You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #90: Because there are already UN and US provisions to be used against Bin Laden [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
90. Because there are already UN and US provisions to be used against Bin Laden
And Al Qaeda

http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2011/05/killing-osama... /

Matt Yglesias

Killing Osama Bin Laden Is Legal
May 5th, 2011 at 9:14 AM

I guess I initially thought this went without saying, but I guess its worth going on record with the view that sending US special operations forces to kill Osama bin Laden was a perfectly legal action. Personally, I would have enjoyed having him captured alive and put on trial, but what went down is fine in both international and domestic law.

In a domestic context, I think the 9/11 AUMF has been put to some questionable uses since its passage but if authorized anything surely it authorized military action against Bin Laden. Meanwhile, Bin Laden considered himself to be at war with the United States. In an international law context, the use of military force is plainly authorized by UN Security Council Resolution 1368 which uses the magic words inherent right of individual or collective self-defence, threat to international peace and security, and all necessary steps. Thats how the UN Charter says bombs away. And this has all been reaffirmed since Bin Ladens death by the Security Council and the Secretary General of the United Nations.

Theres just nothing there on the other side.

What I do think is that this all highlights the desirability of revisiting the 9/11 AUMF which shouldnt just linger on forever as the legal basis for anything and everything terrorism-related.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC