You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #36: Coming from a male-laughable. nt [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Coming from a male-laughable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
  -Obama triumph ahead babylonsister  Nov-12-09 02:21 PM   #0 
  - k & r  HopeOverFear   Nov-12-09 02:22 PM   #1 
  - Will you still support the HCR bill if the Stupak language remains in the final bill?  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 02:23 PM   #2 
  - I'm optimistic it will be removed. nt  babylonsister   Nov-12-09 02:27 PM   #3 
  - But that, as you know , was not the question.  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 02:55 PM   #5 
  - Yes I will; it will still help loads of people, and selfishly,  babylonsister   Nov-12-09 03:04 PM   #7 
     - It is brave of you to admit that ...  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 03:31 PM   #10 
     - Thanks for the lecture; coming from you it's positively laughable. nt  babylonsister   Nov-12-09 03:33 PM   #11 
     - You are the one willing to delegate 50 years of fighting for womens rights to the scrap heap.  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 03:36 PM   #13 
        - I guess that makes you the one sentencing those without health insurance to death  DrToast   Nov-12-09 03:58 PM   #16 
        - Trading one groups civil rights for another's? No not me, that would be you.  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 04:01 PM   #17 
           - We all hope the Stupak language is removed, but if it's not  ecstatic   Nov-12-09 05:44 PM   #29 
              - Bullshit.  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 06:38 PM   #33 
              - I am a woman who has spent 98% of my life uninsured,  ecstatic   Nov-12-09 06:54 PM   #34 
              - Apparently only your opinion matters.  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 07:59 PM   #39 
                 - In other words, this isn't about choice. This is about your hatred for the insurance industry  ecstatic   Nov-12-09 08:04 PM   #42 
                 - I will lecture you, or any other Faux Democrat who shills this bill.  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 08:10 PM   #44 
                 - If a "faux Democrat" = someone with a pre-existing condition then guilty as charged  ecstatic   Nov-12-09 08:28 PM   #45 
                 - Exactly what, and who's rights are you willing to trade for less than mediocre health coverage?  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 09:11 PM   #49 
                 - I am a Real Democrat with a preexisting condition and I will NOT support this Bill if Stupak is not  saracat   Nov-13-09 02:14 PM   #128 
                 - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-12-09 09:05 PM   #47 
                 - God is in fact , fiction, therefore he could not be an asshole.  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 09:09 PM   #48 
                 - This health care bill is a nice piece of "speculative fiction" is it not?  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 09:27 PM   #51 
                 - So lets talk about the amendment, - again  demwing   Nov-13-09 06:02 AM   #56 
                    - Really? Defend it please.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 07:01 AM   #60 
                       - Let's be specific  demwing   Nov-13-09 10:53 AM   #83 
                          - It in ,effect does just that.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 11:45 AM   #92 
                          - That's correct  demwing   Nov-13-09 04:26 PM   #158 
                 - The bill doesn't require insurance cos. to cover birth control.  Hello_Kitty   Nov-13-09 10:56 PM   #165 
                 - As a female who will probably be helped by this bill, I oppose it  Tansy_Gold   Nov-13-09 02:23 PM   #130 
                    - Right on.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 03:57 PM   #147 
                    - Hi Tansy Gold. Beautifully stated, as always!  saracat   Nov-15-09 02:04 PM   #169 
              - Coming from a male-laughable. nt  babylonsister   Nov-12-09 07:37 PM   #36 
                 - You support the Bill with the stupak amendment.  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 07:52 PM   #38 
                 - No, I care about millions of people who will be covered under the bill  babylonsister   Nov-12-09 08:00 PM   #40 
                    - But you are OK with the Stupak amendment.  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 08:06 PM   #43 
                    - Just be sure and let folks know what YOU think.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 09:30 AM   #68 
                 - So if it came from a woman you would take it seriously? Gender biased much? n/t  poverlay   Nov-13-09 09:29 AM   #67 
              - Than this bill? Yes. I CAN elaborate, but I'm presently busy drinking a beer.  pattmarty   Nov-13-09 11:52 AM   #97 
        - Touche.  timeforpeace   Nov-12-09 05:16 PM   #23 
        - 50? More like 50,000  elehhhhna   Nov-12-09 05:22 PM   #24 
        - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-13-09 06:51 AM   #59 
        - i find it hillarious, that in order to rationalize that you guys are a tiny minority on this board,  dionysus   Nov-13-09 08:34 AM   #65 
           - Minority? Do you seriously think the majority of Democrats on this board think  saracat   Nov-13-09 01:56 PM   #123 
              - no, no one here thinks the stupak ammendment is good. however, most, at least many,  dionysus   Nov-13-09 02:48 PM   #138 
                 - Many of us understand that it is much worse than an extension of the Hyde Amendment  saracat   Nov-13-09 03:46 PM   #143 
        - hyperbole fail.  dionysus   Nov-13-09 08:31 AM   #64 
        - Let's be clear. Those 50 years of fighting are not in danger of being consigned to the scrap heap.  stopbush   Nov-13-09 03:05 PM   #139 
     - Exactly  spiritual_gunfighter   Nov-13-09 06:12 AM   #57 
     - Are you aware that people with pre-existing conditions can be charged higher premiums  Garam_Masala   Nov-13-09 01:04 PM   #112 
  - Hi babylonsister ~ I like your style  goclark   Nov-13-09 01:47 PM   #120 
  - No. And people I trust say they are going to get it out. Harkin, Clyburne, etc Additionally I  emulatorloo   Nov-12-09 05:05 PM   #21 
  - But it seems that the 'bishops" have a direct line to the "hill".  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 05:13 PM   #22 
     - Well then we disagree. Only 30ish Dems voted for it in the house.  emulatorloo   Nov-12-09 05:26 PM   #25 
        - You underestimate the strength of this stalking-horse.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 09:19 AM   #66 
  - The Stupak amendment did exactly what it was designed to do; shift our  Lorien   Nov-13-09 09:44 AM   #69 
     - Until it passes, then it is coat hangers and blood.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 12:00 PM   #102 
        - You're fucking ridiculous  Egnever   Nov-13-09 03:41 PM   #141 
           - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-13-09 10:34 PM   #164 
  - K & R  Tigermoose   Nov-12-09 02:48 PM   #4 
  - It's so cool to know who the OP is just by the title of a thread!  timeforpeace   Nov-12-09 10:46 PM   #52 
  - People don't seem to realize that  ProSense   Nov-12-09 03:03 PM   #6 
  - I realize that; this bill is far from perfect, but it's very important to  babylonsister   Nov-12-09 03:06 PM   #8 
  - How about you, ProSense? Are you willing to answer "the question"  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 03:34 PM   #12 
     - I am willing to choose to support the bill with the Stupak amendment  27inCali   Nov-12-09 05:39 PM   #27 
        - Don't care what you think, even though that line is crap.(You really should re-think that)  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 09:21 PM   #50 
           - man, you're rude to everybody, aren't you? you sure must be fun to hang out with.  dionysus   Nov-13-09 09:53 AM   #73 
           - Keep "rolling" it's easier to "take it" when your already on the floor.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 10:01 AM   #77 
           - Cough, Ahem. You really aren't in any position to make that charge  saracat   Nov-13-09 01:58 PM   #124 
           - "Apparently only your opinion matters."  Qutzupalotl   Nov-13-09 11:23 AM   #86 
              - too bad the question was directed to another.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 11:50 AM   #95 
                 - Thanks for proving my point.  Qutzupalotl   Nov-13-09 12:39 PM   #109 
                    - ask a question, I'll answer, spout "points" I'll do as I wish.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 01:46 PM   #118 
  - Well, that's a day-brightener. Thank you, babs. It gives me hope we can even get rid of Stupak...  Hekate   Nov-12-09 03:08 PM   #9 
  - But that does not really matter, does it?  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 03:39 PM   #14 
  - Nice Post  Roosesvelte   Nov-12-09 03:52 PM   #15 
  - I hope so, and welcome to DU Roosesvelte!  babylonsister   Nov-12-09 04:02 PM   #18 
     - Thanks!  Roosesvelte   Nov-12-09 04:23 PM   #19 
  - This is a CLASSIC example of what's wrong with America- and why you're headed for 3rd world status  depakid   Nov-12-09 04:30 PM   #20 
  - "This debate (and others) ought to be about effective public policy- but it's not."  ProSense   Nov-12-09 05:28 PM   #26 
  - Nope- for most ordinary people and the corporate media that sways them it's- he won she lost  depakid   Nov-12-09 05:43 PM   #28 
     - Telling, your point really isn't about how seriously people took the discussion, but  ProSense   Nov-12-09 06:14 PM   #30 
        - You're getting lousy policy and all the VAST majority cares about is who "won" and "lost"  depakid   Nov-12-09 06:22 PM   #31 
           - Lousy is your opinion. n/t  ProSense   Nov-12-09 06:58 PM   #35 
              - No thems the facts.  MNDemNY   Nov-12-09 08:01 PM   #41 
                 - No, ProSense is correct. The legislation is good enough for a start.  stevietheman   Nov-13-09 12:08 AM   #53 
                 - bull.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 07:02 AM   #62 
                 - I realize it  spiritual_gunfighter   Nov-13-09 06:17 AM   #58 
                    - Lap dogs.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 07:02 AM   #61 
  - Yep. In the end we see no positive changes. The corporations just  Lorien   Nov-13-09 09:47 AM   #70 
  - The President said in no uncertain terms that the health bill "would not fund abortion."  mistertrickster   Nov-12-09 06:27 PM   #32 
  - Does it cover Viagra?  1corona4u   Nov-13-09 05:52 AM   #55 
  - Deleted message  Name removed   Nov-13-09 07:03 AM   #63 
  - I live in Wichita. I used to protest in front of now dead George Tiller's clinic against the antis.  mistertrickster   Nov-13-09 09:48 AM   #71 
     - i'm starting to think these guys don't even give a rat's ass about the ammendment. i think it's  dionysus   Nov-13-09 09:52 AM   #72 
     - Your are foolish.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 10:00 AM   #75 
        - no, i'd rather save lives while you wait for a perfect bill that will never exist.  dionysus   Nov-13-09 10:24 AM   #80 
           - How much worse can it get and still win your support?? (Real question)  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 11:24 AM   #87 
              - if the senate can't get a public option, i'd say it's not worth the effort.  dionysus   Nov-13-09 11:34 AM   #89 
                 - Triggered?? Opt out?? Co-ops??  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 11:39 AM   #90 
                    - triggers never get triggered, co-opts don't have a big enough pool to be good.  dionysus   Nov-13-09 11:44 AM   #91 
                       - But you would be OK with a veto? how is that materially different from my position?  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 11:47 AM   #94 
                          - i believe it's different in that you think the house bill with it's imperfect public option is worse  dionysus   Nov-13-09 11:52 AM   #98 
                             - We have a difference in the threshold of when a bill is "not worth the bother"  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 11:57 AM   #100 
                                - well, in my opinion, the letting people die thing happens if a bill WITH a public option, albeit  dionysus   Nov-13-09 12:03 PM   #103 
                                   - and i say there a still needless deaths with the House bill.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 12:08 PM   #106 
                                      - i am pragmatic or cynical enough not to be satisfied with, but at least thankful for, anything good  dionysus   Nov-13-09 12:31 PM   #108 
                                         - "the political climate we have" ?????  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 01:50 PM   #121 
                                            - we have blue dogs and house members that were too bought off or  dionysus   Nov-13-09 02:24 PM   #132 
                                               - My point is that a push to change that fact is a winning strategy.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 02:27 PM   #133 
                                               - i agree that single payer is the way to go. if we could get congress to vote the way they should  dionysus   Nov-13-09 02:32 PM   #134 
                                               - Push for it and change congress. If not now, when?  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 02:35 PM   #135 
                                               - i wholehearted agree we need better dems in office. we also need to educate the voters in  dionysus   Nov-13-09 02:44 PM   #137 
                                               - Why are we arguing?  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 03:47 PM   #144 
                                               - um... cause it's GD:P!!111  dionysus   Nov-13-09 07:09 PM   #162 
     - The stupak bill goes too far.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 09:56 AM   #74 
  - He said federal funds would not be used to fund abortion  laughingliberal   Nov-13-09 01:40 PM   #117 
     - No, it doesn't do that at all  demwing   Nov-13-09 04:29 PM   #160 
  - It's not a great bill - but I do hope it's seen as a triumph for Obama. nt  polichick   Nov-12-09 07:49 PM   #37 
  - Thanks babylonsister for  Cha   Nov-12-09 08:58 PM   #46 
  - Cosgrove at Cleveland Clinic says it will do little to control escalating costs.  Kolesar   Nov-13-09 05:05 AM   #54 
  - That is irrelevant, we need a "win"  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 10:00 AM   #76 
  - For the most part, I'll stay out of the line of fire in this thread.  Altoid_Cyclist   Nov-13-09 12:11 PM   #107 
  - I love this article, babylonsister. Very cool.  BlancheSplanchnik   Nov-13-09 10:07 AM   #78 
  - And he's proud of this?  Beacool   Nov-13-09 10:07 AM   #79 
  - Unlike some, he isn't a bitter sore loser when it comes to supporting HCR & the President.  ClarkUSA   Nov-13-09 04:10 PM   #153 
  - The easily fooled are the enemy of the good and right thing to do. n/t  change_notfinetuning   Nov-13-09 10:34 AM   #81 
  - The traveler in casual shoes offers nothing to the drifting ambergris. n/t  NYC_SKP   Nov-13-09 11:00 AM   #84 
  - Thank You Babylonsiter for this article and viewpoint.  stubtoe   Nov-13-09 10:51 AM   #82 
  - Obama triumph ahead  Andronex   Nov-13-09 11:16 AM   #85 
  - Very good point. That is the heart of the problem.We need real health care  saracat   Nov-13-09 02:23 PM   #131 
  - And the insurance industry hates the bill  ProSense   Nov-13-09 11:29 AM   #88 
  - ProSense loves it, even with the Stupak language.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 12:05 PM   #104 
  - INSURANCE INDUSTRY: don't throw me in the briar patch  frylock   Nov-13-09 01:35 PM   #116 
  - Yeah, sure. The "triumph" will be; pass a shit bill and declare victory.  pattmarty   Nov-13-09 11:46 AM   #93 
  - But the Rose Garden ceremony will be wonderful!!!  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 11:51 AM   #96 
     - I hope they hang around to help with the 2010 and 2012 elections..........  pattmarty   Nov-13-09 11:57 AM   #99 
        - I do not understand why "we" do not see that STRONG HCR, yes, even Single Payer. Is a WINNING issue!  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 11:58 AM   #101 
           - I'll disagree on the single payer issue. Where we are at NOW..........  pattmarty   Nov-13-09 12:06 PM   #105 
              - List for me the 218 reps and 60 Senators that would ever conceivably vote for Medicare for All.  Nicholas D Wolfwood   Nov-13-09 12:45 PM   #110 
              - I think pushing it in the 2012 midterms is a winning play.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 02:04 PM   #126 
  - I agree with this . . .  h9socialist   Nov-13-09 12:54 PM   #111 
  - I take issue with this statement  peace frog   Nov-13-09 01:04 PM   #113 
  - "Obama triumph ahead"  unaffiliated liberal   Nov-13-09 01:06 PM   #114 
  - +1  jgraz   Nov-13-09 02:07 PM   #127 
  - But is getting a bad bill passed really that great?  winyanstaz   Nov-13-09 01:32 PM   #115 
  - It is if all you care about is politics  jgraz   Nov-13-09 02:02 PM   #125 
     - thats what I think too..  winyanstaz   Nov-13-09 03:08 PM   #140 
  - The victory is very important as it springboards the ability for Pres. Obama to get more things done  ProgressOnTheMove   Nov-13-09 01:47 PM   #119 
  - And unicorns will once again inhabit the earth.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 01:54 PM   #122 
  - More "reform" done badly?  unaffiliated liberal   Nov-13-09 02:16 PM   #129 
  - What does an abortion procedure cost these days? I'd imagine it's around $500.  stopbush   Nov-13-09 02:39 PM   #136 
  - You have a point?  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 03:45 PM   #142 
     - Maybe. You have an answer to my question?  stopbush   Nov-13-09 03:47 PM   #145 
        - For the sake of discussion. $500.00  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 03:48 PM   #146 
           - For the sake of discussion, you're willing to scuttle providing insurance  stopbush   Nov-13-09 03:59 PM   #148 
           - Yes, but the point is the rollback of hard fought rights.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 04:04 PM   #150 
              - Why do you consider government subsidy of abortion a "right?"  stopbush   Nov-13-09 04:15 PM   #154 
                 - Only women who can afford an abortion should have that right?  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 04:19 PM   #155 
                    - Logic and reality escape you.  stopbush   Nov-13-09 06:59 PM   #161 
           - For the sake of women  unaffiliated liberal   Nov-13-09 04:00 PM   #149 
              - I'm with you! Don't holler at me!  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 04:06 PM   #151 
              - What happens today with life-saving treatments that the uninsured receive?  stopbush   Nov-13-09 04:09 PM   #152 
                 - Back under your rock.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 04:21 PM   #156 
                 - I am so weary of the argument that hospitals have to provide life saving treatment  laughingliberal   Nov-13-09 07:34 PM   #163 
  - The Pukes, abetted by Stupak, WANTED to cause this argument...  freddie mertz   Nov-13-09 04:22 PM   #157 
  - Why is irrelevant at this point.  MNDemNY   Nov-13-09 04:26 PM   #159 
     - Of course, I agree completely. Dem leadership got trumped...  freddie mertz   Nov-14-09 02:28 PM   #168 
  - Kick  Hekate   Nov-13-09 10:56 PM   #166 
  - K&R  akbacchus_BC   Nov-14-09 12:27 AM   #167 
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC