gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-03-11 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
| 20. Yes, the numbers are small so far, but the odds of all the "problem children" |
|
being encountered in one clump seem low. I'm glad the judge's patience is wearing thin. The first bag or two, you think, "yeah, elections aren't 100.00% accurate, but they're usually nowhere near close enough to matter". This far into the game, they're probably starting to cringe every time they reach for a new bag.
|
| -Wisconsin Recount - Another Chain of Custody Problem in Waukesha County -This makes *4* |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 07:43 AM |
#0 |
-
K&R for the continuing incompetence in commiting election fraud. |
DCKit |
May-03-11 07:55 AM |
#1 |
-
We also had a bag on Saturday with no signatures on it. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 07:58 AM |
#2 |
 -
So many human "errors" .... |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 08:20 AM |
#4 |
  -
Only if replaced ballots match altered Optiscan from election night |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 08:23 AM |
#6 |
 -
That is true. -nt |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 08:34 AM |
#8 |
  -
NOT impossible, just much more difficult to pull off. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 08:37 AM |
#12 |
 -
Yes, it would be tricky |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 08:43 AM |
#14 |
  -
It would be an awful lot of work for a very small gain. |
FBaggins |
May-03-11 10:03 AM |
#33 |
 -
That's where my brain goes in all of this. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 10:12 AM |
#35 |
  -
So is there documentation of the vote count on the night of the election? |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 10:14 AM |
#37 |
 -
Yes, we reconcile to those tapes. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 10:17 AM |
#38 |
 -
A change of 10 ballots per precinct in Wisconsin = 36,300 votes |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 10:38 AM |
#44 |
 -
or 75 votes per precinct in Waukesha County (194 precincts) = 14550 votes |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 10:40 AM |
#45 |
  -
Recent Waukesha County election results |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 10:54 AM |
#48 |
 -
I spoke to that a bit here. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 11:00 AM |
#50 |
 -
With all due respect, this is your impression but I don't believe it is proven fact |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 11:10 AM |
#56 |
 -
It's proven fact that there are few unions and few public sector employees. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 11:15 AM |
#59 |
 -
Sure... but how many precincts have there been problems in? |
FBaggins |
May-03-11 12:07 PM |
#60 |
 -
Yes. If only we had more volunteers in each county we might know the answer to that |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-04-11 07:22 AM |
#81 |
 -
NO IT WOULDN'T |
Lefta Dissenter |
May-03-11 08:00 PM |
#73 |
 -
+1000 |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 11:32 PM |
#79 |
 -
OK, in that case, how would they get the total votes to match the poll books? |
PeaceNikki |
May-04-11 01:39 PM |
#87 |
 -
What are your poll books like? |
gkhouston |
May-05-11 09:11 PM |
#89 |
 -
Is anyone checking them against the original records? |
defendandprotect |
May-05-11 08:52 PM |
#88 |
 -
Is that technically a chain of custody problem? |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 09:47 AM |
#27 |
-
I think so, but I am not an attorney nor do I play one on TV. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 09:49 AM |
#28 |
-
Sure is. There is a procedure that is supposed to take place |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 10:46 AM |
#46 |
-
hi there! |
Lefta Dissenter |
May-03-11 08:08 PM |
#74 |
-
So they've had bags without signatures, bags without seals, and bags whose |
gkhouston |
May-03-11 08:16 AM |
#3 |
 -
We're only about 10% counted so that's tough to tell at this point. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 08:32 AM |
# |
  -
Wow. Granted, you've only done 10%, but still. n/t |
gkhouston |
May-03-11 08:36 AM |
#9 |
 -
The total # of votes in those bags is still WAY too small to be alarming... |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 08:41 AM |
#13 |
 -
Good that this judge seems to be handling this appropriately! -nt |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 08:45 AM |
#15 |
 -
Yes, the numbers are small so far, but the odds of all the "problem children" |
gkhouston |
May-03-11 09:07 AM |
#20 |
  -
Agreed. But also understand how difficult it would be to coordinate a tamper in every municipality. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 09:09 AM |
#21 |
 -
It hasn't happened in every municipality, though - just 4 as of now |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 09:23 AM |
#22 |
 -
I agree, but we've only counted 5 municipalities. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 09:35 AM |
#24 |
 -
We're doing the same thing... |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 09:41 AM |
#25 |
  -
Indeed. Multiple perspectives are important. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 09:44 AM |
#26 |
 -
which manicupality did you count that didn't have one of these bags? |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 09:50 AM |
#29 |
 -
Eagle. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 09:51 AM |
#30 |
 -
Good to know |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 09:53 AM |
#31 |
 -
I saw and photographed small tears in some bags, none big enough for that |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 09:59 AM |
#32 |
 -
are they also checking the vote counts for other races? |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 10:05 AM |
#34 |
 -
No, we're only counting SC race. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 10:14 AM |
#36 |
 -
Maybe. I also don't understand how that original count is documented |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 10:21 AM |
#39 |
 -
Optiscans are run through the machine |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 10:25 AM |
#40 |
 -
how do you verify that the print out is the one that was created on election night |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 10:28 AM |
#41 |
 -
It's all part of the chain of custody, yes. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 10:31 AM |
#42 |
 -
who conduced the canvass the day after? |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 10:36 AM |
#43 |
 -
It was the Board of Canvassers. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 10:51 AM |
#47 |
 -
Do you know who the other 2 were? |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 10:56 AM |
#49 |
 -
Yes, I see them every day. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 11:01 AM |
#51 |
 -
I am sure they are very nice, but Ramona admitted that she was kind of blindsided by Kathy and the |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 11:06 AM |
#52 |
 -
NONE of the issues found in recount have squat to do with canvass errors. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 11:08 AM |
#53 |
 -
so the tapes are kept outside of the bags until after the canvass? |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 11:08 AM |
#54 |
 -
They are secured. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 11:09 AM |
#55 |
 -
thank you for being so nice and answering my questions |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 11:12 AM |
#57 |
 -
Correct. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 11:13 AM |
#58 |
 -
The tapes don't have to be modified after election night. |
gkhouston |
May-03-11 01:29 PM |
#64 |
 -
i am concerned that false tapes could be produced |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 04:04 PM |
#67 |
 -
I'm not sure. At least one per tabulator, and I would think that |
gkhouston |
May-03-11 04:14 PM |
#71 |
 -
If the tabulator can be hacked... |
druidity33 |
May-04-11 06:53 AM |
#80 |
 -
PN, |
Lefta Dissenter |
May-03-11 08:10 PM |
#75 |
 -
It's ABOUT 1500 at this point |
PeaceNikki |
May-04-11 01:35 PM |
#86 |
 -
IMO it is to the point where ballots should not be included if the chain of custody is broken |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 08:32 AM |
#7 |
-
Again, the Optiscans from election night would have had to have been altered first. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 08:36 AM |
#10 |
-
Again, that is true. |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-03-11 08:37 AM |
#11 |
-
There needs to be another election with adult supervision. |
Hubert Flottz |
May-03-11 08:22 AM |
#5 |
-
Here is how *I* would steal an election (not that I ever would). Please tell me this would not work. |
Ian David |
May-03-11 08:52 AM |
#16 |
 -
You'd also have to sneak the tapes from the scanner into the mix. |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 08:56 AM |
#17 |
-
What if you wheeled the machine into the polling place during the last hour? n/t |
Ian David |
May-03-11 08:59 AM |
#18 |
 -
I would hope that the local clerk and/or election inspector and/or poll workers would notice such a |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 09:00 AM |
#19 |
-
Maybe it's been sloppy enough that they wouldn't notice an extra set of tapes in the mix? |
LiberalAndProud |
May-03-11 09:27 AM |
#23 |
-
Thats just weird! |
Ellipsis |
May-03-11 12:25 PM |
#61 |
-
Come on! You know the only voter fraud is perpetrated by fake and dead "Democrats"! |
WinkyDink |
May-03-11 12:27 PM |
#62 |
-
Some folks need to be chained and taken into the custody of we, the people imo k&r n/t |
bobthedrummer |
May-03-11 12:41 PM |
#63 |
 -
I'll K&R that post! |
Lefta Dissenter |
May-03-11 08:17 PM |
#76 |
-
I say give Kathy Nickolaus a lie detector test |
Blue Owl |
May-03-11 03:25 PM |
#65 |
-
Another weird bag |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 03:58 PM |
#66 |
 -
what is wrong with that one? |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 04:05 PM |
#68 |
  -
It's not closed/sealed properly |
PeaceNikki |
May-03-11 04:08 PM |
#69 |
 -
oh, I see |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 04:08 PM |
#70 |
 -
Thanks for keeping us up to date. |
jsamuel |
May-03-11 04:22 PM |
#72 |
  -
BINGO |
Lefta Dissenter |
May-03-11 08:19 PM |
#77 |
 -
Nikki, is that bag the one from district 3? |
Cieran_WI |
May-04-11 09:54 AM |
#82 |
  -
There were 423 ish votes in that bag. It was from |
PeaceNikki |
May-04-11 01:35 PM |
#85 |
 -
deleted, dupe. n/t |
Cieran_WI |
May-04-11 09:56 AM |
#83 |
-
Election fraud is not a partisan issue. No transparency = no |
texpatriot2004 |
May-03-11 10:55 PM |
#78 |
-
I'm heading for Milwaukee for a couple days |
eowyn_of_rohan |
May-04-11 11:15 AM |
#84 |
-
Milwaukee has a higher than average number of ballots with |
gkhouston |
May-05-11 09:19 PM |
#90 |