niyad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-03-11 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. rot in hell, you fat, ignorant, woman-hating bastard |
| -Scalia: Women Don't have Constitutional Protection against Discrimination |
RamboLiberal |
Jan-03-11 06:31 PM |
#0 |
 -
"judges who have been there too long" |
arcane1 |
Jan-03-11 06:33 PM |
#1 |
| -
I frankly do not think Scalia has constitutional protections against |
hlthe2b |
Jan-03-11 06:35 PM |
#2 |
  -
Pigs are useful, intelligent creatures. |
aquart |
Jan-03-11 06:52 PM |
#13 |
| -
Already apologized to porcines for the comparison... |
hlthe2b |
Jan-03-11 07:02 PM |
#15 |
| -
Slug slime is my favorite way to term worthless, disgusting... whatevers. nt |
blondeatlast |
Jan-03-11 07:39 PM |
#28 |
| -
The Constitution also does not stop me from thinking that Scalia |
csziggy |
Jan-03-11 06:36 PM |
#3 |
| -
Do the other Justices do this as much as Fat Tony? |
MattBaggins |
Jan-03-11 06:37 PM |
#4 |
| -
yeah, quite a few of them do. Breyer does. |
cali |
Jan-03-11 06:51 PM |
#11 |
| -
And Roberts and Thomas... |
freshwest |
Jan-03-11 07:31 PM |
#22 |
| -
good god. |
spanone |
Jan-03-11 06:38 PM |
#5 |
| -
I swear, that dude hates everything that is great about the Constitution. |
Vickers |
Jan-03-11 06:41 PM |
#6 |
| -
Combine these statements with the readong of the Constitution that's supposed to happen |
Occulus |
Jan-03-11 06:43 PM |
#7 |
| -
I predict that little theater will not go well. |
immoderate |
Jan-03-11 06:56 PM |
#14 |
| -
I just hope Dennis is there with his copy of the Constitution |
Horse with no Name |
Jan-03-11 09:44 PM |
#46 |
| -
When the 112th Congress reads the Constitution outloud, they'll go for this! |
freshwest |
Jan-03-11 07:02 PM |
#16 |
| -
None of this stuff happens by accident. My life would be more restful if I hadn't read |
blondeatlast |
Jan-03-11 07:41 PM |
#30 |
| -
Diebold has the security contract to protect |
Lars39 |
Jan-04-11 10:19 AM |
#51 |
| -
Hey Tony! The founding fathers didn't also envision Italians immigrating to the US. |
muntrv |
Jan-03-11 06:45 PM |
#8 |
| -
Don't forget wear funny hats |
LiberalFighter |
Jan-03-11 07:02 PM |
#17 |
| -
He's a sick bastard. |
marmar |
Jan-03-11 06:46 PM |
#9 |
| -
rot in hell, you fat, ignorant, woman-hating bastard |
niyad |
Jan-03-11 06:47 PM |
#10 |
| -
Fat Tony is an equal-opportunity hater, He pretty much loathes anyone that |
blondeatlast |
Jan-03-11 07:44 PM |
#32 |
| -
Supreme Court Justices can be investigated and impeached. |
deminks |
Jan-03-11 06:51 PM |
#12 |
| -
If his robes are going to be removed we need to make sure he still has pants on. |
LiberalFighter |
Jan-03-11 07:36 PM |
#26 |
| -
isn't this exactly the argument that led to the Equal Rights Amendment |
Motown_Johnny |
Jan-03-11 07:12 PM |
#18 |
| -
As far as I know, yes. And it didn't pass because of the rise of the religious right. |
freshwest |
Jan-03-11 07:30 PM |
#21 |
| -
and wasn't one of the arguments against it .... |
Motown_Johnny |
Jan-03-11 07:33 PM |
#24 |
| -
Good catch. IIRC, that was one of the "popular" objections. nt |
blondeatlast |
Jan-03-11 07:45 PM |
#33 |
| -
and wasn't it the conservatives making this argument? |
Motown_Johnny |
Jan-03-11 07:51 PM |
#36 |
| -
Of course. nt |
blondeatlast |
Jan-03-11 08:03 PM |
#40 |
| -
If that had been the case, it wouldn't have been fought over for almost a century. |
freshwest |
Jan-03-11 08:14 PM |
#41 |
| -
my point was that this is not a new argument |
Motown_Johnny |
Jan-03-11 09:40 PM |
#45 |
| -
Thanks for your reply to my rant. And I agree Democrats will be the ones. |
freshwest |
Jan-03-11 10:44 PM |
#47 |
| -
but expanding civil rights doesn't cost anything (or not much) |
Motown_Johnny |
Jan-04-11 09:15 AM |
#48 |
| -
He needs to tred carefully. I don't see anywhere that it says clearly |
The Backlash Cometh |
Jan-03-11 07:21 PM |
#19 |
| -
Oh please, let's impeach him, Roberts, Alito and Thomas. |
Alameda |
Jan-03-11 07:52 PM |
#37 |
| -
We can't even get Obama to look into the Bush corruption. |
The Backlash Cometh |
Jan-03-11 07:53 PM |
#39 |
| -
Not with a GOP House of Representatives. But we can still dream... |
freshwest |
Jan-03-11 08:21 PM |
#43 |
| -
Sometimes dreams become reality...dream on. |
Alameda |
Jan-04-11 09:38 AM |
#49 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-03-11 07:52 PM |
#38 |
| -
Scalia is a few dozen donuts from daisy pushing. |
bluestate10 |
Jan-03-11 07:29 PM |
#20 |
| -
I am willing to send him a dozen donuts, anyone else? |
Motown_Johnny |
Jan-03-11 07:34 PM |
#25 |
| -
I'll throw in a 1/2 dozen cannolis. nt |
blondeatlast |
Jan-03-11 07:46 PM |
#34 |
| -
"All you need is a legislature and a ballot box." |
NoGOPZone |
Jan-03-11 07:32 PM |
#23 |
| -
Interesting that this "strict constructionist" |
prolesunited |
Jan-03-11 07:38 PM |
#27 |
| -
Doesn't mention any specific fire arms either .... I say we take ... |
JoePhilly |
Jan-03-11 07:41 PM |
#29 |
| -
The Constitution doesn't say I can't kick Scalia in the 'nads, either. |
The Velveteen Ocelot |
Jan-03-11 07:43 PM |
#31 |
| -
Can someone please begin impeachment proceedings |
Hawkeye-X |
Jan-03-11 07:49 PM |
#35 |
| -
It doesn't say anything about fat little Italian descendants either. |
Kablooie |
Jan-03-11 08:19 PM |
#42 |
| -
Mysogynistic fucking bastard. nt |
Ilsa |
Jan-03-11 08:51 PM |
#44 |
| -
It doesn't specifically authorize a War on Drugs either |
Tsiyu |
Jan-04-11 09:49 AM |
#50 |
| -
Reason #2,342,589 why we still need an Equal Rights Amendment |
Love Bug |
Jan-04-11 10:26 AM |
#52 |
| -
I would say it is Reason #1 |
Motown_Johnny |
Jan-04-11 10:29 AM |
#53 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread