
I'm hoping that, rather than what Goldfinger said. |
Octafish |
Jan-03-11 10:52 PM |
#15 |
| -
Whatever it is, it sure as hell stinks to me. |
lonestarnot |
Jan-03-11 10:54 PM |
#16 |
| -
Definitely enemy action. |
FiveGoodMen |
Jan-04-11 04:55 PM |
#71 |
| -
You know it could be a keep your enemies close strategy |
hootinholler |
Jan-03-11 11:12 PM |
#23 |
| -
Yes #14. |
lonestarnot |
Jan-03-11 11:15 PM |
#24 |
| -
I wrote that before I read through the thread |
hootinholler |
Jan-03-11 11:32 PM |
#26 |
| -
Hehe. |
Smashcut |
Jan-03-11 11:18 PM |
#25 |
| -
This is Bill Daley we're talking about. |
hulka38 |
Jan-04-11 01:21 AM |
#65 |
| -
I don't remember this much opposition to him when he was RUNNING GORE'S CAMPAIGN. |
BzaDem |
Jan-03-11 11:40 PM |
#28 |
| -
Yes, it is complete garbage. None of these accusations have any meat whatsoever. |
stevenleser |
Jan-03-11 11:57 PM |
#32 |
| -
you might be inclined to trust |
Skittles |
Jan-04-11 12:03 AM |
#37 |
| -
RICO Suit Filed Against JPMorgan. |
phasma ex machina |
Jan-04-11 12:11 AM |
#42 |
| -
OK, were getting closer to a specific accusation. Does it mention this candidate? |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:11 AM |
#44 |
| -
here is why it will not mention this candidate. |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:32 AM |
#54 |
| -
The Inet outed banksters AFTER Gore's campaign. Before banksterism became a political |
phasma ex machina |
Jan-04-11 12:02 AM |
#36 |
| -
Really? Can you point to me where tihs person is mentioned in the outing? |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:09 AM |
#41 |
| -
Here's the banksters. Get the picture? |
phasma ex machina |
Jan-04-11 12:13 AM |
#45 |
| -
No, I do not accept accusations against classes of people that way |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:14 AM |
#46 |
| -
Corporations aren't people. nt |
phasma ex machina |
Jan-04-11 12:16 AM |
#47 |
| -
The candidate we are discussing is a person not a corporation nt |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:17 AM |
#48 |
| -
He's an agent of bankster corporation who probably wants to create a presidential shield to protect |
phasma ex machina |
Jan-04-11 12:25 AM |
#50 |
| -
You can allege anything your mind wants to manufacture. You still have no evidence for it. nt |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:26 AM |
#51 |
| -
Why do you think a known bankster seeks high office? nt |
phasma ex machina |
Jan-04-11 12:28 AM |
#53 |
| -
Why do you think you are in his head? nt |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:33 AM |
#55 |
| -
Enlighten me. Give me another plausible explanation. nt |
phasma ex machina |
Jan-04-11 12:36 AM |
#56 |
| -
You think because you think it is ok to impute motives to those you dont know that I agree with the |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:37 AM |
#57 |
| -
EDUCATE YOURSELF ABOUT HIM |
Skittles |
Jan-04-11 12:51 AM |
#60 |
| -
I did. And I am still the only person that found anything substantive wrong. |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 12:55 AM |
#61 |
| -
big NAFTA whore |
Skittles |
Jan-04-11 01:00 AM |
#63 |
| -
That's what I had posted. |
stevenleser |
Jan-04-11 03:39 AM |
#67 |
| -
he is a corporate whore |
Skittles |
Jan-04-11 05:10 AM |
#70 |
| -
Just what we need, another executive in the government. |
Lucian |
Jan-04-11 12:07 AM |
#39 |
| -
Why not just turn out the lights and sell the whole thing off? |
Starry Messenger |
Jan-04-11 12:21 AM |
#49 |
| -
Birds of a feather |
somone |
Jan-04-11 12:26 AM |
#52 |
| -
true colors...... |
bbgrunt |
Jan-04-11 12:45 AM |
#59 |
| -
"Change we can believe in" ??? |
Raine |
Jan-04-11 02:53 AM |
#66 |
| -
Any doubt the Bankers run this country? |
sarcasmo |
Jan-04-11 04:04 AM |
#68 |
| -
"Speed it Up" all over again? |
HughBeaumont |
Jan-04-11 04:45 AM |
#69 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread