Smarmie Doofus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-01-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
| 32. That 13% seems weirdly hyperactive here. |
|
Something about this issue strikes the "crazy" equivalent of the funny bone.
Very strange.
|
| -Do you approve of Wikileaks? |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 08:59 PM |
#0 |
 -
Yes. |
Iggo |
Jan-01-11 09:00 PM |
#1 |
| -
Without Wikileaks, what chance would we EVER have to find out what our rulers are doing? |
Ken Burch |
Jan-01-11 09:01 PM |
#2 |
| -
So far. |
rucky |
Jan-01-11 09:04 PM |
#3 |
| -
The voting link for the first choice is disabled!!!! Why? |
kgnu_fan |
Jan-01-11 09:05 PM |
#4 |
  -
It works for me, kgnu. |
Kaleko |
Jan-01-11 09:08 PM |
#5 |
| -
For me, it is disabled so I can not vote, two links below works but I dont' want to vote for them |
kgnu_fan |
Jan-01-11 09:11 PM |
#6 |
| -
Weird... |
Kaleko |
Jan-01-11 09:14 PM |
#9 |
| -
Which one isn't working? |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 09:20 PM |
#11 |
| -
The first one on the list, "Yes" is the one I can not vote. |
kgnu_fan |
Jan-01-11 09:21 PM |
#12 |
| -
That's strange. Does anyone know what the problem might be? |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 09:24 PM |
#15 |
| -
kgnu_fan, TexasGal just said that you |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 09:28 PM |
#18 |
| -
I believe you have to be a donor |
Texasgal |
Jan-01-11 09:24 PM |
#16 |
| -
I didn't know that. |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 09:26 PM |
#17 |
| -
No you don't |
flying rabbit |
Jan-02-11 12:33 AM |
#43 |
| -
Thanks, then I wonder what the problem was? Doesn't seem like |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 02:48 AM |
#53 |
| -
Thank you for caring.... I don't know what is the problem. My main browser is Firefox... |
kgnu_fan |
Jan-02-11 12:12 PM |
#66 |
| -
I am using Google Chrome now. |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 12:54 PM |
#69 |
| -
You know what? I was able to click it now so I voted. Thank you and I am going to try Chrome soon. |
kgnu_fan |
Jan-02-11 08:17 PM |
#111 |
| -
I'm glad you were able to vote ~ |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 09:07 PM |
#114 |
| -
I'm not a donor |
smiley |
Jan-07-11 12:38 PM |
#127 |
| -
I'm kind of on the fence about this one. On the whole . . . |
MrModerate |
Jan-01-11 09:13 PM |
#7 |
| -
That's a reasonable and thoughtful post. |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 01:51 AM |
#50 |
| -
Think of it this way, if Wikileaks has the info, you can be sure that every intelligence community |
grahamhgreen |
Jan-02-11 08:45 AM |
#62 |
| -
+1 |
realisticphish |
Jan-02-11 04:23 PM |
#91 |
| -
"Support"? |
Recursion |
Jan-01-11 09:13 PM |
#8 |
| -
The question in the subject line was 'Do you approve...' |
Iggo |
Jan-01-11 09:42 PM |
#22 |
| -
In my opinion the CNN poll was misleadingly phrased |
Time for change |
Jan-01-11 09:18 PM |
#10 |
| -
Definitely how the questions are framed plus the |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 09:22 PM |
#13 |
| -
Because your wording intentionally builds in bias |
Still a Democrat |
Jan-01-11 09:45 PM |
#23 |
| -
My example DID NOT allude ot potential benefit or harm |
Time for change |
Jan-01-11 09:53 PM |
#24 |
| -
Just as some contend lives are endangered and American interests compromised |
Still a Democrat |
Jan-01-11 09:57 PM |
#27 |
| -
Which one of the facts that I stated do you think is disputed? |
Time for change |
Jan-01-11 10:17 PM |
#31 |
| -
Both sides have claims, but only one side has facts. |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 11:38 PM |
#41 |
| -
when did they say this? when they first came out. like biden claimed. |
seabeyond |
Jan-02-11 08:44 AM |
#61 |
| -
Just take the helicopter video alone! |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 02:26 PM |
#75 |
| -
Thank you. Sometimes I think people forget what we're talking about. |
Smarmie Doofus |
Jan-02-11 09:36 PM |
#116 |
| -
To say that Wikileaks has not exposed crimes is |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 10:19 PM |
#117 |
| -
self delete |
Still a Democrat |
Jan-02-11 03:12 PM |
#79 |
| -
From Robert Gates: |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 03:34 PM |
#83 |
| -
1000's of crimes? i have not seen even a kinda close to that number. tell me ten crimes. nt |
seabeyond |
Jan-02-11 08:42 AM |
#60 |
| -
Why don't you follow the link I recommended for you where you can read many of the stories... |
JackRiddler |
Jan-02-11 04:03 PM |
#86 |
| -
why do you ASSUME i have not followed the link. challenging the 1000's of crimes the poster |
seabeyond |
Jan-02-11 05:11 PM |
#95 |
| -
This assumption is based on your complete failure to ever address what's in the cables... |
JackRiddler |
Jan-02-11 05:20 PM |
#96 |
| -
he says thousands of crimes. there arent. i call it. you pissed. the other was |
seabeyond |
Jan-02-11 06:05 PM |
#104 |
| -
Fine. You say ZERO. This is definitely less accurate. |
JackRiddler |
Jan-02-11 06:09 PM |
#105 |
| -
link to where i ever said ZERO. oh, i know. i didnt. you MADE it UP. |
seabeyond |
Jan-02-11 06:31 PM |
#106 |
| -
Have you discovered one? Please tell us. |
JackRiddler |
Jan-02-11 06:43 PM |
#107 |
| -
I have answered your question, twice I believe. |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 06:47 PM |
#109 |
| -
Have thousands of innocent civilians not died in Iraq? |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 05:37 PM |
#101 |
| -
The CNN question was not objective. |
JackRiddler |
Jan-02-11 04:01 PM |
#85 |
| -
+1 |
grahamhgreen |
Jan-02-11 08:48 AM |
#63 |
| -
I agree with almost anything that stirs up the shit for TPTB. |
leeroysphitz |
Jan-01-11 09:24 PM |
#14 |
| -
You're a rabble rouser, you are! Lol! |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 12:57 AM |
#45 |
| -
Assange doesn't have the protection of the First Amendment |
Still a Democrat |
Jan-01-11 09:31 PM |
#19 |
| -
Are you serious or is that snark? |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 09:35 PM |
#20 |
| -
Completely serious |
Still a Democrat |
Jan-01-11 09:39 PM |
#21 |
| -
There is a reason that the first ten amendments is called the Bill Of Rights. |
RaleighNCDUer |
Jan-01-11 09:56 PM |
#25 |
| -
Thank you, good post. Rights, people seem so willing to give |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 11:32 PM |
#40 |
| -
Wait, so what you are saying is that the U.S. |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 09:56 PM |
#26 |
| -
Assange as a member of the "press" in another country |
Still a Democrat |
Jan-01-11 10:09 PM |
#30 |
| -
You couldn't be more wrong. |
Kaleko |
Jan-01-11 10:49 PM |
#33 |
| -
I don't know why this is so hard for some people to understand. |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 11:30 PM |
#39 |
| -
The "we" is the United States |
Still a Democrat |
Jan-02-11 07:41 AM |
#54 |
| -
My United States is very clearly not yours. "We" is propaganda. |
JackRiddler |
Jan-02-11 06:45 PM |
#108 |
| -
Thank you for your response. |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-01-11 10:54 PM |
#36 |
| -
Quite welcome |
Still a Democrat |
Jan-02-11 09:22 AM |
#64 |
| -
Well, again, a news organization publishes news. Even though |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 12:52 PM |
#68 |
| -
As far as crimes Assange would face if he were an American citizen, it depends |
Still a Democrat |
Jan-02-11 03:05 PM |
#78 |
| -
Okay, but since the Constitution IS the law of the land |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 03:16 PM |
#80 |
| -
One more thing. You must not be aware of the history of |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 12:07 AM |
#42 |
| -
wow. |
bowens43 |
Jan-01-11 10:05 PM |
#29 |
| -
See explanatory argument in post #30, neither ignorant, nor dangerous |
elias7 |
Jan-01-11 10:52 PM |
#35 |
| -
It's both and wrong. n/t |
EFerrari |
Jan-01-11 11:03 PM |
#38 |
| -
care to explain? |
elias7 |
Jan-02-11 12:53 AM |
#44 |
| -
Should China have the power to go after American journalists |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 01:01 AM |
#46 |
| -
I'm not talking about rights, I'm talking about what's happening now |
elias7 |
Jan-02-11 04:04 PM |
#87 |
| -
I guess I did misunderstand your post, so thanks for the |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 05:28 PM |
#98 |
| -
The channel I was alluding to would be outside of our legal system |
elias7 |
Jan-02-11 09:09 PM |
#115 |
| -
Oh, okay, I see what you mean. |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-03-11 12:06 AM |
#118 |
| -
The first amendment applies to the government's behavior: |
EFerrari |
Jan-02-11 01:50 AM |
#48 |
| -
Not sure I understand your post |
elias7 |
Jan-02-11 04:14 PM |
#89 |
| -
But if we charge him we would be charging him under our laws |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 04:21 PM |
#90 |
| -
Really. So we as citizens have no rigtht to access the foreign press? |
Luminous Animal |
Jan-01-11 10:56 PM |
#37 |
| -
Deleted message |
Name removed |
Jan-02-11 01:52 AM |
#51 |
| -
Is it disingenuous to bring up the Fourth Amendment |
rucky |
Jan-02-11 08:09 AM |
#56 |
| -
It is the duty of journalists to keep government honest. US media has FAILED. |
qb |
Jan-01-11 10:03 PM |
#28 |
| -
That 13% seems weirdly hyperactive here. |
Smarmie Doofus |
Jan-01-11 10:36 PM |
#32 |
| -
There is an active authoritarian element among Democrats as everywhere else. |
JackRiddler |
Jan-02-11 06:49 PM |
#110 |
| -
Yes, and I'm not a big believer in keeping government |
Cleita |
Jan-01-11 10:51 PM |
#34 |
| -
I approve |
clyrc |
Jan-02-11 01:22 AM |
#47 |
| -
YES! Only place to get the real news....nt |
old mark |
Jan-02-11 01:51 AM |
#49 |
| -
Hell Yes ! nt |
Mojeoux |
Jan-02-11 01:55 AM |
#52 |
| -
This is a flawed poll, with no room for a reasonable answer. |
Robb |
Jan-02-11 07:45 AM |
#55 |
| -
Wikleaks is an idea. My question was whether |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 11:39 AM |
#65 |
| -
Just because it doesn't have "Robb is a dingbat" as an option doesn't mean it's flawed.. |
Ghost in the Machine |
Jan-02-11 01:03 PM |
#72 |
| -
I think WikiLeaks would be a lot better if it wasn't being run by a preening egomaniac n/t |
Azathoth |
Jan-02-11 08:15 AM |
#57 |
| -
Thanks for focusing on what really matters. Me, I get all my news from People magazine and Gawker. |
JackRiddler |
Jan-02-11 04:06 PM |
#88 |
| -
Dumb poll. One can disapprove of what Wikileaks did without believing they had no right to publish |
BzaDem |
Jan-02-11 08:29 AM |
#58 |
| -
Well, that was the question. CNN claims that democrats |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 12:58 PM |
#71 |
| -
Yes but... |
walldude |
Jan-02-11 01:17 PM |
#73 |
| -
Yes, and that didn't make sense to me since |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 03:44 PM |
#84 |
| -
Better "Wiki" than waterheater! |
DailyGrind51 |
Jan-02-11 08:40 AM |
#59 |
| -
I approve and hope that more WikiLeaks clones will provide more. |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Jan-02-11 12:28 PM |
#67 |
| -
These choices don't work for me. |
Codeine |
Jan-02-11 12:55 PM |
#70 |
| -
The question is about the idea of Wikileaks. CNN claims |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 01:31 PM |
#74 |
| -
I was about to post a long reply on Monday about how this is eerily similar to the Iraq polls |
Turborama |
Jan-06-11 01:53 PM |
#122 |
| -
Hi Turbo, I am sorry about the problems you had |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-07-11 01:51 PM |
#131 |
| -
YES times however many things they revealed! |
freshwest |
Jan-02-11 02:29 PM |
#76 |
| -
it's good to see a majority approving of Wikileaks here |
fascisthunter |
Jan-02-11 02:31 PM |
#77 |
| -
Why would anyone prefer to be lied to and kept in the dark and fooled? |
lunatica |
Jan-02-11 03:20 PM |
#81 |
| -
I strongly approve of wikileaks. Nt |
xchrom |
Jan-02-11 03:30 PM |
#82 |
| -
Obama wont investigate the war crimes, so the media represses opinion on Wikileaks too |
upi402 |
Jan-02-11 04:26 PM |
#92 |
| -
I don't think it make one damn bit of difference |
ismnotwasm |
Jan-02-11 04:32 PM |
#93 |
| -
who on earth would disapprove of wikileaks except some government hack? |
BOG PERSON |
Jan-02-11 05:05 PM |
#94 |
| -
I think we have many people on DU list who are sent here and tasked to sway opinions of citizens... |
kgnu_fan |
Jan-02-11 08:21 PM |
#112 |
| -
Why not just put yes and no? |
treestar |
Jan-02-11 05:23 PM |
#97 |
| -
"Congress shall make NO law abridging the freedom of the press.." |
Tierra_y_Libertad |
Jan-02-11 05:36 PM |
#99 |
| -
On DU, it makes no difference. These answers probably show bedrock values for approve/disapprove. |
JackRiddler |
Jan-02-11 05:36 PM |
#100 |
| -
I think your comment is directed to me? |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-02-11 05:44 PM |
#103 |
| -
You bet I approve. We need new sunshine laws in this country, for sure. NT |
juajen |
Jan-02-11 05:39 PM |
#102 |
| -
No I think the gummint should hide all the foul shit it is doing so I can pretend |
Warren Stupidity |
Jan-02-11 08:55 PM |
#113 |
| -
So where did CNN find all those Democrats and Liberals |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-03-11 12:49 PM |
#119 |
| -
Julian Assange is a true hero |
Liberal Communist |
Jan-06-11 04:21 AM |
#120 |
| -
I agree and welcome to DU ~ |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-06-11 05:05 AM |
#121 |
| -
Yes, but with a qualification |
Jack Rabbit |
Jan-06-11 02:33 PM |
#123 |
| -
Very interesting post. |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-07-11 12:33 PM |
#126 |
| -
+ 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!! |
WillyT |
Jan-07-11 12:43 PM |
#129 |
| -
It's consistent with my recent check-in thread,sabrina 1. I approve of the truth getting to US n/t |
bobthedrummer |
Jan-06-11 02:36 PM |
#124 |
| -
Yes, I saw your thread and checked in |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-07-11 12:56 PM |
#130 |
| -
i voted no, that was some of the dumb crap ever, well not ever |
okieinpain |
Jan-06-11 02:38 PM |
#125 |
| -
I saw that. I thought that was odd. |
WhaTHellsgoingonhere |
Jan-07-11 12:39 PM |
#128 |
| -
governments have the right to keep certain things secret when they consistently look after |
yurbud |
Jan-07-11 02:08 PM |
#132 |
| -
I don't think governments have a right to secrecy. |
EFerrari |
Jan-07-11 03:10 PM |
#133 |
| -
I think you are right. They have a right to keep some things secret |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-08-11 12:58 AM |
#135 |
| -
'When they consistently look after the interests of their citizens'. |
sabrina 1 |
Jan-07-11 03:11 PM |
#134 |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread